Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Table of contents
Survey methods
Country overview
Definitions of Key Indicators
Results
Key indicators
Availability and access to food
Water, Sanitation and Health
Care practices and MAD
Dietary intake of women and children
Preliminary Logistic regression results
Conclusions
Recommendations
2
Survey methods
Ethiopia
Mali
Kenya
Burkina Faso
Zambia
Togo
Benin
Malawi
*current US$
India
Cambodia
*current US$
5
Eggs
Dairy
Meat, poultry and fish
vegetables
Other vegetables
Other fruits
Food Intake
Health Status
Prevalence of diarrhea
Care Environment
Access to nutrition counselling
malnutrition
improved water
Education
11
12
0-32%
Very low/poor
33-66%
Low
67-100%
Better
FIES-H
MAD
MDD-W
Kenya
87
15
12
Malawi
86
34
27
Mali
55
11
Togo
55
33
28
Zambia
41
34
57
Benin
32
26
34
Cambodia
24
41
53
Ethiopia
23
19
Burkina Faso
22
38
38
India
18
18
20
14
Some
school
20%
Burkina
Cambodia Ethiopia
Faso
33.6%
90.4%
45%
India
Kenya
Malawi
Mali
Togo
Zambia
51%
100%
87%
33.6%
56%
69%
Keep the level of education in mind when designing and implementing interventions
Benin
Access to
land for
agriculture
97%
81%
85%
95%
India
Kenya
Malawi
Mali
Togo
Zambia
71.5%
21%
90%
78%
92%
99%
Keep the level of access to land in mind for agriculture interventions, especially INDIA
and KENYA
15
Burkina
Faso
Cambodia
Ethiopia
India
Kenya
Malawi
Mali
Togo
Zambia
Maize
94
Maize
97
Rice
95
Maize
70
Wheat
93
Maize
88
Maize
91
Rice
88
Maize
98
Maize
100
Sorghum
75
Millet
78
Cassava
15
Teff
60
Mustard
66
Maize
19
Manioc
94
Groundnuts
67
Soya
76
Groundnuts
63
Beans
8
Barley
50
Sesame
56
Soya
20
Millet
19
Beans
66
Sunflower
57
Yams
77
Red sorghum
61
Legumes
43
Bengal
gram
55
Rice
20
Groundnuts
58
Legumes Groundnuts
74
45
17
18
FImod+sev (%)
86.6
86.1
54.8
54.6
41.4
31.7
23.8
22.7
21.9
17.7
FIsev (%)
46.5
35.8
29.7
2.5
10
12.8
0.09
0.8
4.7
8.4
East Africa
Asia
Southern Africa
100
100
100
100
90
90
90
90
80
80
80
80
70
70
70
70
60
60
60
60
50
50
50
50
40
40
40
40
30
30
30
30
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
Ethiopia
Kenya
Benin
Burkina
Faso
Mali
Togo
Malawi
Zambia
Cambodia
India
Sanitation in nearly
every project area is
very far away from
goal.
21
IDDS-W
MDD-W (%)*
Ethiopia
3.1
Kenya
3.2
12
Mali
3.2
India
3.6
20
Malawi
3.9
27
Togo
3.9
28
Benin
4.1
34
Burkina
Faso
4.2
38
Cambodia
4.6
53
Zambia
4.7
57
22
MAD
MDD
MMF
Kenya
Ethiopia
India
Burkina
Cambodia
Faso
11
15
17
18
26
33
34
34
38
41
27
22
19
23
33
43
43
55
50
47
57
71
66
58
67
71
70
77
63
93
MMF higher than MDD for all countries, focus needed on diversification.
Important to also disaggregate results by breastfeeding and age
Results are presented for full sample not by breastfed/non-breastfed as >75% of children breastfed yesterday
24
For Minimum acceptable diet, have a close look at MDD and MMF across age groups
and breastfeeding status
Conclusions
1.
The project sites represent vulnerable areas and are appropriate sites for the proposed
interventions.
2.
The chosen key indicators of IDDS-W and MAD match well with the program intervention
packages in most countries.
3.
There are plausible impact pathways to achieve the objectives of the program given the
combination of interventions in most countries.
4.
Note: Those countries focusing on sanitation and hygiene will need to think how to measure
change as no change in MAD or IDDS-W is expected based on improvements in sanitation
and hygiene
27
Try to assess level and intensity of participation in interventions (see RAIN impact evaluation)
Own production was a big focus of the NBS but market and market access was not, more
exploration of market access and food availability in markets could be undertaken at mid-term
Seasonal fluctuations in food availability should be further explored and addressed when
designing interventions
Divergence between access to fruit and vegetables and consumption should be explored
using qualitative methods (see supplementary slides)
28
All projects should undertake qualitative research with women and men of different age groups
to understand food and nutrition security dynamics within the household:
29
Most knowledge questions were based on maternal recall of general topics, the uptake of
program specific messaging should be tested
Health/WASH
30
Thank you
Gina Kennedy
g.kennedy@cgiar.org
www.bioversityinternational.org/subscribe
@BioversityInt