Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this Article Epele, Maria Esther(2001) 'Scars, Harm and Pain', Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 1: 1, 47 69
To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1300/J233v01n01_04
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J233v01n01_04
copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service:
1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: <getinfo@haworthpressinc.com> Website:
<http://www.HaworthPress.com> E 2001 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights
reserved.]
Maria Epele is an Argentinean medical anthropologist with a PhD from Universidad Nacional La Plata, Buenos Aires. She is a postdoctoral researcher at CONICET-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientficas y Tcnicas--Argentina, and visiting
scholar at the Department of Anthropology, University of California--Berkeley.
Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, Vol. 1(1) 2002
E 2002 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
47
48
INTRODUCTION
Studies about women who inject drugs have identified several social vectors by which gender inequality is transformed into HIV vulnerability. The principal vectors include the following: the reduced
accessibility of syringes (Goldstein, 1998), the dominance of sex for
drugs and sex for money exchanges (Tortu, Mc Coy et al., 1998), the
subjection to situations of physical and sexual violence (Weeks, Grier,
Romero-Daza et al., 1998), the reduced accessibility to medical treatment (Rockwell, Friedman, Sothernan et al., 1998), the tendency to
consume drugs with other people, and the tendency of being injected
by others (Connors, 1994).
Many Latina IDU women express the need to be injected by another
because they have weaker veins or they lack the skill to locate
their veins. Far from being an anatomical or logistical problem only, I
suggest that an analysis of this practice of being injected reveals a
political economy and morality of caring that dominates the treatment
of the female body in the social networks of drug consumption.
Injection leaves lesions and scars on the body. I argue that for those
women who are drug users, being injected by another person is a
practice that allows them to continue injecting in their veins, thus
avoiding the visible cosmetic harm following intramuscular injection.
Abscesses and scars deepen female subordination within street hierarchies and hinder womens strategies of income production.
Further, I suggest that in this setting there exists a moral anatomy
which is defined by valuations of the injection process and of resultant
bodily damage, and which reproduces the politics of the self-care of
the body prevalent in mainstream society. Moreover, the practice of
being injected by others clarifies the limitations and inconsistencies of
the individualistic technology of self-care in settings characterized by
social exclusion. Such self-care appears not only as a moral value
within social networks, but is reinforced by HIV prevention and also
therapeutic programs.
Through the analysis of this practice, it is possible to reconstruct
one of the paradoxes that characterizes the lives of Latina women who
live under conditions of social exclusion and scarcity of resources. I
argue that while being injected by others increases the possibility of
HIV acquisition (because of the possibility of syringe transference),
not being injected implies the potential of bodily damage (such as
49
THE STUDY
The current research was conducted over a period of eight months
with an active IDU population in the Mission District, San Francisco,
California. The objective of this study was to determine through a
qualitative methodology the risk conditions and the care practices
related to HIV in the everyday life of drug users, specifically women,
who belong to the Latino minority.
The Mission District has long been the traditional Latino workingclass neighborhood in San Francisco. The category of Latino conceals
considerable ethnic diversity including the following: Mexican, Mexican Americans and minority groups from Central American (Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua) and Latin American countries. During
the last few years, the composition of the Mission neighborhood has
started to change because of the progressive displacement by middle
class North Americans. This gentrification process has increased the
prices of housing and excerbated ethnic conflicts and law enforcement
problems. These conflicts are inherent in the everyday life of areas in
which poverty, homelessness, illicit drug dealing and sex work are
concentrated. My fieldwork was carried out in approximately 10
square blocks of one of these areas.
With respect to the ethnicity of the members of the social network
settled in this area, the majority of these women have roots in Mexico
(68%), while others originate in different countries of Latin America
(Colombia, Ecuador, etc.) and Puerto Rico. Some women have arrived
through international migration, but others belong to the first or second generation that have often undergone internal migrations within
the U.S. (see Table 1).
