Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

PART A

Chairpersons Visit Report

Undergraduate Engineering Program


TIER-II

Name of the Institution


__________________________________
Name of the Program
_______________________
Visit Dates
___________________

NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION


NBCC Place, East Tower, 4th Floor, Bhisham Pitamah Marg, Pragati
Vihar, New Delhi 110003
Tel: +91 112430620-22; 01124360654; www.nbaind.org

Team composition
Name of the Chairperson:______________________________________________________
Designation:_________________________________________________________________

Program 1:
Program evaluator 1

Name
Organization:

Program evaluator 2

Name
Organization:

Program 2:
Program evaluator 1

Name
Organization:

Program evaluator 2

Name
Organization:

Program 3:
Program evaluator 1

Name
Organization:

Program evaluator 2

Name
Organization:

Program 4:
Program evaluator 1

Name
Organization:

Program evaluator 2

Name
Organization:

Program 5:
Program evaluator 1

Name
Organization:

Program evaluator 2

Name
Organization:

Institute Details

Year of Establishment: _________________________


Physical Infrastructure and Ambience: __________________________________
Number of programs being run in the Institute*:
(i) UG- ____________________
(ii) PG - ____________________
Total Number of Students:
(i) In UG programs - _____________
(ii) In PG programs - _____________
Name of programs applied for accreditation
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)

___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________

*to be verified from SAR

Information for Evaluation


Award of Accreditation
Full Accreditation for 6 years
Minimum of 750 points in aggregate out of 1000 points with minimum score of 60% in
mandatory fields (criteria 4 to 6)
In addition at least 30 % of the required Faculty shall be Ph.D.
Provisional Accreditation for 3 years
Score of greater than or equal to 600 points with minimum 40% marks in Faculty
Information and Contributions (Criterion V) and also availability of at least one (1)
Professor or one (1) Associate Professor (As per AICTE Qualification) in the respective
Department
No Accreditation
Less than 600 points or less than 40% marks in Faculty Information and Contributions
(Criterion V) or non- availability of at least one (1) Professor or one (1) Associate
Professor (As per AICTE Qualification) are not eligible for accreditation.

Name of the Program 1:_______________________________________________________


Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.

Max.
Marks

Criteria

6.

Vision, Mission and Program


Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support

7.

Continuous Improvement

50

TOTAL

780

2.
3.
4.
5.

Marks
Awarded

60
120
120
150
200
80

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :


Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.

First Year Academics

50

9.

Student Support Systems

50

10.

Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources

Remarks

Remarks

120

TOTAL

220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B)

1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)

Name of the Program 2:_______________________________________________________


Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.

Max.
Marks

Criteria

6.

Vision, Mission and Program


Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support

7.

Continuous Improvement

50

TOTAL

780

2.
3.
4.
5.

Marks
Awarded

60
120
120
150
200
80

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :


Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.

First Year Academics

50

9.

Student Support Systems

50

10.

Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources

Remarks

Remarks

120

TOTAL

220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B)

1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)

Name of the Program 3:_______________________________________________________


Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.

Max.
Marks

Criteria

6.

Vision, Mission and Program


Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support

7.

Continuous Improvement

50

TOTAL

780

2.
3.
4.
5.

Marks
Awarded

60
120
120
150
200
80

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :


Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.

First Year Academics

50

9.

Student Support Systems

50

10.

Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources

Remarks

Remarks

120

TOTAL

220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B)

1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)

Name of the Program 4:_______________________________________________________


Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.

Max.
Marks

Criteria

6.

Vision, Mission and Program


Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support

7.

Continuous Improvement

50

TOTAL

780

2.
3.
4.
5.

Marks
Awarded

60
120
120
150
200
80

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :


Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.

First Year Academics

50

9.

Student Support Systems

50

10.

Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources

Remarks

Remarks

120

TOTAL

220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B)

1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)

Name of the Program 5:_______________________________________________________


Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.

Max.
Marks

Criteria

6.

Vision, Mission and Program


Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support

7.

Continuous Improvement

50

TOTAL

780

2.
3.
4.
5.

Marks
Awarded

60
120
120
150
200
80

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :


Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.

First Year Academics

50

9.

Student Support Systems

50

10.

Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources

Remarks

Remarks

120

TOTAL

220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B)

1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)

Overall Observations
1.
S. No.

Name of the
Program

Intake

Admissions

StudentFaculty
Ratio

Placement
(last year)

2. About the progress since last accreditation (to be filled for institutes who have applied for reaccreditation)
Kindly mention the changes made as recommended by NBA, since the previous visit.
3. Observation on general facilities and about the programs.
Kindly mention general observations about facilities like labs, library etc. and a general review about
the programs.

1st year
Academic Ambience
Student Support Systems
Strengths, Weaknesses, Concerns, Suggestions

4. Status of imbibing of outcome based accreditation. For Example:

Formulation of PEOs, PSOs, COs and mappings carried out and implemented
Methodology for assessing the attainment of outcomes

Continual improvement process has been set up

Stakeholders (especially the faculty, HOD, students etc.) awareness about the process

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi