Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Mule
Mid-Term Paper
Case Facts:
Driver,
At
the
The
Mule
Mid-Term Paper
Driver,
At
the
SWOT Analysis
Before June 2000.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Japan.
Network of suppliers,
Storehouses of expertise and
technological
Nissans
undervalued.
Poor brand image, selling its
share
price
knowledge.
(Such as JATCO.
Existing assets in the Japanese
its competitors.
Too
many
culture.
suppliers/No
suppliers.
Factories running
capacity,
High general expenses,
Lack
of
entrepreneurial
at
53%
Marketing.
Threats
Opportunity
significant
international
profit making;
The companys neglect of its
customers;
Cross-functional
scale,
On cutting-edge of technology
in several crucial areas,
2
distribution network.
Mediocre distribution network.
Weakness
in
Sales
and
teams
with
The
Mule
Driver,
At
Mid-Term Paper
Nissans alliance with Renault,
the
sense of urgency;
The lack of common long-term
vision.
The competition.
The
Mule
Driver,
At
the
Mid-Term Paper
A) To be recognized by customers as being among the best three
automotive groups in the quality and value of its products and
of excellence.
Develop a new-culture that built on the best elements of Japans
national culture.
Set up of nine cross-functional teams to cover the entire spectrum
of the reforms he intended to make. Each team headed by two
leaders, members of Nissans executive committee. Cross-functional
The
Mule
Driver,
At
the
Mid-Term Paper
Headcount was reduced by 21,000, according to the NRP, mainly
Weaknesses
domestic
carmaker
in
functional teams.
Reduction of costs by more
to
lower
level
employees,
New transparent policy,
Reconstructed public image,
Motivation of employees.
Necessity and attention to
details.
Opportunity
Threats
as Toyota dealers.
framework.
5
The
Mule
Driver,
At
Mid-Term Paper
Nissan and Renault Alliance.
Ghosn Leadership Attributes
the
The
Mule
Driver,
At
the
Mid-Term Paper
colleagues capable of analyzing subjects in depth and summarizing them in
such a way that you can make, or let someone else make, the most
appropriate decisions.
Finally, Ghosn found very quickly that Nissans bureaucratic culture was a
major impediment, and he identified five important problems that he wanted
to address.
He noted:
1) Lack of a clear profit orientation;
2) Insufficient focus on customers and too much focus on competitors;
3) Lack of a sense of urgency;
4) No shared vision or common long term plan; and
5) Lack of cross-functional, cross-border or cross-cultural lines of work.
Addressing each of these issues involved changing completely the decision
making and feedback structures