The research was based on a qualitative methodology consisting of
in-depth interviews, observations and participation in everyday life
50
settings. The initial phase of the field research involved the recruitment of participants at one of the sites of the Needle Exchange Program. The snowball technique was used in order to recruit other members of the social network.
Interviews took place in such places as: coffee shops and hotel
rooms where some of the respondents live. A total of 35 in-depth
interviews were conducted among 25 women and 10 men. Eighty-five
percent of the interviews were taped and transcribed, and the rest were
recorded as field notes. The majority was conducted in Spanish and
the rest in English. With half of the participants, there were two or
three more interviews in order to probe certain topics. Informal conversations and observation in the streets, hotels and hangout places
were recorded as ethnographic field notes.
The interview protocol considered several topics, including: demographic and personal data, ethnic situation and migration history, strategies of income production, characteristics of gender relationships,
drug use history, current drug use, drug treatment history, injection
practices, sexual practices, HIV-related prevention practices, experiences in violent and abusive situations, characteristics of everyday life
in the streets.
This research focused on those people who practically live in the
streets. In spite of this, they do not consider themselves as homeless.
The majority of them obtain their resources through illegal activities
that take place in this area of the neighborhood. Fifty-two percent
were sex workers, 16% drug dealers, 12% petty thieves and 20% used
mixed strategies.
The age of the women varied between 22 and 54 years old. Their
mean age was 34. All used heroin intravenously and intramuscularly,
but around half injected a combination of heroin and cocaine. Eightyfour percent of the participants consumed other drugs, including
crack, cocaine, speed and marihuana.
The Injection Process
Since the emergence of HIV-AIDS, the practice of drug injection
has been one of the central issues in the research and prevention of the
epidemic. Studies based on an anthropological critical perspective
have conceptualized drug injection as complex practices co-determinated by social, economic and political-legal processes (Singer, 1998).
These processes include: the scarcity of resources and extreme social
51
52
53
women. Lesions, marks and scars have consequences in the stigmatization, subordination, and even exploitation to which IDU women are
exposed daily.
Because of the objectification process suffered by women in the
street network, the female body is treated as a marketable resource
to obtain other resources, an object of transactions, an object of
power and place where diverse forms of male violence are exercised.
In other words, the demand for being injected could be related to the
logic of objectification and the alienation of the female body that
dominates in the street culture, the moral evaluation of the health of
the body, and the construction of the female body as capital to
obtain resources. Although these processes are not exclusive to this
social space and they spread into different social worlds, their reproduction under conditions of marginalization imply particular outcomes
(Carlson, 1996; Friedman, Jose, Stepherson et al., 1997). These circumstances are also closely related to the womens possibility of survival.
In the streets where female subordination is omnipresent, the affirmation of Irigaray that Commodities, women, are a mirror of value
of and for man (Irigaray, 1997, p. 178) becomes reality. According to
this author, the woman as a commodity is divided into two irreconcilable bodies: her natural body and her socially valued, exchangeable body, which is a particularly mimetic expression of masculine
values (p. 180). This commodification is not confined to sex workers. Those IDU women who live from drug dealing, shoplifting or
from mixed survival strategies are also subjected to this male-centered
logic. Consequently, the body for all these women is transformed into
a space through which they suffer, denounce and express the inconsistencies of being women, IDUs, and Latinas who spend the majority
of their time in the streets.1
Moral Anatomy in the Street Ideology
The part of the body (arm, leg, neck or breast), the way in which the
injection is carried out (vein or muscle injection), and its consequences (infections, lesions or scars) are everyday health problems in
the narratives of IDU women. Given the consequences of the injection
process on the female body, women explain the necessity of being
injected by another with expressions, such as for women it is more
difficult to find the vein or we women have veins more difficult to
54
55
Even for those injecting in veins, the different places of body are
valuated differently. The majority prefers to inject in arms and legs
rather in the feet or breasts. However, only two women injected solely
in the veins of their arms.
I do no want to do it in all places. I do not like it. There are a lot
of women who died because of it. When I was in jail, my friends
told me, What is the matter?, I said, it is my life. I really do
not like in the neck nor in legs. (Rita)
In this group of intravenous injectors, comments for women it is
more difficult to find the vein or women have less veins are
frequent.
