Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Compaction test
Soil sample of 2Kg was taken from
sieve No. 4. The weight of the Proctor
mould with volume of 0.000987m3 is
then recorded. After the compaction
apparatus was assembled, soil sample
is the mixed with 150mm3 of water.
After that, the soil is placed into the
Proctor mould layer by layer (3 layers).
The soil was then compacted with 25
evenly distributed blows by using
Proctor hammer. The mould is then
carefully detached from the apparatus
and weighed. Next, the weighed
sample is removed from the mould
and small portion (20-30 grams) of
that soil sample is taken and to find its
moisture content. The procedure is
repeated for another 4 times with
100mm3 volume of water added each
times.
3.0 RESULT
Table 1: Result of sieve analysis
Openin
g (mm)
9.5
4.75
2.36
2
1.4
0.6
0.425
0.3
0.075
Pan
% Finer
FSSA
98.49
4
84.50
2
59.32
6
57.47
49.34
6
13.28
8
9.681
8.979
3.468
0
ODEC
99.398
98.595
FPSK
96.743
76.903
97.039
63.025
96.788
95.031
61.322
56.262
37.049
43.186
23.695
19.83
7.43
0
35.621
31.763
14.237
0
28.
71
27.
74
25.
39
28.
02
26.
79
166
.67
217
.67
120
.67
190
.33
200
.33
28.5
9
30.6
9
31.7
5
31.3
8
3
4
220.
33
171.
67
212.
67
215.
67
2
3
9
FSSA
ODE
C
98.59
5
7.43
Passing
84.50
4.75 mm
2
Passing
3.468
0.075 mm
LL
24.4
NP
PI
2.11
C lassificati SM
SWon
SX
Note: NP means non-plastic.
FPSK
76.90
3
14.23
7
27.5
4.62
SM
FSSA
57.49
3.468
ODEC
96.78
8
23.69
5
7.43
24.4
22.24
2.11
NP
4.62
9.681
FPSK
61.32
2
35.62
1
14.23
7
27.5
22.88
-
FSSA
3.468
ODEC
7.43
84.50
2
24.4
2.11
0.6
5.3
SP
98.59
5
NP
4.198
9.22
SP
FPSK
14.23
7
76.90
3
27.5
4.62
2.56
56.25
SW
FPS
K
0.075<sand<4
79.3
.75
7
0.002<silt<0.0
15.8
75
7
Clay<0.002
1.75 2.1
4.76
Classification
San Loam San
d
y
d
Sand Loa
m
Table 9: Classify the soil samples by
using BS
Properties
Passing
0.063 mm
Passing
2.000 mm
LL
Classificati
on
FSS
A
94.7
4
3.51
ODE
C
76.2
4
21.7
FSSA
3
ODEC
6
FPSK
0
57.47
96.78
8
NP
-
100
24.4
SPu
27.5
SWM
Dry
den
sity
(Kg
/m3)
167
7.58
8
Wat
er
Con
ten
t
(%)
0.19
4
153
9.88
9
0.22
3
152
1.39
3
0.23
8
147
5.46
1
0.25
8
136
3.97
7
0.26
5
4.0 DISSCUSSION
Table 11: Analysis results of the soil
samples
Properti
es
Coarsegrained
soil (%)
Soil
FSSA
96.532
ODEC
92.57
FPSK
85.263
Finegrained
soil (%)
Gravel
(%)
Sand
(%)
Silt (%)
Clay (%)
PL
LL
PI
AASHTO
BS
USCS
ASTM
USDA
3.468
7.43
14.237
43
37
54
89
49
2
1
22.24
24.4
2.11
A-1-b
SPu
SM
SP
Sand
5
12
2
2
22.88
NP
27.5
8.1
A-3
A-1-b
SWM
SP-SX
SM
SP
SW
Loamy Sand
Sand
Loam
Note: The value of coarse and fine
grained, gravel, sand, silt and clay
based on AASHTO.
In this experiment, FPSK soil
sample is chosen for compaction test
because it managed passed the
required
specification
based
on
AASHTO (A-1-b), BS (SWM) and USDA
(Sandy Loam). By observing table 10
(compaction test for FPSK), it is found
that FSPK has the maximum dry
density of 1677.588 Kg/m3 which is
well over the required specification
needed (1600Kg/m3).
On the other hand, soil sample
taken from ODEC is neglected because
it is unable meet the requirement for it
to be tested using fall cone test since
the soil is sandy and does not have
any plasticity. Because of this reason,
we are unable to get the LL and PL for
this soil sample.
Soil sample taken at FSSA is also
neglected because the specification it
meets are less than soil sample taken
from FPSK .
5.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 REFERENCE
Aksakal, Ekrem Lutfi et al. (2013),
Catena Effect of Diatomite on Soil
Consistency
Limits
and
Soil
Compactibility, pp 157-163.
Hassanel, Zachary (2015), KA20801:
Concrete and Material Laboratory,
students
lab
manual,
FKJ,
University Malaysia Sabah.
Makinda, Jodin (2015), KA21603:
Geotechnical
Engineering
1,
students
lab
manual,
FKJ,
University Malaysia Sabah.