Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Corporation
Organizational Analysis of
The Binghampton Development Corporation
Priyanka Chatterjee, Gloria Harris, Iqtidar ul Hassan, and Laura Vaughn
The University of Memphis
seniors and the Tillman Crossing that are now low income apartments. The organization
has partnerships with the City of Memphis Housing Division, the Shelby County Court,
the Tennessee Housing Agency, and the Christ United Methodist Church that help fund
the BDCs projects. Furthermore, residents attend community meetings where they are
empowered to become involved in building their community. As a result, the BDC has
done much to restore confidence, prosperity and self-sufficiency to the area.
continuing to grow in order to adapt to the needs of the community and solidifying the
organizations purpose and importance within the Binghampton community.
To further comment on the technological aspects of the BDC, the website for the
organization has a few flaws. The website is designed in a manner that is solely
informative. There are not many opportunities for Memphians to become involved
because the residents are encouraged to improve the community for their selves;
however, the website does provide contact information for various individuals who work
for and with the BDC.
Resistance from the community is the first problem observed to be a challenge for the
BDC. The residents in the community were very apprehensive of the BDC and how it
would ultimately impact the community. A few words that kept surfacing were the
white knight and gentrification. In order to eliminate this kind of image and ensure
the community that there was no racially fueled reason for wanting to help, the BDC is
very strict about maintaining its integrity by promoting self-sufficiency and having the
2.
3.
life.
The BDC is unusually performance-oriented. We observed that the BDC has ignored
administrative elements to the extent that there is no strategic plan put in place to guide a
more systematic implementation of projects. Subsequently, the BDC has no mechanism
for program evaluation. By implementing a strategic plan and readily evaluating
programs or projects, the BDC could optimize its positive influences on the community
by determining the success of a program and the allocation of time and funds to different
4.
Directors.
An interesting fact about the BDC is that there is no active volunteerism. This approach
is in line with the BDCs focus on making the community more self-sufficient. However,
volunteers would be essential in helping community members complete tasks more
efficiently and even allow Memphis residents to be more involved in the Binghampton
neighborhood and foster the creation of new relationships.
References:
Casey, W. (3/31/2016), Skype Interview
Axelrod, N. R. (1994). Board leadership and board development. The Jossey-Bass
handbook of nonprofit leadership and management, 119-136.
Nason, J. W. (2013). Board assessment of the chief executive: A responsibility essential to
good governance. Washington, DC: National Center for Nonprofit Boards, 1992..
Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1992). The Board's Role in Public Relations and Communications.
National Center for Nonprofit Boards.
Howe, F. (1989). Fund Raising and the Nonprofit. Board Washington, DC: National
Center for Nonprofit Boards