Before I used to do other drugs and snorted heroin. But since one
year ago, I have been injecting speedball. I have good veins. But
my boyfriend helps me because I can not do it without help.
Sometimes I hurt myself. (Victoria)
However, most (52%) drug using women inject in the muscle or in
the vein according to the circumstances. The majority is older than
thirty years, and they have an average of fifteen years injection history.
Among this group, the difficulties of drug administration, the necessity of being injected and moral anatomy valuations are omnipresent.
Their explanations of the difficulties are diverse and sometimes contradictory, including weak veins, obesity, thinness, propensity of veins
to blow out, particularities of the injection history. All seem to assume
these difficulties are natural to women.
I have problems finding the vein. The majority has weak veins or
does not have more veins. It takes too much time, more than men.
(Claudia)
56
The marginal conditions of their everyday lives determine the characteristics of the injecting process. Unstable dwellings promote the practice of injecting in public places, including public or coffee shop
restrooms, and even in the streets. Not only do they sometimes share
syringes or other elements (like cookers); they also lack both clean
water and alcohol to clean the skin. Some women spend days in the
streets before they can rest in a hotel room and take a shower. This
situation increases the possibility of getting infections, abscesses and
death by septicemia. Neither are infection problems caused by drug
injection limited to the bodys surface. Some women have or have had
endocarditis and heart failure because of the recurrent infections related to intense drug use.
On the other hand, those few women who have a place to live can
spend more time on the injection and it is carried out under more
hygienic conditions. Only two of the women of this study formerly
injected in shooting galleries. In the Mission as in other San Francisco
neighborhoods, shooting galleries are less institutionalized than in
other U.S. cities (Bourgois, 1998).
Now, I am not consuming so much and I have some veins. But I
also do hit myself in the muscle. When I am in the street and I do
not have anywhere to go, I cannot do it so well. But I hate the
abscesses. The last year I went to the hospital and they did a cut
in my arm (showing the scar). Look what they did. I do not want
to go anymore to the hospital. When I got an abscess I put
something hot on it, nothing else. (Sylvia)
The lack of availability of a safe place to inject and the permanent
police threat restricts the time women have to locate and inject in
veins. However, the majority of the women also recognize withdrawal
symptoms as another factor that prompts muscle injection. Here, the
impossibility of delaying the drug consumption is coupled with not
having the pulse to obtain it.
It is difficult for old users, we do not have veins. Sometimes it
takes me one hour to find a vein and get it. So when I am with the
mala (withdrawal symptoms) I inject wherever. I know that it is
bad, but I cannot help it. (Rosario)
These women try to maintain the practice of venous injection by
seeking help during the injection process. Such help can be given by
57
58
subordination (also exploitation) is omnipresent, women do not inevitably assume a passive attitude. Frequently, they develop various strategies to reduce or avoid violent situations and to obtain daily subsistence. If passivity were the case, being injected should be an
exclusively female practice; it should also be a regular and a dominant
one. In their narratives being injected is presented, instead, as an
ideal sought; to obtain this assistance, a strategy is required.
Three injection settings that include this practice can be differentiated: (1) with running partners, boyfriends or husbands; (2) with
those people recognized and paid for their skills at injecting (also
called hit doctors); (3) among acquaintances or friends who occasionally buy and inject together.
Running partners have been defined as couples who spend time and
resources and shoot drugs together (Connors, 1994; Friedman, Curtis,
Neaigus, 1999). Running partners, boyfriends and husbands sometimes help women during the injection. However these relationships
are affected by the subordinant place of the women in the street ideology, their inequality in access to resources (almost all resources are
provided by women) and different kinds of everyday violence. Between running partners, transactions are basically about subsistence
resources (drugs and money), a place to live, even protection and
respect. While women provide most resources, protection and respect
are male goods, which are basics to survival in the precarious daily
struggle.
