Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ukrainian influence, and vice versa. While both groups retained, for example,
quite distinct languagesUkrainian and Yiddishborrowed terminology is
common to both.
Economically, however, Jews were markedly different from members of
the surrounding population. Ukrainians were overwhelmingly agricultural,
with more than 94 percent living in rural areas even at the end of the
nineteenth century. Jews, on the other hand, were concentrated in urban
settings, where more than 80 percent made their homes. The larger urban
areas in Ukraine were typically evenly divided among Russians, Ukrainians,
and Jews, but Jews dominated even these settings in the western Ukrainian
provinces of Volhynia and Podolia. The 1897 census shows that only 2.66
percent of Jews in the tsarist empire made their living from agriculture; the
corresponding Ukrainian figure is 73 percent. Jews were very strong in
commerce (29.55%) and industrial labor (35.47%), sectors in which only a tiny
number of Ukrainians were active. This strict economic distinction served to
underline many of the other differences between Jews and Ukrainians.
Jewish industrial labor, in particular, grew over the course of the nineteenth
century as the Russian Empire embarked on a course of gradually increasing
industrialization. Large industrial projects in areas of less traditional
settlement, such as Kharkiv in eastern Ukraine, drew Jewish internal
migrants, and the establishment of the major port of Odessa in the closing
years of the eighteenth century eventually attracted a large Jewish
population. Overall, in 1897,
Jews made up 30 percent of
the urban population of
Ukraine.
Ukraine was
exceptionally fertile ground
for the Hasidic movement,
particularly for the
dynasties centered in Belz,
Bratslav and Uman,
Chortkiv, Chernobyl, and
Ruzhin. There developed a
Ukrainian type of Hasidism
characterized by the princely
comportment of the rebbes.
Graduating class of the Hebrew-language Moriah School,
Zhvanets, Ukraine., 1910. (YIVO)
[See entries on the Belz,
Bratslav, Chernobil, and
Ruzhin Hasidic dynasties.] Tensions between misnagdim and Hasidim were
substantially submerged with the emergence of an intellectual movement
that threatened them both equally: the Haskalah, or Jewish enlightenment,
which emerged from Germany in the late eighteenth century. The expression
of Haskalah in Ukraine was, as might be expected, more significant in
western urban regions, but its impact was felt even in the most remote
regions. Ukrainian maskilim pioneered both modern Hebrew and literary
Yiddish. Uman was the headquarters of early Ukrainian maskilim at the
beginning of the nineteenth century. Eventually, however, Odessa became
the metropolis of modernizing trends among Ukrainian Jews. Indeed, the
second half of the nineteenth century witnessed considerable internal
migration of Jews in the Pale of Settlement to new settlements in southern
Ukraine, of which Odessa was the most prominent. The burgeoning port city
even attracted settlers from Galicia in the Austrian Empire.
18811914. A major watershed in Ukrainian Jewish history occurred
in March 1881 when Alexander II was assassinated by a grenade thrown by a
member of a small socialist circle. Rumors circulated throughout the tsarist
empire to the effect that the new tsar, Alexander III, had given the people the
right to beat the Jews in retaliation, and violent attacks on Jews continued
sporadically for the next three years, with the greatest concentration
occurring in Ukrainian territory. Recent research indicates that these attacks
were spontaneous and principally carried out by migrant industrial workers
traveling along rail lines throughout Ukraine, stopping regularly to plunder
neighboring Jewish communities.
Compared to later pogrom waves, the human devastation of 18811884
was relatively mild, with reasonable estimates of Jewish causalities under
100. The sheer atmosphere of lawlessness, with the apparent inability or
unwillingness of Russian authorities to control the violence, nevertheless
made a major impact on the psyche of the average Ukrainian Jew, rousing
the population to consider even more seriously several alternatives for their
political self-expression. The pace of emigration, which had begun to swell in
the 1870s, accelerated. The earliest stirrings of modern Zionism occurred in
Ukraine, articulated by the BILU movement (an acronym for Isaiah 2:5,
House of Jacob, Let us Ascend), founded in eastern Ukraine and sending its
first settlers to establish communities in Palestine in 1882. Major Zionist
thinkers such as Lev Pinsker and Ahad Ha-Am were active in the region,
particularly in Odessa, and it was a gathering of Zionists in Ukraine in 1903
that rejected the British offer of African territory as a future national home of
the Jews.
