Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Biochimie
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biochi
Review
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 22 July 2013
Accepted 17 September 2013
Available online 26 September 2013
Plant mitochondria have a complex and peculiar genetic system. They have the largest genomes, as
compared to organelles from other eukaryotic organisms. These can expand tremendously in some
species, reaching the megabase range. Nevertheless, whichever the size, the gene content remains
modest and restricted to a few polypeptides required for the biogenesis of the oxidative phosphorylation
chain complexes, ribosomal proteins, transfer RNAs and ribosomal RNAs. The presence of autonomous
plasmids of essentially unknown function further enhances the level of complexity. The physical organization of the plant mitochondrial DNA includes a set of sub-genomic forms resulting from homologous
recombination between repeats, with a mixture of linear, circular and branched structures. This material
is compacted into membrane-bound nucleoids, which are the inheritance units but also the centers of
genome maintenance and expression. Recombination appears to be an essential characteristic of plant
mitochondrial genetic processes, both in shaping and maintaining the genome. Under nuclear surveillance, recombination is also the basis for the generation of new mitotypes and is involved in the evolution of the mitochondrial DNA. In line with, or as a consequence of its complex physical organization,
replication of the plant mitochondrial DNA is likely to occur through multiple mechanisms, potentially
involving recombination processes. We give here a synthetic view of these aspects.
2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Mitochondria
mtDNA
Replication
Recombination
Repair
1. Introduction
Mitochondria are key players in plant development, tness and
reproduction. Their contribution to energy production, metabolism
and cell homeostasis relies on the performance of their own genetic
system that makes them semi-autonomous. As in other organisms,
the mitochondrial genome in plants encodes a series of essential
polypeptides that build up the complexes of the oxidative phosphorylation chain, together with nuclear-encoded subunits. But
plant mitochondrial DNAs (mtDNAs) have remarkable features that
distinguish them from their animal and fungal counterparts. In
particular, higher plants harbor large mtDNAs that are highly variable in size and structural organization. On top of that, in many
plant species, mitochondria contain various forms of plasmids that
replicate independently from the main chromosome. In most plant
species, the mtDNA gene sequences evolve very slowly, as
compared to animal mtDNA sequences, and point mutations are
rare. It is believed that this is because plant mitochondria contain
108
Fig. 1. Circular and linear models of the mtDNA structure in plants. The dynamics of the mtDNA of plants allow several models. a) A circular genome model representing the
different organisations of the mtDNA of A. thaliana ecotype C24. The two pairs of large, frequently recombining repeats (A and B) and their orientations are represented by blue and
red arrows. The different parts of the genome are colored in a range of gray scale. Intramolecular recombination events are represented with dashed lines, and in orange,
recombination leading to subgenomic molecules. Dotted line shows possible intermolecular recombination. b) The mtDNA has been observed as predominantly constituted by a
complex array of linear molecules. Branched forms of the mtDNA could be intermediates of recombination-dependent processes: 30 single-stranded sequences resulting from the
recession of double-strand breaks can invade homologous double-stranded DNA, forming a D-loop and leading to the establishment of replication forks.
are much larger and differ greatly in size, even between very close
species or within species [1,2]. They commonly range between 200
and 750 kb in angiosperms [1], but with a tremendous further
extension in some lineages. As an example, proliferation of
dispersed repeats, expansion of existing introns and acquisition of
sequences (including sequences of nuclear, plastid, viral and bacterial origin) account for the expansion of the cucumber (Cucumis
sativus) mitochondrial genome into a tri-chromosome structure
with components of 1556, 84, and 45 kb in size [3]. Sequencing of
the mtDNA from two Silene species with exceptionally high mutation rate revealed enormous mitochondrial genomes of 6.7 (Silene
noctiora) and 11.3 (Silene conica) megabase-pairs resulting from
massive proliferation of non-coding content [4]. Moreover, these
genomes are distributed into a large number of circular chromosomes: 59 for S. noctiora and over 128 for S. conica. These chromosomes range themselves in size from 44 to 192 kb. As a
comparison, the more typical, slowly evolving mitochondrial
genome of Silene latifolia accounts for a single chromosome of
253 kb [4]. Remarkably, plant mitochondrial genomes are large but
their ploidy appears to be low. Whereas thousands of mtDNA
copies can be present in a mammalian cell, much lower mtDNA
levels were detected in plants. Preuten et al. [5] analyzed the ploidy
of several individual mitochondrial genes in various samples of
Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana tabacum and Hordeum vulgare, using
real time quantitative PCR. The copy numbers of the investigated
genes both differed from each other and varied greatly between
organs or during development, with the highest estimates around
280 copies per cell for the atp1 gene in mature leaves. This was
actually less than the mean number of mitochondria per cell, which
was around 450 in protoplasts derived from mature leaves. Thus,
individual mitochondria in plants may contain only part of the
genome or potentially no DNA [5].
Despite their large sizes, land plant mtDNAs do not contain a
signicantly greater number of genes than mitochondrial genomes
109
also been described [17], which can lead to gene chimeras. Both low
frequency recombination between ISRs and error-prone repair
processes mediated by microhomologies (see below) yield lowcopy number alternative congurations (or mitotypes) of the
mitochondrial genome that contribute to the natural heteroplasmy
of the plant mtDNA. Finally, additional processes might be at work,
depending on the species. In particular, the large size of the mitochondrial genomes in the genera Cucumis and Silene have been
linked with the accumulation of short (30e53 bp) repeated sequences [3,4,18].
Contrary to a prevailing idea, the mtDNA is not naked but is
packed into nucleoprotein particles called nucleoids [19]. In these
membrane-anchored particles, the DNA is associated with a number of factors involved in its compaction and metabolism. Nucleoids
are considered as the heritable units of mtDNA and their structure
inuences mtDNA segregation and transcriptional regulation [20].
