Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted To:
Miss. Khadija Ejaz
Submitted By:
Nouman Abid.
Omaid Laeeque.
M. Umar Ramzan.
M.Usama Sheikh.
Noor Fatima.
work. Herzberg (1950) in his motivational hygiene theory defines motivational factors as
intrinsic, which provide people satisfaction.
Jex perceived jab satisfaction as a general attitude rather than specific. Dormann and Zapf
(2001) says that it is stable across different jobs due to attributes of personality and other
factor. Near,etal (1977) consider satisfaction as only one of the several components of life
satisfaction concept and work related variables. Schymus and Croon (2006) were of view that
it is a predecessor or of organization outcome such as performance, outcome of
conditions(leadership) and a disposition influence by personality traits. Finding of
Goembiewski and Motiaz (1977) show no significant differences between gender
discrimination. When a number of variables were statistically controlled, while schuler and
Rabinowitz (1985) generated inconsistent and mixed result. Barto, schuler & Brenner (1966)
found that women place more importance on extrinsic factor while men preferred intrinsic.
Kunlen (1963)values.
Using data from the US the paradox of the contented female workers, women report higher
job satisfaction than men. Women in female dominated workplace report higher gob
satisfaction because they value job flexibility. Females are more satisfied with five of the six
job satisfaction measures. Gender differences with d.a of J.s.c.b. explained by both personal
and labor market characteristic.
Past studies have found younger and more educated females to have comparable rates of job
satisfaction with their male peers ,however now a days younger female are more satisfied at
work as compared to males in 4/6 measures investigated. Females higher level of job
satisfaction is not econometric, however no evidence support that younger female exhibit job
satisfaction rates as compared to males.
In a study of two AACSB international auredited universities from 1980 to 2003 respondent
were asked a variety of question on job satisfaction is relates to many factors including
professions, firms, age, gender race and parent education .The finding of this study on job
satisfaction provide benchmark upon which accounting firms use to evaluate job satisfaction
level among their employees. Job satisfaction is one of the most widely discuss issues in an
organizational behavior; in a study the resources investigated the present level of job
satisfaction among the faculty member of private universities tertiary level in Bangladesh.
The study concluded the fact that faculty members were overall satisfied with their condition.
Further it has been found that there is no significant difference between male and female
members. As the job satisfaction is not gender base by nature so it does not play a crucial role
for female faculty members while working under masculine culture.
E.M Alexander (2004) investigated the extent to which male and female employees of
university differ in various attributes and attitudes and the level of satisfaction. A satisfied
random sample of 360 academic and administrative staff of the University of Botswana was
collected. Findings indicate the difference between males and females in level of satisfaction
due to negative work experiences such as gender discrimination considering all factor that
might explain different job satisfaction among employees at the university five attributes
which were significant belonging it an older age understanding the competing demand
teaching and research responsibilities taking advantage advancement at work perceiving
equity in distribution of work load.
Smith,Kendall, Hulling, 1969 study says that the factor of gender leads to support the
hypotheses that male medical officers are more satisfied as compared to female medical
officer. Police agencies across the United States face challenges related to advancement of
female officers within the organizational structure. The study reports on a survey
administered by Las-Vegas Metropolitan police department was designed to determine
officers opinions of career satisfaction and career advancement. The result suggests that
while there are several difference in opinion between male and female officer, overall officer
are generally pleased with their career and assignments. Gillbert (1979) and Kirchmeyes
(1992) found that men and women are more satisfied when they are working in groups
containing mostly members of their own gender with lower group cohesiveness. Wiseman
(1994) and Oshagbemi and Titus (2000) found that women were less satisfied in business and
law jobs but equally satisfied with pay promotion, supervision and coworkers.
3. Hypothesis:
Studies in the West found that Male faculty is more satisfied with their work compared with Female
faculty. To check whether this type of relationship exists among the people living in the region of Lahore
we develop our first hypothesis as:
1
H1: Male faculty members are more satisfied with the work of their job as compared to Female
faculty members.
Ho: Male faculty members are equally satisfied with the work of their job as Female faculty
members are.
4. METHODOLOGY
Type of study
Our Type of study will be Quantitative. As our purpose of the study is to investigate the influence
of gender type on the job satisfaction and we compared the job satisfaction in male respondent
and job satisfaction in female respondent so this research can be called as co-relational
Unit of analysis
As individual analysis is the best way to determine the significant difference between the overall
job satisfaction levels between male and female teachers so we will take individual as our unit of
analysis for this research. Male and female respondents have different personal expectations and
our study never allowed us to take them as a whole so we take them separately as unit of analysis
and not in groups.