Other Jews felt that leaving the Russian Empire was not a viable
solution to the triple dilemmas of economic hardship, antisemitic violence,
and government inaction. Indeed, the failure of the government to act against
pogroms was slowly becoming a policy of complicity, with Nicholas II openly
identifying with the antisemitic Black Hundreds organization, personally
sponsoring the publication of the notorious antisemitic forgery The Protocols
of the Elders of Zion, and even prosecuting a Kiev Jew, Mendel Beilis, on the
absurd medieval charge of kidnapping a Christian child and murdering him
for his blood. A jury of Ukrainian peasants acquitted Beilis in 1913.
Thus, many felt that the problems of the tsarist empire had to be
addressed directly, and through potentially radical change. Thousands of
young Jews were drawn to revolutionary movements, some of which espoused
socialism. Moreover, a wide range of Jewish socialist parties, notably the
Bund, spread throughout the region. Another popular option for politically
conscious Ukrainian Jews was the socialist-Zionist hybrid party known as
Poale Tsiyon (Workers of Zion). These political organizations, which were
initially forced to operate underground, were increasingly active after the
1905 Revolution and the subsequent lifting of selected bans on political
organization. [See Bund; Poale Tsiyon.]
The Jewish political movement that had the greatest initial political
achievement in Ukraine was the so-called autonomist movement (also known
as Diaspora Nationalism), devoted to establishing a secular, modernized form
of Jewish national autonomy in twentieth-century Ukraine. The political
party Folkspartey was inspired by the historian Simon Dubnow, who
imagined a Russian federation in which Jews (indeed, all organized
minorities) would form a parliament to regulate all communal affairs, such as
education and cultural activities, as well as internal religious affairs and the
like. The prime minister of this Jewish parliament would in turn occupy a
cabinet-level post in the state government as minister of Jewish affairs
19141939. Ukraine was a major theater during World War I, with
intense fighting in West Ukraine in particular. After invading Austrian
Galicia at the onset of the war, tsarist troops were beaten back in 1915 by
German forces, and fighting raged in that region for the next two years.
Poorly equipped Russian soldiers were rapidly demoralized, and as discipline
faltered, an increasingly ominous pattern of attacks on local Jewish
populations began. During this exceptionally chaotic period of Ukrainian
history, the region went from the throes of World War I, through two
revolutions (the establishment of the Provisional Government in early 1917,
and its overthrow by the Bolsheviks several months later), a declaration of
Ukrainian independence and a brief SovietUkrainian war, occupation by
German forces, and then a cataclysmic civil war that lasted from late 1918
through 1920.
During this time, and for reasons both pragmatic and idealistic, Jewish
and Ukrainian political activists sought to bring a new harmony to
UkrainianJewish relations in a proposed postrevolutionary democracy.
Jewish participation in the Ukrainian movement was important for giving
the movement both a solid foundation in urban regions as well as a foothold
in the economic life of the country, and also helped Ukrainians argue for
greater independence from the former empires center in Saint Petersburg.
