I-69/TTC Tier One Draft Environmental Impact Statement Upgradeable Corridor

ÿ6
Æ
ÿ
Æ
ÿ7
Æ ÿ
Æ
76 ÿ
Æ
99
ÿ7
Æ £
¤
271 £
¤
59
ÿ4
Æ ÿ
Æ
84

£
¤ 287
¤ £
£ ¤
183
283
5

ÿ
ÿ5
Æ
¨
§
¦ 44
ÿ
Æ
53
ÿ
Æ
53
£
¤
177 OKLAHOMA
£
¤
259
ÿ
Æ27
ÿ £
¤
70
Hardeman £
¤
70 Æ
36
ÿ3
Æ Æ
71

ÿ £
¤
70
70 £
£ ¤ ÿ
177 Æ
Ardmore 99
£
¤ £
¤271 ÿ
Æ4

ÿ6 35 ¤
69
Motley Cottle Æ Wilbarger
ÿ
Æ 240
Æ9
ÿ
Æ
32 ÿ
Æ
76
§
¨
¦ £
¤
377 £
¤
70 £
¤
70 AR KANSAS
£
¤
£
¤
70 £
¤
70 £
¤
183
Wichita ÿ
Æ79
ÿ
Æ
32 ÿ
Æ
37
59 Æÿ
27

Æ £
Foard
ÿ ÿ
25Wichita Falls
Æ ¤
81 ÿ
Æ
78
£
¤ £ ÿ4
Æ
£
¤
148 271
ÿ
Æ ÿ
Æ
87 ¤
71
£
¤82 82 £
¤82 Clay
Lake
37
ÿ ÿ
Æ
32
¨
§
¦ Æÿ29
Dickens £
¤
£
¤
281 £
¤
287 Montague Fannin Lamar
Paris

£
¤82 £
¤
259
Æ41 30
82 King
Knox £
¤ Archer ÿ
Æ
59 Cooke
Ray £
¤ £
¤ ÿ8
Æ
82 Baylor
£
¤ ÿ
Æ
25
69
35 Roberts Grayson 160 ÿ
82
£
¤
271
Red River
£
¤
82
ÿ ¨
§
¦ Bowie
277
183 Æ
ÿ Æ
ÿ ÿ
78
Æ Æ Æ
ÿ
Æ £
¤
114 79
ÿ
Delta 37
§
¨
¦
30
ÿ
222
Æ
59
ÿ
281 Æ £
Æ
24
¤
ÿ6
Æ £
¤283 16 £
ÿ
Æ ¤ 148
£
¤
287
Collin
ÿ
Æ
34 ÿ
Æ
19 Titus 67
£
¤
59
ÿ £
¤
Commerce

Æ ÿ 71
Æ
ÿ
251 78

£
¤
380 Haskell
Throckmorton
£
¤380 Young
Jack Wise DentonDenton
Æ ÿ
224 Æ
24
Hopkins Franklin
Morris Cass ÿ
Æ
77 ÿ
Æ
29
Kent
ÿ £ £ÿ
ÿ¤ Æ
380 ÿ
Æ Hunt
ÿ
ÿ
66
Stonewall Æ ¤
283
Æ
199
114
Plano
¨
§
¦ Æ Æ3 Claiborne

LOU ISIANA
277 154
£
¤ ÿ
Æ
16 ÿ
Æ 30
£
¤ Camp £
¤
59
ÿ
287 Carro llton
Richardson 69 2

ÿ
Æ £
¤ £
¤ ÿ
Æ ÆÆ ÿ£ ¤ 67
377
254
Rockwall Æ ÿ £
¤
271
Ga rla nd
34 Rains
ÿ
92 283 Parker Tarrant
ÿ
Æ 92 183 281 Wood
Æ £
¤ Marion
Irving
259 Bossier 154
ÿ 180 £
Mesquite
Æ ¤83 ÿ Shackelford 180
Æ 6 Palo Pinto ÿ
Æ Grand Prairie
Arlington
Da llas
37
£ Kaufman £
70
Scurry Fisher £ ¤ Jones£ ¤ ÿ
Æ 16 ¤80 Upshur
Fort Wo rth Harrison
Wills Point
Grand Sa line Mineola

¨
§
¦
ÿ§ ¨
Stephens
¤ I-69/TTC Tier One Draft Environmental§ ¨
¦ 20
¦ £ ÿ §
Shreveport
Ro b y

ÿ £ ¤
83 Dallas 20 Van Zandt
20Impact Statement
Æ ¤
377
Æ 171
80
Æ ¨
¦ Caddo £¤ Webster 154

ÿ 71
20 243
Æ ÿ
Æ
351
Upgradeable Corridors
6
Smith Gregg Long view

84 §
£
¤ ¨
¦
20
Ab ilen e
ÿ
Æ £
¤
112 Johnson £
¤67
¨
§
¦ ÿ
Æ
ÿ
Æ £
¤
171 64 Tyl er Bienville

ÿ 281 45
I-69/TTC Tier 20
¨
§
¦One Upgradeable ÿExisting
Æ Æ FacilityHood £
¤79
149

