Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CONDITION MSK10
By :
Edy Subiantoro - Sri Rahayu Gama Hafizh
Production Engineer EMP Malacca Strait S.A
Bakrie Tower 23 Floor Rasuna Said street, Rasuna Epicentrum Jakarta Selatan 12960
Ph. (+62 21) 2994 1500/2557 7000 ext 3165
Fax. (+62 21) 2994 1110
Abstract
The MSK10 well was unable to flow
naturally;
even
though the
reservoir
reservoir
connection
second
to
improve
the
frac.
The
previously fracced
ft).
The
team
made
frac
fluid
with
Thermafrac,
crushing,
which
both
reduced
frac
lift.
Introduction
MSK10 Background
Strait
PSC,
Riau
province,
Concept
type) to
conductivity.
4)
ii.
iii.
change
into
mechanical
Where:
lo :the original length of the material
copper.
Method
MSK10 was the final well in the third
fracturing campaign in the DC field.
Similar with the other wells, operational
challenges include high temperature, high
stress contrast and
formation.
low permeability
casing
pumping
the
reduce
packer
reduce
to
when
the
to
frac
pressure
the
chance
of
unsetting.
3. Well integrity evaluation to prevent
packer failure.
and
perform
equipment
mechanical
frac
packer
in
position.
pore
pressure,
fracture
pressure.
In 13
Remedial squeeze-cementing
repair cement bond problem
Recommended
remedial
to
We then
remedial
squeeze-cement
job
squeeze
test.
The
average
treating
run
to
record
pressure
and
2. Data Frac
The Data Frac started with a mini falloff by pumping 24 bbl of 2% KCL
brine at 6 BPM to estimate zone
transmissibility and reservoir pressure.
Figure 11 shows the average treating
pressure was 7750 psi at bottom hole,
and the instantaneous shut in pressure
(ISIP) was 7150 psi at bottom hole. The
calculated transmissibility was 176
mD.ft/cP and the reservoir pressure was
1500 psi.
The second step was a step rate test
(step up and down) as shown in Figure
leak-off
coefficient,
fluid
efficiency, and fracture model to finetune the frac design. The ISIP was 3500
psi at surface, which corresponds to
6115 psi at bottom-hole.
inches.
lbs.
and
100,978
lbs.
4. The
remedial
cement
squeeze
the
Figure 14.
frac
interval.
The
CBL
ft.
performed
on pressure
during pumping.
the
solved.
responses and
problems
after
were
FCD of 18.8.
Conclusions
1. Risk
Mitigation
prior
to
the
15
Results
rates.
good
expansion
joint
was
Acknowledgements
channeling behind
casing,
and
References
3. --------------
:Well
File,
EMP
University.
Michael
and
Nolte,
Strait
S.A.,
Jakarta.