CCMSSITPlan2016 17

CURRITUCK COUNTY SCHOOLS
CURRITUCK COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN & IMPLEMENTATION MAP
2016-2019
Currituck County Schools Mission:
Connecting with students, parents, and community, Currituck County Schools will provide a world class educational
system that produces students of character, prepared for the future.
Currituck County Schools Vision:
"Our goal is to teach and assess skills students will need to be productive and successful learners, workers, and
globally aware citizens." Students will be:
Growth minded and academically prepared;
Effective communicators and collaborators; and
Critical thinkers and problem solvers.
Currituck County Schools Beliefs:
Student learning and decisions will be:

Student Centered;
Data Driven;
Personalized; and
Collaborative.
*****
Year 1 Plan
Transforming Initiative 1: Implement MTSS processes for defining and delivering effective core
instruction, analyzing common assessment data to provide differentiated instructional opportunities
and problem solving for interventions needed for students academic and behavioral success.
MTSS employs a problem-solving process that helps match instructional resources and focus to
educational needs; makes the instructional adjustments necessary for continued improvement in both
student academic performance and students rates of progress; and assesses the effectiveness of
instruction/interventions on student outcomes. (American Institutes for Research, Using a Response to
Intervention Framework to Improve Student Learning May 2013, weblink)
Key Staff Responsible:

School Administration
Staff
Instructional Coach
District-level Support Personnel/Services
Alignment to State Board of Education Goals:

Every student graduates from high school prepared for work, further education and citizenship
Every student has a personalized education
Every student is healthy, safe, and responsible
Alignment to Currituck County Schools Beliefs and Goals:
Students will be:
Growth minded and academically prepared;
Effective communicators and collaborators; and
Critical thinkers and problem solvers.
TOOLS:
District Benchmark Assessments
Page 1 of 7

2016-2019
End-of-Grade/End-Of-Course Test data

MTSS Resources
EVAAS
SchoolNet Assessments
STAR Assessments
USA Test Prep
PHASE I (YEAR 1)
In Year 1 (2016-17), we will be successful if we accomplish:
Growth of 3-5 % student performance on state assessments in Reading at each of the three grade
levels.
Growth of 3-5 % student performance on state assessments in Math at each of the three grade levels.
Grade level PLCs meeting weekly to collaborate and develop instructional plans to meet the needs of
students.
STRATEGIES:
Use data to drive instruction and evaluate teaching practices.
Strategies/Actions detailed here:
KEY ACTIVITY
PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE
TARGET
DATE
ARTIFACTS
Tier I: Use student data history

to determine placement in
Reading and Math classes
Guidance Counselor
School Staff
On-going
EOG/EOC,
Scores/data
Tier I: Create Pre and Post

Tests to determine
differentiated instruction within
ALL classes.
School Staff
PLCs
Instructional Coach
On-going
Assessments SchoolNet, USA Test

Prep, STAR
Reading
Tier I: Core instruction will

School Staff
include research-based
Instructional Coach
strategies aligned with Common
Core and Essential Standards.
On-going
Lesson Plans,
District Pacing
Guides,
Common Core
Tier II: Identify courses (IInterventions; H - Honors)
Fall 2016
Courses/Schedules,
PowerSchool
Tier II: Lower class sizes in

Intervention settings (limit to 15
students in Reading)
On-going
PowerSchool
On-going
SchoolNet, USA Test

Prep
Tier II: Use benchmark and

School Staff
pre/post assessments to progress Instructional Coach
monitor.
Page 2 of 7

2016-2019
Tier II Activities: Collective
Learning Groups, ProjectBased Learning
School Staff
Instructional Coach
AIG Teacher
EC Teachers
On-going
Lesson Plans, PLC

