INTERNSHIP REPORT

CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF COMPANY
Nandan consultancy is a multi disciplinary consulting firm located in Nagarbhavi 2 nd
stage Bangalore, a reputation for responsive, innovative yet practical design approaches
to complex architectural and engineering problems. Through their experience and
dedication to the construction industry Nandan consultancy firm is committed to provide
with the most professional, efficient and cost effective services, the goal of the
consultancy is to satisfy the most demanding construction.
Registered in year 2000 as structural engineering consultancy providing design,
supervision, consultancy and project management services and engineering solution for
various categories of projects. With core staff strength of all professionals in affiliated
engineering firms and the use of the most recent information technology in the production
of contract information, the firm has over the years acquired thorough capability to
execute medium to large scale project administration.
Nandan consultancy is a dynamic organization of innovation professionals who share a
common goal to render the best and most effective services level.

1.2 VISION
Their vision to the future is becoming one of the leading Engineering consultancies in
Bangalore.

1.3 MISSION
Guided by their vision they shall provide quality services exceeding expectation while
altering to the highest of technical and individual excellent through continuous
improvement training and innovation.
Adding values to clients.
Nurturing and promoting talent.
Respecting employees intense efforts and contribution.

1.4 CORE VALUES

Unparalleled customers satisfaction and spirit of challenge as well as change are core
component of Nandan Engineering consultancy.

1 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

CHAPTER 2
DRAFTING AND DESIGN SOFTWARES
2.1 AUTOCAD
The term CAD (Computer Aided Design) applies to a wide range of programs that allow
the user to created drawings, plans, and designs electronically. AutoCAD is one such
program and it main claim to fame is that it is relatively easy to use, it is very
comprehensive in its ability to create 2D and some 3D drawings, and it is very popular.
CAD has completely changed the drafting business and made the storage and retrieval of
projects much easier. However, manual drawing is still very important and provides the
basics of learning to draw.
2.1.1 ADVANTAGESOF AUTOCAD OVER MANUAL DRAWINGS

No need of scaling. All drawings is done full size.

The screen drawing area can be set to any size with the click of a button.
The program supplies all of the tools needed.
Absolute accuracy can be maintained.
Production details can be extracted directly from the drawing.
Eliminates the need for full size set outs.
Both 2D and 3D drawings can be produced.
Drawings are stored on disk rather than a folder.
Dimensioning is almost automatic.
Parts of drawing can be saved and used in other drawings.

2.2 ETABS
ETABS is a full-featured program that can be used for the simplest problems or the most
complex projects. The innovative and revolutionary new ETABS is the ultimate
integrated software package for the structural analysis and design of buildings.
Incorporating 40 years of continuous research and development, this latest ETABS offers
unmatched 3D object based modeling and visualization tools, blazingly fast linear and
nonlinear analytical power, sophisticated and comprehensive design capabilities for a
wide-range of materials, and insightful graphic displays, reports, and schematic drawings
that allow users to quickly and easily decipher and understand analysis and design results.

2 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
From the start of design conception through the production of schematic drawings,
ETABS integrates every aspect of the engineering design process. Creation of models has
never been easier - intuitive drawing commands allow for the rapid generation of floor
and elevation framing. CAD drawings can be converted directly into ETABS models or
used as templates onto which ETABS objects may be overlaid. The state-of-the-art
SAPFire 64-bit solver allows extremely large and complex models to be rapidly analyzed,
and supports nonlinear modeling techniques such as construction sequencing and time
effects (e.g., creep and shrinkage). Design of steel and concrete frames (with automated
optimization), composite beams, composite columns, steel joists, and concrete and
masonry shear walls is included, as is the capacity check for steel connections and base
plates. Models may be realistically rendered, and all results can be shown directly on the
structure. Comprehensive and customizable reports are available for all analysis and
design output, and schematic construction drawings of framing plans, schedules, details,
and cross-sections may be generated for concrete and steel structures.
ETABS provides an unequaled suite of tools for structural engineers designing buildings,
whether they are working on one-story industrial structures or the tallest commercial
high-rises. Immensely capable, yet easy-to-use has been the hallmark of ETABS since its
introduction decades ago, and this latest release continues that tradition by providing
engineers with the technologically-advanced, yet intuitive, software they require to be
their most productive.

