Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
108
Introduction
Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is an important complication
after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). In the phase
II Magnesium in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage
(MASH)-I study and Cochrane meta-analysis of 2007, a trend
toward less DCI and poor outcome was observed in aSAH
patients treated with magnesium vs. placebo (1,2). However, in
the subsequent phase III study (MASH-II) and the updated metaanalysis in 2012, magnesium treatment had no effect on clinical
outcome (3). Data on DCI were not analyzed, leaving the question
unanswered whether magnesium reduces the risk of DCI.
The relation between magnesium treatment and DCI might be
more complex than previously thought. In the IMAGES trial, a
randomized controlled trial that studied the effect of magnesium
treatment on outcome after ischemic stroke, a potential interaction was found between high glucose levels and magnesium treatment, leading to more infarct growth in hyperglycemic patients
when treated with magnesium compared with hyperglycemic
patients treated with placebo (4). In aSAH patients, high blood
glucose levels are also a risk factor for the development of DCI
(57). Thus, high blood glucose levels might lead to more DCI in
magnesium-treated patients in MASH-II, thereby offsetting a
possible beneficial effect of magnesium therapy on the occurrence
of DCI.
First, we studied whether the occurrence of DCI differed
between the magnesium and placebo group in MASH-II patients
and second, whether magnesium effects on DCI differed between
patients with low or high glucose levels.
Methods
Patient population
We analyzed data of patients who participated in the MASH-II
trial, a phase III multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial,
2015 World Stroke Organization
Research
J. F. Leijenaar et al.
and who were admitted to the University Medical Centre Utrecht
(UMCU). Of the 1204 patients included in MASH-II, 630 were
included in the UMCU. For the current study, we excluded 13
patients because of a diagnosis other than aSAH and one patient
because of absence of glucose levels as this patient was transferred
immediately to another hospital. Inclusion criteria for MASH-II
were: admission within four-days of the hemorrhage, aSAH confirmed by the presence of extravasated blood in the basal cisterns
by brain computed tomography (CT), or if CT was negative by
xanthochromia of cerebrospinal fluid in combination with a cerebral aneurysm. Exclusion criteria were age younger than 18 years,
renal failure (defined as serum creatinine concentration of more
than 150 mol/l), a body weight less than 50 kg, or imminent
death (3).
We recorded age, gender, and clinical condition on admission
according to the World Federation of Neurosurgical Surgeons
(WFNS) grading scale. The WFNS scale was dichotomized into
good (WFNS 13) and poor (WFNS 45) clinical condition (8).
Procedures
Data on glucose were collected for the period in which study
medication was administered, i.e., until 20 days after hemorrhage
onset, or until hospital discharge or death if it occurred within 20
days of onset of aSAH. In the original MASH-II trial, the measurement of glucose was not included, but as part of daily practice
glucose measurements were done at least once every day between
6:00 and 8:00 am (fasting glucose) during medium or intensive
care admission, duration depending on the duration of the hospital stay. Most patients however had several glucose measurements per day. In this study, we recorded for each patient a fasting
glucose (measured between 6:00 and 8:00 am) and a mean glucose
level (mean of all available glucose levels) per day as more than
one glucose level per day was often available.
We then calculated for each patient a mean of all available
fasting glucose levels until the occurrence of DCI. For patients
without DCI, the mean fasting glucose values were calculated
until the median day of DCI onset in the patients who did develop
DCI, in order to make a comparison. The same approach was used
with the mean daily glucose levels.
fasting glucose levels separately, and for patients with high and
low daily glucose levels separately. HRs were also calculated for
the occurrence of cerebral infarction for both the mean fasting
and the mean daily glucose independently. To study whether an
interaction existed between magnesium treatment and glucose,
the cross-product of magnesium and either mean fasting glucose
or mean daily glucose was entered into the Cox regression analyses. If the P value of the cross-product was <005, we considered a
statistically significant interaction between treatment modality
and glucose to be present. Because of the explanatory research
questions, all analyses were performed as on-treatment analyses
and adjusted for clinical condition on admission, age, and gender.
During the MASH-II trial, glucose levels were regulated strictly
in the intensive care unit (ICU) unit with insulin treatment. To see
whether insulin influenced the occurrence of DCI, we also performed on-treatment analyses adjusted for insulin.
Results
Of the 616 included patients, 307 (498%) received magnesium
treatment and 309 (502%) placebo (Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the magnesium and placebo groups
(Table 1).