Minutes
Tier III: Compacting
Teachers
AIG Teacher
On-going
Lesson Plans
Tier III: Tutoring
TBD
Spring
Spreadsheet
*****
Transforming Initiative 2: Strengthen teacher effectiveness through high quality professional

development opportunities and provide sustained support in implementing teaching/learning
strategies aligned with district goals.
More than two decades of research findings are unequivocal about the connection between teacher quality
and student learning. Indeed, What Matters Most: Teaching for Americas Future (1996), the influential
report of the National Commission on Teaching and Americas Future, made teaching the core of its three
simple premises in its blueprint for reforming the nations schools. They are:
What teachers know and can do is the most important influence on what students learn.
Recruiting, preparing, and retaining good teachers is the central strategy for improving
our schools.
School reform cannot succeed unless it focuses on creating the conditions under which
teachers can teach and teach well. (weblink)
Every student, every day, has excellent educators
Every student has a personalized education
Student Learning and Decisions will be
Student-Centered
Data Driven
Personalized and Collaborative
Key Staff Responsible:
Staff
Instructional Coach
District-level Support Personnel/Services (Jeff Merithew)
TOOLS:
SCHOOLNET
USA TEST PREP
Page 3 of 7

2016-2019
PHASE I (YEAR 1)
Each core teacher creates one pre-test in his/her subject area
Each core teacher creates one post-test in his/her subject area
Teachers use data to differentiate instruction
Meet expected growth levels
STRATEGIES:
KEY ACTIVITY
PERSON(S)
RESPONSIBLE
TARGET DATE
ARTIFACTS
Professional Development in
School Net
Instructional Coach
Kathy Blades
School Staff
On-going
PLC Minutes
Professional Development in
USA Test Prep
Instructional Coach
Kathy Blades
On-going
PLC Minutes
Develop pre and post

assessments
Instructional Coach
AIG Teacher
School Staff
On-going
Lesson Plans
Assessment/Dashboards
*****
Transforming Initiative 3: Align and allocate resources to goals and needs based on data.
Effective school districts ensure that the necessary resources, including time, money, personnel and
materials are allocated and aligned to accomplish the districts goals. Once these resources are allocated,
their use is monitored and evaluated to determine their impact on student achievement. (Waters &
Marzano, 2006)
Every school district has up-to-date financial, business, and technology systems to serve its
students, parents and educators

Student Learning and Decisions will be
Student-Centered
Data Driven
Personalized and Collaborative
TOOLS:
NC School Executive Evaluation Instrument
Fiscal Management System and Policies
Master Schedule
Districts Technology Plan
NC Teacher Evaluation Instrument

Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Enrollment and ADM data
Page 4 of 7

2016-2019
PHASE I (YEAR 1)
Providing Professional Development in areas of greatest need
Student growth in the areas of reading and math
STRATEGIES:
KEY ACTIVITY
PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE TARGET DATE ARTIFACTS
Schedule PD based on
Data
Administration
School Staff
Instructional Coach
On-going
Previous EOG
Data
Align staff based on area of

student needs
Administration
School Staff
Instructional Coach
Kathy Blades
Jeff Merrithew
On-going
Previous EOG
Data
All PD inside/outside
building is aligned with
SIP
School Staff
Instructional Coach
Kathy Blades
Jeff Merrithew
On-going
Agendas,
Certification of
Completion,
Surveys
WAIVERS
THE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MAY INCLUDE REQUESTS FOR WAIVERS FOR STATE
LAWS, RULES, OR POLICIES FOR THAT SCHOOL. A REQUEST FOR A WAIVER SHALL MEET
THE REQUIREMENTS OF G.S. 115C-105. (REQUESTS OF THIS NATURE MUST BE
SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL BOARD OF EDUCATION PRIOR TO
IMPLEMENTATION OR INCLUSION IN THE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.)
IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ACCEPTED UNDER G.S. 115C105.27, STATE FUNDS ALLOCATED FOR CLASSROOM MATERIALS/INSTRUCTIONAL
SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT MAY BE TRANSFERRED ONLY FOR THE PURCHASE OF TEXTBOOKS;
OR STATE FUNDS ALLOCATED FOR TEXTBOOKS MAY BE TRANSFERRED ONLY FOR THE
PURCHASE OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES, INSTRUCTIONAL EQUIPMENT, OR OTHER
CLASSROOM MATERIALS.
OTHER PLANS REFERENCED OR INCLUDED
THE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN TO:
ADDRESS SCHOOL SAFETY (NOT PUBLISHED) AND DISCIPLINE CONCERNS;
PROVIDE A DUTY-FREE LUNCH PERIOD FOR EVERY TEACHER ON A DAILY BASIS
OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT TEAM; AND
OR AS
Page 5 of 7

