9 vues

Transféré par Ayou Ham

lk

- Introducere in Matlab
- Reflection-Mirror Through an Arbitrary Plane
- Computer Aided Optical Design Kusch Oleg
- FE Structural Analysis on an Excel
- Mf 2010 Student Awards
- TOS GAS 12.docx
- Trusses
- B.Com. Part- I
- Word Cloud
- Improved Accessibility Modeling and Its Relation to Poverty
- nagarro question papers 96
- the_balancing_of_engines_1920.pdf
- maths_cheat_sheet.pdf
- Lie
- Matlab (1): The Basics
- Kom Graf 04 Transform as i
- Spinor Model of Generalized Three-dimensional Rotations
- Lecture Guide in Vector Analysis (2)
- eee186-mt112455
- Mercer Registration

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 15

2.1 Kinematics

The most common task of a robot is to move objects in 3-D space. Therefore, the

geometry of motion, i.e. kinematics is the first topic to be studied in robotics. Forces

will be added later, this will be treated in chapter 2.3 on robot dynamics (Newton-Euler

equations or Lagrange formalism to obtain the differential equations of motion).

Kinematics and dynamics are connected through the concept of the Jacobian matrix

(chapter 2.2). Kinematics and dynamics are needed for model-based optimal control

design of robots (chapter 2.4).

Joint Space Operational Space Work Space

A robot is controlled by set values for joint angles and (in case of linear motions) joint

positions. These values are sent by the control electronics to the joint actuators. These

variables are called joint variables or robot variables, they define the joint space.

The number of variables corresponds to the number of degrees of freedom (d.o.f.,

degrs de libert in French, Freiheitsgrade in German) n of the robot. In this text, we

use two equivalent notations for the joint variables commonly found in literature:

{ q1, q2, qi, . qn } or { 1 , 2 , ... i , ... n }

The task of the robot is not given in joint variables, but in an operational space,

independent of a particular robot. These operational variables or task variables

could be e.g. Cartesian coordinates defined with respect to the workspace, giving the

target point and the orientation of an object to be placed. Sometimes, the operational

variables are also referred to as world coordinates. Orientation and position of a rigid

body in 3-D space is determined by a total of 6 coordinate values.

A third space, essential in robotics, is the workspace. It is the subset of the operational

space, which is reachable by a given robot.

Although seemingly straightforward, it can be a complex time- or configurationdependent construction of sub-workspaces. Think e.g. of an endoscopic telemanipulator

for surgery composed of two tweezers coming out of an endoscope. The tweezers have

partially overlapping workspaces, the intersection defines the workspace for bimanual

operation. The positioning of the endoscope itself will move this workspace within the

operational space. The workspace is modified by the kind of end-effector and by the

requirements as to orientation of the end-effector. Reachable space is not the same than

reachable with arbitrary orientation.

Robot kinematics therefore essentially is concerned with establishing the mathematical

link between these spaces, joint space and operational space. The portion of operational

space reachable by the full joint space will be the workspace.

Two basic mathematical relationships can be defined:

1) Given the joint variables, what are the operational variables? This

mathematical function is called forward kinematics (modle

gomtrique direct in French). Forward kinematics is, in short, the position

and orientation of the robot hand (or end-effector) in function of the joint

variables.

2) Given a set of task variables, what joint variables are needed to reach them?

This function (mathematically the inverse function of the previous one) is

called inverse kinematics (modle gomtrique indirect).

Kinematics is the basis for all that follows, the dynamic model of the robot (the equations

of motion) giving accelerations, forces and torques, the specifications of the mechanical

design, control and actuator implementation. Of all these tasks, kinematics is often

mathematically the most demanding, which is also why it occupies relatively large space

in within chapter 2 of this text. The topic is so complex that entire books or lectures could

be devoted to kinematics only.

