IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36

Original Research Article

doi: 10.5455/ijtrr.000000179

International Journal of Therapies & Rehabilitation

Research
http://www.scopemed.org/?jid=12

E-ISSN
2278-0343

MAITLANDS MOBLIZATION VERSUS CLOSED KINETIC CHAIN EXERCISES

AFTER COLLE'S FRACTURE FIXATION
Ola Ahmed Kamal, M.Sc1* ;Lilian Albert Zaky Ph.D2 ;Hassan Hamdy Abdelrahman Noaman, Ph.D3
1

Physical Therapist, Sohag General Hospital.

The Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders and its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo
University
3
The Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University
ABSTRACT

Background: The colle's fracture is the most common fracture site in the upper extremity; it causes functional
problems and disabling complications. Treatment of these common fractures and their dysfunctional sequalae
continues to challenge surgeons and therapists. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of
Maitland's mobilization versus closed kinetic chain exercises after stable colle's fracture. Method: Thirty patients had
participated in this study. They were assigned randomly into two groups (Group A and Group B) with age ranged from
eighteen to fourty five years old. Group A consisted of 15 patients (15 females) received mitland's mobilization with
therapeutic ultrasound, group B consisted of 15 patients (15 females) received closed kinetic chain exercises with
therapeutic ultrasound for 3 times per week (12) sessions for 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated pre and post
treatment for their pain severity, function of the wrist joint, grip strength, wrist joint's ROM and proprioception at 20
wrist flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation. Result: The result revealed that there were significant differences
between both groups regarding the improvement in function, grip strength, range of motion of flexion, extension, radial
and ulnar deviation and there were no significant difference between both groups regarding the improvement in
function, grip strength, and joint position sense. Conclusion: Maitland's mobilization versus closed kinetic chain
exercises after stable colle's fractures no significant difference in improvement in function, grip strength, and joint
position sense, and Maitland's mobilization significantly improve wrist range of motion.
KEY WORDS:

Colle's fracture, Maitland's mobilization, closed kinetic chain exercises,

Proprioception.

Ola Ahmed Kamal

Photograph

Physical Therapist, Sohag General Hospital, Egypt

*Corresponding author

IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36

INTRODUCTION
COLLE'S fractures are a very
common extra-articular fracture (1). They occur when a
person falls on the palm of the hand with wrist in 4090of extensions (2). Typical fracture is localized at 1.52.5 cm above wrist. Fractures below this level is
designated as low, while high fractures are situated
more than 4 cm above wrist (3). The management of
distal radial fractures depends on patient factors,
fracture patterns, and stability criteria. Stability criteria
can aid in assessing the risk for secondary fracture
displacement (4). Closed reduction with cast treatment
of all types of distal Radius fractures continues to be
the mainstay of treatment in our country. Intra or Extraarticular malunited fractures have been shown to alter
function and patient satisfaction with the outcome of
treatment (5). This fracture can result in some
complications as persistent pain and loss of motion
accompanied by moderate effusion of the distal radius.
Increased angulation of distal radius can lead to
inability to grasp objects after plaster cast (6).
Impairment in range of motion and strength after distal
radius fractures may lead to difficulty with functional
task (7).
The Goal for rehabilitation after wrist
fractures is to achieve complete and rapid recovery of
ROM, strength (8) and to restore optimal function, which
can be complicated by long-term impairments and
functional deficits that prevail after radial fractures
management (9).
Ultrasound (US) has been a widely used and
accepted adjunct modality for the management of many
musculoskeletal conditions Therapeutic ultrasound is
the use of alternating compression and rarefaction of
sound waves for therapeutic benefit (10). Ultrasound is
tought to enhance blood flow, increase membrane
permeability and alter nerve conduction (11).
Ultrasound (US) has been reported to stimulate a wide
variety of subjective somatosensations in humans (12),
as well as EPs in response to painful ultrasonic stimuli.
Based on those observations and our previous ones
that US can directly stimulate central neurons (13)
Maitlands exercises include application of
pressure and accessory oscillator movements to treat
stiffness. The aim is to restore the motion. This
technique includes 5 levels of grades. According to
Maitlands concept, there will be activation of different
mechanoreceptors (14). One factor that is essential in
normalizing proprioception is to restore joint motion at
the level of innervation, since restored joint motion
improves proprioception (15). One way of restoring joint
motion is mobilization/ manipulation, which is suitable
since it can have an immediate and significantly
beneficial effect on proprioceptive feedback (16) and
result in plastic changes from sensorimotor integration
(17)
. Acute decreases in pain following manipulation may
allow more active participation in exercise and
functional retraining earlier in the rehabilitation process
(18)
. Since soft tissues also are richly innervated with
mechanoceptors, some soft tissues may also be useful
in normalizing proprioception (16).