CHAPTER 3
PROJECT PHASE 1
3 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
To evaluate and verify the variety of structural elements of the given project should
satisfy the Indian code standards.

3.1 PROJECT DETAILS

The site of project is located in Bangalore.
The design of this building includes following steps:

Modeling.
Analysis.
Lateral stability checks.
Design.

3.1.1 MODELLING
Plan area of the building as follows
Height of the building =19.33 meters

4 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Fig.1 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS

5 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Fig.2 Beam layout of the building

Fig.3 wall layout of the building

6 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Story details

Fig.4 Story data

Centerline plan(Grids) imported to ETABS

Fig.5 Centerline gird

Details of structural elements

7 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
Table :1 structural element details

Loads
Table: 2 load distribution

LOAD PATTERN

ELEMENTS

LOAD

Super dead

Slabs
Beams
Slabs

1.5 KN/m2
9 KN/m2
2 KN/m2

Slabs
Beams
Slabs

1 KN/m2
4 KN/m2
1 KN/m2

Live
Super dead on roof
Live load on roof
Modeling of structural elements

Fig.6 (a)modeled structure

8 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
3D MODEL(EXTRUDED VIEW TOGGLE)

Fig.6 (b) modeled structure3D MODEL (EXTRUDED VIEW TOGGLE)

Fig.7 Moment releases

PROJECT PHASE 2

9 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
To evaluate and verify the variety of structural elements of the given project should
satisfy the Indian code standards.

3.3 PROJECT DETAILS

The site of project is located in electronic city second phase industrial area Bangalore.
The design of this building includes following steps:

Modeling.
Analysis.
Lateral stability checks.
Design.

3.3.1 MODELLING
Plan area of the building as follows
Height of the building =23 meters

Fig.1 Beam layout of the building

10 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Fig.2 Flat slab layout of the building

Story details

Fig.3 Story data

11 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Centerline plan(Grids) imported to ETABS

Fig.3 Centerline gird

Details of structural elements

Table: 1 structural element details

Loads
Table: 2 load distribution

12 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
LOAD PATTERN

ELEMENTS

LOAD

Super dead
Live

Slabs
Beams
Slabs

1.5 KN/m2
9 KN/m2
2 KN/m2

Super dead on roof

Slabs

1 KN/m2

Beams

4 KN/m2

Slabs

1 KN/m2

Live load on roof

Modeling of structural elements

Fig.4 modeled structure

3D MODEL(EXTRUDED VIEW TOGGLE)

13 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Fig.5(A)

Fig.5 (A),(B) modeled structure3D MODEL(EXTRUDED VIEW TOGGLE)

CHAPTER 4
14 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
ANALYSIS
4.1 STATIC ANALYSIS
Design base shear Vb=Ah*w
Where Ah=design acceleration spectrum=ZISa/2RG
Where Z=zone factor=0.16
I=importance factor
R=response reduction factor=3
Sa/g=average response acceleration coefficient
Define mass source

Define load pattern

Fundamental time period (Ta)

Ta=0.075h0.75 for RC frame building without brick infill
Ta=0.09h/sqrt (d) for RC building with brick infill
Where h=height of the building
d =base dimension of the building at the plinth level
Ta in x direction=0.291sec
15 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
Ta in y direction=0.2717sec

Modify lateral load in x direction

Modify lateral load in y direction

Vb in x direction=921 KN

16 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Fig.8 story shear in x- direction

Vbin Y direction=920KN

Fig.9 story shear in y- direction

4.2 DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

17 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
Vbin x direction=921 KN

Fig.10 story shear in x- direction

Vbin Y direction=920 KN

Fig.11 story shear in y- direction

4.3 WIND ANALYSIS

18 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
Design wind speed (Vz)=Vb*K1*K2*K3
Where Vb=basic wind speed=33m/s
K1=risk coefficient=1
K3=topography=1
Terrain category=2
Structure class=B
Design wind pressure (Pz) =0.6Vz2 n/m2
pressure coefficients
1)Windward coefficient Cp =0.7
2) Leeward coefficient Cp=0.25
Application of diaphragm to shell

