Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
plm1
Driggs, Edmund H.; krsmith@charlottenc.gov
Broughton, Jimmy
Re: Non-discrimination ordinance
Sunday, February 21, 2016 2:51:06 PM
Ed and Kenny --- Thank you for your inquiry. Although I have made a point as the former 14 year Mayor and
current Governor to stay out of specific issues being voted on by the Charlotte City Council, the item of changing
basic long-established values and norms of access to public restrooms is misguided and has major statewide
ramifications.
It is not only the citizens of Charlotte that will be impacted by changing basic restroom and locker room norms but
also citizens from across our state and nation who visit and work in Charlotte. This shift in policy could also create
major public safety issues by putting citizens in possible danger from deviant actions by individuals taking improper
advantage of a bad policy.
Also, this action of allowing a person with male anatomy, for example, to use a female restroom or locker room will
most likely cause immediate State legislative intervention which I would support as governor. This action also puts
an unneeded strain on the relationship between the City of Charlotte and the State of North Carolina.
I encourage you to convince your colleagues to focus on issues most important to our citizens and this proposed
change is not one of them. In fact, the City of Charlotte is causing more problems by trying to solve a problem that
does not exist.
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 21, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Driggs, Edmund H. <edriggs@ci.charlotte.nc.us> wrote:
>
> Governor McCrory,
>
> Tomorrow night Charlotte City Council is scheduled to vote on amendments to the City's non-discrimination
ordinance that, among other things, would add members of the LGBT community to the protected classes in areas
such as the use of public accommodations. There are no exclusions or special provisions in the proposed
amendments related to the use of gender-specific public accommodations such as bathrooms, locker rooms, etc. As
Chair of the City Council Intergovernmental Relations Committee, I am interested to know if you have an opinion
on how such a change to the ordinance might affect North Carolina or relations between Charlotte and Raleigh.
>
> Thank you
>
> Ed Driggs
> Charlotte City Council
>
> Sent from my iPhone
________________________________
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official.
From:
To:
Date:
plm1
Ellis, Joshua N
Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:19:37 PM
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
plm1
Ellis, Joshua N
Fwd: Non-discrimination ordinance
Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:47:04 PM
FYI. Pat
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Driggs, Edmund H." <edriggs@ci.charlotte.nc.us>
Date: February 21, 2016 at 3:59:40 PM EST
To: Jennifer Roberts <jenniferdwroberts@gmail.com>, "Kinsey, Patsy"
<pkinsey@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Austin, Alvin J." <aaustin@ci.charlotte.nc.us>,
"Mayfield, LaWana" <lmayfield@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Phipps, Greg A."
<gaphipps@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Autry, John" <jautry@ci.charlotte.nc.us>,
"Smith, Kenny R." <krsmith@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Fallon, Claire"
<cfallon@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Eiselt, Julie" <Julie.Eiselt@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, Vi
Lyles <violalyles@gmail.com>, "Mitchell, James"
<James.Mitchell@ci.charlotte.nc.us>
Subject: Fwd: Non-discrimination ordinance
Mayor and Council colleagues,
One issue that has concerned me during our deliberations concerning changes to
our non-discrimination ordinance is how Charlotte's relationship with our state
government might be affected. In my capacity as Intergovernmental Relations
chair, I felt it would be better to find out before rather than after our vote, so I
wrote to Governor McCrory. I am forwarding to you below my message to him
and the response he sent me and Councilmember Smith.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Pat McCrory
Date: February 21, 2016 at 2:51:02 PM EST
To: "Driggs, Edmund H." <edriggs@ci.charlotte.nc.us>,
"krsmith@charlottenc.gov" <krsmith@charlottenc.gov>
Cc: "Broughton, Jimmy" <jimmy.broughton@nc.gov>
Subject: Re: Non-discrimination ordinance
Ed and Kenny --- Thank you for your inquiry. Although I have made
a point as the former 14 year Mayor and current Governor to stay out
of specific issues being voted on by the Charlotte City Council, the
item of changing basic long-established values and norms of access
Governor McCrory,
Thank you
Ed Driggs
Charlotte City Council
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
plm1
kennysmthd6@gmail.com
Fwd: Non-discrimination ordinance
Sunday, February 21, 2016 4:24:49 PM
Governor McCrory,
Thank you
Ed Driggs
Charlotte City Council
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
plm1@nc.gov
Billy Constangy
Fwd: As discussed
Friday, March 25, 2016 9:53:14 AM
Q: Why could the General Assembly not simply reverse the "bathroom provision"
of the Charlotte ordinance?
