Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Oil
3%
Bitumen
25%
Coal
66%
NOx
CO
VOC
PM2.5
PM10
SO2
NH3
Emissions
g/MWh
Gas
Coal
26
163
104
49
16
0
29
8
29
0
2
82
42
0
1.2
1
Em issions (lb/m kbtu)
Item
0.8
Coal
Cleaner Coal
Combined Cycle Gas
0.6
0.4
Total
248
302
0.2
0
1
Raw
coal
Steam
Water
Boiler
Pulverizer
Coal
O2
Sulfur
Ash
FGD
ESP
Water
Flue gas drying,
CO2 compression
Pure
Oxygen
ASU
AIR
CO2 transport
&
sequestration
Demonstration of Oxy-combustion
B&Ws oxy-combustion experience
Study (design and costs) for major oil
company to retrofit a boiler to produce
CO2 for enhancing oil recovery - 1979
Member of CANMET since 2000
Teamed with Air Liquide to perform:
Oxy-combustion pilot with IL#6 coal
2001-2, sponsored by State of Illinois
Oxy-combustion pilot with PRB 2003-4,
sponsored by DOE
Performing a techno-economic analysis
and working with DOE to refine it
Demonstration of Oxy-combustion
B&Ws oxy-combustion experience
Engineering Feasibility Study for CCPC 2003
Provided boiler island retrofit and greenfield
designs with costs for three plants/fuels for
Fluor in support of Canadian Clean Power
Coalition study
Fluor performed comparison of oxycombustion with amine scrubber
Flue gas clean-up was stringent in oxycombustion due to high purity CO2 required
CO2
O2
NOx
SO2
CO
convective
section
Oxynator
O2
furnace
Oxygen
Supply
System
Coal
&
O2/Flue Gas
economizer
Primary
superheater
Reheater
Secondary superheater
OFA
O2/Flue Gas
O2/Flue Gas
Oxygen
Supply
System
Sliding Air
Damper
Inner Zone
Adjustable
Spin Vane
Outer Zone
Adjustable
Spin Vane
Linear Actuator
Transition
Zone
Transition Zone
Air Flow
Adjustment
Oxy-combustion Optimization
The following main parameters were tested to
provide optimum conditions:
Oxygen distribution into boiler
Oxygen introduction equipment
Recycled flue gas flow rate
Burner stoichiometry
A stable and attached flame was obtained
Flame temperature was similar to air-firing
conditions, existing boiler tube materials are
acceptable
NOx Emissions
NO x, lb/10 Btu
Air-blown combustion
Oxy-combustion
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
Burner Stoichiometry
Typical Results
Air Firing
Oxy-combustion
4,167
0.86
1797
555
4,030
1.05
1880
547
43.6
46.8
100
80
CO2 concentration
increased from 15% in
air-firing to 80% in O2firing
Volume (a.u.)
- 80%
60
O2
N2
CO2
40
20
AIR
O2/CO2 exp
O2/CO2
without air
(5% air
infiltration) infiltration
O2
3%
3%
3%
CO2
15%
80%
96%
N2
82%
17%
1%
Volume
100
a.u.
19 a.u.
16 a.u.
0
AIR
O2/CO2 exp
O2/CO2 if no air
infiltration
Flue gas
composition
Conclusions
Technical Feasibility of the Oxy-combustion
Technology
The feasibility of the oxy-combustion technology has
been demonstrated on B&Ws 5 million Btu/hr
(1.5MWth) pilot which simulates large coal-fired boilers.
A safe and smooth transition from air to oxy-combustion
has been achieved
CO2 Capture Capability
The CO2 in flue gases has been concentrated to 80%
(vol. dry basis) vs 15% in air-firing. Additional
developments are likely to further reduce the air
infiltration
The Flue Gas volume has been reduced by 80% vs airfired operation enabling cost effective removal of other
pollutants if needed (depending on CO2 purity
requirement)
Conclusions
Heat Transfer Characteristics
Boiler exit gas temperatures and FEGT
measurements indicate similar heat
temperature profiles.
Flame emissivity is similar in air and (dry) O2firing operation
No adverse side effects on boiler
performance are anticipated.
NOx emissions
NOx emissions have been reduced by up to
65% vs staged air-firing operation: reduced
need for SCR
Next Step
Full-scale demonstration
Timelines:
Conclusions
Available Emissions reduction technology can
quickly retrofit coal plants to be very clean
Existing and emerging technologies will reduce
or eliminate GHG emissions from coal
Oxy Combustion technology will soon have a
commercial scale demonstration
Suitable GHG capture and storage is needed
for all fossil fuels
Disclaimer
Although the information presented in this work is believed to be reliable,
this work is published with the understanding that Babcock & Wilcox
Canada and the authors are supplying general information and are not
attempting to render or provide engineering or professional services.
Neither Babcock & Wilcox Canada nor any of its employees make any
warranty, guarantee, or representation, whether expressed or implied,
with respect to the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any
information, product, process or apparatus discussed in this work; and
neither Babcock & Wilcox Canada nor any of its employees shall be
liable for any losses or damages with respect to or resulting from the
use of, or the inability to use, any information, product, process or
apparatus discussed in this work.
Contact Information
Keith B. Rivers, P. Eng.
Babcock & Wilcox Canada
581 Coronation Blvd.
Cambridge, ON
N1R 5V3
519-621-2130 ext 2273
Kbrivers@babcock.com