Study setting
The purpose of our study is not to examine continuity of response and to observe changes that
occur over time. So the data will be collected at a single point in time. Our control on variables
will be non-contrived. We havent made any manipulations in variables. The questionnaire will
be filled by the respondents in natural environment.
Tool of study:
All these things mentioned above directed us to set our mode of observations which is survey. In
survey, we have selected self-administered questionnaire as our observation tool. This is selected
on the basis of the purpose of the study, time dimension, unit of analysis and researchers control
of variables.
Sampling design
Population of this study will be the Teachers, Bankers & people from other professions within
the region of Lahore. And the target population of our study will be the Teachers & Bankers who
are either permanent or on contract. Visiting teachers who are teaching in the Government
College Lahore are not taken as a part of target population.
Data Collection
Data collection is supposed to be carried out by administering the questionnaire individually.
Questionnaire is comprised of demographic information and only five items so that response will
be good enough as respondents will find it convenient for them to fill such short questionnaire.
5. Data Analysis:
The Population of this study was about all the faculty members from the Bank Al-falah, Teachers from
Government College Lahore, Engineers and some other members from different industries within the
region of Lahore. The sample consisted of 48 women out of which 17(35.42%) are Teachers, 14(29.17%)
are Bankers & 17(35.42%) belongs to some other Professions. Apart from this the sample consisted of 73
men out of which 20(27.40%) are Teachers, 33(45.21%) are Bankers & 20(27.40) belongs to some other
Professions. The percentages are shown in Table-1.
Table-2 lists the tabulation of Satisfaction Level with Job by Gender. Out of 73 Male
Respondents the numbers of Male respondents that are not satisfied with their job are 26 and
those who are highly satisfied with their job are 47. On the other hand out of 48 female
respondents the numbers of female respondents that are not satisfied with their job are 26 and
those who are highly satisfied with their job are 22. So the ratio of male members who are highly
satisfied is greater than that of female members. Hence we can say that males are more satisfied
with their Job and it supports our hypothesis.
Table-3(a) lists the regression model of male members including some important independent
variables while keeping satisfaction level with job as dependent variable. As we run the
regression model we saw that only some variable are significant in the model whose P>t value is
less than 0.05. So as the P>t value of two variables Level of Respect from Leadership and
Promotion Policy is greater than 0.05 so we will neglect them in the rest of the model. On the
other hand Table-3(b) lists the regression model of female members including some important
independent variables while keeping satisfaction level with job as dependent variable. As we run
the regression model we saw that only some variable are significant in the model whose P>t
value is less than 0.05. So in case of female members only three variables are considered
significant to the model whose P>t value is less than 0.05 while the rest will be neglected
throughout the model. The chosen variables are Level Of Respect from Leadership, Complaint
Procedure and Contact To EEO Counselor.
Table-4(a) lists the regression model of male members including only those variables which
showed a significant relationship with the dependent variable. As we run the regression model
we saw that all variables are significantly linked with a value of r 2=0.5401. We also saw that the
value of Prob>f=0.0000 which is less than the significance level 0.05 and hence indicating that
there is a significant linear relationship of these variables with our null hypothesis. Hence the
regression equation is:
Satisfaction Level With Job = 0.59+(0.32*Opportunity For Job In spite Of Gender)
+(0.27*Valued By Supervisor)+(0.41*Complaint Procedure)+(-0.35*Contact To EEO
Counselor)+(0.22*Utilization Level).
Table-4(b) lists the regression model of female members including only those variables which
showed a significant relationship with the dependent variable. As we run the regression model
we saw that all variables are significantly linked with a value of r 2=0.5079. We also saw that the
value of Prob>f=0.0000 which is less than the significance level 0.05 and hence indicating that
there is a significant linear relationship of these variables with our null hypothesis. Hence the
regression equation is:
Satisfaction Level with Job = 1.63+ (0.55*Level Of Respect From Leadership) + (0.27*Contact
to EEO Counselor) + (-0.28*Complaint Procedure).
Table-5(a) lists the linear-log regression model of the male members. We did this just to
manipulate our data. The entire variable showed a significant relationship with the dependent
variable with r2=0.5352. We also saw that the value of Prob>f=0.0000 which is less than the
significance level 0.05 and hence indicating that there is a significant relationship of these
variables with our null hypothesis. Hence the linear-log regression equation is:
Satisfaction Level With Job = 0.81+(0.80*log Opportunity For Job In spite Of Gender)
+(0.87*log Valued By Supervisor)+(1.12*log Complaint Procedure)+(-1.13*log Contact To EEO
Counselor)+(0.71*log Utilization Level).