A: The N.C. Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 24, prohibits the General Assembly from
passing local acts on certain subjects, including business regulation (trade, labor,
mining and manufacturing). There is no precedent for the General Assembly to
amend or modify an ordinance of a municipality, and to do so on a subject of
business regulation would almost certainly violate Art. I, Sec. 24. Therefore, we
could not pass a law to amend or modify Charlotte's ordinance specifically and
directly to reverse the bathroom-access aspect.
In either event, invalidating the ordinance wholly would mean that protections
from public accommodations discrimination on grounds of race, color, religion,
national origin and sex that had been in place (perhaps without proper authority)
since 1968 (sex actually was added in 1972) would have been eliminated,
arguably by act of the General Assembly.
The way to prevent that result was whatwe did. We enacted a public policy
statement applying Charlotte's legacy public accommodations protections on a
statewide basis. We coupled that with a preemption of cities from adopting
ordinances in this area, to prevent further conflicts. And we adopted a policy of
sex-separated bathrooms statewide for government buildings. That policy is not
binding on private businesses, which are free to pursue their own policies.
All of this was necessary to undo the cross-sex bathroom maneuver without
uncertainty and without killing the legacy public accommodations protections.
While all of this is true and accurate, and explains why addressing the bathroom
policy alone did require us to proceed as we did in Parts I and III of the bill, I
personally believed that it was even more appropriate on policy grounds to clarify
through field preemption the existing limits on city authority that Charlotte
disregarded. They simply have not been delegated this authority and it is
inconsistent with our governing constitutional structure. Indeed, the one
remaining section of the bill, preempting cities'regulation of their contractors'
business practices, was essential to prevent the City from imposing mandates on
businesses located outside city limits. The prohibition on wage regulation is the
only item that was not strictly necessary, but it also was well warranted and will
be welcomed by businesses.
Regards,
Cell: 704-619-7580
Work: 704-716-1202
dan@votedanbishop.com
To donate: www.votedanbishop.com
Paid for by Bishop for Senate. North Carolina law requires candidate
committees to report the name, mailing address, job title or profession,
and name of employer or employers specific field for each individual
whose contribution aggregate is in excess of $50 in an election.
Contributions may not exceed $5,000 per individual and are not tax
deductible as charitable donations for federal income tax purposes.
Corporate contributions and contributions from foreign nationals are
prohibited by law.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
plm1@nc.gov
Chuck Allen
Fwd: NEWS ALERT: Major businesses stand against NC anti-discrimination law
Thursday, March 24, 2016 6:05:12 PM
and takes diversity into account when it chooses its event sites.
North Carolina passes controversial bill blocking city, county LGBT protections
North Carolina passes controversial bill blocking city, county LGBT protections
"Our commitment to the fair treatment of all individuals, regardless of sexual
orientation or gender identity, has not changed and is at the core of our NCAA
values. It is our expectation that all people will be welcomed and treated with
respect in cities that host our NCAA championships and events," the
organization's statement said.
Supporters of the law signed by Republican Gov. Pat McCrory Wednesday night
say it protects all people from having to share bathrooms with people who make
them feel unsafe. Advocates for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender rights call
the law a "devastating" setback that they may try to challenge in court.
Determined to undo a Charlotte ordinance that would have protected
transgender people who use restrooms aligned with their gender identity, the
North Carolina legislature convened a special session to produce the new law,
which prevents all cities and counties in the state from passing their own antidiscrimination rules.
The new law also prohibits local governments from requiring businesses to pay
workers more than the state's minimum wage, currently set at $7.25 an hour.
McCrory had sought a bill dealing exclusively with bathrooms, but signed it
anyway.
Critics of the Charlotte ordinance, which would have taken effect in North
Carolina's largest city on April 1, focused on its language involving transgender
people and restrooms.
McCrory, who was the mayor of Charlotte for 14 years, said the new law was
"passed by a bipartisan majority to stop this breach of basic privacy and
etiquette."
