Can Liberal Values Such As Freedom, Equality, Individualism, Autonomy, Self-Determination, Pluralism, Tolerance and Individual Rights Are A Base of Social Life
0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
26 vues5 pages
Can Liberal Values Such as Freedom, Equality, Individualism, Autonomy, Self-Determination, Pluralism, Tolerance and Individual Rights Are a Base of Social Life
Titre original
Can Liberal Values Such as Freedom, Equality, Individualism, Autonomy, Self-Determination, Pluralism, Tolerance and Individual Rights Are a Base of Social Life
Can Liberal Values Such as Freedom, Equality, Individualism, Autonomy, Self-Determination, Pluralism, Tolerance and Individual Rights Are a Base of Social Life
0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
26 vues5 pages
Can Liberal Values Such As Freedom, Equality, Individualism, Autonomy, Self-Determination, Pluralism, Tolerance and Individual Rights Are A Base of Social Life
Can Liberal Values Such as Freedom, Equality, Individualism, Autonomy, Self-Determination, Pluralism, Tolerance and Individual Rights Are a Base of Social Life
pluralism, tolerance and individual rights are a base of social life? In recent years, in relation to issues raised by the crisis of social policies, we have developed a theoretical reflection, with reference to the main frame assembly rights problems in modern societies. In order to critically approach this reflection is necessary to bear in mind two points. First: the historical horizon of bourgeois society the concept of the state is connected with the idea of the basic rules. This connection does the political theory of classical liberalism necessary for the doing of individuals to grow in freedom and equal rights institutions, secured against the arbitrary power of the privileged. Compared directly with institutions of freedom and equality before the law and the constitution understood individual rights frameworks strong core guarantee of private property. The inclusion of the right of private property in the editorial context state, based on principles of "freedom" and "fairness" was deemed to ensure simultaneously the essential terms of social reproduction, as the "acquisition" parted from Forcibly rights, whilst captive labor transformed into unfettered. Second: the development of bourgeois society in the 19th century and the birth of the "social question" put into question the adequacy of the above in securing social reproduction conditions, since this takes place through the separation of free labor from the means of reproduction of. With reference to the development of this issue is the comprehensive reform of the political system (universal suffrage) and the legislative vesting of labor rights, starting with the setting of the size of the working day. The largely schematic this historical-theoretical overview, through which attempts to approximate focal issues and redefine frameworks individual and social rights, is the substrate of a perception in these issues which are understood in reference to the central problem of the relationship of individual property and social work in the development of division of labor in modern societies. As part of this approach develops a reflection on political criteria depending on the extent of the support provided for arrangements to ensure social work, as well as on criteria for evaluating theoretical arguments depending on the degree of support of social authority.
Now possible to turn to examine current policies and
theoretical arguments, which are developed by focusing on the confirmation of the "absolute" character of private property, while accompanied by the description 'frames' are considered to implement the rehabilitation demands of private property rights thereby limiting the scope of social authority. Core known as libertarian (libertarian) argument is the establishment of the right to private property as absolute. Any attempt to relativize this right is deemed to constitute insulting (aggression). As relativize attempt of this right not only considered the recognition of social rights (social authority) and vary from context what defines it as a "human right" as a right proper to the human nature, especially the frame what defines human right of those corresponding to the publicity principles in general. This reduction in the absolute rights type of right of private ownership removes initially the historicity of social separations in respect of which formed the framework of individual rights and in the second stage does not understand the connection of these separations in terms of reproduction of society. Thus, in analogy with the properties of atoms, it considered that "the land and natural resources are given to individuals rather than society. The interest in the theoretical argument is that social indeterminacy of the individual doing founded the redefinition of political economy relationship, based on the redefinition of this concept of politics is constructed as a concept "deregulation" of frames that define the processes of social reproduction. It is basically repeating Hobbes argument of the peace, that in order to be assured selfish doing people needed the acceptance of these certain minimum binding frameworks, which are established by reference to data from the localized to a separate from society violence bullet. O Hobbes believes that the only possible content of the human will is the general or the person's fault. So the criterion of the moral act purely considered through a utilitarian and psychological perspective. To maintain social peace, Hobbes creates some trick, the Leviathan, the state, either in the form of absolute monarchy or parliamentary democracy. The important point is that this state has the monopoly of violence and absolute power. In return to man the State exercising this absolute power only for maintaining social peace: Then Rousseau seeks social conditions and collective achievement of the General Will, and for him it is universal as for Diderot, and the conclusion of a genuine social contract.