CKC strengthened the muscle through cocontraction, improved joint congruency, stability and
improved proprioception. Since the progressive
controlled weight bearing is a type of closed kinetic
chain exercise it helps in increasing the bone mineral
density of the fracture site, it decreased the period of
immobilization
because
of
which
secondary
complication like joint stiffness, decreased in muscles
strength are avoided and its promotes the cocontraction of the muscle which help in facilitating the
joint approximation. Thus early rehabilitation of the
fracture is useful in terms of functional range of motion
and abilities of performing activities of daily living
(ADL).The muscles are strengthened through the CKC
exercises then it helps in achieving the early functional
range of motion. Functional range of motion is such
ROM which is necessary to do the normal physical
activities of daily living (19).
It hypothesized that there was no significant
difference between Maitlands mobilization exercise
plus therapeutic ultrasound and closed kinetic chain
exercise plus therapeutic ultrasound on the wrist joint
range of motion, grip strength, proprioception, and
patient-rated wrist evaluation after colle's fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with stable colles fractures
collected from Sohag General Hospital and Hassan
Nomany Hospital treated conservatively with closed
reduction and casting and after removal of plaster cast
they involved in the study from November 2015 to April
2016. All patients were assigned randomly into two
groups; Group I (Maitland's mobilization), and Group II
(CKC).
Inclusion criteria:
For the Colle's fracture group, patients were enrolled in
the current study if they met all of the following criteria:
1) Patients group with radiological diagnosis of
post colle's fractures stiffness after 6 weeks.
2) Patients with limited ROM wrist.
Exclusion criteria:
Subjects of colle's fracture group were excluded if they
had:
3) Patient with Neuromuscular injuries.
4) The wrist or forearm motion deficits were
presented before the wrist injury to the degree
that it affected the patient's daily activity.
5) Patient with cardiac dysfunction.
6) Patient with renal dysfunction.
7) Osteopenia.
8) Previous colle's fracture.
9) Previous physiotherapy sessions for wrist.
10) Patient with both radius and ulna fractures.
Randomization method:
Each participant assigned a unique number.
These numbers were written on a piece of paper. The
paper has the same size otherwise the selected sample
will not be truly random. The pieces of paper were
placed in a container and thoroughly mixed with
strongly shaking the container. The numbers selected
by trusted physical therapist in the same hospital
without looking and after selection of the desired
numbers for each group, the assigned number put in

IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36

closed envelope and delivered to the researcher at
beginning of treatment
This study approved by the Ethical Committee of
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University. All
patients completed an informed consent form and
informed about the aim of the study without any
explanation to treatment.
Intervention:
Patients were assigned to one of two groups A and
B. All patients were received twelve treatment sessions.
All of them were received therapeutic ultrasound at an
intensity of 1.4 w/cm2 and frequency of 3 MHz for 6
minutes.
Group A received Maitland's mobilization plus
therapeutic ultrasound program in the form of:
A. Dorsal glide
The forearm was rested on a mat/table with the
hand just extending off the edge of the surface. The
researcher stabilizing hand grasps the patient's wrist
just proximal to the styloid processes to stabilize the
distal radioulnar joint. The mobilizing hand was placed
over the proximal carpal row. The mobilization was
involved moving the row of carpal bones dorsally to
promote wrist extension.
B. Ventral Glide
The forearm was rested on a mat/table with the hand
just extending off the edge of the surface. The
stabilizing hand was grasped the patient's wrist just
proximal to the styloid processes to stabilize the distal
radioulnar joint. The mobilizing hand was placed over
the proximal carpal row. The mobilization was involved
moving the row of carpal bones palmar to promote wrist
flexion
C. Radial glide (ulnar deviation)
Patient was sit with forearm supported on table.
Forearm was midline between supination or pronation.
The therapist stabilizing hand was grasped the patient's
distal radius and ulna. The table act as additional
stabilization for radius and ulna. The mobilizing hand
webspace was contacted the proximal carpal row
bones. The mobilizing hand was exerted distraction
force then was moved the proximal carpal row in medial
distraction to increase wrist adduction.
D. Ulnar glide (lateral deviation)
Patient was sit with forearm supported on table.
Forearm was midline between supination or pronation.
The therapist stabilizing hand was grasped the patient's
distal radius and ulna. The table act as additional
stabilization for radius and ulna. The mobilizing hand
web-space was contacted the proximal carpal row
bones. The mobilizing hand was exerted distraction
force then was moved the proximal carpal row in lateral
distraction to increase wrist abduction.
Group B received closed kinetic chain exercise plus
therapeutic ultrasound
A. Wall press:
Patient stood with feet shoulder width apart. The
arm was held directly out in front of the body at ninety
degree of elevation against the wall. Feet were
approximately two to three feet away from the wall. The
patient was asked to press on the wall and was asked
to keep pressing for thirty seconds.

B. The Ball Roll:

The subject kneeled on the floor with body
positioned over a ball. The elbow was kept straight and
the shoulder was flexed about ninety degrees. The
subject's upper body weight was position over the
upper extremity on the ball. The patient was balanced
the ball while rolling it in all planes of available motion
with his wrist for 30 seconds. Each week the time was
increased 5 seconds for progression.
CKC exercises were begun with 3 times each
time with 10 repetitions for each exercise and will be
progressed by two repetitions each week.
Outcome measures post radial fracture
The goal of any outcome measure is to
evaluate the improvement or detriment of a given
treatment of a condition, disease, or injury. In order for
a measure to be useful, it must be easily understood
and administered and have consistent reliability and
validity over a wide array of demo- graphic groups (20).

Hand held dynamometer is considered to be a

reliable instrument in evaluating grip strength and is
used widely in rehabilitation it is used to measure the
force of flexor muscles of hand, generated during
gripping the dynamometer (21).
The patient-rated wrist evaluation score is a reliable,
valid measure of patient-rated pain and disability. It is a
patient self-rated, joint-specific questionnaire that
enquires about symptoms of the wrist and functional
limitations in relation to activities of daily living (ADL)
(22), (23)
.
Wrist and hand sensory dysfunction is important due to
its influence on optimal joint neuromuscular control and
stability during functional tasks. It can be tested via joint
position sense JPS method which tests the ability to
accurately reproduce a specific joint angle while vision
is blocked. (9). It can be quantified by using goniometer
and measure the absolute difference between the
target and the matching joint position sense accuracy
(24)
. It is reported that repositioning tests performed for
the upper extremities gave better results when the eyes
of the subjects were open than when they were closed
(25)
.
DATA ANALYSIS
The Independent variables were Maitlands Mobilization
Technique and Closed kinetic chain exercises (CKC)
and dependent variable were Function, Hand Grip
Strength, ROM and wrist proprioception. Analyses were
performed using the SPSS statistical software package.
Pairedt test were used for the measurement of pretestand post-test values of group A and B. Unpaired t
test were used to compare the post-test values of
Group B.P values 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS
In this study 30 patients (15 female and 15 female)
were assigned randomly into 2 groups; Group A (n=15)
their mean age was 36.13 8.5 years old. Group B
(n=15) their mean age was 36.535.75 years old (Table
1). The results at the end of the treatment program
revealed that Group A that received Maitland's
mobilization with therapeutic ultrasound showed a
greater statistical significant than Group B for ROM as
shown in (Table 2).

IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36

Table (1): Demographic data of both groups.

Item
Group A
Age (yrs)
36.8 7.463
Data are expressed as mean SD
NS= Not Significant

Group B
35.4 6.22

t- value
0.249

P value
0.418 (NS)

Table (2): Comparison between the mean values of the variable in the two studied groups after treatment.
t-value
Items
Group A
Group B
P value
-0.868
Function
10.21.923
12.23.492
0.502 NS
-0.185
Grip strength
13.82.049
14.23.114
0.861 NS
Range of motion
2.130
Flexion (degree)
51.224
2.81.303
0.003 Significant
1.672
Extension (degree)
4.81.643
2.91.083
0.016 Significant
2.356
Radial
deviation
2.050.570
1.150.335
0.014 significant
(degree)
2.623
Ulnar
deviation
2.20.758
0.950.325
0.009
(degree)
Significant
Proprioception
-0.981
Flexion
0.2640.276
0.530.379
0.043 NS
-0.265
Extension
0.330.33
0.390.276
0.625 NS
-0.33
Radial deviation
0.1320.180
0.1980.295
0.272 NS
-0.191
Ulnar deviation
0.2660.434
0.3320.408
0.426 NS

Fig (1):post treatment values of function

Fig (2):Post treatment values of grip strength

IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36

Fig (3): Post treatment values of ROM

Fig (4): post treatment values at 20 wrist proprioception in both groups

DISCUSSION
This study was conducted to investigate the effect
of Maitland's mobilization combined with therapeutic
ultrasound versus closed kinetic chain exercises
combined with therapeutic ultrasound in the
rehabilitation after stable colle's fracture. We had
investigated the effect of Maitland's mobilization on
functional disability, grip strength, wrist ROM, and
proprioception at four target angles; at 20 wrist flexion,
at 20 wrist extension, at 20 wrist radial and ulnar
deviation, and compared the results to those patients
who had received the closed kinetic chain exercises.
We had assessed function in the current study
using the patient- rated wrist evaluation questionnaire.
The Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) was
originally designed for the assessment of colle's
fracture and wrist injuries. Items were limited to 5 pain
questions and 10 function questions to permit a simple
scoring system. For answering each of questions, a 0
(no pain /no difficulty) 10 (worst pain / unable to do)
scale was selected. The reason we've chosen this
questionnaire is that it achieves highest possible patient
acceptance, simplicity in scoring, and responsiveness
to change. The test- retest reliability of the PRWE was

high, and validity was also good as compared to other

questionnaires (26).
The PRWE was the functional outcome measure
used in the study of (27) to measure pain, activity
limitation and participation restriction. It was chosen its
qualities
of
validity,
testretest
reliability,
responsiveness to change and being user friendly in
that it was easy to administer. A limitation in using this
scale was that it did not evaluate compensatory
mechanisms that the participants adopted in order to
perform activity and participate. Also, this scale does
not have a physical component of objective
measurement of activities. It could be argued that
compensatory strategies are not meaningful to the
practitioner rather than being of significance to the
person with a fracture of distal radius (27). The use of the
PRWE questionnaire in our study has been supported
by many other studies, like those of (26), (28), and (29),
who found it to be more efficient at detecting clinical
improvement, simpler for patients to complete, quicker
to administer, easier to score, and was simpler for both
themselves and their patients. This may explain why
they selected it for routine utilization.
According to the current results in this study,
there was a significant difference between patients in
group A who received Maitland's mobilization with
therapeutic ultrasound, and patients in group B who
received closed kinetic chain exercises regarding

IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36

improving wrist ROM,
there was no significance
difference between patients in group A who received
Maitland's mobilization with therapeutic ultrasound, and
group B who received closed kinetic chain exercises on
function, grip strength, and wrist proprioception. A
similar study by (30) and (31) they statement that thermal
ultrasound used in concert with joint mobilizations was
an effective regimen aimed at restoring ROM in
hypomobile wrists postinjury or when immobilized after
surgery. Ultrasound also increased patient comfort
during the treatment and minimized posttreatment
soreness. Another study by (32) study who statement
that early mobilization of the wrist joint lead to increase
in both strength and movement without any
observational progression of residual deformity. (33)
report that applying mobilization early confirmed the
improvement in strength and pain.
Abd El-Latief (34)who statement that closed
kinetic chain exercise need more time and greater
range of motion in upper limb joints especially wrist joint
during quadruped and push up activities and active
range of motion has a little effect on recruitment of all
muscle fibers. Another study by (35) who statement that
closed kinetic chain with traditional physical therapy
program in the rehabilitation after fractures distal end of
radius, closed kinetic chain exercises didn't significantly
improve the proprioception of the wrist joint at the two
tested target angles (at 30 wrist flexion and at 30 wrist
extension) after four weeks of training in comparison to
traditional physical therapy program without CKC
exercises, but CKC exercises shown significant
improvement in grip strength, functional activities, and
increase in ROM of wrist flexion and extension, thought
radial and ulnar deviation didn't increase significantly.
Saad et al., (25), added the closed kinetic chain
exercises to the open kinetic chain exercises despite (36)
has found that the wrist proprioception was improved
only by open kinetic chain exercises but not by the
closed kinetic chain exercises because training with
closed kinetic chain exercises will add additional
benefits to the exercise program such as allowing the
mechanoceptors within the joints to be more aware and
responsive to static and dynamic stability at the joint
(37)
; the CKC activities facilitate the integration of
proprioceptive
feedback
coming
from
joint
mechanoceptors; and that the proprioceptive exercises,
especially in the closed kinetic chain, train the body to
use cocontraction of the muscles to produce stability,
thus protecting the healed soft tissue structures that
might be damaged by open chain exercises.
Studies are unfortunately lacking the effect of
proprioceptive training on different conditions of the
wrist joint, and up to the investigator knowledge, there's
are no study to show the effect of eight bearing

REFERENCES
1. Pye SR, O'Neill TW, Lunt M, Kanis JA, Cooper C,
Johnell O, Reeve J and Silman AJ (2004): Risk
factors for Colles' fracture in men and women:
results
from
the
European
Prospective
Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int; 15(11): P
927.

exercises as those used in the CKC exercises in the

rehabilitation after colle's fracture which is a common
fracture seen in orthopedic wards. The results of this
study revealed that there was a proprioceptive defect in
patients with colle's fracture after removal of the cast
and before starting the physical therapy program. In this
study, the resesrcher investigated the effect of
maitland's mobilization with therapeutic ultrasound
versus closed kinetic chain exercises with therapeutic
ultrasound in the rehabilitation after colle's fracture,
maitland's mobilization used in group A, no significance
difference on function, grip strength, and wrist
proprioception at the four tested angles (at 20 wrist
flexion, at 20 wrist extension, at 20 wrist radial and
ulnar deviation) after four weeks of training in
comparison to group B which received closed kinetic
chain exercises and significant improvement of wrist
ROM (flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation) in
group A who received Maitland's mobilization.
CONCLUSION
It can be concluded that, Maitland's
mobilization versus closed kinetic chain exercises after
stable colle's fractures no significant difference in
improvement in function, grip strength, and joint
position sense. And Maitland's mobilization significantly
improved wrist joint range of motion.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The results of the present study offered the need
for considering the following recommendations:
Further studies are required to investigate the
effect of the weight bearing exercises like
closed kinetic chain exercises on different
upper extremity fractures.
Further similar comparisons including a larger
number of patients and possibly longer
treatment period.
Replication of the current study may be
required to the test proprioception of the wrist
joint at more target angles.
Correlational study is required between
functional disability after colle's fractures and
proprioceptive errors of the wrist joint.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there is
no conflict of interest in this study. The manuscript has
been read and approved by authors.