Republicans and their allies said they had to protect the safety of women and
children, arguing that any man perhaps even a sex offender could enter a
woman's restroom or locker room simply by calling himself transgender.
"It's common sense biological men should not be in women's showers, locker
rooms and bathrooms," said GOP Rep. Dean Arp of Monroe before the House
voted 82-26 in favor. Although 12 House Democrats joined all Republicans
present in voting for the bill, all Senate Democrats walked out in protest, leaving
Republicans to voice unanimous approval.
"We choose not to participate in this farce," Senate Minority Leader Dan Blue of
Raleigh said.
Gay rights leaders and transgender people said the law demonizes them and
espouses bogus claims about risks in bathrooms to defeat a much broader range
of protections, denying lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people the right to
get a hotel room, hail a taxi or dine at a restaurant without fear.
Charlotte Mayor Jennifer Roberts, who pressed for the anti-discrimination
ordinance, said in a statement that the General Assembly "is on the wrong side of
history."
McCrory countered that Roberts and the city council had overreached into "the
most personal of settings."
Ordinance supporters and opponents spoke to legislators in House and Senate
committees.
Everyone deserves to be treated with dignity and respect, Donna Eaton of Cary
told lawmakers, but she worried that Charlotte's ordinance would "open the door
for people with malicious intent who would masquerade as transgenders to come
in and actually take advantage and have access to our kids."
Skye Thompson, 15, of Greenville, who was born female but now identifies as
male, told senators that requiring him to use a woman's restroom puts his life in
danger: "I've dealt with bullying my whole life and now I worry that my own state
lawmakers are bullying me as well. I feel bullied by you guys," Thompson said.
Bathroom use has proved to be a potent wedge issue for opponents of gay rights
protections around the country since Houston's anti-discrimination law was
overwhelmingly voted down in a referendum last year, but LGBT advocates have
had some victories, too. South Dakota's legislature failed to override Gov. Dennis
Daugaard's veto of a bill requiring students to use bathrooms corresponding to
their birth gender, and a similar bill in Tennessee bill died Tuesday.
Associated Press
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
plm1@nc.gov
Ellis, Joshua N
Fwd: Non-discrimination ordinance
Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:47:00 PM
FYI. Pat
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Driggs, Edmund H." <edriggs@ci.charlotte.nc.us>
Date: February 21, 2016 at 3:59:40 PM EST
To: Jennifer Roberts <jenniferdwroberts@gmail.com>, "Kinsey, Patsy"
<pkinsey@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Austin, Alvin J." <aaustin@ci.charlotte.nc.us>,
"Mayfield, LaWana" <lmayfield@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Phipps, Greg A."
<gaphipps@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Autry, John" <jautry@ci.charlotte.nc.us>,
"Smith, Kenny R." <krsmith@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Fallon, Claire"
<cfallon@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, "Eiselt, Julie" <Julie.Eiselt@ci.charlotte.nc.us>, Vi
Lyles <violalyles@gmail.com>, "Mitchell, James"
<James.Mitchell@ci.charlotte.nc.us>
Subject: Fwd: Non-discrimination ordinance
Mayor and Council colleagues,
One issue that has concerned me during our deliberations concerning changes to
our non-discrimination ordinance is how Charlotte's relationship with our state
government might be affected. In my capacity as Intergovernmental Relations
chair, I felt it would be better to find out before rather than after our vote, so I
wrote to Governor McCrory. I am forwarding to you below my message to him
and the response he sent me and Councilmember Smith.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Pat McCrory
Date: February 21, 2016 at 2:51:02 PM EST
To: "Driggs, Edmund H." <edriggs@ci.charlotte.nc.us>,
"krsmith@charlottenc.gov" <krsmith@charlottenc.gov>
Cc: "Broughton, Jimmy" <jimmy.broughton@nc.gov>
Subject: Re: Non-discrimination ordinance
Ed and Kenny --- Thank you for your inquiry. Although I have made
a point as the former 14 year Mayor and current Governor to stay out
of specific issues being voted on by the Charlotte City Council, the
item of changing basic long-established values and norms of access
Governor McCrory,
Thank you
Ed Driggs
Charlotte City Council
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
plm1@nc.gov
kennysmthd6@gmail.com
Fwd: Non-discrimination ordinance
Sunday, February 21, 2016 4:24:49 PM
Governor McCrory,
Thank you
Ed Driggs
Charlotte City Council
From:
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject:
Date:
plm1@nc.gov
Driggs, Edmund H.; krsmith@charlottenc.gov
Broughton, Jimmy
plm1
Re: Non-discrimination ordinance
Sunday, February 21, 2016 2:51:01 PM
Ed and Kenny --- Thank you for your inquiry. Although I have made a point as the former 14 year Mayor and
current Governor to stay out of specific issues being voted on by the Charlotte City Council, the item of changing
basic long-established values and norms of access to public restrooms is misguided and has major statewide
ramifications.
