THE U(SECURED)

BEFORE TAKEN BEFORE A CORPORATED PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OR A

JUDGE:
FIRST INQUIRE IF WE ARE ON THE RECORD, INSIST IT!
IF NOT, THEN SAY NOTHING UNTIL YOU ARE SURE ITS RECORDED!
SECOND: ALL YOU HAVE TO SAY FOR THE RECORD IS: " I AM THE
BENEFICIARY OF THE TRUST,
AND I AM APPOINTING YOU AS MY TRUSTEE!"
THIRD:
THEN YOU DIRECT YOUR TRUSTEE TO DO YOUR BIDDING! " AS MY
TRUSTEE, I WANT
WANT YOU TO DISCHARD THIS MATTER I AM ACCUSED OF AND
ELIMINATE THE RECORD!"
FOURTH: IF YOU SUFFERED ANY DAMAGES AS A RESULT OF HIS ARREST, HE
CAN DIRECT THAT
THE TRUST COMPENSATE HIM FORM THE PROCEEDS OF THE
COURT BY SAYING:
" I WISH TO BE COMPENSATED FOR ____ DOLLARS, IN
REDEMPTION."
THIS STATEMENT IS SUFFICENT TO REMOVE THE AUTHORITY AND
JURISDICTION FROM ANY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OR JUDGE. THE ACCUSED
WILL BE IMMEDIATELY RELEASED FROM CUSTODY, WITH A CHECK, LICENSE
OR CLAIM HE IDENTIFIES AS A DAMAGE. IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE
ACTION INVOLVES OR HOW IT IS CLASSIFIED BY THE CORPORATE LAW AS A
CIVIL OR CRIMINAL ACTION! IT WORKS EVERY TIME!
ALL OF THE CODES, STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED
STATES ARE A WILL FROM THE MASTERS TO THEIR SLAVES. A WILL IS
DEFINED AS, " AN EXPRESS COMMAND USED IN A DISPOSITIVE NATURE."
WHEN INDIVIDUALS IN AMERICA ARE CHARGED WITH A CRIME AND
WAREHOUSED IN A JAIL; IT IS BECAUSE THEY WENT AGAINST THE WILL OF
THE MASTERS, AND NOT BECAUSE THEY HARMED ANOTHER PERSON!
REMEMBER THAT: THE WILL DEMANDS FROM US, ALL THAT WE ARE; KEEPS
US IN CHECK AND PROMISES US NOTHING.
PART OF THE FRAUD PERPETRATED AGAINST " WE THE PEOPLE" BY THIS WILL,
IS THE FACT THAT THERE ARE ACTUALLY NO CRIMINAL LAWS IN AMERICA.
THE RULES OF PROCEDURE USED BY EVERY LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL
COURT ARE CIVIL RULES, NOT CRIMINAL! COURT OFFICIALS SIMPLY
SUBSTITUTE THE WORD CRIMINAL FOR CIVIL, DEPENDING UPON THE CASE AT
HAND. RULE 1 OF THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READS: "THERE SHALL BE
BUT ONE FORM OF ACTION, A CIVIL ACTION." THIS MEANS THAT THE

CRIMINAL LAWS PROMULGATED AND ENFORCED BY THE POLICE AND OUR

CORPORATE GOVERNMENTS ARE ALL CIVIL AND ARE BEING FRUADULENTLY
ENFORCED AGAINST OUR "CORPORATE FICTIONS" AS CRIMINAL.
WHEN ANYONE GOES TO JAIL, IT IS FOR A CIVIL INFRACTION OF THE MASTERS
WILL. THAT MAKES ALL OF OUR JAILS, DEBTOR PRISONS " DOES THAT RING A
CONSTITUTIONAL BELL?"
TITLE 18, FEDERAL CRIMES AND OFFENSES: WAS NEVER VOTED ON BY
CONGRESS, WHICH MEANS THAT THESE FEDERAL LAWS ARE NOT POSITIVE
LAW IN AMERICA!
THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE RELIES UPON TITLE 18 TO CONVICT PEOPLE
OF TAX EVASION, WHICH (ONLY APPLIES TO CORPORATIONS). LOOK AT ALL
THE PEOPLE SITTING IN FEDERAL PRISIONS WHO WERE CONVICTED OF THIS
SO-CALLED CRIME? WHAT MAKES IT WORSE IS THE FACT THAT THE QUEEN
OF ENGLAND, ENTERED INTO A TREATY WITH THE FEDRAL
GOVERNMENT FOR THE TAXING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND
CIGARETTES SOLD IN AMERICA. THE TREATY IS CALLED THE STAMP ACT
AND IN THIS ACT, THE QUEEN ORDAINED THAT HER SUBJECTS, THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE, ARE EXONERATED OF ALL OTHER FEDERAL TAXES!
SO THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX AND THE STATE INCOMES TAXES LEVIED
AGAINST ALL AMERICAN'S IS CONTRARY TO AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY
AND AGAINST THE SOVEREIGN ORDERS OF THE QUEEN! LIKE IT OR NOT,
THE QUEEN IS OUR MONARCH AND MASTER! THE TAX IS ILLEGAL AND STILL
PEOPLE HAVE BEEN PROSECUTED AND IMPRISIONED, CONTRARY TO LAW!
ANYONE WHO APPLIES FOR A PUBLIC DEFENDER, SIGNS THE SAME
CONTRACT WITHOUT KNOWING IT AND ANY ONE WHO PRIVATELY HIRES A
LAWYER TO REPRESENT THEM IN A COURT PROCEEDING, CONSENTS TO THE
SAME CONTRACT UPON THE LAWYER FILING A " NOTICE OF APPEARANCE!"
WHEN YOU HIRE A LAWYER, YOU SIGN A POWER OF ATTORNEY. HE IS
REQUIRED TO FILE HIS NOTICE OF APPEARANCE IN THAT CASE AND THAT
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OFFERS YOUR CONSENT AND BINDS YOUR
APPEARANCE TO THE PROCEEDINGS!
SO ALWAYS RESERVE YOUR RIGHTS ON YOUR SIGNATURE!!!
ABSENT THESE AFORMENTIONED CONTRACTS; THE COURT CANNOT PROCEED
AGAISNT YOU! WHEN THAT OCCURS; THE JUDGE AND THE PROSECUTOR,
ATTEMPT TO TRICK AND INTIMIDATE YOU INTO GIVING YOUR CONSENT! IF
YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO INVOKE YOUR SOVEREIGNTY, AND YOU TAKE
WHAT THEY THROW AT YOU, AND STAND YOUR GROUND; THEY WILL BE
FORCED TO RELEASE YOU AFTER 72 HOURS HAS ELAPSED!
MANY EARLY IMMIGRANTS TO THE UNITED STATES ARRIVED HERE AS BONDED
SLAVES. A PERSON OF WEALTH OR SUBSTANCE BECAME THE [PAYOR] BY
OFFERING TO PAY OR PROMISING TO PAY OR [BOND] THE DEBTS OF ANOTHER
PERSON, AND USUALLY PAID THE COST OF HIS OR HER VOYAGE TO AMERICA.

THIS MADE THE PAYOR A [CONSTITUTOR] AND GAVE HIM TITLE AS [MASTER]
OVER THE DEBTOR [SLAVE] BY WRITTEN CONTRACT. A " BONDED SLAVE" IS A
COPORATE FICTION. THE PAYOR'S NEW TITLE AND POWER AS THE " BOND
MASTER" OF THE DEBTOR, CAUSES THE IMMIGRANT TO BECOME " A BOND
SLAVE" AND THE PROPERTY OF THE MASTER UNTIL SUCH TIME HE IS PAID
BACK HIS INVESTMENT BY THE BOND SLAVE OR BY SOMEONE ELSE. THIS
MEANS THAT THE BOND MASTER CAN BUY AND SELL THESE CONTRACTS!
OF A BONDED SLAVE WAS MISTREATED BY HIS BOND MASTER; THE LAW DID
NOT REPRESENT HIM BECAUSE THE BOND SLAVE(A CORPORATE FICTION)
HAD NO HUMAN RIGHTS AFFORDED TO HIM BY ANY LAW CORPORATE
FICTIONS HAVE NO RIGHTS. IF THE BONDED SLAVE DESIRED RIGHTS, HE
WAS OBLIGATED TO NEGOTIATE THEM IN HIS CONTRACT WITH THE BOND
MASTER BEFORE ACCEPTING THE CONTRACT. IF THE BONDED SLAVE RUNS
AWAY FROM HIS ABUSIVE BOND MASTER, THE LAW IN PLACE HOWEVER,
ATTACHED A BOUNTY, HUNTED HIM DOWN AND RETURNED HIM TO THE
BOND MASTER. REMEMBER THE FIRST SLAVES IN AMERICA WERE (INDIAN)
AND THEN CAUCASIAN, OF ENGLISH, FRENCH, IRISH, AND GERMAN
ANCESTRY.
THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT FOR " WE THE PEOPLE"
AS MENTIONED BEFORE, THE COLONIST WERE NEVER PRESENTED THE
CONSTITUTION TO VOTE ON ITS PASSAGE AND APPROVAL BECAUSE THE
CONSTITUTION WAS NEVER WRITTEN FOR THEM AND HAS BEEN REWRITTEN
TWO MORE TIMES SINCE THEN, BUT ONLY OUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
KONW ABOUT THAT. AND NOW, SO DO YOU
YOU MAY BE WONDERING ABOUT NOW, HOW THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT CAN COLLECT TAXES FROM, " WE THE PEOPLE" WHEN WE ARE
SLAVES, OWN NOTHING AND ARE NOT A PARTY TO THE CONSTITUTION?
DESPITE ITS LEGALITY, IT IS DONE UNDER A PROCESS KNOWN AS "DEBT
COLLECTION" THROUGH PRIVATE CONTRACTORS [THE IRS] AND THROUGH A
PRIVATE CONTRACT, THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. THE IRS BELONGS
TO THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, WHO ALSO OWNS THE FEDERAL
RESERVE BANK. THE IMF HOLDS THE CONTROLLING INTEREST IN ALL THE
BANKS IN AMERICA! THE IMF IS THE ROCKERFELLER AND ROTHSCHILD
EMPIRES, ALONG WITH THE ELEVEN WEALTHIEST FAMILIES IN THE WORLD.
WHEN YOU SEE OR HEAR OF A BANK CLOSING- IT IS A DIVERSION ANS IS
INTENDED TO INJURE AND PANIC THE PUBLIC. THE CONDITION OF THE
ECONOMY IN THE WORLD TODAY IS BEING MANIPULATED BY THESE PEOPLE!
THE TITLE TO THE AMISH IS RECORDED AS AN ECCLESIASTICAL TRUST. THE
VATICAN (THE HOLY ROMAN CHURCH) ACTUALLY OWNS ALL THE LAND,
TERRITORIES AND INSULAR POSSESSIONS CALLED AMERICA AND AS LONG AS
THE AMISH REMAIN AN ECCLESIASTICAL TRUST AND REMAIN A PASSIVE
CHRISTIAN SOCIETY, THE VATICAN WILL PROTECT THEM. THE HOLY ROMAN
CHURCH POSSESSES THE POWER TO PROTECT OR CRUSH ANYONE AND
ANYTHING [SEE: TILLMAN V. ROBERTS, 108 SO. 62 [AND] TITLE 26
U.S.C. 7701 [AND] 18 U.S.C. SECTION 8].