The actual set of nucleoid-associated proteins is still discussed and
seems to vary between the different organisms, suggesting that the
composition of mitochondrial nucleoproteins has been reinvented
several times along with mtDNA evolution [19]. Mitochondrial
nucleoids contain a set of core proteins involved in DNA maintenance and expression, as well as peripheral factors that are components of signaling pathways [21]. Plant mitochondrial nucleoids
were characterized as dynamic entities, with chromatin-like or
bril-like structures, depending on the developmental stage or
tissue [22,23]. Chromatin-like structures were associated with a
vesicle component.
Whereas a nucleoid-enriched proteome has been established
for chloroplasts [24], information on the composition of their
mitochondrial counterparts remains scarce. Plant nucleoids
appeared to share a qualitatively similar phospholipid composition
with the whole organelle and to contain polypeptides of both inner
and outer membrane origin [22]. The association of the identied
proteins with isolated nucleoids was a function of the detergent
concentration in the isolation procedure, so that the structural or
functional signicance has to be further evaluated. Little is known
about the proteins responsible for nucleoid organization in plants
[25]. The presence of nucleosome-like structures was suggested,
depending on the developmental stage [22,26]. It was reported that
histone H3 and histone deacetylase might be targeted to mitochondria in cauliower [27,28]. However, such a view was contradicted by studies in tobacco cells [29]. Actin was persistently
recovered in plant nucleoids, where it seemed to associate with the
mtDNA [22]. Import of actin to the inside of mitochondria was
indeed reported and its potential function in the organelles was
discussed [30]. It would bind to the mtDNA in complexes also
containing porin and the ADP/ATP carrier. Plant mitochondrial
nucleoids likely have a heterogeneous genomic organization. Open
circles, supercoils, complex forms, and linear molecules with
interspersed sigma-shaped structures and/or loops represented
about 70% of the mtDNA molecules present in mung bean nucleoids
[23]. As in fungi or mammals, mitochondrial nucleoids in plants are
not only compaction and segregation units but they support the
entire DNA metabolism. Isolated mung bean nucleoids were reported to run DNA synthesis and were capable of directing regulated RNA synthesis [22]. Membrane-association of the plant
mitochondrial base excision repair (BER) components (see Section
6.2) also supports the assumption that mtDNA maintenance and
repair pathways take place in the membrane-bound nucleoids
[31,32].
3. Mitochondrial DNA replication
Replication of plant mitochondrial genomes is far from being
understood. Several factors involved in organellar genome
110
111
112
Table 1
Nuclear-encoded proteins involved or suspected to be involved in organelle DNA replication, recombination and repair in A. thaliana.
Category
Name
AGI
Targeting
Function
References
DNA polymerase
Pol1A
Pol1B
Twinkle
GyrIIA
GyrIIB1
GyrIIB2
Topo I
RECA2
RECA3
SSB1
SSB2
OSB1
OSB2
OSB3
OSB4
WHY1
WHY2
WHY3
ODB1
ODB2
MSH1
UNG
FPG
OGG1
ARP
APE1L
APE2
LIG1
At1g50840
At3g20540
At1g30680
At3g10690
At3g10270
At5g04130
At4g31210
At2g19490
At3g10140
At4g11060
At3g18580
At3g18580
At4g20010
At5g44785
At1g31010
At1g14410
At1g71260
At2g02740
At1g71310
At5g47870
At3g24320
At3g18630
At1g52500
At1g21710
At2g41460
At3g48425
At4g36050
At1g08130
Mt Cp
Mt Cp
Mt Cp
Mt Cp
Cp
Mt
Mt Cp
Mt Cp
Mt
Mta
Mt
Mt
Cp
Mt Cp
Mt
Cp
Mt
Cp
Mt Nuc?
Cp Nuc?
Mt Cp
Mt
Nuca
Nuc, Cpa
Cp
Nuca Cp
Nuca Mta
Mt Nuc
Replication
Replication, Repair
Replication
Replication?
[34e37,144]
Helicase/primase
Topoisomerase
Recombinase
ssDNA-binding/recombination mediator
MutS
DNA glycosylase
AP endonuclease
DNA ligase
[35,39,145]
[40]
Replication?
Recombination surveillance
Recombination surveillance, Repair
Replication, Repair?
[35]
[16,90]
Recombination surveillance
n.d.
n.d.
Recombination surveillance
Repair
[93]
Repair
Recombination surveillance
Repair
Repair
Replication, repair
[33,41]
Unpublished
[95,146]
[17,146]
[95,146]
[96,97,147]
[96,97]
[106]
[31,148]
[123,124]
[121,122]
[118]
[127]
[130]
molecular phenotype of the mutants for the mitochondriontargeted OSB1 and OSB4 proteins is the same as that of the recA2
and recA3 mutants: mutant plants accumulate aberrant mtDNA
sequences resulting from ectopic recombination between certain
ISRs ([93] and our unpublished results). This suggests that OSB
proteins are also involved in the surveillance of mtDNA recombination. The specic expression of OSB1 in gametophytic cells
further suggests that recombination surveillance by OSB proteins is
required to prevent transmission of aberrant mtDNA congurations
generated by ectopic recombination [93].
Whirly (WHY) proteins are further single-stranded DNA-binding proteins present in plant organelles (reviewed in Refs. [89,94]).
In plastids, WHY proteins have multiple DNA- and RNA-related
roles [89,94]. In A. thaliana mitochondria there is a single WHY
protein (WHY2) (Table 1), whose roles are not yet completely understood. Over-expression of WHY2 affected the transcription of
several mitochondrial genes but this could be a non-specic effect
due to masking of the mtDNA by WHY2. Rather, like chloroplast
WHY1 and WHY3, mitochondrial WHY2 seems to be involved in
the surveillance of illegitimate recombination, preventing errorprone pathways of double-strand break (DSB) repair through
sequence microhomologies [17,95]. It is possible that WHY proteins
function as recombination mediators, promoting RecA-dependent
homologous recombination repair pathways to the detriment of
alternative illegitimate recombination processes.
