----- Forwarded message from belle.linnai@lvmhgroups.

com -----
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:57:59 -0700
From: Belle Lin Nai <belle.linnai@lvmhgroups.com>
Reply-To: Belle Lin Nai <belle.linnai@lvmhgroups.com>
Subject: 30 Mount Elizabeth, Unit 20-30
To: lai@unilegal.com.sg
Cc: belle.linnai@lvmhgroups.com

Dear Mr Lai,

I know that you ignored my email sent on the 13th of October 2009 because I had my lawyer Ms
Rosina Lau.

I am not too sure if you are aware of this but Ms Rosina is discharged and no longer will represent
me. Please send all future correspondence through email to belle.linnai@lvmhgroups.com or by
fax to +65 62353208. It was only on the 8th of October 2009 that we discovered and suffered a
loss of approximately S$107,000.

Contrary to Ms Linda Lee's remark on the 8th of October 2009 when we confronted her about our
loss in the presence of 2 police officers " These people, what kind of valuables can they have. "

My mother did tell Mr John Lee and the 2 Police Officers on the 2nd of October 2009 that she has
put her valuables in the master bedroom cupboard and would need their help to retrieve them or
she would rather die than leave the apartment.

But none of them helped her. John Lee just continued to harress and threaten her to leave. If he
wanted my mother to leave the apartment so much, why could'nt he just help her take her
valuables and then lock her out? Why!!!

My mother is suffering from high blood pressure and diabetes, she felt giddy because of the
commotion and stress she suffered due to the landlord's efforts to enforce a wrongful eviction and
I had to rush her to SGH A&E department. John Lee used the opportunity to lock us out of the
rented premise without a chance to retreive anything.

Even while being attended to by the doctor, she refused to accept the medication advised by the
doctor as it would take more time and pleaded me to bring her back to the premise to retrieve her
valuables immediately. I asked John Lee to please let us retreive them and later even begged the
investigation officer to help plead on our behalf but even when the officer asked, the request was
rejected.

This is not an allegation, we made a police report on this incident and even asked the police for
help to re-enter but to no avail. For the record, I as the legal tenant was LOCKED OUT and
WRONGFULLY EVICTED on the 2nd of October 2009. I have not written to terminate
the tenancy agreement and I have not been sentenced guilty of the landlord's allegations.
I am not sure if you are aware but your clients used a draft of your legal letter to me and told my
mom that it is a Court Order and that she has no choice but to comply. I was on the phone with my
mom and asked her to read what the court order says but she could not see too well because the
"Court Order" was in very small print. They pasted it on the door on the day of the wrongful
eviction and then only later on the 8th of October 2009 Madam Chua from the buidling
management accompanied by John Lee pasted another version of your draft on top of the original
but with a signature on it. My brother and I asked Madam Chua what it was and John Lee
answered, " It's the same thing " I have this on video recording.

I would like to appeal to you Mr Lai to advice your client to abide by the tenancy agreement and
not continually ignore the tenant's rights and behave in a manner as if they are above the law.

Pursuant to Clause 5(K) of the tenancy agreement:

" Upon expiration of the said term or earlier determination thereof, the Tenant shall deliver the
said premises to the Landlord after a joint inspection thereof by BOTH parties, and thereafter the
Tenant shall not be under any liability whatsoever to the Landlord nor shall the Landlord have any
claim against the Tenant in respect of any damage to the said premises other than for damage
ascertained at the said joint inspection. "

I understand that the landlord would like to release the premise back into the rental market so as to
seize the much higher rental rates at present but he will have to allow me to restore the place to
original condition or accept the property as is. Please ask John to arrange for the date to restore.

None of your client's accusations have been confirmed. I did have guests in the apartment but I
have full authority given by the landlord to do so according to Clause 2(j) of the tenancy
agreement and the landlord is fully aware and agreeable to our activities. I agreed to the landlord's
request that my name be put in because he said that since my company can't give him a guest list
then at least my name will have to be in the tenancy and I agreed.

That is the reason why in Clause 4(s), only my name is there. And then Clause 2(j) reflects why I
as the tenant can invite anyone as guests and also the family members of my guests.

I am not sure if the landlord is denying all these agreed and signed upon clauses but anyone with
common sense will know that these 2 clauses are pre-arranged and agreed upon because it would
be nonsensical to think that a single person (Belle Lin Nai) would rent a 4-bedroom apartment to
stay on her own. And it is also the same reason why Clause 1(l) (aa) and (bb) were never applied
from the start of the tenancy.

I made myself very clear on the company's frequent guests and that the reason my company is
renting the premise is solely to house our guests. I never once lied about it and even told John Lee
that without the landlord's agreement to these requirements I will not sign. The rental market was
very bleak in JULY 2009 and I had many other choices, if the landlord did not agree to my
requirements, I would not have accepted this tenancy.

I know why the Landlord did not evict me in July and August 2009 when there already were
guests in the rented premise and only chose to evict me in September 2009. I went back to the
same website (iProperty.com) where I found the advertisements that led me to this rental and it is
evident why the Landlord has chosen to evict me and deny the tenancy agreement only in
September.

I am a layman not a lawyer, but simple human ethics tells me that such unreasonable behaviour
and actions are wrong.

I keep asking the Landlord for the evidence he has been given or found that he is 100% sure that
my company and I sold his property as a hotel but till today I received NOTHING.

I ask for the evidence because I know I can prove the landlord wrong but the landlord refuses to
give me a chance to point out his misinterpretation. What is the harm in giving me a chance to
reveal the truth?

Please Mr Lai, please ask your clients to ask whoever who took my mother's 2 KG of Gold Bars
and her diamond bracelet to please just send it back or mail it back to us. If they can do that, upon
receiving it, you have my word that I will voluntarily agree to early termination and you have my
word that we will not pursue anything. If a private contract needs to be signed to assure that we
will not pursue the matter if the items are returned as original, I will be willing. The loss is too
much to bear, there is no chance in the world that we can ever just accept this loss. The landlord's
cruel behavior towards me I can swallow and tolerate but my mom is innocent, I can never accept
her loss.

Please, I just want this nightmare to be over, please just return my mom's items.

I am in the midst of appointing another lawyer but till then, I will represent myself and my
company in Arbitration.

Thank you.

--
Sincerely,
Belle Lin Nai
Regional Manager
LVMH Couture International LLC
www.lvmhgroups.com

DID: +65 90218988

FAX: +65 62353208
----- End forwarded message -----