Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s00404-010-1382-8
G E N E RA L G Y N E CO L O G Y
Received: 17 October 2009 / Accepted: 21 January 2010 / Published online: 5 February 2010
Springer-Verlag 2010
Abstract
Objective To compare the eVectiveness of the vaginal
tablets of hyaluronic acid and estrodiol for the treatment of
atrophic vaginitis.
Materials and methods Forty-two postmenopausal women
with symptoms of atrophic vaginitis were randomized to
take vaginal tablets of 25 g estradiol (n = 21) (group I) or
5 mg hyaluronic acid sodium salt (n = 21) (group II) for
8 weeks. The symptoms of atrophic vaginitis were evaluated by a self-assessed 4-point scale of composite score and
the degree of epithelial atrophy was determined as, none,
mild, moderate and severe. Vaginal pH and maturation
index were measured and compared in both the groups.
Results The symptoms were relieved signiWcantly in both
the groups (P < 0.001). The relief of symptoms was signiWcantly superior in group I compared with group II
(P < 0.05). A signiWcant decrease in epithelial atrophy and
Introduction
123
540
123
541
Results
Mean age of the patients in group I (51.86 4.35) and group
II (52.95 4.80) was not signiWcantly diVerent (P > 0.05).
The patients were menopausal for 5.29 3.03 years in group
I and 4.67 3.13 years in group II, respectively (P > 0.05).
Three of the patients in group I and 4 of the patients in group
II were hysterectomized because of benign conditions like
Wbroids. The frequencies of symptoms before and after treatment in two groups are presented in Table 1. The composite
score of vaginal symptoms was not signiWcantly diVerent at
the beginning of the treatment. The relief of symptoms was
signiWcantly detected in both study groups (P < 0.001) after
8 weeks of treatment. The relief of vaginal symptoms was
signiWcantly superior in group I when compared with group
II, respectively (P < 0.05) (Table 2). The degree of epithelial
atrophy was signiWcantly severe in group II P < 0.05), a signiWcant decrease was detected in both groups (P < 0.01) after
treatment (Table 3). The vaginal pH was signiWcantly
decreased in both groups (P < 0.01) after treatment, while the
decrease was more prominent in group I (Table 4). The vaginal maturation values were also signiWcantly improved in
both study groups (P < 0.001) after 8 weeks of treatment,
while the mean maturation value was signiWcantly higher in
group I when compared with group II, respectively
(P < 0.001) (Table 5).
Discussion
The quality of life of menopausal women can be negatively
aVected by vulvovaginal atrophic changes. More than a half
9.24 1.92
0.427
2.67 1.53
3.86 1.39
0.012*
0.001**
0.001**
Students t test
Paired sample test
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
Epithelial atrophy
(after treatment)
Group II
n (%)
0 (0%)
16 (76.2%)
3 (Severe)
0 (0%)
Median
0 (None)
3 (14.3%)
2 (9.5%)
1 (Mild)
18 (85.7%) 18 (85.7%)
2 (Moderate) 0 (0%)
Median
P
5 (23.8%)
0.012*
1 (4.8%)
0.001**
0.001**
0.419
MannWhitney U test
Wilcoxon-signed rank test
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
Table 1 The frequency of vaginal complaints before and after treatment in two groups
Group
Severity of
symptoms
II
Dryness before
treatment (%)
After
treatment
None
0 (0)
5 (23.8)
Mild
0 (0)
15 (71.4)
Moderate
9 (42.8)
1 (4.8)
Severe
12 (57.2)
None
0 (0)
Mild
Soreness
before
treatment
After
treatment
Irritation
before
treatment
After
treatment
Dyspareunia
before
treatment
After
treatment
0 (0)
8 (38.9)
0 (0)
6 (28.6)
0 (0)
9 (42.8)
1 (4.8)
13 (61.9)
1 (4.8)
15 (71.4)
0 (0)
12 (57.3)
10 (47.6)
0 (0)
13 (61.9)
0 (0)
12 (57.2)
0 (0)
0 (0)
10 (47.6)
0 (0)
7 (33.3)
0 (0)
9 (42.8)
0 (0)
1 (4.8)
0 (0)
3 (14.2)
1 (4.8)
2 (9.5)
0 (0)
3 (14.2)
0 (0)
17 (80.9)
1 (4.8)
17 (80.9)
0 (0)
18 (85.7)
1 (4.8)
16 (76.1)
Moderate
13 (61.9)
3 (14.3)
12 (57.3)
(4,8)
13 (61.9)
1 (4.8)
13 (61.9)
2 (9.5)
Severe
8 (38.1)
0 (0)
8 (38.9)
0 (0)
7 (33.3)
0 (0)
7 (33.3)
0 (0)
123
542
Group I
n (%)
Group II
n (%)
Vaginal pH
2 (5.56.49) 19 (90.5%) 15 (71.4%)
(before treatment) 3 (>6.49)
2 (9.5%)
6 (28.6%)
Vaginal pH
(after treatment)
Median
0 (<5.0)
3 (14.3%)
0 (0%)
0.120
6 (28.6%)
0.001**
0.001**
0.003**
MannWhitney U test
Wilcoxon-signed rank test
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
Group II
(mean SD)
4.38 0.80
4.14 0.85
0.358
71.19 12.96
44.40 9.32
0.001**
0.001**
0.001**
Students t test
Paired sample test
** P < 0.001
123
None.
References
1. Mehta A, Bachmann G (2008) Vulvovaginal complaints. Clin
Obstet Gynecol 51(3):549555
2. Notelovitz M (1997) Urogenital aging: solutions in clinical practice.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet 59:S35S39
3. Castelo-Branco C, Cancelo M, Villero J, Nohales F, Julia D
(2005) Management of post-menopausal vaginal atrophy, atrophic
vaginitis. Maturitas 52S:S46S52
543
11. Notelovitz M, Funk S, Nanavati N, Mazzeo M (2002) Estradiol
absorption from vaginal tablets in postmenopausal women. Obstet
Gynecol 99:556562
12. Nilsson K, Heimer G (1992) Low-dose oestradiol in the treatment
of urogenital oestrogen deWciencya pharmacokinetic pharmacokineticand pharmacodynamic study. Maturitas 15:121127
13. Bachmann G, A Lobo R, Gut R, Nachtigal L, Notelovitz M (2008)
EYcacy of low-dose estradiol vaginal tablets in the treatment of
atrophic vaginitis a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol
111:6776
14. North American Menopause Society (2007) The role of local vaginal estrogen for treatment of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal
women: 2007 position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 14:355369
15. ACOGPractice Bulletin (2001) Use of botanicals for management
of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 97(Suppl):111
16. Morali G, Polatti F, Metelitsa EN, Mascarucci P, Magnani P, Marr
GB (2006) Open, non-controlled clinical studies to assess the eYcacy and safety of a medical device in form of gel topically and
intravaginally used in postmenopausal women with genital atrophy.
Arzneimittelforschung 56(3):230238
123
Copyright of Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics is the property of Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright
holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.