Table-5(b) lists the linear-log regression model of the female members. We did this just to
manipulate our data. The entire variable showed a significant relationship with the dependent
variable with r2=0.5283. We also saw that the value of Prob>f=0.0000 which is less than the
significance level 0.05 and hence indicating that there is a significant relationship of these
variables with our null hypothesis. Hence the linear-log regression equation is:
Satisfaction Level with Job = 2.15+ (1.32*log Level of Respect from Leadership) + (0.71*log
Contact to EEO Counselor) + (-0.87*log Complaint Procedure).
6. Conclusion:
The study aimed to explore and investigate the global job satisfaction of officers in Lahore
region. The overall results supported the proposed hypotheses that the male faculty members are
more satisfied as compared to female faculty members. Men and women are significantly
different in their roles, behavior, attitudes and status in society. The main responsibility of men is
to financially support the families, on the other hand, the, main responsibility of women is to
care and rear their family. So, we could not consider their feelings equal about work. They have
different sets of responsibilities and pressures which affects the work in different manner. As
female experience more role pressure thats why they are less satisfied.
In conclusion it can be said that the results of present study show that in case of Bankers &
Teachers such personal factors as sex can contribute to significant differences in the magnitude
of job satisfaction as measured by questionnaire. As compared to men, womens duty hours
should be flexible and their working condition should be improved.
7. Appendix:
Tables
Table-1
Gender
0
1
Total
1
17
35.42
20
27.40
37
30.58
Occupation
2
14
29.17
33
45.21
47
38.84
Total
3
17
35.42
20
27.40
37
30.58
48
100
73
100
121
100
Table-2
Gender
Total
0
1
Total
N.S.
26
26
52
H.S.
22
47
69
48
73
121
Table-3(a)
Satisfaction Level With Job
P>t
0.082
0.389
0.001
0.043
0.000
0.000
0.040
Where r2=0.5631
Table-3(b)
Satisfaction Level With Job
Level Of Respect From Leadership
Promotion Policy
Opportunity For Job In spite Of Gender
Valued By Supervisor
Complaint Procedure
Contact To EEO Counselor
Utilization Level
P>t
0.001
0.642
0.513
0.702
0.030
0.028
0.308
Where r2=0.5381
Table-4(a)
Satisfaction Level With Job
Opportunity For Job In spite Of Gender
Valued By Supervisor
Complaint Procedure
Contact To EEO Counselor
Utilization Level
Where r2=0.5401, Prob>F=0.0000, cons=0.598
Table-4(b)
P>t
0.000
0.021
0.000
0.000
0.022
P>t
0.000
0.016
0.009
Table-5(a)
Satisfaction Level With Job
Log Opportunity For Job In spite Of Gender
Log Valued By Supervisor
Log Complaint Procedure
Log Contact To EEO Counselor
Log Utilization Level
P>t
0.000
0.021
0.000
0.000
0.006
Table-5(b)
Satisfaction Level With Job
Log Level Of Respect From Leadership
Log Complaint Procedure
Log Contact to EEO Counselor
P>t
0.000
0.004
0.009
Table-6
Symbols
0
1
N.S.
H.S.
1
2
3
Notations
Female
Male
Not-Satisfied
Highly-Satisfied
Teachers
Bankers
Others
Male
Female
Age:
Occupation: _____________________________________________________________
How long have you worked for this company? _________________________________
What is your job title? _____________________________________________________
PART II
RATING YOUR JOB SATISFACTION
Using the scale shown above, rate your level of satisfaction with the following aspects of your
job.
Questions
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
ee
Stron
gly
Agree
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
ee
Stron
gly
Agree
manager
visibly
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
ee
Stron
gly
Agree
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
and
valued
in
this organization.
My organization values the rights of its
members to practice their respective religion.
This organization is committed to creating an
environment of human respect and dignity.
I am satisfied with the physical surroundings
of my work area.
Work areas are accessible to persons with
disabilities.
My immediate supervisor effectively passes
on information I need to know.
Communication between work centers is
good.
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
ee
Stron
gly
Agree
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
opportunity (EEO)
with
bulletin
upcoming
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
ee
Stron
gly
Agree
I have sufficient time in my duty day to
conduct my core duties.