ÿ
16
£
¤ Æ
108 Ellis ÿ
Æ
ÿ
31
Mitchell Nolan (for visual purposes
Taylor Callahan line widthEastland
does not represent 3 77
proposed right of Æ
way)
ÿ
144
171 ÿ
Æ ÿ
Æ 43
£ ÿ183and ÆÿPotential Connection
64

£
¤ ¤
84 Æ ÿ Æ36
Erath
206 Æ Henderson
Rusk
Panola 34
£
¤ £
¤84 Athens
Cartha ge
Red River
will also£ £
277 Somervell
¤ ¤ ÿ
6 5
ÿ
Æ 70
£
¤ 81 175
Æ £
¤
The Modal Transition
£
¤ £
¤ 67 Zones be part
£
¤ ÿ
Æ £
¤69 59 315

ÿ Æ
22

ÿ Hill
283 77
of the Tier Two
£
¤ £
¤ study area. Æ ÿÆ 220
£
¤
Navarro 287 144 174
£
¤ £
¤
84 De Soto Jacks onv ille
83 84 ÿ 84
£
Æ
ÿ Æÿ Æÿ ÿ£ ¤
36
ÿ Æ ¤ 96
ÿ
79 Cherokee
Coke
£
¤277 ÿÆ
Æ Comanche
206
£
¤
279
£
¤
2 81
Bosque
ÿ
Æ
Æ Æ
Anderson £
¤
259
171 31
Shelby
14 Natchitoches 19 155

ÿ
22
Sterling
Æ Runnels 158
Brown £
¤ Æ
67
377
ÿ ÿ
Æ 16
6 £
¤84 ÿ
Æ Sabine Pa lesti ne 7
ÿ ¨
§
¦ ÿ ÆÿNacogdoches Æÿ Æÿ
Coleman Hamilton Æ 22 Nacogdoches

ÿ£
35 21 87
£
¤67 £
¤ 84
Freestone
Æ Æ 294 294

£
¤
277 £
¤67
£
¤
84 Limestone ¨
§
¦45
¤287 Waco ÿ
Æ 21 6

£
¤
McLennan
ÿ
Æ
ÿ
Æ ÿ
Æ 6 Sabine 164
ÿ Æ ÿAngelina
Mills 84 164
Æ ÿ Æ San Augustine 21 103 Lufkin
San Angelo
Tom Green Coryell
£
¤79 Crock ett
7

£
¤
87
£
283 £
¤ ¤ ÿ £
¤77
Leon Houston
£
¤
ÿ £
Æ
Irion Concho 377
Æ ¤Lampasas
183 16
ÿ
Æ
Falls
ÿ
Æ ÿ
Æ 36 ÿ
Æ
7 69
ÿ
Æ 14
ÿ
Æ
7
Vernon 19
63 87

ÿ Æÿ Æ ÿ £
McCulloch
San Saba
Æ Killeen 317 Trinity 320¤59 £
¤96
ÿ
Æ
£
¤
190
Robertson
Madison ÿ
Æ 53
94 Jas per
63

£
¤
83 ÿ
Æ Bell
£ ÿ £
71
¤
277
£
¤
281 Æ ÿ 190
Æ ÿ
Æ 195
ÿ
Æ ÿ
Æ 95 Polk ¤287
£
¤ Jasper Newton
190
6
90
Schleicher
£
¤190 Menard ÿ
Æ 29
Burnet ÿ
Æ £
¤ Milam £ ¤79
£
¤
190
138 ¨
§
¦45
ÿ
Æ Tyler
21
19

Mason Llano Æ ÿ ÿ
Æ 29
Brazos
195
Walker
ÿ
Æ ÿ
Æ
Beauregard
Bryan 30 156
£
¤377 £
¤87
Williamson
Lake £
¤
79 ÿ Æ
Æ ÿ ÿ
Æ
Grimes
ÿ
Æ
ÿ
Æ £
36 21 Co llege
30 75
146
San Jacinto ¤
69
£
¤96
Statio n

Sutton Kimble Travis Burleson ÿ

Æ ÿÆ
Æ ÿ 90 62 87
¨
§
¦10 ÿ
Æ 16

£ £
¤77
Hardin Calcasieu Co nroe

ÿ ¤290
ÿ
Montgomery
ÿ
Æ
ÿLiberty
Æ
ÿ Æ
Travis Lee 71
Æ Orange 105
£
¤
290 Gillespie ÿ
Æ Washington
Austin
Æ
95 6
242
321
Orange

£
¤83 ÿÆ
Æ ÿ 41 27
Blanco
£
¤290 ÿ
Æ ÿ
Æ £
¤
290 71 21
£
¤90
Beaumont

ÿ Æ
Po rt
Cameron
ÿ
Æ55 ÿ
Æ 41 Kerr £
¤
87
£
¤
Hays Bastrop
Æ ÿ £
¤
290 £
¤59 ÿ
Æ
237
159 146
Arthur
281
ÿ
Æ Waller ÿ
Æ 73
Edwards
ÿ Æ
Æ ÿ Kendall 16 27 ÿ
Æ Austin21
ÿ Harris
71
¨
§
¦10
Æ
Houston
Fayette Jefferson 36
¨
§
¦
§
¦
¨
Baytown

