Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
1.1 Structure and Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2 AMPK Activation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3 Direct and Indirect Activators of AMPK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.4 Concluding Remarks and Outstanding Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Abstract AMP-activated protein kinase is a family of heterotrimeric serine/threonine protein kinases that come in twelve different flavors. They serve an essential
function in all eukaryotes of conserving cellular energy levels. AMPK complexes
are regulated by changes in cellular AMP:ATP or ADP:ATP ratios and by a number
of neutraceuticals and some of the widely-used diabetes medications such as
metformin and thiazolinonediones. Moreover, biochemical activities of AMPK
are tightly regulated by phosphorylation or dephosphorylation by upstream kinases
and phosphatases respectively. Efforts are underway in many pharmaceutical
companies to discover direct AMPK activators for the treatment of cardiovascular
and metabolic diseases such as diabetes, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and
diabetic nephropathy. Many advances have been made in the AMPK structural
biology arena over the last few years that are beginning to provide detailed
molecular insights into the overall topology of these fascinating enzymes and
how binding of small molecules elicit subtle conformational changes leading to
their activation and protection from dephosphorylation. In the brief review below
on AMPK structure and function, we have focused on the recent crystallographic
results especially on specific molecular interactions of direct synthetic AMPK
activators which lead to biased activation of a sub-family of AMPK isoforms.
Keywords X-ray Crystallography Enzyme activators Allostery AMPK
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) serves an essential function in all eukaryotes as a guardian of cellular energy status (Carling and Viollet 2015; Hardie 2016;
Mounier et al. 2015; Neumann et al. 2007; Oakhill et al. 2012). When the overall
energy levels in cells decrease due to increased demands, AMPK gets activated
through a combination of phosphorylation by upstream kinases and direct activation by AMP and ADP. Activated AMPK in turn downregulates anabolic processes
that consume ATP while upregulating catabolic processes that lead to ATP synthesis. This is accomplished in part by direct inhibition of catalytic activity of a number
of biosynthetic enzymes such as HMG-coA reductase or acetyl-coA carboxylase
(ACC) through phosphorylation by AMPK (Carling et al. 1987). In addition,
AMPK also exerts long-range effects through regulation of transcriptional
co-activator PGC1-, upregulation of which results in increased mitochondrial
biogenesis (Zong et al. 2002). AMPK activation also leads to negative regulation
of protein translation via phosphorylation of tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2)
and regulatory associated protein of TOR (raptor) (Gwinn et al. 2008;
Inoki et al. 2003). The net effect of these AMPK-mediated events is to restore the
overall energy level in cells.
1.1
2YZA
3AQV
3DAE
3H4J
3MN3
2Y8L
2Y8Q
2YA3
3T4N
3TDH
3TE5
4EAG
4EAI
4EAJ
4EAK
4EAL
2LTU
4F2L
Description
GBD (CBM) of mammalian 1
GBD (CBM) of human 2
Kinase domain from yeast SNF1
Kinase domain of human 2
Yeast adenylate sensor with AMP and
ATP
Structures of CBS domain pairs with
nucleotide and ZMP
Res.
()
1.9
1.5
2.0
2.8
1.8
2.6
2.9
1.3
1.7
2.0
2.0
2.6
2.1
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.7
2.4
3.0
Citation
Polekhina et al. (2005)
Walker et al. (2005)
Nayak et al. (2006)
Littler et al. (2010)
Townley and Shapiro (2007)
Day et al. (2007)
3.0
2.1
2.9
2.8
2.4
2.5
2.8
2.5
2.3
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.3
2.6
2.5
2.5
N/A
1.5
4QFG
4QFR
4QFS
4RED
4RER
4REW
4YEE
4Y0G
4YEF
4ZHX
5EZV
Description
Solution structure of 2 CBM
Solution structure of 2 CBM plus
cyclodextrin
Full-length AMPK 211 plus cmpd
991
Full-length AMPK 211 plus
A769662
AMPKcore plus kinase domain
Full-length AMPK 111
Full-length AMPK 111 plus
Cl-A769662
Full-length AMPK 111 plus
Br-A769662core
Human 1 KD-AID K43A
Full-length AMPK 121
Full-length non-phosphorylated
AMPK 121
2 CBM with glucosyl-beta-cyclodextrin
2 CBM
1 CBM with glucosyl-betacyclodextrin
Full-length AMPK 211 in complex
with compound C2
Res.
()
N/A
N/A
Citation
Koay et al. (citation yet
unpublished at www.rcsb.org)
3.0
3.9
3.2
3.5
3.3
3.5
2.9
4.0
4.5
Li et al. (2015)
2.0
1.6
1.7
3.0
Fig. 1.1 AMPK topology and structure. (a) Overall topology of full-length heterotrimeric AMPK.
