Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
____________________
A Proposal
Presented to the
Faculty of the Graduate School
St. Paul University Philippines
____________________
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Science in Nursing
____________________
by
JOSEFA C. TRINIDAD
August 2014
A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T
D E D I C A T I O N
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page
TITLE PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
ii
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
iv
DEDICATION
Chapter 1
Introduction ..
Theoretical Framework
24
26
Hypotheses
30
32
33
Definition of Terms
35
Chapter 2
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
36
38
40
Data Collection
42
Data Analysis
45
REFERENCES
48
APPENDICES
52
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Introduction
The traditional understanding of intelligence assumes
that our ability to learn and do things come out of a
uniform
cognitive
capacity.
Because
of
this,
some
used
to
analyze
childs
intelligence
in
order
to
scores
this
researchers,
on
battery
long-lived
educators,
of
intelligence
convention,
even
parents
though,
have
tests.
many
expressed
potential.
that
growing
measure
dissatisfaction
limited
number
with
of
standardized
abilities
while
related
achievement,
construct:
specific
scholastic
abilities
and
of
school
success,
aptitude,
others
school
that
are
are
not
the
best
that
instead
of
the
application
of
It
general
It broadens
Students
should not be judged by what they cannot do, but what they
can
do.
Education
should
individuals potential.
focus
on
bringing
out
the
not
measure
abilities
all
required
areas
for
of
Intelligence tests
ability.
various
kinds
of
There
school
are
and
more
job
success.
This study aimed to discover an explanation on the
relationship of multiple intelligence, career choice and
academic
performance.
Over
the
years,
researchers
have
intelligences
should
be
recognized
and
nurtured
From
the
available
information
about
multiple
been
taken
to
select
for
review
those
that
are
The aim of
related
studies
gathered
from
literatures
that
have
Theoretical Framework
When people are asked who is an intelligent person, the
most common responses will often note a persons ability to
solve
problems,
utilize
logic,
and
think
critically.
Our
separate
factors,
or
mental
abilities,
exist.
He
Howard
Gardner
has
also
been
then
proposed
Intelligence.
theory
which
he
called
Multiple
Multiple
Intelligences
Career
Choice
Academic
Performance
It
It also
respondents
differ
significantly
with
their
career
relationship
and
difference
in
the
multiple
it
sought
to
answer
the
following
questions:
1. What
is
the
profile
of
the
respondents
when
grouped
multiple intelligences
number of multiple intelligences
career choice
academic performance
2. What
is
the
intelligences
profile
when
of
the
grouped
respondents
according
multiple
to
the
3. What
is
the
performance
profile
when
of
the
grouped
respondents
according
academic
to
the
there
significant
relationship
between
multiple
there
significant
relationship
between
academic
there
significant
difference
in
the
multiple
there
significant
difference
in
the
multiple
Hypotheses
It is posited in the study that:
1. There
is
no
significant
relationship
between
multiple
is
no
significant
relationship
between
career
is
no
significant
relationship
between
academic
is
no
significant
difference
in
the
multiple
is
no
significant
difference
in
the
multiple
of
multiple
intelligence
and
its
predicted
in
the
enhancement
of
current
and
existing
The
in
activities
the
design
that
are
of
geared
more
towards
scholarly
the
classroom
development
of
the
students
to
develop
their
potentials
to
the
of
the
and
Psychometricians.
The
task
It
the
Furthermore,
maximization
such
of
the
information
will
students
be
potentials.
springboard
for
Researchers.
investigation
was
conducted
mainly
to
assess
The
determine
questionnaire
on
their
Multiple
multiple
intelligences,
Intelligence
was
given
to
the
the
respondents.
Grade Point Average (GPA) of the respondents from their
first year to the first semester of their fourth or fifth
year determined the academic performance.
A descriptive research design was used in the study.
Definition of Terms
The
terms
in
the
study
are
defined
to
enable
the
1999 2000.