Questions
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
to
enhance
awareness
cross
cultural
among
all
of
morale
in
this
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
ee
Stron
gly
Agree
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
ee
Stron
gly
Agree
Questions
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
ee
Stron
gly
Agree
Stron
gly
Disag
Disag
ree
Neith
er
Agree
Stron
gly
Agree
Agr
ee
ree
nor
Disagr
ee
deal
free
from
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
Stron
gly
Agree
ee
Relationships at work are professional in
nature.
I understand how to report a sexual assault.
If I were sexually assaulted I would be
reluctant to report it.
My organization encourages sexual assault
victims to report sexual assaults.
My work area is free of sexual misconduct.
The organizations zero tolerance policy on
sexual assault is clear.
Agency leadership addresses allegations of
sexual
harassment
and/or
unlawful
would
not
be
afraid
to
report
and policies
are
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Disag
ree
Neith
Agr
er
ee
Agree
nor
Disagr
Stron
gly
Agree
ee
The rigorous or the tough jobs are always
assigned to the male teacher.
Female faculty members are kept aside in
important decision making because of being
an woman.
Male teachers show rigidity in opinion while
female teacher's opinion is much better.
My supervisor does not appear to consider
gender in making job assignments.
My opportunity for promotion is the same as
other employees in spite of my gender.
My company encourages openness regarding
gender and racial diversity.
I like my job.
Near, P.J.,Rice W.R., & Hund G.R (1978). Work and extra work correlates Of life and job
The
Definition
of
Good
Job
and
Determinant,
The Korean Sociology, 1:93-126.
13. Anker, R. (1997) Theories of occupational segregation by sex: an overview, International
Labour Review, 136, 31549.
Bain, G. (2001) About Time: Flexible Working, Work and Parents Taskforce, London.
14. Bradley, Jennifer. (1999). You Cant Be a Mother and a Police Officer: How Police
Services Can Do it Better. Paper presented at the Australasian Women and Policing
Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
Brown, Jennifer. (1997). European Policewomen; A Comparative Research
15.International Journal of the Sociology of Law 25, pp. 1-19.
-----. (2000). Discriminatory Experiences of Women Police. A Comparison of Officers
Serving in England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Republic of
Ireland. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 28, pp. 91-111.
Dantzker, M. L. (1997). Police Officer Job Satisfaction: Does Agency Size Make a
Difference? Criminal Justice Policy Review 8, pp. 309-322.
Dantzker, M. L., and Betsy Kubin. (1998). Job Satisfaction: The Gender Perspective
Among Police Officers. American Journal of Criminal Justice 23, pp. 19-31.
16. Kranau, E.J., V. Green, and G. Valencia-Weber. 1982. Acculturation and the Hispanic
woman: Attitudes toward women, sex role attribution, sex role behavior and demographics.
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 4 (1): 21-40.
. Lankau, M.J. and T.A. Scandura. 1996. An examination of job attitudes of white, black and
Hispanic nurses in a public hospital. International Journal of Public Administration 19 (3): 377398.
17. Argyris, C. (1964) Integrating the Individual and the Organization. New York: Wiley.
20. T. Oshagbemi, The influence of rank on the job satisfac-tion of organizational members,
Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 511519, 1997.
[38]
C. M. Hellman, Job satisfaction and intent to leave, The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.
137, No. 6, pp. 677689, 1997.
[39]
D. Lund, Organizational culture and job satisfaction, Journal of Business & Industrial
Marketing, Vol. 18, No
21. Clark, A. (1997), Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy in work?,
Labour Economics, 4, 341-372.
Donohue, S. and Heywood, J. (2004), Job satisfaction, comparison income and gender:
Evidence from the NLSY, International Journal of Manpower, 25, 211-234.
22. E. Terpstra and A. L. Honoree, Job satisfaction and pay satisfaction levels of university
faculty by discipline type and geographical region, Education, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 528539,
2004.
[15]
Thilmany, Formula for job satisfaction, American Soci-ety of Mechanical Engineering-CIME,
Michigan, 2004. [16] K. V. Rondeau and L. H. Francescutti, Emergency de-partment
overcrowding: The impact of resource scarcity on physician job satisfaction, Journal of
Healthcar
23. V. M. Dendinger, G. A. Adams, and J. D. Jacobson, Rea-sons for working and their
relationship to retirement atti-tudes, job satisfaction and occupational self-efficacy of bridge
employees, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 2135,
20205.
24. Ofuani,F N(2010), An Analysis of Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction of Women in Paid
Employment in Benin
City, Journal of Counseling Vol. 3, No. 1,
25. Moch, M.K. 1980. Racial differences in job satisfaction: Testing four common explanations.
Journal of Applied Psychology 65 (3): 299-306.