Structure shown in cartoon representation for the 211 isoform derived from 4CFE.pdb (Xiao
et al. 2013). Subunits are colored as indicated and with structural modules labeled. Bound AMP in
the subunit and staurosporine in the kinase ATP site are shown as sticks (green). (b) Global
superposition of the three distinct full-length AMPK heterotrimers solved to date illustrating a
conserved topology. 111 (4QFR.pdb) (Calabrese et al. 2014), 211 (4CFE.pdb) (Xiao
et al. 2013), and 121 (4RER.pdb) (Li et al. 2015) are shown in slate blue, green, and gray,
respectively
The different structural and functional modules of the three AMPK subunits
share a high degree of amino acid similarity. The 1 and 2 subunits share an
overall sequence identity of ~77 % which increases to ~90 % for the protein kinase
module. The CBM motifs of 1 and 2 retain ~80 % identity, while the CBS
modules across the three isoforms share ~60 % conservation. Some of the
AMPK subunits are known to be alternately spliced in different tissues allowing
for further regulation and complexity. For example, three different splice variants
of the 2 subunit have been identified which have been described in detail in a
recent review article (Steinberg and Kemp 2009).
The presence of multiple AMPK heterotrimeric complexes that are differentially
expressed allows for unique regulation of metabolic processes in various tissues.
The catalytic function of AMPK resides on the 1 and 2 subunits which are
encoded by two separate genes. Using recombinant AMPK isoforms expressed in
bacteria and quantitation of phospho SAMS peptide by careful HPLC methods,
Suter et al. reported similar specific activities (~6 mol/min/mg) for 111- and
221-complexes (Suter et al. 2006). Furthermore, they also reported that the 2containing complex was much more sensitive to deactivation by the phosphatase
PP2C compared to the 1-complex. The latter observations were recently confirmed in a study of six recombinant AMPK isoforms expressed in Escherichia coli
which showed ~25 higher sensitivity of 2-containing heterotrimers for dephosphorylation relative to 1-complexes (Rajamohan et al. 2015). In the recent study,
however, the authors observed that 1-containing isoforms in general have ~3
higher specific activities compared to 2-containing isoforms. This was true for
isolated kinase domain reagents as well. Enzymatic characterization of kinetic
parameters revealed that the higher specific activities for the 1 isoforms were
primarily driven by reduced Km (~3) for the SAMS peptide. Even though the
maximal stimulation by AMP of 1- and 2-complexes was approximately similar
(~2), in general 2 isoforms were much more sensitive to AMP stimulation with
AC50 values (concentration required for half-maximal stimulation) 610 lower
than that for 1 isoforms (Rajamohan et al. 2015). These observations were in
contrast to previous reports of roughly similar sensitivity of 1- and 2-complexes
to AMP stimulation (Suter et al. 2006). The precise reasons for some of these
discrepancies are not clear but could be due to different experimental protocols
used for generating the protein reagents and for biochemical characterization.
However, both these studies unequivocally showed that bacterially expressed,
non-phosphorylated AMPK has significantly less catalytic activity compared to
fully phosphorylated forms, and activation by upstream kinase increases their
catalytic activities 5001000.
As previously discussed, the nucleotide-binding regulatory domain of AMPK
comes in three flavors: 1, 2, and 3. Expression of recombinant 3-containing
AMPK heterotrimers has been challenging, but a robust procedure for generating
human 223 from E. coli has recently been described (Rajamohan et al. 2010).
By immunoprecipitation of rat brain extracts using a combination of antibodies
directed against and subunits, it was shown that AMPK complexes that contain
2 were the most sensitive to activation by AMP and the -3 complexes the least
(Cheung et al. 2000). Recently, this was further probed by overexpression of
1.2
AMPK Activation
Most studies indicate that AMPK has minimal basal activity in its resting state in
the absence of phosphorylation on its activation loop. However, recent studies have
shown that the presence of synthetic activator A769662 along with AMP can
stimulate significant AMPK activity even in the absence of activation loop phosphorylation (Scott et al. 2014). Upon phosphorylation of a conserved threonine in
the activation loop of the kinase module (Thr174 in 1 and Thr172 in 2), the
ability of AMPK to phosphorylate downstream substrates or peptides derived from
them (SAMS or AMARA peptides) increases >500-fold (Dale et al. 1995; Hawley
et al. 1996; Suter et al. 2006). Two upstream kinases that promote AMPK phosphorylation are the tumor suppressor Liver Kinase B1 (LKB1) and Ca2+-calmodulin-activated protein kinase kinase beta, CamKK (Hawley et al. 1996, 2005;
Hurley et al. 2005; Shaw et al. 2004; Woods et al. 2005, 2003a, b). Of these, LKB1
is constitutively active but can be further modulated by posttranslational modifications (Hawley et al. 2003). LKB1 is activated by associations with a scaffold
protein MO25 and Ste20-related adaptor protein (STRAD). It has been shown
recently that binding of AMP to the subunit of AMPK further stimulates its
10
activation by LKB1 (Gowans et al. 2013; Oakhill et al. 2010, 2011, 2012). The
subunit of AMPK contains an N-terminal myristoylation site which plays a role in
reversible interaction with membranes and is critical for mediating the effect of
AMP in phosphorylation by upstream kinases (Oakhill et al. 2010; Warden
et al. 2001). It is as yet unclear how this occurs structurally as the N-terminus of
the subunit is disordered or absent in all AMPK crystal structures solved to date.