Proteins with sequence and structural similarities to eukaryotic
RAD52, a recombination mediator, are present in plants [96,97]. The
two RAD52-like genes identied in the A. thaliana genome were
reported to generate four orfs through differential splicing, with the
respective isoforms being distributed between the nucleus, mitochondria and chloroplasts [96]. However, a specic antibody only
detected the mitochondrial and chloroplast isoforms [97]. Like
WHY2, the RAD52-like mitochondrial protein ODB1 (organellar
DNA-binding) is possibly an additional recombination mediator
(Table 1). ODB1 co-puried with WHY2 from cauliower mitochondrial extracts and both proteins were shown to coimmunoprecipitate [97]. ODB1 has a high afnity for singlestranded DNA, with no apparent sequence specicity, but is also
able to bind double-stranded DNA, although with much less afnity. On the other hand, ODB1 is able to promote annealing of
complementary sequences [97]. In this respect, ODB1 seems to be a
functional homolog of yeast mitochondrial Mgm101p. Also
distantly related to RAD52, the latter is involved in mtDNA maintenance and has recombination mediator properties similar to
those of RAD52 [98e100]. In agreement with this assumption,
A. thaliana knockout mutants of ODB1 are impaired in homologous
recombination-dependent repair of mtDNA breaks generated by
genotoxic treatment [97].
An important component of the mitochondrial recombination
machinery is the MSH1 gene, which encodes a MutS-like protein
(Table 1). MSH1 has essential functions in the surveillance of
mtDNA recombination. The gene was identied in A. thaliana as
responsible for the cytoplasmic inherited CHM (chloroplast mutator) phenotype. The msh1 mutants display phenotypes of variegated and distorted leaves that correlated with important
rearrangements of the mtDNA by recombination [15,90,101e103].
In additional species where MSH1 was knocked down by RNA
silencing, mtDNA recombination was also increased, accompanied
by phenotypic defects that included male sterility [104]. In
A. thaliana, MSH1 is targeted to both mitochondria and chloroplasts
[105] and recently it was shown that it is also active in the maintenance of the plastidial genome, explaining the variegation
phenotype of msh1 plants [106]. In bacteria, MutS is a protein that
participates in mismatch repair and in the suppression of ectopic
recombination. Together with MutL, it recruits the endonuclease
113
114
DSB in mtDNA
RECA3, RECA2
ODB1, WHY2
RECA3, RECA2,
MSH1, OSB1, OSB4
RecA-dependent
D-loop formation
MicroHomology-Mediated
Recombination (MHMR)
POL1B
Break-Induced
Synthesis-Dependent Replication (BIR)
Strand Annealing (SDSA)
Gene conversion
without crossovers
RecA-independent
Recombination
Single-Strand
Annealing (SSA)
Increased recombination
involving ISRs
Fig. 2. Alternative recombination-dependent repair pathways that might exist in plant mitochondria. Double strand breaks (DSBs) of the mtDNA can be repaired by RecAdependent and independent homologous recombination (HR) pathways. RecA-independent repair of mtDNA DSBs that occur in somatic tissues can lead to increased recombination involving intermediate-size repeats (ISRs), probably by single-strand annealing (SSA). These recombination events are under recombination surveillance, and are derepressed in certain mutant backgrounds (mutants decient in RECA3, RECA2, MSH1, OSB1 or OSB4). DSBs that can be induced by genotoxic treatments are repaired by breakinduced replication (BIR), which requires RecA activity for initial D-loop formation. Mutants decient in RecA-dependent mtDNA repair show reduced recombination following
genotoxic treatment and can accumulate products of illegitimate microhomology-mediated recombination (MHMR).
changes in gene expression, and is under tight control. Thus, mutants of several genes that apparently modulate mtDNA recombination can have dramatically higher frequencies of ectopic
recombination between ISRs, correlating with phenotypes of distorted and variegated leaves. Among these, mutants affected in the
expression of MSH1 have been extensively characterized in several
plant species [90,106,108]. In A. thaliana, in addition to MSH1, other
genes have been identied whose mutants have the same molecular phenotypes of increased ectopic recombination across ISRs.
These are the genes coding for the two mitochondrion-targeted
RecA proteins RECA2 and RECA3 [16] and the plant-specic
organellar single-stranded DNA-binding proteins OSB1 and OSB4
([93] and our unpublished results). The mtDNA rearrangements
induced by the loss of any of these surveillance genes concern ISRs
ranging from about 50 bp up to 556 bp in A. thaliana [15,16,103].
These can be identical in sequence or imperfect repeated sequences, and the efciency of sequence exchange appears to
loosely correlate with repeat size and sequence homology. How far
apart the repeats are located in the genome and how they are
oriented might also inuence the recombination efciency and the
differential accumulation of the corresponding crossover products
[15,16].
The similar molecular and visible phenotypes of these mutants
suggest that the corresponding genes are involved in recombination surveillance processes that restrict recombination when
sequence homology between repeats is below a certain size. In the
case of MSH1, like for other MutS factors, when there is little
sequence homology the protein might recognize heteroduplexes in
strand-exchange complexes, and promote their rejection. The Cterminal GIY-YIG-type homing endonuclease domain of MSH1
could be responsible for cleaving the heteroduplexes and starting
over the process of sequence homology scanning [105]. However,
different recombination pathways might be affected in other mutants. In the case of the RECA2 and RECA3 mutants, the observed
increase in ectopic recombination suggests that it is the loss of
RecA-dependent recombination that favors RecA-independent
pathways under more relaxed control. These could involve the
Single-Strand Annealing recombination pathway (SSA) that can
occur when complementary single-stranded DNA sequences are
exposed [16]. The OSB1 and OSB4 proteins might also be involved in
modulating RecA-dependent recombination, for instance by promoting or suppressing binding of RecA to single-stranded DNA.
