Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Priori
ty
25%
Technolo
gy
adoption
(Priority
= 20%)
Frequency of
emails accessed
Usage of access
reports
Average time
spent on seller
forum
Activity on seller
platform
15%
5%
5%
5%
5%
10%
Change orientation
Change responsiveness
10%
7.5%
7.5%
5%
Plan of Action
1. Understanding the scope of the project
Offer depth to be increased by 5 for a list of 250 books which means adding 1250 offers
from the smaller sellers. Assuming a hit ratio of 40% i.e. of all the recommendations made
only 40% offers are listed, we need to reach out by 3125 offers within one month.
Offer depth net increase = a = 5
Number of books = b = 250
Net offers to be listed = a*b = 1250
Hit ratio z=40%
Thus, total number of offers to be recommended = a*b/z = 1250/0.4 = 3125 offers
2. Gathering, analyzing and clustering sellers data
The selection of sellers would be on the basis of the criteria mentioned above. The sellers
would then be classified into five clusters based on the below mentioned parameters.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
No of AM
man hours
required
4
4
4
4
24
10
Finding the right seller is not the only problem. We need to also choose the right book for the
seller. Hence, the following inputs will be given to the seller and books would be suggested
based on these criteria:
Parameter
Popularity of the book
Seasonality factor
Out of stock factor
Number of existing
offers
Number of small sellers
offering the book
Number of key sellers
offering the book
Seller Overall
Performance factors
Geographic location of
demand
Publication house factor
Time taken by seller
Formats provided
Payment options
Bundling of books
Price range
Description
Popular books(based on past weeks sales) will get preference
Priority should be given to books which have immediate
demand
Sellers would be advised to list under books which have
maximum out of stock offerings and modest demand
Books with less number of offers (<=x-2) to get preference
Greater the number of small sellers offering the same book,
more likely it is to be recommended
Greater the number of key sellers, lesser the number of
recommendations provided to small sellers
Preference to books belonging to the category which the seller
has a comparative advantage
Sellers from the same geography using MFN will be preferred
while catering to the demand
Preference to books with the publication house from which the
seller is procuring maximum books
Lesser the delivery time greater the recommendations given
to seller
Preference to sellers who provide the desired format like hard
cover and paper back
Recommendations based on sellers preference to give cash
on delivery or not
Seller will be recommended books which are bought together
Seller will be recommended to list under books which fall
within his price range
Metrics to evaluate the success of the plan - These metrics would be evaluated for the
offers/products in the context of the recommendations provided by Amazon
Seller Evaluation
Customer Activity Evaluation
Total number of offers listed by sellers
Total number of purchases made from new offers liste
Total number of sellers who listed a product
Total number of clicks by customers on the books new
Total number of sellers who listed under a new category
Total number of clicks by customers on the new offer
Average increase in the number of offers listed for every cluster of the target sellers
Number of products which were listed following the recommendation and then deleted
Average increase in the number of hours spent by the seller on the forum and platform
Impact Evaluation
Impact on revenue from newly added books by sellers
Overall impact on revenue of the target sellers after implem
Overall deterioration/enhancement in the performance of th
Process Evaluation
Q2).a Devise a framework to evaluate the benefits and shortcomings of these
Average time taken by the seller to list the product after receiving the recommendat
mechanism.
Number of calls made to the call centre by the target sellers
Measuring
the framework
accuracy ofare
theas
demand
The parameters involved
in the
follows:forecasts made by Amazon using the actual
Parameter
Ease of Use
Cost Effectiveness
Scalability
Manpower
requirement
Degree of
Collaboration
Frequency of Usage
Significance
Simplicity of the mechanism in view of the technological
orientation of sellers; the simpler the better
Cost of deployment & operation ; the lesser the better
Ability to proportionally expand with the fast expansion of mass
seller base;
Self-explanatory; the lesser the better
Mechanism fostering collaboration; the more the better
Self-explanatory; the more the better
Following is the framework deployed to measure the overall efficacy of the mechanisms
deployed by Amazon:
Mechanism/
Metric
Ease
of
use
Newsletter
Emails
Seller forums
Webinars
- Perfect -
Cost
Scalability
Effectivene
ss
Moderate
- not fit/ up
Manpower
requiremen
t
to the mark
Degree of
Collaborati
on
Frequen
cy of
Usage
Q2)b. If Priyanka has to modify these, what will you modify and why ?