2016-2019
PROVIDE DUTY-FREE INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING TIME FOR EVERY TEACHER UNDER
G.S. 115C-301.1, WITH THE GOAL OF PROVIDING AN AVERAGE OF AT LEAST FIVE
HOURS OF PLANNING TIME PER WEEK.
COMMITMENT TO THE WORK
This document reflects the work of the School Improvement Team, Principal, Assistant
Principal(s) and staff subcommittees and teams. The plan will serve as a guide as
the school works toward increasing academic achievement for ALL students. It will be
continually monitored, evaluated and updated.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT TEAM MEMBERS:
NAME
ROLE/POSITION
DATE OF ELECTION TO TEAM
DR. MATT LUTZ
PRINCIPAL
JUNE 2016
DR. ABRAM DAVENPORT
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL
JUNE 2016
CINDY WALKER
MEDIA
COORDINATOR/CHAIRMAN
JUNE 2016
CHRISTY HODGES
INSTRUCTIONAL
COORDINATOR
AUGUST 2016
PAM BALLANCE
CTE INSTRUCTOR
JUNE 2016
VIRGINIA GIOIA
CLASSROOM TEACHER GRADE 6
SEPTEMBER 2016
MITCHELL METZ
JUNE 2016
KIM JACKSON
JUNE 2016
GINGER NEWBERN
TEACHER - EXCEPTIONAL
CHILDREN
JUNE 2016
CAMERON LOWE
PARENT
SEPTEMBER 2016
JAMES KING
PARENT
SEPTEMBER 2016
SIGNED BY:
___DR. MATTHEW LUTZ ______________________
PRINCIPAL
_10/24/16__________________
DATE
__CINDY WALKER____________________________
__10/24/16_________________
Page 6 of 7

2016-2019
CHAIRMAN, SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT TEAM
THIS PLAN WAS PRESENTED TO THE STAFF FOR REVIEW

OCTOBER 24, 2016.
THE RESULTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 32 (YES); 1 (NO);
DATE
AND APPROVAL ON
MONDAY,
Page 7 of 7

CCMSSITPlan2016 17

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

CCMSSITPlan2016 17

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

CURRITUCK COUNTY SCHOOLS

CURRITUCK COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL

Currituck County Schools Vision:

Currituck County Schools Beliefs:

Student learning and decisions will be:

Key Staff Responsible:

Alignment to State Board of Education Goals:

CURRITUCK COUNTY SCHOOLS

End-of-Grade/End-Of-Course Test data

Tier I: Use student data history

Tier I: Create Pre and Post

Assessments SchoolNet, USA Test

Tier I: Core instruction will

Tier II: Identify courses (IInterventions; H - Honors)

Tier II: Lower class sizes in

SchoolNet, USA Test

Tier II: Use benchmark and

CURRITUCK COUNTY SCHOOLS

Lesson Plans, PLC

Tier III: Compacting

Tier III: Tutoring

Transforming Initiative 2: Strengthen teacher effectiveness through high quality professional

CURRITUCK COUNTY SCHOOLS

Develop pre and post

students, parents and educators

NC Teacher Evaluation Instrument

CURRITUCK COUNTY SCHOOLS

PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE TARGET DATE ARTIFACTS

Align staff based on area of

CURRITUCK COUNTY SCHOOLS

DATE OF ELECTION TO TEAM

DR. MATT LUTZ

DR. ABRAM DAVENPORT

CLASSROOM TEACHER GRADE 6

CLASSROOM TEACHER GRADE 7

CLASSROOM TEACHER GRADE 8

CURRITUCK COUNTY SCHOOLS

CHAIRMAN, SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT TEAM

THIS PLAN WAS PRESENTED TO THE STAFF FOR REVIEW

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi