Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
TECHNOLOGY
JAIPUR
(RAJASTHAN)
SUMMER INTERNSHIP
(20TH MAY 2016 - 4TH JULY
2016)
At
CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
REPORT
GANGA HOSTEL-MNIT (JAIPUR)
SUBMITTED BY-
VIPIN ARYA
2013UCE1549
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is indeed a great pleasure and privilege to present this rep
ort on training at CPWD.
I am extremely grateful to my training and placement officer f
or issuing a Training letter, which
made my training possible at CPWD,Jaipur.
I would like to express my gratitude to Er P R CHARAN
BABU for his invaluable suggestions, motivation,
guidance and support through out the training. His
methodology to start from simple ant then deepen
through made me to bring out this project report without
anxiety.
Thanks to all other CPWD officials, operators and all other
members of CPWD, yet uncounted for their help in
completing the project and see the light of success.
I am very thankful to friends, colleagues and all other
persons who rendered their assistance directly or
indirectly to complete this project work successfully.
INDEX
S.NO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
DESCRIPTION
Plan
Project Overview
Excavation
Levelling and Marking
P.C.C Laying
Tests
Materials
PROJECT OVERVIEW
NAME of WORK: Construction of 884 bedded Girls Hostel for
MNIT, JLN Marg,
Jaipur. (SH: Civil work i/c Water Supply &
sanitary
Installations,
Development work, Electrical work i/c internal
E/I, Lifts, Fire
Fighting & Fire Alarms. CCTV Camera System,
Solar Water
Heating & D.G. Set)
Cost of Project
57,56,85,638/-
Date of commencement
13/02/2016
Name of Contractor
Rs
Address
110048
Excavation
Sh.
: Sh.
Total Station and Auto level are used for levelling and
markings of points.
Bench Mark is taken same as of Gargi Hostel. And all
the reduced level is taken with respect to this datum. Reduced
Level in surveying refers to equating elevations of survey
points with reference to a common assumed datum. It is
a vertical distance between survey point and adopted
datum plane. Thus it is considered as the base elevation
which is used as reference to reckon heights or depths of
other important places.
Total station
2.
3.
Horizontal distance.
4.
5.
6.
4.
5.
Auto Level
Marking
Marble powder is used for marking. All the lines are
marked so that P.C.C can be easily laid.
P.C.C Laying
Tests
Sieve Analysis
Sieve analysis helps to determine the particle size
distribution of the coarse and fine aggregates. This is
done by sieving the aggregates as per IS: 2386 (Part I)
1963. In this we use different sieves as standardized by
Sieve
size
(mm)
Weight
(gm)
Retaine
d
( in %)
Passing
( in %)
Limit
(in %)
Cumulati
ve
weight(g
m)
0
40
100
100
20
301
301
10.03
89.97
85-100
10
2106
2407
80.23
19.76
0-20
4.75
582
2989
99.63
0.36
0-5
Pan
2995
99.83
0.17
-----
Weight
(gm)
Passing
( in %)
Limit
(in %)
Cumulati Retaine
ve
d
weight(g
( in %)
m)
0
0
12.5
100
100
10
106
106
2.12
97.88
85-100
4.75
4574
4680
93.60
6.40
0-20
2.36
197
4877
97.54
2.46
0-5
Pan
107
4984
99.68
0.32
Weight
(gm)
Retained Passing
( in %)
( in %)
Zone II
Limit
(in %)
Cumulati
ve
weight(g
m)
0
10 mm
100
100
4.75
mm
2.36
mm
1.18
mm
49
49
4.90
95.10
90-100
62
111
11.10
88.90
75-100
140
251
25.10
74.90
55-90
600 m
315
566
56.60
43.40
35-59
300 m
311
877
87.70
12.30
8-30
150 m
95
972
97.20
2.80
0-10
Pan
20
992
99.20
0.80
All the values are in the limit so the course and fine
aggregates and sand are good for use.
CURING
The test specimens are stored in moist air for 24hours
and after this period the specimens are marked and
removed from the moulds and kept submerged in clear
fresh water until taken out prior to test.
PRECAUTIONS
The water for curing should be tested every 7days and
the temperature of water must be at 27+-20C.
Calculations
Grade of concrete is M25
Size of the cube =15cm x15cm x15cm
Area of the specimen (calculated from the mean size of
the specimen)=225cm2
Date of casting= 24/04/2016
Date of Testing=01/05/2016 (7 days)
Cube
I
II
III
Load(KN)
695
551
571
Strength(N/m Average(N/m
m2)
m2)
30.88
24.48
26.91
25.37
Cube
I
Load(KN)
1100
II
III
1055
1090
Strength(N/m Average(N/m
m2)
m2)
48.88
46.88
48.06
48.44
Impact Test
APPARATUS:
The apparatus as per IS: 2386 (Part IV) 1963 consists of:
(i) A testing machine weighing 45 to 60 kg and having a
metal base with a painted lower surface of not less than
OBSERVATIONS
Sample 1
Total weight of
dry sample
( W1 gm)
Weight of portion
passing 2.36 mm
sieve (W2 gm)
Aggregate Impact
Value (percent) =
W2 / W1 X 100
Sample 2
338 gm
336 gm
62 gm
58 gm
18.34 %
17.26%
Mean=17.80%
RESULT:
RECOMMENDED VALUES
Classification of aggregates using Aggregate Impact
Value is as given below:
Aggregate Impact Value
<20%
10 20%
20-30%
>35%
Classification
Exceptionally Strong
Strong
Satisfactory
Weak
Materials
1. Reinforcement
Bar:
3.
Aggregates:
4.
Water:
5.
Admixtures:
6.
Curing Compound:
7.
Shuttering Oil:
Footing
Combined footing
Raft foundation
Isolated footing
Shuttering of footing
Concreting of footing
Column
Plinth Beam