In addition to ectopic recombination that is suppressed under
normal plant conditions, it was observed that genotoxic treatments
also result in increased ectopic recombination across ISRs. This can
be explained by the mobilization of recombination factors for the
repair of DNA breaks by the BIR pathway. This homologous
recombination-dependent repair pathway depends on RecA-like
activities and accordingly it was found that genotoxin-induced
mtDNA recombination is suppressed in RECA3 mutants [16].
Other genes were also found to be involved in this genotoxininduced repair process: the organellar DNA polymerases Pol1B
[37], the Rad52-like protein ODB1 [97] and the plant-specic single-stranded DNA-binding protein WHY2 [17]. The corresponding
mutants are not affected in recombination surveillance under
normal growth conditions, but under genotoxic treatment they
have reduced recombination, as compared to wild-type plants.
Concomitant with the loss of the RecA-dependent repair activity,
these mutants also display increased illegitimate recombination
involving microhomologies of just a few nucleotides [17,37,97].
Such sequence chimeras are of very low abundance, and can only be
detected by PCR-based approaches. But collectively they likely
constitute a major source of mtDNA heteroplasmy. On an evolutionary time scale, they are probably responsible for the important
changes in the mtDNA structure observed between plant species.
6. Mitochondrial DNA repair
6.1. Recombination-dependent repair
Repair of DSBs is essential for genome stability because they can
lead to collapsed replication forks, gene loss and genome instability. The sequence of plant mtDNAs revealed numerous examples
of gene chimeras or fusions of unrelated sequences likely emerging
from repair by illegitimate recombination, involving none or just a
few nucleotides. Several of these gene chimeras have been associated with CMS phenotypes.
In chloroplasts there is extensive evidence for the participation
of plastid-targeted RecA in DNA repair [112e114]. In Physcomitrella
patens, it was shown that disruption of a mitochondrial RecA results
115
Fig. 3. Short-patch base excision repair in plant mitochondria. The rst step involves
either a monofunctional DNA-glycosylase (1) or a bifunctional DNA glycosylase (2).
UNG, uracil-DNA glycosylase; OGG1, 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase; FPG:
formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase; APE2 and APEL1, homologs of AP endonucleases from yeast and bacteria. For enzymes followed by question marks, the
involvement is not established.
other side, the AP endonuclease subsequently generates a 30 -hydroxyl end that is used by DNA polymerase. One nucleotide is
inserted in the case of spBER, while for lpBER 2e6 nucleotides are
added from the 30 -hydroxyl end, thus displacing the nucleotides
downstream of the gap on the same DNA strand. Plant mitochondria possess an spBER pathway (Fig. 3) but did not seem to run
lpBER [31], contrary to mammalian mitochondria [117].
The rst step of the BER pathway involves a DNA glycosylase. In
A. thaliana, DNA glycosylases were found in mitochondria [31] and
in chloroplasts [118]. Several DNA glycosylase activities exist in
plant mitochondria (Table 1). Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) activity
was detected by in vitro assays with mitochondrial fractions from
Z. mays seedlings [119] and by in vitro and in organello assays with
A. thaliana and Solanum tuberosum mitochondria [31]. The enzyme
did not seem to have a lyase activity and was in part membraneassociated. In vivo targeting and in vitro import of GFP fusion proteins showed that the enzyme encoded by the single putative
A. thaliana UDG gene is indeed targeted into mitochondria [31]. For
8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1) and formamidopyrimidineDNA glycosylase (FPG), which are functional analogs, the situation
is less clear. A DNA glycosylase activity recognizing 8-oxoguanine in
A. thaliana and S. tuberosum mitochondria was characterized, using
in vitro and in organello assays (Boesch P., Paulus F. and Dietrich A.,
unpublished data). Plants are the only organisms where the presence of both OGG1 and FPG has been reported [120]. There are thus
two candidates to account for the 8-oxoguanine-cleaving activity.
A. thaliana OGG1 is a bi-functional enzyme that was shown to
localize to the nucleus by GFP fusion experiments [121]. Based on
bioinformatic analysis, Macovei et al. [122] suggested the presence
of a putative mitochondrial targeting sequence in the N-terminal
part of the Medicago truncatula, A. thaliana, Populus nigra and Oryza
sativa OGG1. However, when considering all relevant bioinformatic
tools, prediction of OGG1 localization in plants is either
116
stand for plant species with low mtDNA mutation rates and high
mitochondrial genome expansion, but it remains difcult to apply
to species like S. noctiora or S. conica, which show both exceptionally high mutation rates in genes and highly expanded genomes. Christensen proposed a model based on DNA repair and
recombination mechanisms [138] that might account both for low
mutation rates in genes combined with high expansion, rearrangement and mutation rates in the rest of the mitochondrial
genome, and for the conundrum posed by species with huge genomes and high mutation rates in genes [4,139,140]. The model
postulates different repair mechanisms in transcribed and nontranscribed regions [138]. Accurate template-directed DSB repair
by synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) with enhanced
second strand capture, gene conversion and BER would keep mutation rates low in coding regions. Conversely, BIR, NHEJ and
further error-prone repair pathways, such as microhomologymediated BIR, would explain expansion, rearrangements and
rapid divergence in non-coding regions. In species with both high
gene mutation rates and dramatic expansion of non-coding regions, lack of some BER or mismatch repair mechanisms would
promote the accumulation of damaged and unpaired bases in
coding regions, the xation of mutations, the enhancement of DSB
formation and the frequency of BIR [138]. This attractive hypothesis
implies that transcription-directed repair processes exist in plant
mitochondria, although the mechanisms and factors involved
remain to be identied.
8. Conclusion
In many aspects, the genetics of plant mitochondria is more
complex than that of most other organisms. The capacity to integrate and/or expand intergenic non-coding sequences in the
organellar genome is remarkable, especially versus the strictly
compact mammalian mtDNA. One might speculate that gain of
sequences is related to the competence of plant mitochondria for
DNA import [141]. Notably, both the acquisition of plasmids and the
import competence are shared with fungal mitochondria [142].
