The determination of the moisture

content was properly executed since the data

obtained from the experiment is within the

commercial value of around 2%-3%.

The % that was obtained in the

experiment was lower than the claimed value

of 14%. This might be due to very small

precipitates that passed through the filter

paper.

The values obtained by the other

groups are within the commercial value of

around 2%-3% moisture, but the % are far

from the commercially available fertilizers.

The experiment is prone to errors,

which is not good for qualitatively analyzing

samples. The experiment is also not very

efficient since it takes a very long time to

finish one sample. The determination of the moisture

content was properly executed since the data

obtained from the experiment is within the

commercial value of around 2%-3%.

The % that was obtained in the

experiment was lower than the claimed value

of 14%. This might be due to very small

precipitates that passed through the filter

paper.

The values obtained by the other

groups are within the commercial value of

around 2%-3% moisture, but the % are far

from the commercially available fertilizers.

The experiment is prone to errors,

which is not good for qualitatively analyzing

samples. The experiment is also not very

efficient since it takes a very long time to

finish one sample. The determination of the moisture

content was properly executed since the data

obtained from the experiment is within the

commercial value of around 2%-3%.

The % that was obtained in the

experiment was lower than the claimed value

of 14%. This might be due to very small

precipitates that passed through the filter

paper.

The values obtained by the other

groups are within the commercial value of

around 2%-3% moisture, but the % are far

from the commercially available fertilizers.

The experiment is prone to errors,

which is not good for qualitatively analyzing

samples. The experiment is also not very

efficient since it takes a very long time to

finish one sample. The determination of the moisture

content was properly executed since the data

obtained from the experiment is within the

commercial value of around 2%-3%.

The % that was obtained in the

experiment was lower than the claimed value

of 14%. This might be due to very small

precipitates that passed through the filter

paper.

The values obtained by the other

groups are within the commercial value of

around 2%-3% moisture, but the % are far

from the commercially available fertilizers.

The experiment is prone to errors,

which is not good for qualitatively analyzing

samples. The experiment is also not very

efficient since it takes a very long time to

finish one sample. The determination of the moisture

content was properly executed since the data

obtained from the experiment is within the

commercial value of around 2%-3%.

The % that was obtained in the

experiment was lower than the claimed value

of 14%. This might be due to very small

precipitates that passed through the filter

paper.

The values obtained by the other

groups are within the commercial value of

around 2%-3% moisture, but the % are far

from the commercially available fertilizers.

The experiment is prone to errors,

which is not good for qualitatively analyzing

samples. The experiment is also not very

efficient since it takes a very long time to

finish one sample. The determination of the moisture

content was properly executed since the data

obtained from the experiment is within the

commercial value of around 2%-3%.

The % that was obtained in the

experiment was lower than the claimed value

of 14%. This might be due to very small

precipitates that passed through the filter

paper.

The values obtained by the other

groups are within the commercial value of

around 2%-3% moisture, but the % are far

from the commercially available fertilizers.

The experiment is prone to errors,

which is not good for qualitatively analyzing

samples. The experiment is also not very

efficient since it takes a very long time to

finish one sample. The determination of the moisture

content was properly executed since the data

obtained from the experiment is within the

commercial value of around 2%-3%.

The % that was obtained in the

experiment was lower than the claimed value

of 14%. This might be due to very small

precipitates that passed through the filter

paper.

The values obtained by the other

groups are within the commercial value of

around 2%-3% moisture, but the % are far

from the commercially available fertilizers.

The experiment is prone to errors,

which is not good for qualitatively analyzing

samples. The experiment is also not very

efficient since it takes a very long time to

finish one sample.