It is not only the citizens of Charlotte that will be impacted by changing basic restroom and locker room norms but
also citizens from across our state and nation who visit and work in Charlotte. This shift in policy could also create
major public safety issues by putting citizens in possible danger from deviant actions by individuals taking improper
advantage of a bad policy.
Also, this action of allowing a person with male anatomy, for example, to use a female restroom or locker room will
most likely cause immediate State legislative intervention which I would support as governor. This action also puts
an unneeded strain on the relationship between the City of Charlotte and the State of North Carolina.
I encourage you to convince your colleagues to focus on issues most important to our citizens and this proposed
change is not one of them. In fact, the City of Charlotte is causing more problems by trying to solve a problem that
does not exist.
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 21, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Driggs, Edmund H. <edriggs@ci.charlotte.nc.us> wrote:
>
> Governor McCrory,
>
> Tomorrow night Charlotte City Council is scheduled to vote on amendments to the City's non-discrimination
ordinance that, among other things, would add members of the LGBT community to the protected classes in areas
such as the use of public accommodations. There are no exclusions or special provisions in the proposed
amendments related to the use of gender-specific public accommodations such as bathrooms, locker rooms, etc. As
Chair of the City Council Intergovernmental Relations Committee, I am interested to know if you have an opinion
on how such a change to the ordinance might affect North Carolina or relations between Charlotte and Raleigh.
>
> Thank you
>
> Ed Driggs
> Charlotte City Council
>
> Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
McCrory, Pat
Governor"s Office
FW: Message from an ex-pat
Tuesday, March 22, 2016 9:32:00 AM
image001.png
image002.png
Lisa Frazier
Executive Assistant to Governor Pat McCrory
lisa.frazier@nc.gov
I moved to Europe from North Carolina because NC is so ignorant and backward. Heard your
special session to try to stop Charlotte's LGBT protective ordinance has been called. Note the
world sees what NC Republicans are doing and it looks backward and actually hurtful not
helpful. This is sad for the children of NC that grown ups are blind and want discrimination
instead of holding a special assembly over something worthwhile like poverty, equality,
education or being the best you can be. It is not about beating people down or stomping on the
rights of people not "like" you or of your religion. So glad I am in Europe and watching this
from NC..... Shame on you for your ignorance in 2016.....it is not 1960 anymore....
Carol King
Sent from my Xperia tablet
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
McCrory, Pat
Governor"s Office
FW: Special Session Called for Wed (March 23rd)
Tuesday, March 22, 2016 10:21:00 AM
image001.png
image002.png
Lisa Frazier
Executive Assistant to Governor Pat McCrory
lisa.frazier@nc.gov
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Stith, Thomas A
Broughton, Jimmy
FW: Charlotte Regional Partnership Responds to NC General Assembly Action
Thursday, March 24, 2016 2:28:00 PM
image001.png
image002.png
Thomas Stith
Chief of Staff to Governor Pat McCrory
The NC State Capitol
Office: 919.814.2111
Fax: 919.733.3715
Tony Almeida
North State Media
704-245-4528
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ronnie Bryant <rbryant@charlotteusa.com>
Date: March 24, 2016 at 2:00:38 PM EDT
To: <talmeida2113@gmail.com>
Subject: Charlotte Regional Partnership Responds to NC General Assembly Action
Reply-To: Ronnie Bryant <rbryant@charlotteusa.com>
Investor Insider.
