bnjm,k.j.svcbngmch,jnfbvzc/k.

,mhgsvxsary to carry out the calculations three tim

es with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr

oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route

in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit

h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd

uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the

other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t

hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route

in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the

other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit

h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit

h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit

h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t

hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t

hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t

hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it

cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro

ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in

troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit

h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the

other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit

h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the

other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route

in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t

hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route

in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route sary to carry out the calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not changeary necessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
oary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it
cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the

other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thether roary necessary last on
e introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that
the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of tr
ips on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry ouary necessary last one introduced
In Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introdu
ction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the

other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theary necessary last one intro
ducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the in
troduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it ary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is
suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is neces
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip

s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theurn becoming the last one int
roducedIn Lary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested
that if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, ary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggest
ed that if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route

in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the

other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thethen it ary necessary last o
ne introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed tha
t the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theis necessary to carry out the
calculations three times with each route
in its turn becoming ary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is
suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the

other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thenecessary last one introduce
dIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introd
uction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thee last one introducedIn Langd
on (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of
an
additional route (mode iary necessary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it
is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out then fact) does not changary nec
essary last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot
be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit

h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thee the relative proportions of
trips on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route

in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the

other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theangdon (1982), it is suggeste
d that if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the the relative proportions of
trips on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theis necessary to carry out the
calculations three times with each route

in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out thet the calculations three time
s with each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s oIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested that if it cannot be assumed that the intr
oduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn n the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route

in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out theon (1982), it is suggested th
at if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an

additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introducedIn Langdon (1982), it is suggested t
hat if it cannot be assumed that the introduction of an
additional route (mode in fact) does not change the relative proportions of trip
s on the
other routes, then it is necessary to carry out the calculations three times wit
h each route
in its turn becoming the last one introduced