CamKK, in contrast, is stimulated by calcium ionophores or hormones and
appears to be the primary upstream kinase of AMPK in cardiomyocytes and
neurons (Hawley et al. 2005; Hurley et al. 2005; Woods et al. 2005). Activation
by CamKK is mediated by increases in cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations, thus
providing an alternate pathway to activate AMPK independent of changes in
adenine nucleotide concentration. CamKK has been routinely employed for
in vitro phosphorylation of bacterially expressed recombinant AMPK (Neumann
et al. 2003). Conflicting data have been reported regarding the role of AMP or ADP
in AMPK activation by the CamKK pathway. Oakhill et al. demonstrated that
AMP can promote phosphorylation of AMPK on its activation loop by CamKK
(Oakhill et al. 2010, 2011, 2012). Furthermore, they showed that the presence of a
myristoyl group on the subunit of AMPK is necessary for this effect. AMP does
not promote phosphorylation by CamKK of E. coli-expressed AMPK that lacks
the myristoyl group, but this can be restored by co-expression of N-myristoyl
transferase (NMT) in E. coli which results in -myristoylation (Oakhill
et al. 2010). Using purified AMPK obtained from rat liver, which is myristoylated
on its subunits, Gowans et al. showed that AMP promotes phosphorylation of
AMPK by LKB1 but not by CamKK (Gowans et al. 2013; Ross et al. 2016a).
Moreover, this effect seems to be restricted to AMP as ADP did not promote
phosphorylation by either LKB1 or CamKK (Gowans et al. 2013).
Phosphorylated AMPK is rapidly inactivated in vivo by dephosphorylation by
phosphatases. The precise identity of phosphatases responsible for pThr172
dephosphorylation in different tissues remains unclear, though protein phosphatase
2-C (PP2C) and protein phosphatase 2-A (PP2a) can mediate this effect in vitro
(Davies et al. 1995; Kudo et al. 1996). Both AMP and ADP inhibit inactivation of
AMPK by inducing conformational changes, thus increasing the effective halflife of functionally active AMPK in cells and tissues (Oakhill et al. 2012; Ross
et al. 2016a; Xiao et al. 2011). While both AMP and ADP are effective in protecting
AMPK from dephosphorylation, AMP appears to be ~10 more potent (Gowans
et al. 2013). ATP, in contrast, antagonizes the protective effects of AMP and ADP.
Other small molecule synthetic activators such as A769662 have also been shown
to inhibit AMPK dephosphorylation in vitro (Goransson et al. 2007). In addition to
promoting AMPK phosphorylation by upstream kinases and inhibiting dephosphorylation by phosphatases, AMP also increases AMPK activity by allosteric activation by two- to fivefold (Carling et al. 1989). Recently, it was shown that AMPK is
allosterically activated >10-fold by AMP even at physiological concentrations of
ATP (Gowans et al. 2013; Ross et al. 2016a). Among the known endogenous
adenine nucleotides, only AMP appears to be capable of allosteric activation, and
this could be an important aspect of overall regulation of the AMPK pathway
in vivo.
11
Fig. 1.2 Nucleotide-binding sites in AMPK. subunit (gray) derived from 4CFE.pdb (Xiao
et al. 2013) shown in ribbon representation along with a portion of the regulatory -RIM (purple).
subunit has been removed for clarity. AMP bound in sites 1, 3, and 4 are shown as sticks. Sites
1 and 4 lie deep within the plane of the page while site 3 lies close to the surface. The AMP in site
3 is proximal to the -RIM
12
weakest nucleotide site on the subunit. The equilibrium binding affinities of AMP
and ADP are significantly weaker (>30) for site 3 compared to site 1 (Rajamohan
et al. 2015; Xiao et al. 2011). ATP shows even a stronger discrimination between
the sites 1 and 3 with a significantly weaker Kd for site 3 (>1000 M) (Rajamohan
et al. 2015).