Fig.11 Diaphragm of shell

Wind force in x direction

19 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Fig.12 wind force in x- direction

Wind force in y direction

Fig.13 wind force in y- direction

4.4 BASE REACTION

20 GAT

Story

Unique Name

Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base21 GAT
Base
Base

3
8
13
78
68
63
53
73
83
88
103
108
113
118
123
128
133
138
143
148
153
158
163
168
173
178
183
188
193
198
213
228
238
243
248
253
258
263
268
273
278
283
293
298
303
318
323
328
333
338
1
468
917

FZ
kN
131.669
INTERNSHIP
REPORT
2098.1301
612.9601
2146.8581
233.504
53.8935
1468.5766
315.4762
432.1684
401.5138
325.6961
327.8087
426.8964
482.8444
1874.6736
3416.8571
332.5218
318.3876
432.9235
2383.7179
1978.8532
4125.6985
1634.0008
4531.9919
557.6965
1144.217
324.4084
573.4732
96.1691
4064.5619
3263.8802
2061.9114
1514.1929
447.5586
3322.6193
410.4841
3196.7618
407.6372
352.8865
2933.5518
2051.6426
1688.4613
623.7864
352.4429
147.92
140.7491
1906.8009
1347.6625
328.6779
-39.3247
1495.0407
333.32
1961.5165

Fig.12
column
unique
names

INTERNSHIP REPORT
4.1 STATIC ANALYSIS
Design base shear Vb=Ah*w
Where Ah=design acceleration spectrum=ZISa/2RG
Where Z=zone factor=0.16
I=importance factor
R=response reduction factor=3
Sa/g=average response acceleration coefficient
Define mass source

Define load pattern

Fundamental time period (Ta)

Ta=0.075h0.75 for rc frame building with out brick infill
Ta=0.09h/sqrt (d) for rc building with brick infill
Where h=height of the building
d =base dimension of the building at the plinth level
Ta in x direction=0.291sec
Ta in y direction=0.2717sec

Modify lateral load in x direction

22 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Modify lateral load in y direction

Vb in x direction=4478 KN

23 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Fig.6 story shear in x- direction

Vb in Y direction=4476 KN

Fig.7 story shear in y- direction

4.2 DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

Vb in x direction=4478 KN
24 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Fig.8 story shear in x- direction

Vb in Y direction=4476 KN

Fig.8 story shear in y- direction

4.3 WIND ANALYSIS

Design wind speed (Vz)=Vb*K1*K2*K3
Where Vb=basic wind speed=33m/s
K1=risk coefficient=1
25 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
K3=topography=1
Terrain category=2
Structure class=B
Design wind pressure (Pz) =0.6Vz2 n/m2
pressure coefficients
1) Windward coefficient Cp =0.7
2) Leeward coefficient Cp=0.25
Application of diaphragm to shell

Fig.9 Diaphragm of shell

26 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
Wind force in x direction

Fig.10 wind force in x- direction

Wind force in y direction

Fig.11 wind force in y- direction

27 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
4.4 BASE REACTIONS
Story
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base

C0lumn Unique Name

Load Case/Combo

957
958
997
996
995
992
990
989
988
959
987
986
985
984
983
982
981
980
960
999
979
956
978
977
976
974
975
973
955
972
971
970
969
968
967
966
965
954
964
963
962

DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max

28 GAT

FZ
kN
4143.5465
4170.5145
641.733
338.1771
1638.7481
1080.5466
854.4532
1361.4373
2100.4801
4361.647
1642.8118
3689.2636
3848.8524
3738.4635
1197.507
1291.9311
2225.9688
2663.4092
2255.4798
2743.8992
3559.3441
4513.4755
1757.7016
802.3717
868.6031
2373.5855
1169.035
4645.0376
4200.9507
4436.6817
7219.993
4746.644
5338.6486
7633.6703
7055.9995
2749.6867
4656.8299
1687.8749
8390.5036
7649.5832
7636.2345