However, mammalian organelles are competent as well [143] and
their genome size is stable. Also, many years after their discovery,
the signicance of mitochondrial plasmids and their cross-talk with
the main mitochondrial genome are still a mystery. Not only the
sequence content but also the physical organization of the plant
mtDNA is a complex mix that either results from or supports a
variety of replication and maintenance mechanisms. While rare in
mammalian organelles, recombination is a major player in shaping
plant mitochondrial genomes, redistributing sequences, generating
polymorphism, driving evolution and at the same time preserving
the genetic information. In the end, the challenge remains to understand how the high plasticity of the plant mtDNA can combine
with gene conservation, intercompartment genome coordination
and appropriate functional efciency of the organelles. In this
respect, it can be noted that, apart from reported mutants, mtDNA
maps and restriction patterns have been reproduced many times
for many species and generations, which indicates that, although
dynamic, plant mitochondrial genomes remain stable on an
observable time scale.
Acknowledgments
Our projects are funded by the French Centre National de la
Recherche Scientique (CNRS, UPR2357), the Universit de Strasbourg (UdS), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-06MRAR-037-02, ANR-09-BLAN-0240-01) and the Ministre de la
Recherche et de lEnseignement Suprieur (Investissements
dAvenir/Laboratoire dExcellence MitoCross).
117
References
[1] T. Kubo, K.J. Newton, Angiosperm mitochondrial genomes and mutations,
Mitochondrion 8 (2008) 5e14.
[2] J.O. Allen, C.M. Fauron, P. Minx, L. Roark, S. Oddiraju, G.N. Lin, L. Meyer,
H. Sun, K. Kim, C. Wang, F. Du, D. Xu, M. Gibson, J. Cifrese, S.W. Clifton,
K.J. Newton, Comparisons among two fertile and three male-sterile mitochondrial genomes of maize, Genetics 177 (2007) 1173e1192.
[3] A.J. Alverson, D.W. Rice, S. Dickinson, K. Barry, J.D. Palmer, Origins and
recombination of the bacterial-sized multichromosomal mitochondrial
genome of cucumber, Plant Cell 23 (2011) 2499e2513.
[4] D.B. Sloan, A.J. Alverson, J.P. Chuckalovcak, M. Wu, D.E. McCauley, J.D. Palmer,
D.R. Taylor, Rapid evolution of enormous, multichromosomal genomes in
owering plant mitochondria with exceptionally high mutation rates, PLoS
Biol. 10 (2012) e1001241.
[5] T. Preuten, E. Cincu, J. Fuchs, R. Zoschke, K. Liere, T. Borner, Fewer genes than
organelles: extremely low and variable gene copy numbers in mitochondria
of somatic plant cells, Plant J. 64 (2010) 948e959.
[6] M. Unseld, J.R. Marienfeld, P. Brandt, A. Brennicke, The mitochondrial
genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains 57 genes in 366,924 nucleotides,
Nat. Genet. 15 (1997) 57e61.
[7] S. Anderson, A.T. Bankier, B.G. Barrell, M.H. de Bruijn, A.R. Coulson, J. Drouin,
I.C. Eperon, D.P. Nierlich, B.A. Roe, F. Sanger, P.H. Schreier, A.J. Smith,
R. Staden, I.G. Young, Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome, Nature 290 (1981) 457e465.
[8] R.M. Stupar, J.W. Lilly, C.D. Town, Z. Cheng, S. Kaul, C.R. Buell, J. Jiang,
Complex mtDNA constitutes an approximate 620-kb insertion on Arabidopsis
thaliana chromosome 2: implication of potential sequencing errors caused by
large-unit repeats, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001) 5099e5103.
[9] M. Klein, U. Eckert-Ossenkopp, I. Schmiedeberg, P. Brandt, M. Unseld,
A. Brennicke, W. Schuster, Physical mapping of the mitochondrial genome of
Arabidopsis thaliana by cosmid and YAC clones, Plant J. 6 (1994) 447e455.
[10] Y. Sugiyama, Y. Watase, M. Nagase, N. Makita, S. Yagura, A. Hirai, M. Sugiura,
The complete nucleotide sequence and multipartite organization of the tobacco mitochondrial genome: comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in higher plants, Mol. Genet. Genom. 272 (2005) 603e615.
[11] Y. Ogihara, Y. Yamazaki, K. Murai, A. Kanno, T. Terachi, T. Shiina, N. Miyashita,
S. Nasuda, C. Nakamura, N. Mori, S. Takumi, M. Murata, S. Futo, K. Tsunewaki,
Structural dynamics of cereal mitochondrial genomes as revealed by complete nucleotide sequencing of the wheat mitochondrial genome, Nucleic
Acids Res. 33 (2005) 6235e6250.
[12] A.J. Bendich, Reaching for the ring: the study of mitochondrial genome
structure, Curr. Genet. 24 (1993) 564e588.
[13] D.J. Oldenburg, A.J. Bendich, Size and structure of replicating mitochondrial
DNA in cultured tobacco cells, Plant Cell 8 (1996) 447e461.
[14] S. Backert, R. Lurz, O.A. Oyarzabal, T. Borner, High content, size and distribution of single-stranded DNA in the mitochondria of Chenopodium album
(L.), Plant Mol. Biol. 33 (1997) 1037e1050.
[15] J.I. Davila, M.P. Arrieta-Montiel, Y. Wamboldt, J. Cao, J. Hagmann, V. Shedge,
Y.Z. Xu, D. Weigel, S.A. Mackenzie, Double-strand break repair processes
drive evolution of the mitochondrial genome in Arabidopsis, BMC Biol. 9
(2011) 64.