The functional roles of the different nucleotide-binding sites have been somewhat controversial, and conflicting results have been reported by different laboratories. Most studies agree that site 3 is likely to be responsible for protection of
pThr172 from dephosphorylation by phosphatases. The crystal structures suggest a
possible explanation for this observation. The -RIM2 regulatory segment of the
subunit directly contacts nucleotides (AMP or ADP) at site 3 (Chen et al. 2013;
Xiao et al. 2011). Conformational changes induced by binding of AMP or ADP can
be transmitted to the activation loop of the kinase domain by the flexible regulatory
segments in the subunit, and this can lead to protection of pThr172 from
dephosphorylation. As described above, site 3 is the weakest nucleotide-binding
site on the subunit, yet it is exquisitely sensitive to changes in nucleotide levels
and this allows AMPK to respond rapidly to changes in cellular energy status.
Based on crystallographic studies and competitive binding experiments of
NADH or fluorescent analogs of ATP, Xiao et al. suggested that site 1 is responsible
for allosteric activation of AMPK (Xiao et al. 2011). This has been questioned by
Chen et al. based on site-directed mutagenesis experiments (Chen et al. 2012). The
latter studies suggest that sites 3 and 4 are responsible for allosteric activation by
AMP. Previous mutagenesis studies had shown that allosteric activation by AMP is
modulated by all the three sites (1, 3, and 4) (Oakhill et al. 2010). These seemingly
conflicting results may reflect a level of cross talk between the nucleotide-binding
sites via the coordinating positively charged residues. Since AMP or ADP binds
~10 stronger than Mg2+ATP at site 1, they are likely to occupy site 1 at significant
proportions even though cellular ATP concentration vastly exceeds that of AMP
and ADP. It is very likely that the exact binding affinity of AMP or ADP at site
3 and hence the conformational changes induced on AMPK will depend on the
identity of the nucleotide that occupies site 1.
1.3
Given the central role that AMPK plays in the maintenance of overall cellular
energy status, it is not surprising that it is modulated by a variety of stimuli
including plant-derived phytochemicals and neutraceuticals as well as reactive
oxygen species (e.g., hydrogen peroxide) and mitochondrial poisons such as dinitrophenol and oligomycin. Thus, AMPK gets activated by resveratrol (from red
wine), epigallocatechin (from green tea), flavonoids such as quercetin and genistein
(from fruits and vegetables), capsaicin (from chili peppers), and berberine which
has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for centuries (Ahn et al. 2008; Baur
et al. 2006; Hwang et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2006) (Fig. 1.3). Two of the most widely
13
Fig. 1.3 Indirect AMPK activators. Chemical structures are shown for a representative set of
reported indirect activators of AMPK (natural and synthetic)
14
Fig. 1.4 Direct AMPK activators. Chemical structures are shown for a set of reported direct
AMPK activators. Note that AICAR itself is not a direct AMPK activator but it is metabolized to a
direct activator (ZMP) in vivo which then functions as a nucleotide mimetic. Compound 24 is the
result of optimization of the PT1 screening hit (Yu et al. 2013)
Though the binding mode remained elusive for nearly a decade, it was quickly
apparent that A769662 acted in a manner fundamentally distinct from nucleotide
and appeared to show a preference for 1-containing heterotrimers with a dependence on the CBM motif (Cool et al. 2006; Goransson et al. 2007; Landgraf
et al. 2013; Sanders et al. 2007; Scott et al. 2008).
Enzyme activation can be achieved through multiple kinetic mechanisms. For
example, increasing the turnover number (Kcat) or maximum enzyme velocity
(Vmax) through structural modulation can lead to an overall increase in catalytic
activity of enzymes. Alternatively, lowering the MichaelisMenten constant (KM,
the substrate concentration needed to achieve a half-maximum enzyme velocity)
for one or more of the substrates will also manifest as enzyme activation. AMP
exerts its allosteric effects primarily through enhancing reaction Vmax, an observation that was made nearly three decades earlier (Carling et al. 1989). This was
further confirmed recently by enzymology studies of recombinant AMPK 111
which showed an approximate doubling of Vmax by AMP (Calabrese et al. 2014). In
contrast, A769662 appears to have very little impact on Vmax but lowers KM for
substrate (SAMS peptide) approximately fourfold (Calabrese et al. 2014). The
precise structural basis for this is not clearly understood. However, the close
association of the C-interacting helix of the subunit with the C-helix of the
15
Fig. 1.5 Transparent molecular surface of AMPK 111 (PDB accession code: 4QFR) with
Cl-A769662 bound at the ADaM site. Also shown is staurosporine bound at the kinase ATP site.