The following can be the tweaks that can be implemented in the given mechanisms:
Mechanis
Modifications
Reason
ms
Newsletter
Emails
Seller
forums
Webinars
Q2) c. Apart from the available mechanisms suggest one more mechanism which
will provide the best results for Indian sellers and will be more engaging. What will
be resource requirement? Why do you suggest this mechanism?
There can be basically two kinds of sellers in the Indian Context 1. Tech Savvy 2.Technology
averse. We have devised one mechanism each for both of them to maximise the benefit of
Amazon and the sellers. The description is as follows:
IVRS & Catalogue
This mechanism is aimed towards the second (Technology averse) category of sellers.
Following is the description of the mechanism:
IVRS & SMS service
There are several aspects on which improvement can be done to enhance the performance of
a seller. The point in focus in the case is the adoption rate. The mechanism enables Amazon
to cater to such sellers in an easy way to remove the technological barrier so as to avail the
reports and services provided by Amazon. During the on-boarding process the sellers would
be given a manual to use an IVRS & SMS service accessible through mobile phones. The IVRS
would contain information about the following parameters (most of which are already
available in the report formats):
Item
Top 10 prices offered
for best selling SKUs
Product opportunity
report
Popular OOS report
FBA days of Inventory
Percentage of best
selling SKUs in the total
offer list of a seller
Process
Write the name of the particular SKU and send an SMS to get
this information or just call on the IVRS no and go through the
required path mentioned in the manual to get one/ multiple
SMS having the required the information
Dial the required extension to get this report in one/ multiple
SMS. Alternatively, write the required code for the information
in an SMS and send it to the correct SMS service no of Amazon
Process same as that mentioned in the immediate earlier point
Either dial the required extension from the manual or send an
SMS typing the required code and name of the SKU to get the
information
Process same as that mentioned in the immediate earlier point
Catalogue
Current Trends
Mechanism
IVRS & SMS
service
Catalogue
Dashboard &
Analytics
Software
APPENDIX
Amazon Virtuous Circle & IVRS-SMS service
1. Extension of an existing
mechanism
2. Easy to implement
3. High adoption probability
4. Easier to access for
technologically challenged sellers
5. Sellers can be convinced of the
importance of the reports in a
firsthand experience which can
later lead to better adoption of
existing reporting facilities in the
website later on
Us
e
of
e
Ea
s
Amazon Virtuous Circle & Dashboard Analytics
In
r
to
n
ve
st
co
se
a
re
ec
Scenario Analysis
Related to the selection of sellers using the above stated factors, we have taken an extreme
scenario to test the validity of our framework. The scenario is depicted below:
Factors
Past
Scores
Weighta
Seller
ge
Seller1
2
25
60
39
performance
Competition
factor
Others
Technology
Adoption
Change
Orientation
Change
Readiness
Cluster selection
15
20
20
10
10
20
40
80
79
Cluster
Cluste
3/4
r1
In this case, the Seller1 scores 60 out of 60 in the first three parameters but still finds itself in
the Cluster 3/4 as it fares poorly in the Technology Adoption & change orientation
parameters. Now, this is a paradox where the seller has extremely well past performance,
competition factor and should get higher priority so that the offer depth increases. Thus our
algorithm to choose sellers to increase offer depth fails in such situations, apparently.
The catch in this case is that if a seller is extremely good at Technology Adoption and Change
orientation, Change Readiness, the only possibility that it fails to come good in the
performance and competition factors is when the seller fails in timely Customer delivery.
This is exactly the situation with Seller 2 .Simply put; Seller 2 takes advantage of all the
technological services provided by Amazon but fails in competition and performance (sales
growth, profitability etc). It is safe to assume that this seller is using MFN and has not been up
to the mark in delivery due to which it is unpopular amongst customers. Moreover, its
inventory and logistics cost must be high and hence the business is not profitable. Now, if
inventory and logistics is better handled through FBA, the natural logical selection should be
to move from MFN to FBA. Hence, this scenario can be considered a distant one where the
focus of the sellers are totally misplaced in terms of profitability and thus can be safely
excluded in our discussion.