[16] M. Miller-Messmer, K. Kuhn, M. Bichara, M. Le Ret, P. Imbault, J.M. Gualberto,
RecA-dependent DNA repair results in increased heteroplasmy of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial genome, Plant Physiol. 159 (2012) 211e226.
[17] L. Cappadocia, A. Marechal, J.S. Parent, E. Lepage, J. Sygusch, N. Brisson,
Crystal structures of DNAeWhirly complexes and their role in Arabidopsis
organelle genome repair, Plant Cell 22 (2010) 1849e1867.
[18] J.W. Lilly, M.J. Havey, Small, repetitive DNAs contribute signicantly to the
expanded mitochondrial genome of cucumber, Genetics 159 (2001) 317e
328.
[19] M. Kucej, R.A. Butow, Evolutionary tinkering with mitochondrial nucleoids,
Trends Cell Biol. 17 (2007) 586e592.
[20] A.P. Rebelo, L.M. Dillon, C.T. Moraes, Mitochondrial DNA transcription
regulation and nucleoid organization, J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 34 (2011) 941e
951.
[21] R. Gilkerson, L. Bravo, I. Garcia, N. Gaytan, A. Herrera, A. Maldonado,
B. Quintanilla, The mitochondrial nucleoid: integrating mitochondrial DNA
into cellular homeostasis, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5 (2013) a011080.
[22] H. Dai, Y.S. Lo, A. Litvinchuk, Y.T. Wang, W.N. Jane, L.J. Hsiao, K.S. Chiang,
Structural and functional characterizations of mung bean mitochondrial
nucleoids, Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (2005) 4725e4739.
[23] Y.-S. Lo, L.-J. Hsiao, N. Cheng, A. Litvinchuk, H. Dai, Characterization of the
structure and DNA complexity of mung bean mitochondrial nucleoids, Mol.
Cells 31 (2011) 217e224.
[24] W. Majeran, G. Friso, Y. Asakura, X. Qu, M. Huang, L. Ponnala, K.P. Watkins,
A. Barkan, K.J. van Wijk, Nucleoid-enriched proteomes in developing plastids
and chloroplasts from maize leaves: a new conceptual framework for
nucleoid functions, Plant Physiol. 158 (2012) 156e189.
[25] A. Sakai, H. Takano, T. Kuroiwa, Organelle nuclei in higher plants: structure,
composition, function, and evolution, Int. Rev. Cytol. 238 (2004) 59e118.
[26] M. Takusagawa, T. Hayashi, H. Takano, A. Sakai, Organization of
mitochondrial-nucleoids in BY-2 cultured tobacco cells, Cytologia 74 (2009)
329e341.
118
[27] B.Z.M. Katherine, J.M. Donohue, B.A. Everitt, Evidence that core histone H3 is
targeted to the mitochondria in Brassica oleracea, Cell Biol. Int. 34 (2010)
997e1003.
[28] M.B. Scher, A. Vaquero, D. Reinberg, SirT3 is a nuclear NAD-dependent
histone deacetylase that translocates to the mitochondria upon cellular
stress, Genes Dev. 21 (2007) 920e928.
[29] M. Takusagawa, S. Tamotsu, A. Sakai, Histone H3 is absent from organelle
nucleoids in BY-2 cultured tobacco cells, Cell Biol. Int. 37 (2013) 748e754.
[30] Y.S. Lo, N. Cheng, L.J. Hsiao, A. Annamalai, G.Y. Jauh, T.N. Wen, H. Dai,
K.S. Chiang, Actin in mung bean mitochondria and implications for its
function, Plant Cell 23 (2011) 3727e3744.
[31] P. Boesch, N. Ibrahim, F. Paulus, A. Cosset, V. Tarasenko, A. Dietrich, Plant
mitochondria possess a short-patch base excision DNA repair pathway,
Nucleic Acids Res. 37 (2009) 5690e5700.
[32] P. Boesch, F. Weber-Lot, N. Ibrahim, V. Tarasenko, A. Cosset, F. Paulus,
R.N. Lightowlers, A. Dietrich, DNA repair in organelles: pathways, organization, regulation, relevance in disease and aging, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1813
(2011) 186e200.
[33] A. Elo, A. Lyznik, D.O. Gonzalez, S.D. Kachman, S.A. Mackenzie, Nuclear genes
that encode mitochondrial proteins for DNA and RNA metabolism are clustered in the Arabidopsis genome, Plant Cell 15 (2003) 1619e1631.
[34] A.C. Christensen, A. Lyznik, S. Mohammed, C.G. Elowsky, A. Elo, R. Yule,
S.A. Mackenzie, Dual-domain, dual-targeting organellar protein presequences in Arabidopsis can use non-AUG start codons, Plant Cell 17 (2005)
2805e2816.
[35] C. Carrie, K. Kuhn, M.W. Murcha, O. Duncan, I.D. Small, N. OToole, J. Whelan,
Approaches to dening dual-targeted proteins in Arabidopsis, Plant J. 57
(2009) 1128e1139.
[36] J.D. Cupp, B.L. Nielsen, Arabidopsis thaliana organellar DNA polymerase IB
mutants exhibit reduced mtDNA levels with a decrease in mitochondrial
area density, Physiol. Plant. 149 (2013) 91e103.
[37] J.S. Parent, E. Lepage, N. Brisson, Divergent roles for the two PolI-like
organelle DNA polymerases of Arabidopsis, Plant Physiol. 156 (2011) 254e
262.
[38] D.B. Udy, S. Belcher, R. Williams-Carrier, J.M. Gualberto, A. Barkan, Effects of
reduced chloroplast gene copy number on chloroplast gene expression in
maize, Plant Physiol. 160 (2012) 1420e1431.
[39] J. Diray-Arce, B. Liu, J.D. Cupp, T. Hunt, B.L. Nielsen, The Arabidopsis
At1g30680 gene encodes a homologue to the phage T7 gp4 protein that has
both DNA primase and DNA helicase activities, BMC Plant Biol. 13 (2013) 36.