The C-interacting helix of the subunit and the B- and C-helices of the kinase domain are
highlighted. pThr172 is shown in space filling representation. The dotted red arrow points to the
substrate-binding groove where SAMS peptide is likely to bind. Binding of A769662 or other
allosteric activators that target the ADaM site could result in enhanced binding affinity of SAMS
peptide (decrease of KM) through structural perturbations involving the C-interacting helix and the
C-helix. Inset: Overall AMPK topology colored as in (a) illustrating the approximate distance
between the ADaM site and pThr172 (~25 ) and the -nucleotide-binding sites and pThr172
(~50 )
subunit suggests that A769662 might promote more optimal binding of SAMS
peptide in the substrate-binding groove between the N- and the C-lobes of the
kinase module (Calabrese et al. 2014; Xiao et al. 2013) (Fig. 1.5).
Recent structures of AMPK bound to A769662 and related analogs as well as the
benzimidazole (compound 991) revealed that these activators bind at a site that is
remote from nucleotide-binding sites on the subunit (Calabrese et al. 2014; Xiao
et al. 2013) (Fig. 1.6). The binding site, at the interface of the CMB motif of the
subunit and the N-lobe of the kinase domain of the subunit, has been recently
termed the ADaM (allosteric drug and metabolite) site and represents a novel
binding pocket with no as-yet identified endogenous ligand (Langendorf and Kemp
2015). Close inspection of binding mode reveals that the bicyclic core of all ligands
is sandwiched between Ile46 of the subunit and a stacked Arg83 from the
subunit. Cation interaction formed by the positively charged guanidinium side
chain of Arg83 with the delocalized -electron cloud of the heterocyclic core of
activators is an important feature of ligand binding at the ADaM site. In addition,
electrostatic contributions emerge from a set of conserved outward-facing lysines
from the subunit (Lys29/Lys31/Lys51), as well as an autophosphorylation site on
16
Fig. 1.6 Allosteric activator binding sites. (a) / (ADaM) binding site between the N-lobe of the
kinase domain from the subunit and the CBM of the subunit. Structure is shown for the 111
isoform to a chlorinated analog of A769662 (Cl-A769662) derived from 4QFR.pdb (Calabrese
et al. 2014). A set of key residues are labeled including D108 which represents an engineered
phosphomimetic variant of the autophosphorylated S108. (b) C2 ligand binding site shown bound
to 211 derived from 4ZHX.pdb (Langendorf et al. 2016) illustrating the two copies of ligand
bound to . Inset: Overall AMPK topology illustrated for full-length AMPK 121 derived from
4RER.pdb (Li et al. 2015). ADaM and C2 binding regions are illustrated by red shaded circles
the subunit (pSer108) (Fig. 1.6a). In addition, recent work has supported that
salicylate, a metabolite of aspirin, directly activates AMPK in a manner that is
competitive with A769662 (Hawley et al. 2012). Low-resolution crystallographic
data from iodinated-salicylate analogs lend further support to the hypothesis that
this aspirin metabolite also activates AMPK via the ADaM site (Calabrese
et al. 2014).
AMPK activity is modulated, in part, by the presence of an AID on the subunit.
Previous reports have shown that constructs containing the KD-AID have impaired
catalytic activity relative to the isolated KD alone (Chen et al. 2009; Crute
et al. 1998; Rajamohan et al. 2015). In an effort to activate AMPK through
modulation of this auto-regulatory mechanism, Pang et al. carried out a highthroughput screen against a KD-AID construct and identified a hit termed PT1
compound (Pang et al. 2008) (Fig. 1.4). PT1 showed cellular potency based on
phosphorylation of downstream targets and could be modeled to dock at the KD
AID interface. However, recent work has suggested that PT1s in vivo activity may
derive from an indirect mechanism through inhibition of the respiratory chain
affecting nucleotide levels and ratios (Jensen et al. 2015).