Between running partners, help during the injection is not a regular
practice. Among those women who have a male partner, only a few
(28%) said that they are helped by their partner during the injection
process. Specifically, only two are always injected by their partners;
the others receive help only occasionally.
--I have my boyfriend. I only hit with him, always with him. I do
not like to do it with strangers or people to whom I do not know
so well. We women have more problems, because we do not have
veins or like me, veins are too thin.
--How do you inject?
--I only hit in this vein of my arm. My boyfriend helps me,
because when I do it, it swells up. (Rita)
The principal reasons these women express for the unhelpful behavior of their partners are the time that takes to inject the other person
59
60
Smith, 1990; Friedman, Curtis & Neaigus et al., 1999.) In this scenario,
only those women who have more resources (12%), specifically those
who work in street level drug dealing or even shoplifting can occasionally pay for this service.
--Here, there are some who know how to do it, but you must pay.
That guy to whom I was talking when you came, he is good.
When I have extra money, I call him and he injects me. But he
only wants money.
--How much?
--It varies. Ten, eight, five, it depends on the circumstances, you
know. But eventually I do not have enough money to pay my
drug; rarely I can afford it. (Viviana)
Just as syringes are a product sold on the street black market, help
during the injection has been transformed into a product subject to a
system of transactions. While the syringe costs two dollars, injection
help can be paid in different ways: drugs, money, even in other kind of
products (for example, clothes). The usual situation involves giving or
sharing drugs as an exchange for being injected.
--Nobody wants to do it for free. Here everybody is in the same
situation, looking for the same. Nobody wants to spend his (her)
time for nothing, except with women.
--Why women?
--When you work selling your body, much people think that you
have more money, so that you can pay anything. (Irene)
In this way, moral anatomy not only imposes care/destruction values on the body; this valuation also transforms these womens bodies
into a sort of capital that defines their levels of subordination or
independence, their levels of marginalization and the availability of
material and human resources they have.
These womens efforts to find injection help might be interpreted as
a form of dissent (even a fragmented resistance), expressed through
their bodies, against inequalities that they suffer in their everyday
lives. It is also possible to interpret this necessity as a denouncement
of female subordination and inequality in the transactions with which
they survive in the street economy. However, in the context of the
male-centered street ideology and female subordination, this de-
61
62
63
64
Among those who are sex workers, the body damage negatively
affects directly values of the transactions (specifically, sex-for-money
and sex-for-drugs exchanges). The reduction of the exchange values
transforms the usual gender inequality into exploitation, more abusive
situations, frequent physical and sexual violence and even death. This
is the case of those women who are called too used or too wasted.
Excluded from the street transactions system, sometimes they can only
obtain drugs by begging. On the other hand, those who are younger,
with a short history of drug injections, have the possibility of obtaining larger quantities of drugs through the street exchanges. Such is the
case of Patricia.
All the time these dealers (the crack dealers) offer me money or
drugs in exchange for spending some time with them. Others
want to be my boyfriend, and they say to me, I want to take care
of you. So when I have the mala I sometimes do it, but I do not
like to be a hooker. I prefer to help my boyfriend in selling drugs.
In fact, bodily deterioration reduces the possibility of finding running partners and participating in the transaction system of protection,
respect, credit, alliances of buying and selling and also help during the
injecting process. Although IDU women have subordinant positions,
these transactions--that allegorically reproduce those of the capitalist
market--are the means that allow them to hold on to their precarious
life in the streets.
Given the womens survival strategies, the necessity to be injected
introduces another level of suffering: that of being trapped in a vicious circle without escape and with a progressive devaluation of
their transactions. While, drug injection is not the only cause of body
deterioration and being injected by another cannot stop this process
indefinitely, for these women the practice is viewed as a preventive
strategy against bodily damage.
In synthesis, bodily damage promotes global vulnerability that involves the following: the possibility of producing income, the level of
marginalization, the way of valuing themselves through body image,
and the possibility of acquiring HIV and other infections.