CARES OF THE CHURCH

A Church with Tax Exemption
Is Not a Tax Exempt Church
(Author Unknown)

bar
During recent Senate hearings on Senate Bill 557 (1990), the so-called "Civil
Rights Restoration Act," it was noted that Senator Kennedy and other
supporters consistently referred to "religious or church organizations"
whereas opponents spoke of defending "religious freedom" and "rights" of the
Church. The word "organizations" is emphasized because the use of this term
may be the key to government meddling in the affairs of the Church.
Most people believe a Church that has tax exemption is a "tax-exempt
church." They err greatly. A church that has tax exemption is not a tax
exempt Church ... it is a tax exempt "organization." A "religious or church
organization" is a corporation that "functions" in a "legal" capacity, doing
"business" as a church. The IRS is fully aware of this distinction, because all
of their publications reflect it. Nowhere do they refer to "tax-exempt
churches." They always refer to religious or church "organizations." Surely,
Congress understands the distinction as well?!
A Church that voluntarily initiates an "application" to the State for "corporate"
status obtains "limited liability" and "tax exemption." It has petitioned the
State to dictate it's right to exist and prosper. Thus, the Church consents to a
change of its status; from a "lawful" assembly of private citizens to that of a
"legal" gathering of public subjects.
The Church (a congregation of believers) does not have rights granted by the
Constitution. It has inalienable rights granted by God that are "secured" by
the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. Incorporated churches and artificial
persons (Corporations) do not have "inalienable rights" granted by God that
are "secured" by the Constitution. They only have such rights, privileges and
immunities, as granted to entities created by the State. The U.S. Supreme
Court understands corporations are creatures of the State, as the Court has
stated:
"A corporation is an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only

in contemplation of law. Being the mere creature of law, it possesses only

those properties which the charter of its creation confers upon it, either
expressly, or as incidental to its existence. These are such as are supposed
best calculated to effect the object for which it was created. Among the most
important are immortality, and, if the expression may be allowed,
individuality; properties by which a perpetual succession of many persons are
considered as the same, and may act as a single individual. They enable a
corporation to manage its own affairs, and to hold property, without endless
necessity of perpetual conveyances, for the purpose of transmitting it from
hand to hand. It is chiefly for the purpose of clothing bodies of men with
these qualities and capacities, that corporations were invented and are in
use."
Dartmouth College v. Woodward,
4 Wheat. Rep. 634
Osborn et.al. v. The Bank of the United States,
9 Wheat 740 @ 767

