Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
txt
Citation Nr: 1630496
Decision Date: 07/29/16
DOCKET NO.
)
)
2.
REPRESENTATION
Appellant represented by: Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States
ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD
Kate Sosna, Associate Counsel
INTRODUCTION
The Veteran had active duty service from October 1975 to March 1983.
He di
This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal f
In her January 2012 substantive appeal, the appellant requested a Board vid
By way of background, the Board notes that, in a June 2009 rating decision,
Thereafter, in March 2010, the appellant filed a claim for Dependency and I
Thereafter, in November 2015, the Board found that, while the appellant met
The appellant appealed the Board's November 2015 decision denying the subst
This appeal was processed using the Veterans Benefits Management System (VB
The appeal is REMANDED to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ).
VA wi
REMAND
As noted in the Introduction, in May 2016, the Court granted a JMR in which
With regard to the appellant's accrued benefits claim, the JMR determined t
As a final matter, the Board notes that in July 2016 the appellant requeste
Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following actions:
1.
Inform the appellant that she is eligible to substitute for the Veteran
2. If a NOD is timely filed, issue a statement of the case so that the app
returned to the Board if a timely substantive appeal is filed.
3.
After completing the above, and any other development as may be indicat
The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on t
_________________________________________________
A. JAEGER
Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals
Under 38 U.S.C.A. 7252 (West 2014), only a decision of the Board of Vete