Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.nextgeneration.co.za/effective-stakeholder-engagement-in-sustainabilityreporting/
Effective Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Reporting
By Reana Rossouw on March 15, 2015 in Articles, Sustainable Development
The Value of Effective Stakeholder Engagement in Integrated and Sustainability
Reporting
INTRODUCTION
for setting organisational strategy, implementing action plans, and assessing outcomes.
Sustainability reporting enables a robust assessment of the organisations performance, and
can support continuous improvement in performance over time. It also serves as a tool for
engaging with stakeholders and securing useful input to organisational processes.
MATERIALITY
Materiality includes matters that are significant to a companys activities. Materiality takes
into account substantial economic, environmental and social factors in addition to financial
factors. By determining its most material issues, a company can clarify and confirm the
strategic themes that drive the long-term success of the business (sustainability), ascertain the
most significant risks and opportunities, and manage the expectations and priorities of its
stakeholders. Materiality identification provides a company with a competitive advantage,
enabling the generation of business intelligence and knowledge, assists with the anticipation
and management of change and of course, influence the companys strategic direction,
management priorities and therefore its performance over time, thus contributing to a more
sustainable future. Enabling informed decision-making and avoiding or reducing risks
ultimately contribute to a more stable environment for society and business, and develops and
expands market opportunities. The link between stakeholder inclusiveness and materiality
is undeniable, as stakeholders assist in the identification and prioritisation of material
issues.
SELECTING STAKEHOLDERS
Increasingly, issues that are important to society e.g. water scarcity, cultural preservation,
health, education, environmental protection, and climate change are becoming critical factors
for companies to consider strategically and address operationally. Shareholders, investment
partners, boards and executives will always need to know what is in the best interest of the
companys financial performance, but prioritising issues based on a companys financial
needs will become less effective if these fail to also reflect societys rights, needs and
expectations. The only way that companies can address this enigma effectively is to engage
the stakeholders that are impacted by their operations and balance this through the
engagement with financial stakeholders.
Stakeholders should not be lumped together in homogenous groups. They should be
separated into groupings such as internal stakeholders and external stakeholders or directly or
indirectly impacted/affected stakeholders or even primary/secondary or tertiary stakeholder
groups. Of course, these stakeholder groups will vary from year to year as the most material
issues are identified and prioritized year after year. Additionally, stakeholder groupings
should also reflect potential impact on companys performance, potential risk, opportunities,
operational and strategic alignment. Engaging the right stakeholders in the right way will
ultimately result in on-going learning about and improvement of the organisation as it
provides in-depth knowledge and understanding about specific sustainability and business
topics and challenges.
Stakeholder engagement is not a once-off annual intervention but a continuous process and
comes in many forms. This insight creates the need for a well-defined stakeholder
management process and approach. Many companies struggle with marrying the concepts of
stakeholder engagement and reporting. Traditional forms of reporting are based on the
manipulation of static information to convey desired messages at particular intervals e.g.,
annually through the Annual Financial Report.
Quality sustainability and integrated reports, however, should be the outcomes of continuous
engagement processes that include planning, information gathering, consultation,
collaboration, collation, alignment, execution, measurement, monitoring, priority assessment
and communication. Key principles to determine the appropriate stakeholders include an
understanding of:
The most critical and prioritized issues that need to be addressed per
stakeholder group
For each stakeholder engagement, objectives need to be set and formats selected e.g. private
meeting, roundtable discussions or stakeholder panels etc. A company needs to ensure that
the engagement approaches used provide meaningful and relevant data. Research techniques
that get real insights even in situations where people are inclined to lie, or where their
aspirational statements dont meet their actions or where they have raised issues previously
such as grievance and complaints lines can be interesting starting points for a more creative
and proactive stakeholder discussions.
Furthermore, a clear distinction between normal company communication activities (such as
investor relations, government relations, industrial relations, etc) and company
communication channels (such as advertising and marketing) with various customer groups
(such as suppliers, consumers, employees) needs to be made. Engagement for reporting on
specific material issues is far removed from daily/regular communication with stakeholder
groups.
Stakeholders have the ability to influence the success or failure of a company at various
levels. The level to which each stakeholder should be engaged will depend on the potential
risk and impact of the stakeholder on the company and vice versa. Corporate governance
systems are becoming more responsive and aligned to stakeholder interests and companies
are going beyond engagement to develop collaborative partnerships with stakeholders. To be
effective and fair, governance systems should have the capacity to respond to differences in
power and access to resources between and within stakeholder groups. Engaging with
stakeholders and using their inputs for decision-making is fundamental to understanding
financial risks and managing sustainably. For this reason, social investment indices, such as
the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and the JSE-SRI Index give more weight to stakeholder
engagement than to any other social impact measure.
FEEDBACK TO STAKEHOLDERS
Deciding how information will be disclosed to stakeholders will therefore depend on what
stakeholders would like to know (and read in sustainability and integrated reports) and how
the presented information will be used in their own decision-making process about the
company.
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT FOR INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING
CONCLUSION
Smart stakeholder engagement equips companies with stakeholder buy-in and collaboration.
Proactive engagement enables companies to create competitive advantage and informs
strategies, policies, decision-making processes, accountability and ultimately sustainability.
Through engagement, companies can proactively identify complex problems and act on them
before they become crises, eliminating the risk of reputational damage. The insights from
well-managed stakeholder engagements will benefit both sustainability reporting and
integrated reporting. It therefore creates strong linkages between the two forms of reporting.
Next Generation Consultants have extensive experience in Stakeholder Management. We
assist companies with conducting stakeholder engagement for reporting purposes, assist in in
stakeholder strategy and policy formulation and assist with reporting to stakeholders through
Sustainability and Integrated Reports. We also train companies in effective stakeholder
management. For more information contact: rrossouw@nextgeneration.co.za.
[1] Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Guidelines 2013
[2] The International Integrated Reporting Council Basis for Inclusions International <IR>
Framework 2013
[3] Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Guidelines 2013