However, there are a few women who do not want to be injected by
others and who resist being placed in the stereotypic subordinant
female position through having a male partner. The majority of them
are alone and are used to injecting themselves in the muscle. That they
65
66
REFERENCES
Abdulrahim, D. (1998). Power, culture and the hard to reach. The Marginalisation
of Minority Ethnic Populations from HIV Prevention and Harm Minimisation. In
R. Barbour & Huby G. (Eds.), Meddling with Mythology. Aids and the Social
Construction of Knowledge (pp. 37-53). London: Routledge.
Auerbach, J., Wypijewska C., & Brodie H. (Eds.) (1994). AIDS and Behavior: An
Integrated Approach. Washington D. C.: National Academy Press.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
Bourgois, P., Lettiere M. & Quesada J. (1997). Social Misery and the Sanctions of
67
68
Injectors. In M. Singer (Ed.), The Political Economy of AIDS (pp. 105-127). New
York: Baywood Publishing.
Friedman, S., Curtis R., Neaigus A., Jose B., & Des Jarlais, D. (1999). The Drug
Scene and Risk Behaviors in Bushwick. In Social Networks, Drug Injectors
Lives, and HIV/AIDS. New York: Kluwer Academic.
Gainotti, M. (1999). Body Image and Drug Addiction. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
88, 21-22.
Goldstein, N. & Marlowe J. (Eds.) (1998). The Gender Politics of HIV-AIDS in
Women. Perspectives on the Pandemic in United States. New York: University
Press.
Herb, F., Watters J., Case P., & Pettiti D. (1989). Endocarditis, subcutaneous abscesses, and other bacterial infections in intravenous drug users and their association with skin-cleaning at drug injection sites. Abstract Th. D.O.4. 5 the International Conference of AIDS, Montreal, Canada.
Irigaray, L. (1997).Women on the Market. In A. Schrift (Ed.), The Logic of the Gift.
(pp. 174-189). New York: Routledge.
Jackson, J. (1994). Chronic Pain and the Tension between the body as subject and
object. In T. Csordas, Embodiment and experience (pp. 201-228). Cambridge:
University Press.
Kleinman, A. & Kleinman J. (1991). Suffering and its professional transformation:
Toward an Ethnography of Interpersonal Experience. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry 15, 275-301.
Kleinman, A. (1992). Pain and Resistance: The Delegitimization and Relegitimization of Local Worlds. In M. Del Vecchio-Good, P. Browdin, B. Good, A. Kleinman (Eds). Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective (pp. 169197). University of California Press.
Koester, S. (1994). Copping, Running, and Paraphernalia Laws: Contextual Variables
and Needle Risk Behavior among Injection Drug Users in Denver. Human Organization, 53(3), 287-295.
Koester, S. (1996). The process of drug injection: Applying ethnography to the study
of HIV risk among IDUs. In T. Rhodes & R. Hartnoll (Eds.), AIDS, Drugs and
Prevention: Perspectives on Individual and Community Action (pp. 133-148).
London: Routledge.
Page, J. (1990). Shooting Scenarios and Risk of HIV-1 infection. Am. Behav. Scient.,
33, 478-490.
Page, J., Chitwood D., Smith P., Kane N., & Mc Bride D. (1990). Intravenous Drug
Use and HIV infection in Miami. Medical Anthropology Quaterly: 4(4), 56-71.
Rockwell, R., Friedman S., Sothernan J., & Des Jarlais D. (1998). Medical Access
for Injecting Drug Users. In M. Singer, The Political Economy of AIDS. (pp. 131147). New York: Baywood Publishing.
Scarry, E. (1985). The Body in Pain: The Making and Un-Making of the World. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Scheper-Hughes, N. & Lock M. (1987).The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to
Future Work in Medical Anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1,
(6-41).
Singer, M., R. Irizarry and J. Schensul (1991). Neddle Access as an AIDS Prevention
69
SUBMITTED: 3/30/00
REVISION SUBMITTED: 10/30/00
ACCEPTED: 11/30/00