2. Padegimas EM and Osei DA (2013): Evaluation

and treatment of osteoporotic distal radius
fracture in the elderly patient. J Orthop Trauma;
27(6):303-307.
3. Henry MH (2008): Disatl radius fractures: current
concepts. J Hand Surg Am sep; 33(7): 1215-27.
4. Laseter GF (2006): External and Internal fixation
of unstable distal radius fractures. In: Burke S,
Higgins J, McClintonM, Saunders R, Valdata L

IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36

(Eds.). Hand and upper extremity rehabilitation.
3rd edition. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 489503.
5. Masood K, Jamil M, Pasha FI, Quresshi KZ, Malik
NI (2013): Is casting an acceptable treatment
approach for a distal radius fracture that has
undergone a satisfactory closed reduction?
JUMDC; 4(1).
6. Balsky S and Goldford RJ (2000): Rehabilitation
protocol for undisplaced Colles fractures
following cast removal. J Cand Chiropr Assoc;
44(1):2933).
7. Altizer L (2003): Hand and Wrist fractures. Orthop
Nurs; 22(3): 232-239.
8. Schneppendahl J, Windolf J and Kaufmann RA
(2012): Distal radius fractures: current concepts.
J Hand Surg Am; 37:1718-1725.
9. Karagiannopoulos C, Sitler M, Michlovitz S and
Tierney R (2013): A descriptive study on wrist
and hand sensori-motor impairment and function
following distal radius fracture intervention. J of
Hand Ther; 26(3): 204-215.
10. O'Brien WD Jr (2007): Ultrasound-biophysics
mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol ; 93(13):212-55.
11. Stansinopoulos D, Stansinopoulu K and Johnson
MI (2005): An Exercise programme for the lateral
elbow tendinopathy. British J of
Sport Med; 39:
944-947.
12. Dickey TC, Tych R, Kliot M, Loeser JD and
Pederson K (2012): Intense Focused Ultrasound
Can Reliably Induce Sensations in Human Test
Subjects in a Manner Correlated with the Density
of Their Mechanoreceptors. Ultrasound in
Medicine and Biology; 38: 8590.
13. Tyler WJ, Tufail Y, Finsterwald M, Tauchmann
ML and Olson EJ (2008): Remote excitation of
neuronal circuits using low-intensity, lowfrequency ultrasound. PLoS One; 3: P3511.
14. Varsha N (2007): Maitlands mobilization
technique was found to be an effective in active
and passive wrist flexion. According to the
Maitlands concept the different grades of
mobilization will produce activation of different
mechanoreceptors. Indian J of Physio and
Occupational Ther - An Inter J; 1(4).
15. Cuomo F, Birdzell MG and Zuckerman JD (2005):
The effect of degenerative arthritis and prosthetic
arthroplarty on shoulder proprioception. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg; 14: 345-348.
16. Clark NC, Roijezon U and TreleavenJ (2015):
Prorioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
Part 2: Clinical assessment and intervention. Man
Ther; 20(3): 378-387.
17. Haavik H and Murphy B (2012): The role of spinal
manipulation
in
addressin
disordered
sensorimotor integration and altered motor
control. J Electromyogr. Kinesiol; 22: 768-776.
18. Wassinger CA Rich D, Cameron N, Clark S,
Davenport S, Lingelbach M, Smith A, Baxter GD
and Davidson J (2015): Cervical and thoracic
manipulations: Acute effects upon pain pressure