One of the difficulties in describing kinematics is the need to use different coordinate

frames, moving ones fixed to robot links or to the endeffector, and fixed ones connected

to operational space. Such multiple coordinate frames, some moving and some fixed, are

responsible for the complex notations and calculations when setting up the equations of

motion. An elegant modern way to deal with these complexities is the use of 6-D algebra

(Featherstone) for the setup of rigid body dynamics. In this lecture, time does not allow to

introduce this method, but it is recommended to search the abundant literature on the

topic before solving complex modelling problems of rigid body dynamics.

In the classical methodology used here to introduce the basic mathematical modelling,

coordinate transforms will be necessary to move from one reference frame to the other. In

this context, there are two basic situations, always to be clearly distinguished:

1) Either the coordinate frame is changed, but the situation (the object, the physical

position vector) is unchanged. This is called passive transformation

2) Or, on the opposite, an object is moved with respect to a fixed coordinate frame.

This is called active transformation.

For the rest of chapter 2.1, we will essentially deal with active transformations, i.e. unless

otherwise stated, we will express vectors in a single fixed coordinate frame. This will

help to simplify significantly mathematical treatment, as we can do without all kinds of

indices and superscripts. We will also (in chapter 2.1) leave out the time dimension, i.e.

velocities and accelerations will only be introduced from chapter 2.2. (Dynamics) on.

There are only two types of motions of a solid: Translation and rotation. Translation of a

solid is the motion characterised by every point of the solid having a single identical

velocity vector t.

y

v1

P (before)

t

C

v2

P

(after)

C

the change of position of any point C of the

object being moved.

x

Let the coordinates of a material point P be given by a coordinate vector v1 . After

moving the object by a translation t , the point P will have the new coordinates v2 in the

fixed reference frame:

v2 = v1 + t

(1a)

This equation thus describes an active transformation, i.e. the object is moving in a

fixed frame. For any point P of the object, the same equation (1) is valid.

Passive transformation is just the opposite: The position of the object is fixed, but it is

described in a new coordinate frame displaced from the original one. In case of a

translation of the coordinate frame, the direction of the axes stays the same, but the origin

is shifted by a translation vector t:

P!

(after)!

v2!

y!

O2!

v1!

t!

O!

(before)!1

x!

stays fix, the coordinate frame is moved by vector t

It can be seen that in this case, the equation of transformation becomes the inverse

operation as compared to equation 1a), i.e. subtraction in place of addition.

v2 = v1 t

(1b)

Rotation is more complex: A rotation axis can be defined, each of its points

characterized by zero velocity. This rotation axis can run through the solid or it can be

completely disconnected from it.

Finally, the most general motion of a solid is a combination of the two, with a velocity

component in direction of the rotation axis. This is called a screw motion, obviously a

motion in 3-dimensional space, discussed in the next subchapter.

In this sub-chapter, we first analyse only plane motions. In this case, the rotation axis

perpendicular to the plane and no screw motion is possible. The intersection of the plane

and the rotation axis is called the (instantaneous) center of rotation. Mathematically a

translation within the plane is a limit case of a rotation with center of rotation at infinity.

Let us first limit ourselves to rotations about the origin 0 of a Cartesian coordinate

system. Again, let the coordinates of a material point P be given by a coordinate vector v1

After moving the object by a rotation of angle about the origin, the point P will have

the new coordinates v2 in the fixed reference frame. This time, the equations are a found

by a trick, transforming the Cartesian coordinates into polar coordinates:

P

y

(after)

v2

x

r cos #

v1 = ! 1 # = !

" y1 $ " r sin $

x

r cos( + ) #

v2 = ! 2 # = !

y

" 2 $ " r sin( + ) $

v1

(2)

P

(before)

coordinates, the following trigonometric identities are used:

cos(a+b) = cos(a)cos(b) sin(a)sin(b)

sin(a+b) = sin(a)cos(b) + cos(a)sin(b)

Inserting this in (2) gives

(3)

v2 = # & = #

=

=

" y2 % " r sin( + ) &% #" r cos sin + r sin cos &% #" sin cos &% #" r sin &% (4)

with the rotation matrix R :

" cos

!

!

v2 = Rv1 where R = $

# sin

sin %

'

cos &

(5)

Exercise 1)

1a)

R(= 0) = ?

1b)

R() = ?

1c)

R()1 = ?

(6)

1d)

(7)

The rotation matrix can be interpreted as the expression of the unit vectors of the rotated

system (x2, y2) in components of the fixed system (x1, y1), in an active transformation

situation:

y1

y2

x2

x1

!

!" x 2 , y #$ = & cos

2

" sin

!

sin # & x 2 x1

'=

cos $ & x 2 y1

"

y 2 x1 #

'

y 2 y1 '

$

(8)

given in (6), which is the cosine of the angles between the vectors. This matrix is

therefore also called the matrix of direction cosines.

Thus the orthogonality of the coordinate frame gives its qualifier orthogonal to the

rotation matrix. Reminder: The column vectors of such a matrix are orthogonal among

each other and of unity norm. It follows from this that RT=R1 .

Exercice 1d) demonstrates that the sequence of two rotations (called composition) can be

calculated by matrix multiplication. This corresponds to a rotation about the sum of the

angles (1+ 2), as can be seen from applying the trigonometric identity (3) to the result

of the matrix product R(2)R(1).

2.1.3 Combination of translations and rotations: Homogenous matrices

to compose translations and rotations, especially to achieve rotation about an arbitrary

center. This becomes complicated when a sequence of vector additions (for translations)

and matrix multiplications (for rotations) has to be elaborated. In order to facilitate this, a

method known from projective geometry is used, allowing to integrate translation AND

rotation in a single matrix multiplication. This is called the homogenous representation,

with homogenous matrices and homogenous vectors, defined as follows:

A scale factor of value 1 is added at the end of each vector column. 2-d vectors thus

will have three elements, 3-d vectors four elements. This scale factor is not a geometric

dimension, it is only an algebraic element.

In 2-d we will have 3x3 transformation matrices combining rotation and translation, in 3d transformation matrices will be 4x4. The last column of such a rotation matrix contains

the translation vector, with a scale factor 1. The remaining two or three elements below

the rotation matrix are filled with zeros. We thus have:

"

"R t % $cos

$# 0 1 '& = $ sin

# 0

sin

cos

0

tx % "c s tx %

ty ' = $ s c ty '

' $

'

1 & #0 0 1 &

(9)

with the 2x2 rotation matrix R as before and the translation vector t augmented by the

scale factor 1. The remaining two elements on the bottom left are filled with zeros.

You will immediately understand how this works by trying a pure translation of a

vector v = [vx , vy , 1]T . Remember, this is a 2-d vector with an additional scale factor 1.

This scale factor is NOT a spatial dimension (such as, later on, the z-coordinate). So, try a

pure translation (=0) by multiplying matrix (8) with vector v.

Example: Composition of translations and rotations:

Let v1 be a vector who is

1) rotated by angle 1

2) translated by t1

and then again

3) rotated bym angle 2

4) translated by t2

with the final result

giving v2 = R(1) v1 + t1

(9a)

the final result in a single matrix, containing all four motions.

Important: Note that the 2x2 rotational matrix (top left block) can be simplified by

applying the trigonometric identities (3). The composed rotation R(2) R(1) is thus

equivalent to R(1+2) while the composed translation is R(2) t1 + t2

Exercise 3a) Give the homogenous matrices for pure translation, pure rotation, identity.

3b) First translation, then rotation.

3c) Inverse motion of 3b), i.e. first rotation by then translation by t .

These preliminaries allow us now to introduce easily rotation about an arbitrary center

point P described by vector p. All we have to do is to compose a translation of P to the

origin, rotation, and then translation back to P . This gives the following composed

matrix:

"1 0

$

$0 1

$#0 0

0%"1 0 p x %

'$

'

0'$0 1 p y ' =

1&'#$0 0 1 '&

" I p%"R 0%" I p% "R p Rp%

$

'$

'$

'=$

'

1 &

#0 1 &# 0 1� 1 & # 0

p x %"cos

'$

p y '$ sin

1 &'#$ 0

sin

cos

0

9c)

From this it can be seen, that a rotation about P can also be achieved by a rotation about

the origin and a subsequent translation by . Conversely, any combination of rotation and

translation can be expressed by a rotation about a certain point P.

Exercise

2.1.5

4a) Is the above statement entirely correct? (4b) to 4f), see exercises)

we did for plane kinematics. Any change of orientation in 3D defines an axis of

rotation. This axis was given in case of plane kinematics: It was always perpendicular to

the plane in question. Now, the axis can have any direction in space. This fact alone

opens up entirely new concepts and techniques in kinematics, especially also as to

intuition and mental representation of the geometry of motion.

How many parameters define a rotation in 3-D?

How many parameters are necessary to characterize a change of orientation (a rotation) in

3-D?

Of course, as before, we will first have an angle of rotation.

But now the direction of the rotation axis needs also to be specified. A direction of an

axis in 3-D space is fixed by only two parameters. These could be, as an example,

latitude and longitude of a point on the surface of a sphere. The axis is then defined as

going from the centre of the sphere through the point of given latitude and longitude.

Together, this gives three parameters, two for the axis direction and one for the angle of

rotation around this axis.

Alternatively, we could consider the axis given by a vector v = [xa, ya, za]T i.e. three

parameters, defining the rotation axis and the angle of rotation around this axis. This

gives a total of four parameters. So there is an excess of one parameter: The excess

parameter is the length of the vector, which does not have any meaning for the definition

of our rotation. This length could be normalized ( ||v|| = xa2 + ya2 + za2 = 1 ), such an

additional constraint on the four parameters removes one freedom, so we are again at the

minimal number of three for the definition of a change in orientation.

Different ways to express a change of orientation in 3-D

We have just introduced a first kind of specifying change of orientation. Lets call it

Axis-Angle.

In practice many other ways to specify this information are used, so let us introduce them

here. In the context of flight dynamics, the three angles roll, pitch and yaw are used to

define orientation. They are sometimes also called Tait-Bryan angles or Bryan

Angles (George H Bryan, 1864-1928). These angles can also be used in robotics. In

French, the names of these same angles are have familiar names in the navigation

context: roulis, tangage, lacet, in German they are called Roll, Nick & Gier

Winkel. The particularity of this set of angles (again, three parameters to define an

orientation) is, that they are defined with respect to a direction of a vehicle motion, or, in

case of a robot, with respect to the approach direction.

Furthermore, they can either be defined with respect to a fixed direction independent of

the instantaneous vehicle orientation (e.g. in navigation), or with respect to body-fixed

axes (as in flight dynamics or robotics), this should be specified from the context. Be

careful not to confuse the two situations!

This leads us to a further generalization, which is linked to the work of Leonard Euler.

While Newton formulated the laws of motion for point masses, it is Leonard Euler who

clarified the dynamics of rigid bodies by generalizing the equations of motion for rigid

body dynamics. He thus had to describe the orientation of a rigid body in space. He

studied specifically the gyroscope and it is in this context that the three Euler Angles

were first introduced. They are: Precession, nutation and self-rotation. Euler being one

of the most prolific mathematician of all times, there is a large collection of Eulersomething. Orientation in space can also be represented by the Euler parameters,

which are NOT the Euler angles! We will define the Euler parameters in a short moment,

they are equivalent to the quaternions discussed a bit later. Let us first connect all this

to the 2-D rotations and give some examples.

Let us start with a straightforward generalization from 2-D (plane) kinematics to 3-D

kinematics. We have introduced previously rotation as a matrix used in the

transformation

where v(before) and v(after) are the vectors indicating a point on an object before resp. after

rotation (active transformation, fixed coordinate frame). The 2x2 orthogonal matrix

R() contains the rotation by angle as seen in section 2.1.2. How do we now apply this

formalism when we have to specify a rotation axis?

We know the answer for rotations about the (vertical) z-axis for rotations in the x-yplane: Such a rotation matrix, now 3x3, has to leave the z-coordinate values unchanged.

The (x-y) coordinates are transformed as before. Thus we obtain:

#cos

R z = % sin

%$ 0

sin

cos

0

0&

0(

1('

Exercise 5: Give the rotation matrices Rz(), Rx() and Ry() for rotations about the z-,

x- and y- axis. Hint: Use the transform of the unit vectors ex , ey , ez as in equation (8)

with the direction cosines. It is more than useful to draw a figure for each case! Use the

direction cosine matrix as in equation (8) above.

Rx() = ?

Ry() = ?

Now for the core problem in this context. Try the following:

Exercise 6: Rotate an object a) 90 around the z-axis, then 90 around the y-axis

b) 90 around the y-axis, then 90 around the z-axis

This is done mathematically by composition of the rotations, i.e. by matrix

multiplications. What do you observe?

Exercise 7: Solve the previous question graphically, by rotating the object (a sheet with a

1 printed, to define orientation):

z!

z!

x!

y!

x!

z!

y!

x!

z!

y!

x!

y!

Can you identify the rotation axis and angle equivalent to the two rotations about the zand y-axis?

How can we find this axis in the matrix products resulting from 6a) and 6b)?

A point on the rotation axis will not be affected by the rotation. We therefore have the

identity Rv = v for any point v on the rotation axis. The rotation axis is therefore the

eigenvector of the rotation matrix corresponding to the eigenvalue 1. The angle can then

be found by projecting a transformed vector on the plane normal to the axis.

Example: Matlab command [V,d]=eig(A) gives eigenvectors in matrix V and eigenvalues

in d:

0

0 1

0.05 - 0.57i

0.05 + 0.57i

0.57

0.5 + .86i

A = 1

0 0

V = 0.47 + 0.32i

0.47 - 0.32i

0.57

d= 0

1 0

0.52 + 0.24i

0.52 - 0.24i

0.57

0.5 0.86i

0

0

1.0

Transformation from direction cosine matrix to angle-axis representation:

The angle of rotation matrix R is then given by the following expressions:

! a d

#

R =# b e

# c f

"

g $

&

h &

i &

%

1

cos( ) = (tr(R) 1)

2

1

sin( ) =

( f h)2 + (g c)2 + (b d)2

2

where the trace operator tr(R) is defined as the sum of the diagonal elements of R.

" f h %

'

1 $

The rotation axis is given by

$ gc '

2sin( ) $

'

# bd &

(10)

Note that this formula breaks down for rotation angle zero! Worse, this means that

numerical condition will deteriorate as the angle approaches zero, which is physically a

completely normal situation. This behavior is undesirable for the control of robots. It will

be a strong incentive to find other representations for change of orientation than

angle/axis.

Exercise 8a): Find the direction cosine matrix (the rotation matrix) for a rotation about an

angle around the axis [0, sin(), cos()]T

Hint: Use composition of rotations around known coordinate axes.

Of course, this could be done more easily by an inverse of formula (10), i.e. by finding a

formula rotating directly a vector when rotation axis and angle are given.

Let us assume that the rotation axis k is given as a vector of length one: k=[x,y,z]T and let

the rotation angle be . Any vector v may then be transformed by decomposing it into a

component parallel to the rotation axis and a component perpendicular to it. While the

parallel component remains unchanged, the rotated perpendicular component can be

found by a combination of vector cross-product and trigonometric functions. The final

result is

! !

! !!

!

!

vrot = v cos + (k v)sin + k (kv)(1 cos )

This formula was first published by Benjamin Olinde Rodrigues, a French

mathematician who lived from 1795 to 1851. By applying this formula to the base

vectors of a coordinate system, one obtains the matrix form of the Rodriguez equation,

which gives the rotation matrix (direction cosines) from an angle-axis

representation.

Given axis k = [x,y,z]T with || k || = x2+ y2 + z2 = 1 & angle of rotation about k:

" xx

$

R = (1 cos )$ xy

$ xz

#

" 0 z y %

" 1 0 0 %

xy xz %

'

$

'

$

'

yy yz ' + cos $ 0 1 0 ' + sin $ z 0 x '

$ y x 0 '

$ 0 0 1 '

yz zz '&

#

&

#

&

(11)

with x2+ y2 + z2 = 1.

With rotation matrices we use 9 parameters for the change of orientation which are

interconnected for the three degrees of freedom of orientation. With the angle-axis

representation as introduced above, we run into problems for small rotation angles. This

why mathematicians in early 19th century where searching for a way to represent

orientation in 3-D space by an analogy of complex numbers, after Jean-Robert Argand

(1768-1822) from Geneva had popularized the complex plane allowing a very elegant

representation of plane rotation.

After many unsuccessful attempts to generalize the complex numbers with one real and

two imaginary components, William Rowan Hamilton famously succeeded in 1843 based

on work by Gauss and Euler, by introducing quaternions. It is worth noting that this work

was motivated by the representation of orientation in 3-D space.

Quaternions, Euler Parameters, Olinde-Rodriguez Parameters

While Euler Parameters (also called Rodriguez Parameters) are strictly concerned with

kinematics, quaternions have acquired a far greater significance as generalized complex

numbers. The trick in Hamiltons breakthrough is two-fold.

not possible, that he must jump directly to four dimensions, i.e. a real part and

three imaginary parts.

2) Furthermore, he also recognized, that he must abandon the law of commutatitvity

of multiplication. (remember, this was many years before introduction of matrices

and vectors).

Based on this, the new hypercomplex numbers, called quaternions could be

introduced, according on the following algebraic rules :

There is a real part and three imaginary parts, with units i, j, k.

We have

i2 = j2 = k2 = ijk = 1

(11a)

ij = k= ji

jk = i = kj

ki = j = ik

(11b)

z = {a,b} = a + bi

we now have for the quaternion Q a quadruplet of real numbers (scalars) 0 , 1, 2, 3

Q = { 0 , 1, 2, 3} = 0 + i 1 + j 2 + k 3

(11c)

With this, we have all necessary algebraic definitions. In modern notation, the three

imaginary parts are often grouped as a 3x1 vector = [1, 2, 3]:

Q = { 0 , 1, 2, 3} ={ 0 , }

How is spatial orientation coded in quaternions?

This is where the four Euler Parameters introduced in the 18th century by Euler are used:

0 = cos(/2)

(11d)

The direction of the rotation axis is given by the vector part = [1, 2, 3]

As we use four parameters for three degrees of freedom, we may introduce a constraint. It

is essential. The constraint is that the modulus (the absolute value) of the quaternion is

equal to one (unitary quaternion):

02 + 12+ 22+ 2 = 1

(11e)

|| || = sin(/2)

leading to

|| Q || = 1

(11f)

These rules lead to the following composition of quaternions (and therefore of rotations):

QMQL = { 0 , } { 0 , } = { 00 T ,

0 + 0 + }

(11g)

With this, we can now solve problems such as exercises 6, 7 or 8a) much more easily.

Exercise 8b) Find the rotation axes of 6 & 7 with the help of quaternions.

Finally, it is useful to have equations translating from direction cosines to quaternions

and vice-versa.

Direction cosines given in terms of the quaternion (from Sciavicco & Siciliano,

Modelling and Control of Robot Manipulators, Springer, 2000):

# 2(20 + 21) 1 2(1 2 0 3) 2(1 3 + 02)&

%

(

R = %2(12 + 03) 2(20 + 22) 1 2(2 3 01)(

%$2(13 0 2) 2( 2 3 + 01) 2(20 + 23) 1 ('

(11h)

! r r

# 11 12

R = # r21 r22

#

#" r31 r32

r13 $

&

r23 &

&

r33 &%

"

$

1$

= $

2

$

$#

1

0 =

2

%

sgn(r32 r23 ) r11 r22 r33 +1 '

'

sgn(r13 r31 ) r22 r11 r33 +1 '

sgn(r21 r12 ) r33 r22 r11 +1 ''

&

r11 + r22 + r33 +1

(11i)

With the signs of the vector component as defined above, one has to take the positive

angle when computing it from (11d) = arccos(0)

While quaternions are most useful to describe change of orientation, we still need to work

with rotation matrices (direction cosines) especially when combining of rotations and

translations. In this case, the use of homogenous matrices is particularly helpful. There is

nothing new to introduce at this stage, the expansion of the vectors and matrices can be

done exactly as in the 2-D case: Add a scale factor of 1 to the vectors, now having for

algebraic elements: The three spatial coordinates (x, y, z ) and the scale factor 1. The

homogenous matrix contains as before as a fourth column (to the right of the direction

cosines) the translation vector t and the last row of the homogenous matrices contains

three zeros and the scale factor 1 of vector t :

!"!

0!"#

(12)

A rotation around an axis not through the origin is is given, again as before, by translating

the object from any point P on the axis to the origin (translation by p), then rotating

around the axis now through the origin and finally translating back:

$

'$

'$

'=$

'

1 &

#0 1 &# 0 1� 1 & # 0

(13)

The most general motion in 3-D is not, as before, rotation around a give center. There can

also be a translational motion in the direction of the rotation axis. Therefore the general

motion in 3-D is a screw (sometimes called a twist).

We are now in a position to introduce the forward kinematics of a robot, as defined in the

introduction to this chapter. It is the position and orientation in operational space where a

certain configuration of the joint variables { 1 , 2 , ... i , ... n } of the robot will bring a

given object. Expressed as an equation, the forward kinematics is the following

functional relationship:

(x, y, z, (orientation))T = f (1 , 2 , ... i , ... n )

As an example, we first derive the forward kinematics for the SCARA robot, which is

essentially 2-D, and then for a 6 degrees-of freedom 3-D robot. SCARA stands for

Selective Compliance Robot Arm, the most common assembly robot with 4 degr. of

freedom, xyz and orientation around the vertical axis. The compliance in the horizontal

plane can be increased (through the control) while it remains low in z-direction, very

useful for insertion and assembly tasks with self-alignement of the inserted piece.

- Introducere in MatlabTransféré parFlorin-Lucian Ciubotariu
- Reflection-Mirror Through an Arbitrary PlaneTransféré parIgor Gjorgjiev
- Computer Aided Optical Design Kusch OlegTransféré parTugba
- FE Structural Analysis on an ExcelTransféré parEAZA83
- Mf 2010 Student AwardsTransféré parPreetham Madapura
- TOS GAS 12.docxTransféré parRoldan Ormilla
- TrussesTransféré parSamul Tyagi
- B.Com. Part- ITransféré parhimanshubnl
- Word CloudTransféré parTeppi Nguyen
- Improved Accessibility Modeling and Its Relation to PovertyTransféré parSimona Cuciureanu
- nagarro question papers 96Transféré parakhiles!
- the_balancing_of_engines_1920.pdfTransféré parMario Eduardo Santos Martins
- maths_cheat_sheet.pdfTransféré parDaniel Smith
- LieTransféré par123chess
- Matlab (1): The BasicsTransféré parAmer Dradka
- Kom Graf 04 Transform as iTransféré parAnnysa Firdaus
- Spinor Model of Generalized Three-dimensional RotationsTransféré parhmalikn7581
- Lecture Guide in Vector Analysis (2)Transféré parkenneth
- eee186-mt112455Transféré parSems Krks
- Mercer RegistrationTransféré parSweta Tripathi
- Word CloudTransféré par0x1aa
- Chapter 02, 103 PhysTransféré parfadhali
- AE264_Spring2014_HW1Transféré parSerdar Bilge
- Basicsandstaticsofparticles Uniti Ge6253 170102092116Transféré parAmexTesfayeKora
- Assignment 4Transféré parUday Karri
- MATLAB1Transféré parShekhar Vishwanadha
- DIP Experiment 1Transféré parRohit Goswami
- How-Transformations-WorkTransféré parDr. Birajashis Pattnaik
- Assignment 1Transféré parAnonymous k2scQvN2
- L10Transféré parAngad Sehdev

- Slides_Kinematics_H_Bleuler_Part2 - Copie.pdfTransféré parAyou Ham
- Language of Presentation v7Transféré parFlorin V. Iagaru
- matscienceTransféré parraagaa777
- MATLAB Primer Third EditionTransféré parmohamed ahmed
- Roulement Choisi B608ZZTransféré parfreeze1304
- APP2 Plans ComplementairesTransféré parAyou Ham

- Etika Penelitian Dr.meitaTransféré parFathin Rahmani Salman
- Naratologie - Curs 3Transféré parlogc
- Educating African-Centered Psychologists: Towards a Comprehensive Paradigm • by Erylene Piper-Mandy, Ph.D.Transféré par☥ The Drop Squad Public Library ☥
- fluid momentumTransféré parSasa Mohamed
- What is Operational Excellence in Sales and MarketingTransféré parScarlet Cunningham
- Human UniversalsTransféré parAbraham Absalon
- LINE AND PLAN IN 3DTransféré parMing Fong Liaw
- That's Nice for You, But It's Not for MeTransféré parpilesar
- leadershipphilosophypaperTransféré parapi-376040443
- Third Eye MeditationTransféré parkpe.online
- CI 17182 SKEM4173 Artificial IntelligenceTransféré parfauzansaadon
- Towards a Better Design- Physical Interior Environments of Public Libraries in Peninsular MalaysiaTransféré parIzzat Amir Hamid
- Relationships Between Adverse ChildhoodTransféré parOssiris1
- V1+Ch6FyANVC06+Test+Ch+6+Work,+Energy+and+the+PowerTransféré parEpic Win
- Assignment2ed.pdfTransféré parIza Hamdan
- Theory & Practice GogueTransféré parJoannaLin
- 0806906944 Mind Stretch iTransféré parmanikanta
- Applied Combinatorics 5th Edition by Tucker Instructor's ManualTransféré parZahaib Akhtar
- 389528_374144_2_MT_PSmarkup-374144-389528-1-TM-TM-MF-Chapter-3---Methodology--Revised-.docxTransféré parpriyadarshini212007
- Gospel Reflection Matthew 14:1-12Transféré parRyan Alisaca
- Layout 1Transféré paradam sim
- Poverty ResearchTransféré parKeval King
- Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. 1998. High performance work.pdfTransféré parÁtila de Assis
- VedantaDarshanam_Feb10Transféré parRAMESHBABU
- Rewards and Virtues of Surah Yasin, Waqiah and MulkTransféré parAhmad Sanusi Husain
- Organisational Analysis Notes and EssaysTransféré parRichwell Musoma
- Interview With Nikola Tesla From 1899Transféré parjanmodaal2010
- SUPER POWER YAJNA IS OUR FATHER AND SUPER ENERGY GAYATRI IS OUR DIVINE MOTHERTransféré parYuga Rishi Shriram Sharma Acharya
- Session-5 Reasons for Selecting a Particular Consulting FirmTransféré parPeeyush Modi
- PALGI_A_Cross-Cultural_Perspecive_2155675.pdfTransféré parGuillermo Bisbal