The solution proposed by Rousseau is that of self-government.
So in place of the automatic Hobbes, puts the concept of man as an autonomous (source of law). At the same time, make a "positive" conception of liberty which is not based on the definition and protection of privacy of others, but to participation in community collective decisions. As a concept appears in ethics, politics and philosophy and bioethics refers to the potential capacity of a logical person to take crucial decisions on information and without coercion. The term is also used political sense regarding self-determination of a people. In fact, liberalism is a philosophy on the concept of humanity and society. The political philosopher John Gray has identified common elements in the liberal thought as: the individualistic, the balancing, progressive and world. The individualistic element supports the moral superiority of man against the pressures of social collectivism, the balancing element give equal moral value and the same status in all subjects, the progressive element asserts that successive generations can improve their socio-political settings, and global element confirms the moral unity of mankind and marginalizes local cultural differences. The moral and political liberalism of speculations have been based on traditions such as natural rights and utilitarian theory, although sometimes the liberals sought support up by scientific and religious circles. Through all these elements and traditions, scientists have identified the following important common aspects of liberal thinking: belief in equality and individual freedom, defense of private property and individual rights, advocacy of limited constitutional government, recognition the importance of the relative values as pluralism, tolerance, autonomy, bodily integrity and consensus. Besides the negative screening, positive and eternal freedom, liberals have tried to understand the exact relationship between freedom and democracy. While struggling to extend the right to vote, the Liberals understand more and more that those who lived outside the democratic decision-making subject to the tyranny of the majority, a principle that is explained in the book "On Liberty" by John Stuart Mill and "The Republic in America "by Alexis de Tocqueville. To respond to this, the liberals began to assert safeguards to prevent any attempts of majorities violating the rights of minorities. Apart from freedom, liberals have contributed to the development of other principles important to build their philosophical structure, such as equality, pluralism and tolerance.
Stressing the confusion in the first principle, Voltaire commented
that "equality is simultaneously the most natural state and, at times, the biggest pipe dream." All forms of liberalism claim that fundamentally people are equal. Arguing that people are naturally equal, liberals claim that all possess the same right to freedom. In other words, no one is inherently entitled to enjoy the privileges of liberal society more than any other and all people are equal before the law. For the liberal philosophy, pluralism easily leads to tolerance. Where persons hold differing views, argue the liberals, must defend and respect everyone's right to disagree. From the liberal perspective, tolerance originally associated with religious tolerance, with Baruch Spinoza condemning the "nonsense of religious persecution and the ideological wars." Tolerance also played a central role in the ideas of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. Both philosophers believed that society would contain different perceptions of good, moral life and how they need to allow people to make their own choices without interference from the state or other persons. In philosophical term individualism (or individualism) we refer to the theory that establishes the social existence of the individual conscience and will, gives exclusive value to the particular person's rights and describes the tendency of man to do what most interest for him. As to individualism, individual rights have priority over social and purpose of social life is the welfare of the individual, individualism describes mainly beings survive individually rather than live together socially and the proposed utilitarian lifestyle leads to fission, instead of relationship and unity. From the observation of the American experience, especially in the New England region, which has been free from the stigma of slavery, Tocqueville notes that the defense of democracy, avoiding the tyranny of the majority and public opinion and the survival of political freedom guaranteed thanks to government communities, active citizenship, the existence of a free press and the organization system of justice in the courts of jurors. Today, we see around us individuality is fully mutated into a sterile individualism, in the sense of egoism, of cynicism, of petty and corporatist interests, forming a new system of values and ideals. We see the concept of citizenship has been demolished by indifference and passivity of people without identity, confused with views on rights and obligations. As a result, nearly every form of collective organization of life (state, syndicalism, movements and
associations) has alienated and has lost its content, now addressing the reluctance of people.