Recently, a new and exciting crystal structure was solved of full-length 211
bound to the direct activator, compound C2 (Fig. 1.4) (Langendorf et al. 2016). C2,
which contains a phosphonate group, and its cell-permeable diester prodrug C13
were designed as AMP mimetics that activate AMPK by directly binding to its
subunit (Gomez-Galeno et al. 2010). In stark contrast to A769662 and compound
991, C2 binds at the center of the subunit and was observed to interact with a
stoichiometry of two copies of ligand per AMPK heterotrimer. Though the
17
1.4
References
Ahn J, Lee H, Kim S, Park J, Ha T (2008) The anti-obesity effect of quercetin is mediated by the
AMPK and MAPK signaling pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 373:545549
Amodeo GA, Rudolph MJ, Tong L (2007) Crystal structure of the heterotrimer core of Saccharomyces cerevisiae AMPK homologue SNF1. Nature 449:492495
Baur JA, Pearson KJ, Price NL, Jamieson HA, Lerin C, Kalra A, Prabhu VV, Allard JS, LopezLluch G, Lewis K et al (2006) Resveratrol improves health and survival of mice on a highcalorie diet. Nature 444:337342
18
Calabrese MF, Rajamohan F, Harris MS, Caspers NL, Magyar R, Withka JM, Wang H, Borzilleri
KA, Sahasrabudhe PV, Hoth LR et al (2014) Structural basis for AMPK activation: natural and
synthetic ligands regulate kinase activity from opposite poles by different molecular mechanisms. Structure 22:11611172
Carling D, Viollet B (2015) Beyond energy homeostasis: the expanding role of AMP-activated
protein kinase in regulating metabolism. Cell Metab 21:799804
Carling D, Zammit VA, Hardie DG (1987) A common bicyclic protein kinase cascade inactivates
the regulatory enzymes of fatty acid and cholesterol biosynthesis. FEBS Lett 223:217222
Carling D, Clarke PR, Zammit VA, Hardie DG (1989) Purification and characterization of the
AMP-activated protein kinase. Copurification of acetyl-CoA carboxylase kinase and
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase kinase activities. Eur J Biochem 182:129136
Chen L, Jiao ZH, Zheng LS, Zhang YY, Xie ST, Wang ZX, Wu JW (2009) Structural insight into
the autoinhibition mechanism of AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature 459:11461149
Chen L, Wang J, Zhang YY, Yan SF, Neumann D, Schlattner U, Wang ZX, Wu JW (2012)
AMP-activated protein kinase undergoes nucleotide-dependent conformational changes. Nat
Struct Mol Biol 19:716718
Chen L, Xin FJ, Wang J, Hu J, Zhang YY, Wan S, Cao LS, Lu C, Li P, Yan SF et al (2013)
Conserved regulatory elements in AMPK. Nature 498:E8E10
Cheung PC, Salt IP, Davies SP, Hardie DG, Carling D (2000) Characterization of AMP-activated
protein kinase -subunit isoforms and their role in AMP binding. Biochem J 346:659669
Cool B, Zinker B, Chiou W, Kifle L, Cao N, Perham M, Dickinson R, Adler A, Gagne G, Iyengar R
et al (2006) Identification and characterization of a small molecule AMPK activator that treats
key components of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab 3:403416
Corton JM, Gillespie JG, Hawley SA, Hardie DG (1995) 5-Aminoimidazole-4-Carboxamide
Ribonucleoside. Eur J Biochem 229:558565
Crute BE, Seefeld K, Gamble J, Kemp BE, Witters LA (1998) Functional domains of the alpha1
catalytic subunit of the AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 273:3534735354
Dale S, Wilson WA, Edelman AM, Hardie DG (1995) Similar substrate recognition motifs for
mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase, higher plant HMG-CoA reductase kinase-A, yeast
SNF1, and mammalian calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I. FEBS Lett 361:191195
Davies SP, Helps NR, Cohen PT, Hardie DG (1995) 50 -AMP inhibits dephosphorylation, as well as
promoting phosphorylation, of the AMP-activated protein kinase. Studies using bacterially
expressed human protein phosphatase-2C alpha and native bovine protein phosphatase-2AC.
FEBS Lett 377:421425
Day P, Sharff A, Parra L, Cleasby A, Williams M, Horer S, Nar H, Redemann N, Tickle I, Yon J
(2007) Structure of a CBS-domain pair from the regulatory gamma1 subunit of human AMPK
in complex with AMP and ZMP. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 63:587596
Fryer LG, Parbu-Patel A, Carling D (2002) The Anti-diabetic drugs rosiglitazone and metformin
stimulate AMP-activated protein kinase through distinct signaling pathways. J Biol Chem
277:2522625232
Gomez-Galeno JE, Dang Q, Nguyen TH, Boyer SH, Grote MP, Sun Z, Chen M, Craigo WA, van
Poelje PD, MacKenna DA et al (2010) A potent and selective AMPK activator that inhibits de
novo lipogenesis. ACS Med Chem Lett 1:478482
Goransson O, McBride A, Hawley SA, Ross FA, Shpiro N, Foretz M, Viollet B, Hardie DG,
Sakamoto K (2007) Mechanism of action of A-769662, a valuable tool for activation of
AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 282:3254932560
Gowans GJ, Hawley SA, Ross FA, Hardie DG (2013) AMP is a true physiological regulator of
AMP-activated protein kinase by both allosteric activation and enhancing net phosphorylation.