The adjusted HR for the risk of DCI in patients treated with
magnesium vs. those treated with placebo was 10 (95% CI 07
14). Adjusted HRs for occurrence of DCI for magnesium vs.
placebo in patients with high mean fasting (HR 11, 95% CI
0717) vs. low mean fasting (HR 10, 95% CI 0616) and high
daily glucose level (HR 10, 95% CI 0716) vs. low daily glucose
level (HR 09, 95% CI 0515) were similar (Table 2). There were
no significant interactions between magnesium and mean fasting
Outcomes
The outcome of the study was DCI, either clinically (defined as
the occurrence of focal neurological impairment, or a decrease of
at least 2 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale, present for at least
one-hour, not apparent immediately after aneurysm occlusion,
and not explained by other causes), or radiological [defined as the
presence of new cerebral infarction on repeated CT or magnetic
resonance (MR) scan, which could not be attributed to other
causes such as surgical clipping or endovascular treatment] (9).
Data-analysis
First, we calculated a hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence
interval (95% CI) with Cox regression analysis for the occurrence
of DCI for magnesium treatment compared with placebo.
Second, we dichotomized mean fasting glucose and mean daily
glucose levels at their median values. We then again calculated
HRs for the occurrence of DCI for magnesium treatment compared with placebo, but now for patients with high and low
2015 World Stroke Organization
109
Research
J. F. Leijenaar et al.
Magnesium (n = 307)
Placebo (n = 309)
562 (135)
219 (713)
71 (231)
26 (1954)
579 (131)
222 (718)
72 (233)
30 (2053)
153 (498)
118 (384)
36 (117)
69 (13)
70 (13)
81 (264)
144 (466)
124 (401)
41 (133)
67 (12)
68 (12)
75 (243)
DCI, delayed cerebral ischemia; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.
Table 2 HRs for DCI for magnesium compared with placebo in patients with high fasting/daily glucose and low daily glucose
n/N (%)
41/147 (279)
50/165 (303)
Ref.
11 (0717)
Ref.
11 (0717)
34/162 (210)
31/142 (218)
Ref.
09 (0514)
P = 048
Ref.
10 (0616)
P = 054
43/147 (293)
52/161 (323)
Ref.
10 (0716)
Ref.
10 (0716)
32/162 (198)
29/146 (199)
Ref.
09 (0514)
P = 062
Ref.
09 (0515)
P = 060
*Adjusted for age, gender, and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons. CI, confidence interval; DCI, delayed cerebral ischemia; HR, hazard ratio.
Discussion
Our study shows that magnesium treatment did not change the
risk of DCI after aSAH, and that the absence of an effect was not
explained by interaction with glucose levels.
110
Research
J. F. Leijenaar et al.
the interaction in the post hoc study of IMAGES was a chance
finding.
Our study has a couple of strengths: our cohort was much
larger than the sub-analysis cohort of IMAGES wherein the relationship between glucose and infarct growth was investigated
(616 vs. 90 patients). Patients were randomized to receive either
magnesium or placebo therapy, and although we had to use a
retrospective design, the data used in our study were collected
prospectively at that time according to our local aSAH protocol. A
limitation of the study might be that only the UMCU patients of
the MASH-II trial were included, but we have no reason to think
results would be different in patients of the other centers, as
baseline and outcome characteristics were similar in the UMCU
cohort compared with the whole MASH-II cohort. We did not
exclude patients known with diabetes, because diabetes is not a
risk factor for aSAH, in contrast to patients with ischemic stroke,
so we do not expect a high percentage of patients with diabetes
(11). Additional adjustment for insulin use did not influence the
HRs for the occurrence of DCI; therefore, it is unlikely that any
interaction between blood glucose levels and magnesium was
masked by insulin use. We do not have information on how many
patients were on continuous gastric tube feeds.
Several trials (1214) indicated that combined treatment with
mild hypothermia and magnesium had a synergistic neuroprotective effect. In our study population, hypothermia was not
employed, thus we could not assess a potential synergistic effect of
hypothermia and magnesium treatment in our study. Hyperthermia and fever were treated with medication and cooling blankets
according to the institutional protocols.
In conclusion, magnesium treatment did not influence the
occurrence of DCI in MASH-II. Glucose levels did not influence
the relation between magnesium treatment and occurrence of
DCI, and are unlikely to explain the failure of magnesium to
prevent DCI.