[40] M.K. Wall, L.A. Mitchenall, A. Maxwell, Arabidopsis thaliana DNA gyrase is
targeted to chloroplasts and mitochondria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101
(2004) 7821e7826.
[41] A.C. Edmondson, D. Song, L.A. Alvarez, M.K. Wall, D. Almond, D.A. McClellan,
A. Maxwell, B.L. Nielsen, Characterization of a mitochondrially targeted
single-stranded DNA-binding protein in Arabidopsis thaliana, Mol. Genet.
Genom. 273 (2005) 115e122.
[42] J.M. de Haas, J. Hille, F. Kors, B. van der Meer, A.J. Kool, O. Folkerts,
H.J. Nijkamp, Two potential Petunia hybrida mitochondrial DNA replication
origins show structural and in vitro functional homology with the animal
mitochondrial DNA heavy and light strand replication origins, Curr. Genet.
20 (1991) 503e513.
[43] D.L. Robberson, D.A. Clayton, Replication of mitochondrial DNA in mouse L
cells and their thymidine kinase e derivatives: displacement replication on a
covalently-closed circular template, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 69 (1972)
3810e3814.
[44] J. Farkasovska, Sequence analysis of a Papaver somniferum L. mitochondrial
DNA fragment promoting autonomous plasmid replication in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis, Curr. Genet. 24 (1993) 366e367.
[45] S. Backert, P. Dorfel, T. Borner, Investigation of plant organellar DNAs by
pulsed-eld gel electrophoresis, Curr. Genet. 28 (1995) 390e399.
[46] D.J. Oldenburg, A.J. Bendich, Mitochondrial DNA from the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha: circularly permuted linear molecules, head-to-tail concatemers, and a 50 protein, J. Mol. Biol. 310 (2001) 549e562.
[47] S. Backert, R. Lurz, T. Borner, Electron microscopic investigation of mitochondrial DNA from Chenopodium album (L.), Curr. Genet. 29 (1996) 427e
436.
[48] S. Backert, P. Dorfel, R. Lurz, T. Borner, Rolling-circle replication of mitochondrial DNA in the higher plant Chenopodium album (L.), Mol. Cell. Biol. 16
(1996) 6285e6294.
[49] S. Backert, T. Borner, Phage T4-like intermediates of DNA replication and
recombination in the mitochondria of the higher plant Chenopodium album
(L.), Curr. Genet. 37 (2000) 304e314.
[50] J.M. Gerhold, A. Aun, T. Sedman, P. Joers, J. Sedman, Strand invasion structures in the inverted repeat of Candida albicans mitochondrial DNA reveal a
role for homologous recombination in replication, Mol. Cell 39 (2010) 851e
861.
[51] D.M. Lonsdale, J.M. Grienenberger, The mitochondrial genome of plants, in:
R.G. Hermann (Ed.), Cell Organelles, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992, pp.
181e218.
[52] R.H. Brown, M. Zhang, Mitochondrial plasmids: DNA and RNA, in:
C.S. Levings III, K. VasiI (Eds.), The Molecular Biology of Plant Mitochondria,
Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995, pp. 61e91.
[53] B.O. Bengtsson, H. Andersson, The population genetics of plant mitochondrial
plasmids, J. Theor. Biol. 188 (1997) 163e176.
119
[110] S.T. Lovett, R.L. Hurley, V.A. Sutera Jr., R.H. Aubuchon, M.A. Lebedeva,
Crossing over between regions of limited homology in Escherichia coli. RecAdependent and RecA-independent pathways, Genetics 160 (2002) 851e859.
[111] A.J. Alverson, S. Zhuo, D.W. Rice, D.B. Sloan, J.D. Palmer, The mitochondrial
genome of the legume Vigna radiata and the analysis of recombination
across short mitochondrial repeats, PLoS One 6 (2011) e16404.
[112] H. Cerutti, A.M. Johnson, J.E. Boynton, N.W. Gillham, Inhibition of chloroplast
DNA recombination and repair by dominant negative mutants of Escherichia
coli RecA, Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 (1995) 3003e3011.
[113] T. Kwon, E. Huq, D.L. Herrin, Microhomology-mediated and nonhomologous
repair of a double-strand break in the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010) 13954e13959.
[114] B.A. Rowan, D.J. Oldenburg, A.J. Bendich, RecA maintains the integrity of
chloroplast DNA molecules in Arabidopsis, J. Exp. Bot. 61 (2010) 2575e2588.
[115] M. Odahara, T. Inouye, T. Fujita, M. Hasebe, Y. Sekine, Involvement of
mitochondrial-targeted RecA in the repair of mitochondrial DNA in the moss,
Physcomitrella patens, Genes Genet. Syst. 82 (2007) 43e51.
[116] J.S. Sung, B. Demple, Roles of base excision repair subpathways in correcting
oxidized abasic sites in DNA, FEBS J. 273 (2006) 1620e1629.
[117] P. Boesch, N. Ibrahim, A. Dietrich, R.N. Lightowlers, Membrane association of
mitochondrial DNA facilitates base excision repair in mammalian mitochondria, Nucleic Acids Res. 38 (2010) 1478e1488.
[118] B.L. Gutman, K.K. Niyogi, Evidence for base excision repair of oxidative DNA
damage in chloroplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana, J. Biol. Chem. 284 (2009)
17006e17012.
[119] R.J. Bensen, H.R. Warner, The partial purication and characterization of
nuclear and mitochondrial uracil-DNA glycosylase activities from Zea mays
seedlings, Plant Physiol. 83 (1987) 149e154.
[120] T. Morales-Ruiz, M. Birincioglu, P. Jaruga, H. Rodriguez, T. Roldan-Arjona,
M. Dizdaroglu, Arabidopsis thaliana Ogg1 protein excises 8-hydroxyguanine
and 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine from oxidatively
damaged DNA containing multiple lesions, Biochemistry 42 (2003) 3089e3095.