Cell Metab 18:556566
Gwinn DM, Shackelford DB, Egan DF, Mihaylova MM, Mery A, Vasquez DS, Turk BE, Shaw RJ
(2008) AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol Cell
30:214226
19
20
Landgraf RR, Goswami D, Rajamohan F, Harris MS, Calabrese MF, Hoth LR, Magyar R, Pascal
BD, Chalmers MJ, Busby SA et al (2013) Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase revealed
by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Structure 21:19421953
Langendorf CG, Kemp BE (2015) Choreography of AMPK activation. Cell Res 25:56
Langendorf CG, Ngoei KR, Scott JW, Ling NX, Issa SM, Gorman MA, Parker MW, Sakamoto K,
Oakhill JS, Kemp BE (2016) Structural basis of allosteric and synergistic activation of AMPK
by furan-2-phosphonic derivative C2 binding. Nat Commun 7:10912
Lee YS, Kim WS, Kim KH, Yoon MJ, Cho HJ, Shen Y, Ye JM, Lee CH, Oh WK, Kim CT
et al (2006) Berberine, a natural plant product, activates AMP-activated protein kinase with
beneficial metabolic effects in diabetic and insulin-resistant states. Diabetes 55:22562264
Li X, Wang L, Zhou XE, Ke J, de Waal PW, Gu X, Tan MH, Wang D, Wu D, Xu HE et al (2015)
Structural basis of AMPK regulation by adenine nucleotides and glycogen. Cell Res 25:5066
Littler DR, Walker JR, Davis T, Wybenga-Groot LE, Finerty PJ Jr, Newman E, Mackenzie F,
Dhe-Paganon S (2010) A conserved mechanism of autoinhibition for the AMPK kinase
domain: ATP-binding site and catalytic loop refolding as a means of regulation. Acta
Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 66:143151
Mayer FV, Heath R, Underwood E, Sanders MJ, Carmena D, McCartney RR, Leiper FC, Xiao B,
Jing C, Walker PA et al (2011) ADP regulates SNF1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog
of AMP-activated protein kinase. Cell Metab 14:707714
McBride A, Hardie DG (2009) AMP-activated protein kinasea sensor of glycogen as well as
AMP and ATP? Acta Physiol (Oxf) 196:99113
McBride A, Ghilagaber S, Nikolaev A, Hardie DG (2009) The glycogen-binding domain on the
AMPK subunit allows the kinase to act as a glycogen sensor. Cell Metab 9:2334
Mobbs JI, Koay A, Di Paolo A, Bieri M, Petrie EJ, Gorman MA, Doughty L, Parker MW,
Stapleton D, Griffin MD et al (2015a) Determinants of oligosaccharide specificity of the
carbohydrate binding modules of AMP-activated protein kinase. Biochem J 468:245257
Mobbs JI, Koay A, Di Paolo A, Bieri M, Petrie EJ, Gorman MA, Doughty L, Parker MW,
Stapleton DI, Griffin MD et al (2015b) Determinants of oligosaccharide specificity of the
carbohydrate-binding modules of AMP-activated protein kinase. Biochem J 468:245257
Mounier R, Theret M, Lantier L, Foretz M, Viollet B (2015) Expanding roles for AMPK in skeletal
muscle plasticity. Trends Endocrinol Metab 26:275286
Nayak V, Zhao K, Wyce A, Schwartz MF, Lo WS, Berger SL, Marmorstein R (2006) Structure
and dimerization of the kinase domain from yeast Snf1, a member of the Snf1/AMPK protein
family. Structure 14:477485
Neumann D, Woods A, Carling D, Wallimann T, Schlattner U (2003) Mammalian AMP-activated
protein kinase: functional, heterotrimeric complexes by co-expression of subunits in
Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 30:230237
Neumann D, Wallimann T, Rider MH, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Hardie DG, Schlattner U (2007)
Signaling by AMP-activated protein kinase. In: Saks V (ed) Molecular system bioenergetics.