BodilyKinesthetic Intelligence.
use
the
complete
body
in
It is the capacity to
expressing
ideas
and
feelings
use
the
artistic
hands
painter,
to
create
mechanic,
or
transform
sculptor,
things
surgeon)
(e.g.,
(Carvin,
1999).
Career.
lifetime;
It
is
the
global
capacity
to
think
grasp
Intelligence.
and
evaluate
It
the
is
the
moods,
capacity
to
intentions,
Intelligence.
It
is
the
capacity
to
Linguistic
Intelligence.
It
is
the
capacity
to
Mathematical
Intelligence.
It
is
the
to
perceive
(e.g.,
music
lover),
discriminate
and
and
to
perform
transformations
perceptions.
Chapter 2
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
upon
those
Research Design
The descriptive research design was utilized in the
research.
employed
Specifically,
to
determine
relationship
career
choice
among
and
the
correlational
whether
the
there
students
academic
exist
multiple
performance.
method
a
was
significant
intelligence,
The
study
was
Fourth
and
Fifth
year
college
who
were
representation
of
the
participants.
The
Slovins
respondents.
It
is
composed
of
35
statements
which
If the statement is
Student
Record.
Students
Grade
Point
Data Collection
The researcher conducted a survey on the number of
graduating college students from the different colleges of
the university.
Having identified the respondents for the study, the
questionnaire on Multiple Intelligence was given to them
during
their
free
time
at
the
Guidance
Center.
Their
available
University.
at
the
Registrars
Office
of
the
Averages (GPA).
Data Analysis
The data gathered from the respondents were analyzed
through the use of the following
For
problems
number
statistical treatment.
and
2,
the
frequency
and
(x2)
was
used
to
know
whether
multiple
choice
with
academic
performance
and
academic
Chi-square (x2) is
It
sample
differ
differently
from
the
hypothesized
frequencies.
Mean was used to determine the GPA of the respondents.
The statistical output was presented in tables with
corresponding qualitative interpretations.
REFERENCES
Books
Bootzin, R. R.,
(1986).
Psychology today:
an introduction (6 ed.).
N.
R.
Massachusetts:
(1988).
Discovering
Psychology.
Chaplin, J. P. (1985).
Dictionary of Psychology.
New York:
Psychology. (3 ed.).
Solomon, P.
Foresman.
Feldman, R. S.
(1987).
Understanding Psychology.
U.S.A.:
McGraw-Hill.
Goleman, D. (1998).
U.S.A.:
Allyn &
Bacon.
Kimbrell,
G.
&
Vineyard,
B.
(1982).
Activities
for
California: McKnight
Psychology. (2 ed.).
New York:
Worth
Publishers.
Price, R.H., Glickstein, M., Horton, D.L., Sherman, S.J. &
Fazio, R.H. (1987).
ed.).
Simons,
J.
Principles of
Psychology. (2
Irwin,
D.B..,
&
Drinnin,
B.A.
(1987).
Journals
Gardner,
H.
(1989).
PSYCHOLOGY TODAY.
Goleman, D. (1988).
How
the
(1992).
fiction.
PSYCHOLOGY TODAY.
PSYCHOLOGY TODAY.
30-38.
gets
joke.
Sternberg, R. J. (1989).
TODAY.
brain
74-78.
split
Do
48-59.
Fact and
38-44.
Whos intelligent?
PSYCHOLOGY
Unpublished Thesis/Material
Buena,
M. F. (1997).
Unpublished masters
C.
classroom.
(19998).
Multiple
intelligences
in
the
Electronic
Carvin, A. (1999). Exploring technology and school reform.
U. S. A. [EdWeb]
Geter, R. (1997).
for teachers.
MIDAS. (1999).
Multiple intelligences.
U.S.A. [On-line]
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Questionnaire on Multiple Intelligence
Where
Does
Your
True
Intelligence
Lie?
If it expresses a characteristic
If it
rather
draw
map
than
give
someone
verbal
directions.
2. If I am angry or happy, I usually know exactly why.
3. I can play (or used to play) a musical instrument.
4. I can associate music with my moods.