For their part, Ukrainians pledged to implement the major tenets of
autonomism, giving Jews communal as well as individual rights, including
the appointment of a minister of Jewish affairs in the Ukrainian cabinet, the
which were part of independent Poland between the wars and then subject to
a brief and brutal period of Soviet control between September 1939 and the
summer of 1941, was seen by many Ukrainians as a liberation from a
perceived JewishCommunist oppressor, and spontaneous pogroms against
Jews broke out in many communities after the Soviet evacuation. The Nazis
considered this violence quite advantageous, and in some cases (such as the
infamous Petliura Days of Lviv) actively sought to encourage Ukrainian
attacks on Jews. Ghettos were established in the major communities; the
Janowska ghetto in Lviv was especially notorious for its brutal treatment of
the Jews
Accurate demographic calculations of the extent of the Holocaust are
difficult to achieve, but a realistic estimate of the number of Ukrainian Jews
killed would be approximately 1.5 million: 60 percent of the total prewar
population. This figure is massive, but at the same time very unusual in that,
with the exception of Poland, Ukraine had the largest single population of
Jews in any country completely occupied by the Nazis. Therefore, a survival
rate of 40 percent, even approximate, is especially high. This figure is also
surprising given the much more brutal nature of the occupation in Eastern
Europe, and the fact that Ukraine was classified as either part of the
Generalgouvernement (in the formerly Polish regions) or as a
Reichskommissariat. Hence, both regions were under complete martial law,
and lacked the sort of meaningful organs of self-government that were
permitted in some Western countries. Furthermore, many Ukrainians,
particularly in the western regions, viewed cooperation with the Nazis as
justified retribution for perceived Jewish collaboration with the Communists.
Some Ukrainians also sheltered Jews from the Nazis, including the Uniate
Metropolitan Andryi Sheptytskyi, responsible for rescuing some 250 children
in his network of convents and monasteries.
19441991. At the wars end, returning Jews were met with a surge of
antisemitic violence as they attempted to secure their homes and property
after the dislocations of the war. The official reaction of the Soviet Union was
to dismiss such violence as the lingering effect of pro-Fascist elements, and in
fact the postwar years were characterized by silence on the unique suffering
of Jews during the Holocaust. The most egregious example of this failure to
memorialize the Holocaust properly was at Babi Yar, which did not receive a
memorial until 1976. Official antisemitism, sometimes covered with a thin
veneer of anti-Zionism, was especially prominent in Ukraine: in 1963, the
Academy of Sciences of Ukraine published Trofim Kichkos crude and
cartoonish Iudaizm bez prykras (Judaism without Embellishment), a
blatantly antisemitic work under the guise of scholarship.
Beginning in the 1960s, however, Ukrainian and Jewish dissidents
were intensifying their activities, the former demanding internal change and
the latter demanding release to immigrate to Israel. Although their
immediate demands were not entirely congruent, the broader need for change
was something both groups shared, and informal contacts between the
movements flourished. With the era of glasnost, the predominant Ukrainian
movement for change, known as Rukh, adopted a decidedly friendly posture
toward Jews in both Ukraine and the State of Israel. When the extremist
Russian nationalist organization Pamiat called for anti-Jewish violence in
May 1990, Rukh successfully campaigned against any attacks, convincing
many Ukrainian Jews that this more liberal, national-democratic movement
deserved their support.
After 1991. Ukraine officially achieved independence in 1991 with the
collapse of the Soviet Union. In the late Soviet period, Jews had already
begun emigrating at a rapid rate, especially to Israel and the United States.
According to the 2001 census, roughly 380,000 Jews had chosen to leave
Ukraine, some three-quarters of the Jewish population. Nevertheless, a
strong community of Jews remained in Kiev, organized initially under the
leadership of Yaakov Dov Bleich, an American Hasid who became chief rabbi
of Ukraine during the late Soviet period. A rich network of Jewish schools
and synagogues appeared in the major centers, especially Kiev, Lviv, and
Dnipropetrovsk, where the Lubavitch Hasidic movement was especially
active, and tens of buildings confiscated by the Soviet regime were returned
to Jewish communal organizations. Jewish newspapers, typically in the
Russian language, circulated, and even advanced scholarship was reviving,
including at the Tkuma Holocaust Museum and Research Center in
Dnipropetrovsk. Although the population markedly declined, Ukrainian
Jewry displayed remarkable vitality after the fall of the Soviet Union.
[See also Communist Party of the Soviet Union; Jewish Confederation
of Ukraine; Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; and entries on the cities and
principal individuals mentioned.]
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The article presented above is a sample entry from The YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe, to
be published by the Yale University Press. Copyright 2005 YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, Inc.
Reproduced by permission of Yale University Press and the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, Inc. All
rights reserved.