Wiley, Weinheim, pp 303338
Oakhill JS, Chen Z-P, Scott JW, Steel R, Castelli LA, Ling N, Macaulay SL, Kemp BE (2010)
-Subunit myristoylation is the gatekeeper for initiating metabolic stress sensing by
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:1923719241
Oakhill JS, Steel R, Chen Z-P, Scott JW, Ling N, Tam S, Kemp BE (2011) AMPK is a direct
adenylate charge-regulated protein kinase. Science 332:14331435
Oakhill JS, Scott JW, Kemp BE (2012) AMPK functions as an adenylate charge-regulated protein
kinase. Trends Endocrinol Metab 23:125132
Pang T, Zhang ZS, Gu M, Qiu BY, Yu LF, Cao PR, Shao W, Su MB, Li JY, Nan FJ et al (2008)
Small molecule antagonizes autoinhibition and activates AMP-activated protein kinase in
cells. J Biol Chem 283:1605116060
Polekhina G, Gupta A, Michell BJ, van Denderen B, Murthy S, Feil SC, Jennings IG, Campbell
DJ, Witters LA, Parker MW et al (2003) AMPK subunit targets metabolic stress sensing to
glycogen. Curr Biol 13:867871
21
Polekhina G, Gupta A, van Denderen BJ, Feil SC, Kemp BE, Stapleton D, Parker MW (2005)
Structural basis for glycogen recognition by AMP-activated protein kinase. Structure
10:14531462
Rajamohan F, Harris MS, Frisbie RK, Hoth LR, Geoghegan KF, Valentine JJ, Reyes AR, Landro
JA, Qiu X, Kurumbail RG (2010) Escherichia coli expression, purification and characterization of functional full-length recombinant 223 heterotrimeric complex of human
AMP-activated protein kinase. Protein Expr Purif 73:189197
Rajamohan F, Reyes AR, Frisbie RK, Hoth LR, Sahasrabudhe P, Magyar R, Landro JA, Withka JM,
Caspers NL, Calabrese MF et al (2015) Probing the enzyme kinetics, allosteric modulation and
activation of alpha-1 and alpha-2 subunit containing AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)
heterotrimeric complexes by pharmacological and physiological activators. Biochem J
473:581592
Riek U, Scholz R, Konarev P, Rufer A, Suter M, Nazabal A, Ringler P, Chami M, Muller SA,
Neumann D et al (2008) Structural properties of AMP-activated protein kinase: dimerization,
molecular shape, and changes upon ligand binding. J Biol Chem 283:1833118343
Ross FA, Jensen TE, Hardie DG (2016a) Differential regulation by AMP and ADP of AMPK
complexes containing different subunit isoforms. Biochem J 473:189199
Ross FA, MacKintosh C, Hardie DG (2016b) AMP-activated protein kinase: a cellular energy
sensor that comes in twelve flavours. FEBS J. doi:10.1111/febs.13698
Rudolph MJ, Amodeo GA, Iram SH, Hong SP, Pirino G, Carlson M, Tong L (2007) Structure of
the Bateman2 domain of yeast Snf4: dimeric association and relevance for AMP binding.
Structure 15:6574
Rudolph MJ, Amodeo GA, Tong L (2010) An inhibited conformation for the protein kinase
domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae AMPK homolog Snf1. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct
Biol Cryst Commun 66:9991002
Sanders MJ, Ali ZS, Hegarty BD, Heath R, Snowden MA, Carling D (2007) Defining the
mechanism of activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by the small molecule A-769662,
a member of the thienopyridone family. J Biol Chem 282:3253932548
Scott JW, van Denderen BJ, Jorgensen SB, Honeyman JE, Steinberg GR, Oakhill JS, Iseli TJ,
Koay A, Gooley PR, Stapleton D et al (2008) Thienopyridone drugs are selective activators of
AMP-activated protein kinase 1-containing complexes. Chem Biol 15:12201230
Scott JW, Ling N, Issa SMA, Dite TA, OBrien MT, Chen ZP, Galic S, Langendorf CG, Steinberg
GR, Kemp BE et al (2014) Small molecule drug A-769662 and AMP synergistically activate
naive AMPK independent of upstream kinase signaling. Chem Biol 21:19
Shaw RJ, Kosmatka M, Bardeesy N, Hurley RL, Witters LA, DePinho RA, Cantley LC (2004) The
tumor suppressor LKB1 kinase directly activates AMP-activated kinase and regulates apoptosis in response to energy stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:33293335
Steinberg GR, Kemp BE (2009) AMPK in health and disease. Physiol Rev 89:10251078
Suter M, Riek U, Tuerk R, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Neumann D (2006) Dissecting the role of
50 -AMP for allosteric stimulation, activation, and deactivation of AMP-activated protein
kinase. J Biol Chem 281:3220732216
Townley R, Shapiro L (2007) Crystal structures of the adenylate sensor form fission yeast
AMP-activated protein kinase. Science 315:17261729
Walker JR, Wybenga-Groot L, Finerty Jr PJ, Newman E, Mackenzie FM, Weigelt J, Sundstrom M,
Arrowsmith C, Edwards A, Bochkarev A, Structural Genomics Consortium et al (2005)
Structure of the glycogen-binding domain of the AMP-activated protein kinase beta2 subunit,
PDB accession code, 2F15
Warden SM, Richardson C, ODonnell J Jr, Stapleton D, Kemp BE, Witters LA (2001) Posttranslational modifications of the 1 subunit of AMP-activated protein kinase affect enzyme
activity and cellular localization. Biochem J 354:275283
Woods A, Johnstone SR, Dickerson K, Leiper FC, Fryer LG, Neumann D, Schlattner U,
Wallimann T, Carlson M, Carling D (2003a) LKB1 is the upstream kinase in the
AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Curr Biol 13:20042008
22