"A corporation is a creature of the state. It is presumed to be incorporated

for the benefit of the public. It receives certain special privileges and
franchises.. . Its powers are limited by law ... Its rights to act as a corporation
are only preserved to it so long as it obeys the laws of its creation."
Wilson v. U.S., 221 U.S. 382

"... Corporations are not citizens ... The term citizen ... applies only to
natural persons ... not to artificial persons created by the legislature..."
Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168, 177
(See also the Opinion of Field, J.,
in the Slaughterhouse Cases,
16 Wall.36,99)

"Whenever a corporation makes a contract it is the contract of the legal

entity ... The only rights it can claim are the rights which are given to it in
that charter, and not the rights which belong to its members as citizens of a
state."
Bank of Augusta v. Earle,
13 Pet. 586

"A corporation can only appear by its attorney or solicitor, duly authorized;
and if this authority is not apparent upon the face of the record, the decree is
erroneous, and cannot be supported."
Osborn et.al. v. The Bank
of the United States,
9 Wheat 740 @ 767

According to IRS Publication 557, the instruction manual for organizations

seeking recognition of tax exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code, in order to be an "organization" in the legal sense, it is
necessary to incorporate.
Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Ed., defines "Organization" as:
"Organization includes a corporation or governmental subdivision or
agency, business trust, partnership or association, two or more persons
having a joint orcommon interest, or any other legal or commercial entity."
UCC 1-201(28)

Notice that all of the entities in the definition are government franchised,
under the jurisdiction of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) which has been
"Codified" into law within each state. The definition is sound evidence that a
corporation (even if it functions as a church) is recognized by law as a
commercial and public activity. An incorporated church, "legally" is a
commercial or public activity. Didn't Jesus say that His house was not to be a
house of merchandise (commerce)?
"And [Jesus] said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence;
make not my Father'shouse an house of merchandise."
John 2:16

Since incorporated churches must register with the State tax commission as
an "organization," most States will not permit exempt status until the Church
applies for and obtains an IRS 501(c)(3) status ruling. As long as the church
"organization" toes the government "public policy" line and performs
according to the terms of the charter (remaining non-political and noncontroversial), it retains its tax exempt status without hassle. Of course, that
means the "church" must comply with every nit-picking demand passed by
government that applies to any public entity ... including humanist doctrines
of a "One World Caesar."

IRS Publication 557 stipulates that:

"Sec.508(c) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that churches are not
required to apply for recognition of section 501(c)(3) status in order to be
exempt from federal taxation or to receive tax deductible contributions ..
"Churches are automatically exempt from Federal income tax. That
contributions to churches are deductible by donors under section 170 of the
Code."
If Churches are "automatically exempt," then why would they be so dumb to
apply for exemption? Exemption or immunity is a government grant afforded
only to certain classes of juristic persons. Law Dictionaries that define
"exempt" and "immune," plus Webster's 1828 Dictionary for the word
"exclude" will provide you with a clearer understanding of what is being said
here.
The First Amendment PROHIBITS government from making any law for or
against the exercise of "religion." Laws that grant special benefits for religion
are just as bad as laws enacted against religion.
The free exercise clause DOES NOT make the Church "immune" or "exempt"
from anything. It excludes un-franchised Churches from the "legal"
jurisdiction of man, but not from the "lawful" Common Law of God. A Church
that fully retains its First Amendment status is "lawfully" and automatically
"excluded" from any form of direct taxation or public laws governing business
franchises.
When citing the First Amendment, it should be considered in all its parts,
Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly are equally as important to the
Church as any other part. Any law that infringes upon the inalienable right of
pastors or believers saying or teaching whatever is proper and sound
according to God's word, including His commandments on the unlawfulness
of homosexuality, abortion, pornography, miscegenation, taxation and evil
doings of government, etc., must be considered null and void. The same
holds true for the printed word. It must be concluded, that for religious free
exercise to exist, free choice as to whom may or may not assemble in a
private setting must be upheld. A free un-incorporated Church cannot be held
to the standards of a corporation doing "business" as a church.
A Church congregation is a private assembly of individuals, coming together
as a family, to worship their Lord. Biblical worship is not a "public" activity.
Jesus Christ, not the State ordained the assembling together of believers.
Legislatures pass laws effecting juristic entities as a safeguard to the
"General" health, safety and welfare to the public as a whole. Congress has
no authority to grant "special" benefits or privileges to un-enfranchised
Churches or religious activities. The IRS only authorizes such "privileged"
exemptions to churches that are incorporated as organizations. When a

Church possesses such "benefits," it is because it has petitioned and

accepted the State's franchise. As a "legal" organization, the Church removed
itself from the protection of the First Amendment and is no longer free. As a
subject of Caesar, the Church is rendering unto Caesar that which is God's.
It is the Church, not the State, that has transgressed the barrier separating
Church and State. The greatest single thread that binds the Church to
government is the act of "incorporation."