Dear Valued Investor,
Charlotte USA and North Carolina are better than this. The Charlotte Regional
Partnership stands firmly with the many voices who have spoken out against
this law, including Charlotte Mayor Jennifer Roberts and North Carolina
Attorney General Roy Cooper. We must find a way to reverse this
discriminatory legislation and implement progressive laws that truly reflect the
people and business owners of North Carolina.
Sincerely,
Ronnie L. Bryant, CEcD, FM, HLM
President & CEO
Charlotte Regional Partnership
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Stith, Thomas A
"plm1"
FW: BofA statement
Thursday, March 24, 2016 1:34:00 PM
image001.png
image002.png
Thomas Stith
Chief of Staff to Governor Pat McCrory
The NC State Capitol
Office: 919.814.2111
Fax: 919.733.3715
Jimmy,
Good to speak with you. Heres the statement again, it will only be given reactively. Thanks again.
Bank of America has been steadfast in our commitment to non-discrimination and in our
support for LGBT employees through progressive workplace policies and practices. We support
public policies that support non-discrimination.
Kelly Whitley
SVP, State Government Relations
Mid-Atlantic Region
Bank of America
kelly.whitley@bankofamerica.com
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms
and conditions available at http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete this message.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties by an authorized state official.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Stith, Thomas A
John Rustin
Broughton, Jimmy
Re: Letter to Gov. McCrory re: Need for Special Session to Repeal Charlotte Ordinance Changes
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:26:46 PM
John,
Thanks for your input and recommendation.
Best Regards,
Thomas
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:18 AM, John Rustin <jrustin@ncfamily.org> wrote:
Thomas and Jimmy,
I pray this email finds you both well! Please find attached a letter to Governor
McCrory, Senator Berger, and Speaker Moore regarding the need for the
Governor to call a Special Session prior to April 1 to repeal the local ordinance
changes recently adopted by the Charlotte City Council. The North Carolina
Family Policy Council believes a FULL REPEAL of these ordinance changes
before they go into effect and preemptive legislation to prevent other cities and
counties in North Carolina from adopting similar ordinances is of utmost
importance.
Please contact me at 919.807.0800 or by email at jrustin@ncfamily.org if you
have any questions and if you would like to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,
John L. Rustin
P.S. A copy of the letter is also being hand-delivered to your office today.
<NCFPC_H_Logo-270x76.jpg>
John L. Rustin, President
North Carolina Family Policy Council
P.O. Box 20607, Raleigh NC 27619
Office: 919.807.0800
Mobile: 919.389.3682
Email:jrustin@ncfamily.org
Web:www.ncfamily.org
Equipping NC families to be voices of persuasion in their communities."
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thomas.Stith@nc.gov
John Rustin
Broughton, Jimmy
Re: Letter to Gov. McCrory re: Need for Special Session to Repeal Charlotte Ordinance Changes
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:26:45 PM
John,
Thanks for your input and recommendation.
Best Regards,
Thomas
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:18 AM, John Rustin <jrustin@ncfamily.org> wrote:
Thomas and Jimmy,
I pray this email finds you both well! Please find attached a letter to Governor
McCrory, Senator Berger, and Speaker Moore regarding the need for the
Governor to call a Special Session prior to April 1 to repeal the local ordinance
changes recently adopted by the Charlotte City Council. The North Carolina
Family Policy Council believes a FULL REPEAL of these ordinance changes
before they go into effect and preemptive legislation to prevent other cities and
counties in North Carolina from adopting similar ordinances is of utmost
importance.
Please contact me at 919.807.0800 or by email at jrustin@ncfamily.org if you
have any questions and if you would like to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,
John L. Rustin
P.S. A copy of the letter is also being hand-delivered to your office today.
<NCFPC_H_Logo-270x76.jpg>
John L. Rustin, President
North Carolina Family Policy Council
P.O. Box 20607, Raleigh NC 27619
Office: 919.807.0800
Mobile: 919.389.3682
Email:jrustin@ncfamily.org
Web:www.ncfamily.org
Equipping NC families to be voices of persuasion in their communities."
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
plm1
Chuck Allen
Fwd: NEWS ALERT: Major businesses stand against NC anti-discrimination law
Thursday, March 24, 2016 6:05:12 PM
and takes diversity into account when it chooses its event sites.