threshold
and
selfreported
pain
in
experimentally induced shoulder pain. Man Ther;
28: 38.
19. Singh S, Rao K, Iyer C and Khatri S (2014):
Effect of progressive controlled weight bearing of
upper extremity following proximal humeral
fracture: Randomised control study. Inter J of
Scien and Res Publications; 4 (4).
20. Ritting A and Wolf J (2012): How to Measure
Outcomes of Distal Radius Fracture Treatment,
Hand Clinics; 2(28): 165-175.
21. Alencar MA, Dias JM, Figueiredo LC and Dias
RC (2012): Handgrip strength in elderly with
dementia: study of reliability. Rev Bras Fisioter;
16(6):510-514.
22. Dzaja I, Macdermid JC, Roth J and Grewal R
(2013): Functional outcomes and cost estimation
for extra-articular and simple intra-articular distal
radius fractures treated with open reduction and
internal fixation versus closed reduction and
percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. Canadian J
of Surgery; 56(6): 378-384.
23. MacDernid JC (1996): Development of a scale for
patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand
Ther; 9: 178-183.
24. Lonn J, Crenshaw AG and Djupsjobacka
M(2000): position sense testing: influence of
starting position and type of displacement. Arch
Phys Med Rehabil; 81:592-597.
25. Saad M, El Nahass B and El Safouri Y (2008):
Assessment of proprioception in pre-operative
and postoperative carpal tunnel syndrome
patients following different physical therapy
programs. Doctoral Thesis Cairo University
Library.
26. MACDERMID JC, TURGEON T and RICHARDS
RS (1998): Patient rating of wrist pain and
disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J
Orthop Trauma; 12: 577-586.
27. Maciel JS, Taylor NF, and McIlveen C (2005): A
randomized clinical trial of activity- focused
physiotherapy on patients with distal radius
fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 125: 515520.
28. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy
N, and Roth JH (2000): Responsivness of the
short form- 36, Disability of the Arm, shoulder,
and Hand questionnaire, Patient- Rated Wrist
Evaluation,
and
physical
impairement
measurements in evaluating recovery after a
distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg [Am]; 25:330340.
29. MacDermid JC and Tottenham V (2004):
Responsivness of the disability of the arm,
shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient- ratede
wrist/ hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating
change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther; 17: 1823.
30. Draper DO (2011): Ultrasound and Joint
Mobilizations for Achieving Normal Wrist Range
of Motion After Injury or Surgery: A Case
Series. J Athl Train; 46(1): 112
31. Kaltenborn FM (2003): Manual Mobilization of the
Joints: The Kaltenborn Method of Joint

IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36

Examination and Treatment. Vol 2. 4th ed. Oslo,
Norway: Olaf Norlis Bokhandel.
32. Kuo LC, Yang TH, Hsu YY, Wu PT, Lin CL and
Hsu HY (2013): Is progressive early digit
mobilization intervention beneficial for patients
with external fixation of distal radius fracture? A
pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil; 27:
983-999.
33. Burke SL, James PH, Michael AM, Rebecca JS
and Lauren V (2006): Hand and upper extremity
rehabilitation:
A practical guide, Third Ed.
Elsevie.
34. Abd El-Latief EM, El-Kabalawy MA, Saleh AM
and Mohamed AL (2015): The effect of russian
current stimulation versus closed kinetic chain

exercise on the range of motion in patients with

colles fracture.Med J Cairo Univ, 83(1): 933-939.
35. Abdel fatah MA (2009): combined effect of closed
kinetic chain exercises and convensional physical
therapy after fractures of lower end of radius.
Master Thesis Cairo University Library.
36. Hatches LH (2005): The effect of wrist
proprioception on joint stability for forward falls.
Published master thesis, school of physical
education, Morgantown, West Virginia.
37. Ubinger ME, Prentice WE, and Guskiewiccz KM
(1999): Effect of closed kinetic chain training on
neuromuscular control in the upper extremity. J
Sport Rehab; 8: 184-194.