INTERNSHIP REPORT
Story
Base
Base

C0lumn Unique Name

Load Case/Combo

961
953

DCon15 Max
DCon15 Max

Fig.12 C0lumn Unique Name

CHAPTER 5
29 GAT

FZ
kN
7742.2154
1509.5121

INTERNSHIP REPORT
LATERAL STABILITY CHECKS
5.1 INTER STOREY DRIFT
Inter storey drift ratio should 0.004be less than
Table: 3 inter storey drift

5.2 MAXIMUM DEFLECTION

Maximum deflection against wind allowed is H/500.
Table: 4 Maximum deflection against wind

30 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Maximum deflection against earthquake allowed is H/250.

Table: 5 Maximum deflection against earthquake

Maximum deflection against cantilever or any individual element allowed is

H/350 or 20mm whichever is less.
Guideline for fundamental time period is 0.1N.
Where N is number of stories
Table: 6 Guideline for fundamental time period

31 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

PROJECT 2
5.1 INTER STOREY DRIFT
Inter storey drift ratio should 0.004be less than
Table: 3 inter storey drift

5.2 MAXIMUM DEFLECTION

Maximum deflection against wind allowed is H/500
Table :4 Maximum deflection against wind

32 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Maximum deflection against earthquake allowed is H/250.

Table :5 Maximum deflection against earthquake

Maximum deflection against cantilever or any individual element allowed is

H/350 or 20mm which ever is less.
Guidline for fundamental time period is 0.1N.
Where N is number of storeys
Table :6 Guidline for fundamental time period

33 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

5.3 MODAL PARTICIPATING MASS RATIO

Number of modes given should be given in such a way that around 98 to 100%
modal participating mass ratio should be achieved.
Table :7 modal participating massratio

First mode of vibration is preferred to be in translation mode.

If the frequency of the building is less than one hertz then wind dynamic analysis
need to be done by considering the wind gust factor.
All the structural elements need to be well with in the strength design limit
criteria.

PROJECT 2
34 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
LATERAL STABILITY CHECKS
5.1 INTER STOREY DRIFT
Inter storey drift ratio should 0.004be less than
Table :3 inter storey drift

5.2 MAXIMUM DEFLECTION

Maximum deflection against wind allowed is H/500.
Table :4 Maximum deflection against wind

35 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

Maximum deflection against earthquake allowed is H/250.

Table :5 Maximum deflection against earthquake

Maximum deflection against cantilever or any individual element allowed is

H/350 or 20mm which ever is less.
Guidline for fundamental time period is 0.1N.
Where N is number of storeys
Table :6 Guidline for fundamental time period

36 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

5.3 MODAL PARTICIPATING MASS RATIO

Number of modes given should be given in such a way that around 98 to 100%
modal participating mass ratio should be achieved.
Table :7 modal participating massratio

First mode of vibration is preferred to be in translation mode.

If the frequency of the building is less than one hertz then wind dynamic analysis
need to be done by considering the wind gust factor.
All the structural elements need to be well with in the strength design limit
criteria.

CHAPTER 6
37 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT

CONCLUSION
This internship was a great experience to me. It was a real pleasure for me to work in
NANDAN CONSULTANCY, Nagarbhavi Bangalore. I worked with nice people in a
good atmosphere. Carrying out this internship in Nandan Consultancy ,allows me to be
immerged in a different ways to meet several learning opportunities like analysis of
building plan, modeling of residential building using Etabs 2013 software, further we are
going to learn about design of the building, foundation design using SAFE software.

CHAPTER 7
38 GAT

INTERNSHIP REPORT
REFERENCES
1. IS 456: 2000, Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of
Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards.
2. SP 16: 1980, Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS: 456 - 1978, Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi.
3. Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete - 2nd edition P.C. Varghese,
Prentice hall of India Private Ltd.,
4. IS: 875 1987, Indian Standard CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DESIGN LOADS
(OTHER THAN EARTHQUAKE) FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES,
Bureau of Indian Standards.
5. IS 1893 (Part 1) :2002, CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
DESIGN OF STRUCTURES, PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND
BUILDINGS, Bureau of Indian Standards.

39 GAT