[121] H. Chen, P. Chu, Y. Zhou, Y. Li, J. Liu, Y. Ding, E.W. Tsang, L. Jiang, K. Wu,
S. Huang, Overexpression of AtOGG1, a DNA glycosylase/AP lyase, enhances
seed longevity and abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis, J. Exp. Bot. 63
(2012) 4107e4121.
[122] A. Macovei, A. Balestrazzi, M. Confalonieri, M. Fae, D. Carbonera, New insights on the barrel medic MtOGG1 and MtFPG functions in relation to
oxidative stress response in planta and during seed imbibition, Plant Physiol.
Biochem. 49 (2011) 1040e1050.
[123] T. Ohtsubo, O. Matsuda, K. Iba, I. Terashima, M. Sekiguchi, Y. Nakabeppu,
Molecular cloning of AtMMH, an Arabidopsis thaliana ortholog of the
Escherichia coli mutM gene, and analysis of functional domains of its product,
Mol. Gen. Genet. 259 (1998) 577e590.
[124] T.M. Murphy, M.J. Gao, Multiple forms of formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase produced by alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana,
J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 61 (2001) 87e93.
[125] L.M. Grifths, D. Swartzlander, K.L. Meadows, K.D. Wilkinson, A.H. Corbett,
P.W. Doetsch, Dynamic compartmentalization of base excision repair proteins in response to nuclear and mitochondrial oxidative stress, Mol. Cell.
Biol. 29 (2009) 794e807.
[126] D.B. Swartzlander, L.M. Grifths, J. Lee, N.P. Degtyareva, P.W. Doetsch,
A.H. Corbett, Regulation of base excision repair: Ntg1 nuclear and mitochondrial dynamic localization in response to genotoxic stress, Nucleic Acids
Res. 38 (2010) 3963e3974.
[127] T. Kleffmann, D. Russenberger, A. von Zychlinski, W. Christopher,
K. Sjolander, W. Gruissem, S. Baginsky, The Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast
proteome reveals pathway abundance and novel protein functions, Curr.
Biol. 14 (2004) 354e362.
[128] Y. Mori, S. Kimura, A. Saotome, N. Kasai, N. Sakaguchi, Y. Uchiyama,
T. Ishibashi, T. Yamamoto, H. Chiku, K. Sakaguchi, Plastid DNA polymerases
from higher plants, Arabidopsis thaliana, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
334 (2005) 43e50.
[129] D. Cordoba-Canero, T. Roldan-Arjona, R.R. Ariza, Arabidopsis ARP endonuclease functions in a branched base excision DNA repair pathway completed
by LIG1, Plant J. 68 (2011) 693e702.
[130] P.A. Sunderland, C.E. West, W.M. Waterworth, C.M. Bray, An evolutionarily
conserved translation initiation mechanism regulates nuclear or mitochondrial targeting of DNA ligase 1 in Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant J. 47 (2006) 356e
367.
[131] I. Small, R. Suffolk, C.J. Leaver, Evolution of plant mitochondrial genomes via
substoichiometric intermediates, Cell 58 (1989) 69e76.
[132] O.A. Kajander, A.T. Rovio, K. Majamaa, J. Poulton, J.N. Spelbrink, I.J. Holt,
P.J. Karhunen, H.T. Jacobs, Human mtDNA sublimons resemble rearranged
mitochondrial genomes found in pathological states, Hum. Mol. Genet. 9
(2000) 2821e2835.
[133] F. Budar, P. Touzet, R. De Paepe, The nucleo-mitochondrial conict in cytoplasmic male sterilities revisited, Genetica 117 (2003) 3e16.
[134] M. Odahara, H. Kuroiwa, T. Kuroiwa, Y. Sekine, Suppression of repeatmediated gross mitochondrial genome rearrangements by RecA in the
moss Physcomitrella patens, Plant Cell 21 (2009) 1182e1194.
[135] M. Woloszynska, D. Trojanowski, Counting mtDNA molecules in Phaseolus
vulgaris: sublimons are constantly produced by recombination via short
repeats and undergo rigorous selection during substoichiometric shifting,
Plant Mol. Biol. 70 (2009) 511e521.
120
[136] D.Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z.F. Lin, S.X. Zhang, M.X. Sun, Sodmergen, The
levels of male gametic mitochondrial DNA are highly regulated in angiosperms with regard to mitochondrial inheritance, Plant Cell 22 (2010) 2402e
2416.
[137] M. Lynch, B. Koskella, S. Schaack, Mutation pressure and the evolution of
organelle genomic architecture, Science 311 (2006) 1727e1730.
[138] A.C. Christensen, Plant mitochondrial genome evolution can be explained by
DNA repair mechanisms, Genome Biol. Evol. 5 (2013) 1079e1086.
[139] C.L. Parkinson, J.P. Mower, Y.L. Qiu, A.J. Shirk, K. Song, N.D. Young,
C.W. dePamphilis, J.D. Palmer, Multiple major increases and decreases in
mitochondrial substitution rates in the plant family Geraniaceae, BMC Evol.
Biol. 5 (2005) 73.
[140] J.P. Mower, P. Touzet, J.S. Gummow, L.F. Delph, J.D. Palmer, Extensive variation in synonymous substitution rates in mitochondrial genes of seed
plants, BMC Evol. Biol. 7 (2007) 135.
[141] M. Koulintchenko, Y. Konstantinov, A. Dietrich, Plant mitochondria actively
import DNA via the permeability transition pore complex, EMBO J. 22 (2003)
1245e1254.
[142] F. Weber-Lot, N. Ibrahim, P. Boesch, A. Cosset, Y. Konstantinov,
R.N. Lightowlers, A. Dietrich, Developing a genetic approach to investigate
the mechanism of mitochondrial competence for DNA import, Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 1787 (2009) 320e327.