AMERICAN
= PSYCHOLOGICAL
= ASSOCIATION
November 10, 2016
CONFIDENTIAL
Christopher J. Ferguson, PhD
Department of Psychology
Stetson University
421. N, Woodland Bivd.
DeLand, FL 32729
Dear Dr, Ferguson:
she Ethics Commitee reviewed your consultation request concerning tne fle of sharing research data
inte relationship to the American Psychological Association's Ethical Principles of Psychologists and
oie of Conduct the “Ethies Code"). In fulfiling its consultative ote, the Committee responds to the
cone presented in consultation requests in general terms with reference 10 the relevant section(s} of
the Ethies Code, which inform(s) its discussion, but it does not give define opinions regarding specific
situations.
ste isues you raised in your October 5, 2016 letter are addressed in the EAE Code. Note that the
re eg provides guidance that caries greater weight due tits enforeeabity than most “APA
policy”, a phrase that was used in your etter and accompanying contract.
“the Ethics Committee discussed the isues you raised concerning sharing research data and its
telationship to Standard 8.14 of the Ethics Code, which states:
Sa reavareh results are published, psychologists do not withhold the data on which
their conclusions are based from other competent professionals whe seek to verify the
vnpetantive claims through reanalysis and who intend to use such date only for that
purpose, provided that the confidentiality of the participants col be protected and
aos egal rights concerning proprietary data preclude thelr release This does not \
preclude psychologists from requiring that such individuals or BrO°PS be responsible for ]
oats associated with the provision of such information.” (emphasis added)
in their discussion, the Committee focused on the key terms bolded in the above citation, Namely, that
data from published research should be made available for Purposes of "verifyling) substantive claims
through reanalysis...” The Committee noted that there is aciferente between a reanalysis and a |
replication study, Thus, the Commitee feels that Standard & +a{a) promotes the sharing of data for
reanalysis, whether this be a straight replication of the published analyte et not. However, this does
hot necessarily require release of variables/data that were not included in the original published study. |
regarding the question of permission to publish findings from conducting your verification analysis, note
that Standard 8.14(b) states:Christopher J. Ferguson, PhO
November 10, 2016
Page 2
"psychologists who request data from other psychologists to verify the substantive
claims through reanalysis may use shared data only for the declared purpose.
Requesting psychologists obtain prior written agreement for all other uses of the data."
Further information regarding the appropriateness of requiring permission to publish findings may be
found by contacting the APA's Directorate for Scientific Affairs, APA's Journals Department, or one of the
Open Science Initiative organizations.
Finally, your letter raised an issue concerning the fees charged for the data. Note that Standard 8.14(a)
permits psychologists to charge a fee for costs "associated" with providing the data. The Code does not
dictate what is appropriate or reasonable for such associated costs.
We hope this information was helpful to you
Sincerely,
‘The APA Ethics Committee
APA Media Psychology and Technology Division (Div 46) Policy Statement Expressing Concern Regarding The Plan To Include "Gaming Disorder" in The ICD-11