ÿ ÿ
10
Real
Æ ÿ Comal ÿ
Æ Caldwell
ÿ 80 Chambers Æ 87
Æ
ÿ Æ ¨
§
¦ 610
173 46 95 Pa sad ena
Bandera Æ £
¤
123 10

ÿ
Æ ¨
§
¦35 Guadalupe 16
ÿ£
Æ ¤183
90
£
¤77
Colorado
ÿ£
Æ ¤
8090 ¨
§
¦
45 Æ ÿ ÿ
Æ 60
146
87

San Antonio§ £
¤ Fort Bend Æ ÿ 6
¨
¦10
Gonzales
90
ÿ
Æ
ÿ Æÿ
Æ Galveston 71
£
¤ ÿ Medina ÿ 288
Æ
Uvalde Æ
83
ÿ£
36
£
¤ Bexar ¤77 Lavaca
127
90 £
¤ Æ 95 Galveston
Kinney
£
¤90 ÿ
Æ
£
¤90
55 ¨
§
¦
35 §
¦
¨410
37 £
87

¤ Æÿ ÿ
Æ
Wharton
Brazoria
35

ÿ
181 111
Æ 281 §
¨
¦ £
¤
97 £
¤
59
131
£
¤ Wilson 87

ÿ Æÿ
Æ DeWitt
123 Freeport

£
¤ 57
ÿ
Æ Karnes
173 £
¤77
£
¤87 Jackson
80 ÿ
Æ
Matagorda
ÿ
Æ 71 36

£
¤
57 Zavala Frio ÿ
Æ 97 £
¤
183
ÿ
Æ ÿ
Æ
Victoria
35 60

ÿ
Atascosa
Maverick ÿ
Æ 85
Æ
¨
§
¦35
£
¤59 Victoria
239

£
¤
277
£
¤83 ÿ
ÿ
Æ
Goliad
Calhoun Æ
72

ÿ
Æ 85
£
¤
181
ÿÆÿ Æ
Æ
316

ÿ ÿ
239
ÿ
Æ Æ 97 72
35 185
Dimmit
La Salle McMullen
Live Oak Bee
ÿ
Æ Refugio 202

£
¤ £
¤
ÿ
83 77 Aransas
37 Æ
59 £
359

£
¤ ¤281 ¨
§
¦
ÿ
Æ 16
San Patricio
ÿ Gulf of Mexico
COAHUILA ÿ
Æ
44 Æ
35
DE
ZARAGOZA ¨
§
¦35
ÿ
Æ
ÿ
44
Webb Æ
339 ÿ
Æ
44
Jim Wells Corpus Christi
Duval
Laredo
£
¤59
ÿ
Æ
Nueces
ÿ
Nu ev o 141
Laredo ÿ
Æ
16
Æ
359

ÿ
Æ
359
£
¤
281
£
¤
77
Kleberg

ÿ
Æ
285
ÿ
Æ 285

Jim Hogg
Zapata
ÿ
Æ
16 Brooks
NUEVO LEON £
¤
83 Kenedy

Starr

£
¤
83
Hidalgo

ÿ
Æ
336
ÿ
Æ
186

£
¤77
Willacy
¶
McAllen
£
¤
83 Cameron Miles
£
¤
281 ÿÆÿ
Æ
100
48
0 60 120

Brownsville
TAMAULIPAS 1 Inch = 60 Miles
Monterrey June 2008
T:\GIS_Data_Sets\TX_Corridor_Wide_Data\Public_Involvement\TxDOTPublicRelations\UpgradeableCorridors_all_ghostedLetterSize.mxd 6/6/2008
 I-69/TTC Recommendation
Texas Department of Transportation
June 2008

• TxDOT is recommending I-69/TTC use the existing highways in response

to public input.
• February - March 2008: 47 public hearings held along the study corridor
from northeast Texas to the southern end of the state.
• Some 12,000 Texans attended.
• Approximately 28,000 comments were received.
• Initial review of these comments has been completed.
• The new location corridors proposed and presented during the public
hearings earlier this year are no longer under consideration.
• The existing highways along the study corridor include US 59, US 77,
US 84, US 281 and SH 44.
• TxDOT will now complete a detailed review of the comments, prepare
the final environmental impact statement and seek Federal Highway
Administration approval of this recommendation.
• Once approved, individual segments of the corridor could be upgraded.
As needs are identified, TxDOT will conduct more detailed studies and
work with local officials to upgrade that segment to meet those needs.
• I-69/TTC study area is approximately 650 miles stretching from far south
Texas to northeast Texas. There is no authorization to purchase property
or begin construction on this corridor.

“We asked Texans to become more involved in the decision-making process, and
they did not let us down. We listened as they voiced their concerns and issues
about I-69/TTC. And, we also agree that along this corridor, improvements can
be made to the existing facilities to keep Texas moving.”
Amadeo Saenz, Executive Director, Texas Department of Transportation