North Carolina passes controversial bill blocking city, county LGBT protections
North Carolina passes controversial bill blocking city, county LGBT protections
"Our commitment to the fair treatment of all individuals, regardless of sexual
orientation or gender identity, has not changed and is at the core of our NCAA
values. It is our expectation that all people will be welcomed and treated with
respect in cities that host our NCAA championships and events," the
organization's statement said.
Supporters of the law signed by Republican Gov. Pat McCrory Wednesday night
say it protects all people from having to share bathrooms with people who make
them feel unsafe. Advocates for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender rights call
the law a "devastating" setback that they may try to challenge in court.
Determined to undo a Charlotte ordinance that would have protected
transgender people who use restrooms aligned with their gender identity, the
North Carolina legislature convened a special session to produce the new law,
which prevents all cities and counties in the state from passing their own antidiscrimination rules.
The new law also prohibits local governments from requiring businesses to pay
workers more than the state's minimum wage, currently set at $7.25 an hour.
McCrory had sought a bill dealing exclusively with bathrooms, but signed it
anyway.
Critics of the Charlotte ordinance, which would have taken effect in North
Carolina's largest city on April 1, focused on its language involving transgender
people and restrooms.
McCrory, who was the mayor of Charlotte for 14 years, said the new law was
"passed by a bipartisan majority to stop this breach of basic privacy and
etiquette."
Republicans and their allies said they had to protect the safety of women and
children, arguing that any man perhaps even a sex offender could enter a
woman's restroom or locker room simply by calling himself transgender.
"It's common sense biological men should not be in women's showers, locker
rooms and bathrooms," said GOP Rep. Dean Arp of Monroe before the House
voted 82-26 in favor. Although 12 House Democrats joined all Republicans
present in voting for the bill, all Senate Democrats walked out in protest, leaving
Republicans to voice unanimous approval.
"We choose not to participate in this farce," Senate Minority Leader Dan Blue of
Raleigh said.
Gay rights leaders and transgender people said the law demonizes them and
espouses bogus claims about risks in bathrooms to defeat a much broader range
of protections, denying lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people the right to
get a hotel room, hail a taxi or dine at a restaurant without fear.
Charlotte Mayor Jennifer Roberts, who pressed for the anti-discrimination
ordinance, said in a statement that the General Assembly "is on the wrong side of
history."
McCrory countered that Roberts and the city council had overreached into "the
most personal of settings."
Ordinance supporters and opponents spoke to legislators in House and Senate
committees.
Everyone deserves to be treated with dignity and respect, Donna Eaton of Cary
told lawmakers, but she worried that Charlotte's ordinance would "open the door
for people with malicious intent who would masquerade as transgenders to come
in and actually take advantage and have access to our kids."
Skye Thompson, 15, of Greenville, who was born female but now identifies as
male, told senators that requiring him to use a woman's restroom puts his life in
danger: "I've dealt with bullying my whole life and now I worry that my own state
lawmakers are bullying me as well. I feel bullied by you guys," Thompson said.
Bathroom use has proved to be a potent wedge issue for opponents of gay rights
protections around the country since Houston's anti-discrimination law was
overwhelmingly voted down in a referendum last year, but LGBT advocates have
had some victories, too. South Dakota's legislature failed to override Gov. Dennis
Daugaard's veto of a bill requiring students to use bathrooms corresponding to
their birth gender, and a similar bill in Tennessee bill died Tuesday.
Associated Press
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
plm1
Phil Berger; Rep. Tim Moore
Broughton, Jimmy; Steen, Fred; Stith, Thomas A
Fwd: Non-discrimination ordinance
Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:50:03 PM
Governor McCrory,
Thank you
Ed Driggs
Charlotte City Council
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
plm1@nc.gov
Phil Berger; Rep. Tim Moore
Broughton, Jimmy; Steen, Fred; Stith, Thomas A
Fwd: Non-discrimination ordinance
Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:50:02 PM
Governor McCrory,
Thank you
Ed Driggs
Charlotte City Council
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
plm1@nc.gov
Phil Berger; Rep. Tim Moore
Broughton, Jimmy; Steen, Fred; Stith, Thomas A
Fwd: Non-discrimination ordinance
Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:50:02 PM
Governor McCrory,
Thank you
Ed Driggs
Charlotte City Council