Contributions
Jolien F. Leijenaar: Acquisition of data, drafting/revising manuscript for content including medical writing of content, analysis/
interpretation of data.
Sanne M. Dorhout Mees: Interpretation of data, critical revision
of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Ale Algra: Analysis/interpretation of data, critical revision of
the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Walter M. van den Bergh: Critical revision of the manuscript for
important intellectual content.
Gabriel J. E. Rinkel: Critical revision of the manuscript for
important intellectual content.
lands), F. van Kooten (Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), H. Kuijsten (St Elisabeth Hospital,
Tilburg, The Netherlands), P. M. Lavados (Institute of Neurosurgery, Universidad de Chile and Clinica Alemana, Universidad del
Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile), R. J. van Oostenbrugge (Maastricht
University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands), W. P.
Vandertop (Neurosurgical Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical
Centre and VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands). Data monitoring committee: J. G. van der Bom
(Chair; Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands), W. P. Th. M. Mali (University Medical Centre Utrecht,
Utrecht, The Netherlands), P. M. Rothwell, R. S. C. Kerr (University of Oxford and Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals, Oxford, UK). Participating centers (local investigators who included at least 10
patients): University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (630 patients; S. M. Dorhout Mees, W. M. van den Bergh,
A. Algra, G. J. E. Rinkel, R. Kleinloog, J. W. Dankbaar, C. S. Gathier,
D. J. Nieuwkamp, M. J. A. Luitse, S. Achterberg); Neurosurgical
Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (150 patients;
W. P. Vandertop); Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (104 patients; F. van Kooten); St Elisabeth
hospital Tilburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands (91 patients; H. Kuijsten, G. Roks); Medical Centre Haaglanden, the Hague, The Netherlands (81 patients; J. Boiten, J. Kerklaan, J. P. W. Dennessen);
Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands (68 patients; R. J. van Oostenbrugge); Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK (59 patients; R. Al-Shahi Salman),; Institute
of Neurosurgery, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile (21
patients; P. M. Lavados, V. V. Olavarria).
References
1 van den Bergh WM, Algra A, van Kooten F et al. Magnesium sulfate in
aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial.
Stroke 2005; 36:10115.
2 Dorhout Mees SM, Rinkel GJ, Feigin VL et al. Calcium antagonists for
aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2007; (3):CD000277.
3 Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Vandertop WP et al. Magnesium for
aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (MASH-2): a randomised
placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 380:449.
4 Kidwell CS, Lees KR, Muir KW et al. Results of the MRI substudy of
the intravenous magnesium efficacy in stroke trial. Stroke 2009;
40:17049.
5 Kruyt ND, Roos YW, Dorhout Mees SM et al. High mean fasting
glucose levels independently predict poor outcome and delayed cerebral ischaemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79:13825.
6 Barletta JF, Figueroa BE, DeShane R, Blau SA, McAllen KJ. High
glucose variability increases cerebral infarction in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Crit Care 2013; 28:798803.
7 Badjatia N, Topcuoglu MA, Buonanno FS et al. Relationship between
hyperglycemia and symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:16039.
8 Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on
a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale. J Neurosurg
1988; 68:9856.
9 Vergouwen MD, Vermeulen M, van Gijn J et al. Definition of delayed
cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an
outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of
a multidisciplinary research group. Stroke 2010; 41:23915.
Vol 10, October 2015, 108112
111
Research
10 Muir KW, Lees KR, Ford I, Davis S, Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy
in Stroke (IMAGES) Study Investigators. Magnesium for acute stroke
(Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363:43945.
11 Cui R, Iso H, Yamagishi K et al. Diabetes mellitus and risk of stroke
and its subtypes among Japanese: the Japan public health center study.
Stroke 2011; 42:26114.
12 Meloni BP, Campbell K, Zhu H, Knuckey NW. In search of clinical
neuroprotection after brain ischemia: the case for mild hypothermia
(35C) and magnesium. Stroke 2009; 40:223640.
112
J. F. Leijenaar et al.
13 Campbell K, Meloni BP, Zhu H, Knuckey NW. Magnesium treatment
and spontaneous mild hypothermia after transient focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Brain Res Bull 2008; 77:3202.
14 Campbell K, Meloni BP, Knuckey NW. Combined magnesium and
mild hypothermia (35 degrees C) treatment reduces infarct volumes
after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat at 2 and 4,
but not 6 h. Brain Res 2008; 1230:25864.