WILLIAM JOHN JOSEPH HOGE, IN THE Plaintiff, CIRCUIT COURT v. FOR BRETT KIMBERLIN, ET AL, CARROLL COUNTY Defendant. ‘Case No. 06-C-16-070789 ORDER ‘The Court having considered the open motions filed by the parties in this matter, it is this_S?* day of December , 2016, by the Circuit Court for Carroll County, hereby ORDERED that the Defendants’, Brett and Tetyana Kimberlin’s, Motion for Sanctions be, and the same is hereby, DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the Defendants’, Brett and Tetyana Kimberlin's, Motion to Stay Discovery be, and the same is hereby, DENIED; and it is further ORDERED thet the Plaintiff's, William John Joseph Hoge's, Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendant Brett Kimberlin be, and the same is hereby, DENIED for failure to comply with Md. Rule 2-431, which requires a party to file a certificate of good faith attempt to resolve the discovery dispute before a Court will consider the moving party's request; and it is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff's, William John Joseph Hoge's, Motion. to Strike Defendants’, Brett and Tetyana Kimberlin’s, Motion to Stay Discovery be, and the same is hereby, DENIED as moot; and it is further ENTEREO DEC 05 OIEORDERED that the Plaintiff's, William John Joseph Hoge's, Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendant William Schmalfeldt be, and the same is hereby, DENIED for failure to comply with Md. Rule 2-431, which requires a party to file a certificate of good faith attempt to resolve the discovery dispute before a Court will consider the moving party's request. _becemer S, 2018 DATE FRED S. HECKER, JUDGE Circuit Court for Carroll County,