Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Caroline Clevenger PhD , Scott Glick PhD, LEED AP & Carla Lopez
del Puerto PhD
a
To cite this article: Caroline Clevenger PhD , Scott Glick PhD, LEED AP & Carla Lopez del Puerto
PhD (2012) Interoperable Learning Leveraging Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Construction
Education, International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 8:2, 101-118, DOI:
10.1080/15578771.2011.647249
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2011.647249
Introduction
Construction management (CM) professional practice, construction education, and
workforce training are evolving due to changes in regulation, financing, product
choice, information delivery, and knowledge transfer. Professional practitioners
typically build projects that combine complexity with tight schedules and budgets
using workforces diverse in culture, language, training, and communication skills.
With regard to workforce preparation, CM education is subject to many of these
same pressures. It is not uncommon to find non-traditional or second major students
in the classroom or, on the jobsite, to find workers from various cultures speaking a
wide spectrum of native languages. Coupling this diversity with increasing need for
cross-discipline integration, varied levels of construction experience, and multigenerational audiences poses unique and complex challenges for CM educators trying
to prepare tomorrows CM workforce.
Construction education traditionally uses experiential learning to assist in the
delivery of course content that requires spatial cognition and visualization. However,
Address correspondence to Caroline Clevenger, PhD, Colorado State University,
Construction Management, 1584 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. E-mail:
caroline.clevenger@colostate.edu
101
102
C. Clevenger et al.
spatial abilities not fully developed may compound and have lasting negative
impacts on CM students, particularly on those without prior construction experience. If students cannot visualize building system components and their spatial relationships, they may remain at a disadvantage to their peers. Kolb (1984) motivated
experiential education by defining learning as the process where knowledge is
acquired through the transformation of experience. One of the many benefits associated with experiential education in CM coursework is the ability to learn how to
think conceptually about building system components, their geometric relationships
and how they interact to form a complete and viable structure.
Purpose
In an effort to meet these challenges, CM educators at Colorado State University,
Department of Construction Management are promoting the use of 3D visualization
and Building Information Modeling (BIM) to help teach core construction concepts.
Our hope is that such technology might serve as an effective supplement or classroom proxy for experience while enhancing and developing critical thinking skills
in students. This paper presents initial findings and lessons learned from the development and implementation of educational modules leveraging 3D visualization
and BIM. The objective is to test the possibility of using the 3D interface of BIM
to create stronger learning platforms to help students and workers better visualize
and develop a more comprehensive understanding of construction processes. Three
modules were developed: the first two are designed for direct classroom application
to further specific course objectives. These modules focused on masonry construction sequencing, and the incorporation of cross-discipline structural engineering
and construction management analysis. The third module, a bilingual safety-training
module, is intended to aid construction companies that provide on-site worker
education.
This research documents the development of three educational modules as well
as the pilot implementation of the masonry construction sequencing module. Future
research will focus on the development and implementation of assessment techniques
to further gauge the impact of these educational modules across construction
education.
103
Olkun (2003) stated that spatial relations are necessary for any field requiring
scientific thought and argues that math curriculums in geometry (grades 5 through
8) neglect to teach 3D views, prohibiting opportunities for improvement. Strong
and Smith (2002) identify establishing the effects of computer technology on spatial
visualization skills and the subsequent measurement of these skills as an up and coming field of research. In general, preliminary research shows that visualization may
enhance the students or workers ability to conceptualize and understand construction concepts. As future construction managers, students will need such skills to
effectively manage information and communicate with others.
Models are widely used in the construction industry today ranging from full
scale mock-ups to geometric 2D or 3D models to reliably test and communicate
design intent. While virtual 3D models lack the physicality of an onsite mock-up,
they significantly improve the level of communication and comprehension among
viewers over 2D models. Three dimensional models represent depth, height, and
width by using x, y, and z axes. Such models can be scaled and rotated to meet user
viewing preference or requirements and provide continuous views from any angle.
BIM is increasingly being used to communicate a variety of information and transformations to multiple stakeholders in a readily accessible visual format. BIM is a
term first coined by architect Jerry Laiserin to describe three dimensional (3D),
object-oriented, architecture, engineering, construction (AEC)-specific computeraided design (CAD) (Davis, 2003). BIM is efficient and visual. Database efficiency
allows BIM information to be stored centrally, updated quickly, and accessed by
multiple stakeholders. The visual aspect of BIM allows a 3D model to represent a
building based on the information in various databases.
Opportunities for BIM in Construction Education and Training
To keep up with industry and provide students needed skills, construction education
is increasingly utilizing 3D models for both visualization and information sharing
purposes. For example, traditional structures classes in construction management
use pencil diagrams to denote and distinguish the properties of a roller, versus a
pin (Figure 1a), versus a fixed connection. At many leading programs, educators also
have access to fabricated steel sculptures, to provide material demonstrations of
common steel connections (Figure 1b). This allows students not only to touch
and feel, but also to directly experience steel connections in 3D. A limitation is that
access to a steel sculpture is limited to laboratory use. In addition, the sculpture is
104
C. Clevenger et al.
Module Development
3D models provide an enhanced opportunity to teach and communicate. A primary
challenge for educators using such techniques is the logistics of introducing, implementing and maintaining software platforms in the construction management classroom. Information Technology (IT) departments across universities struggle to serve
the variety of complex and evolving classroom needs with the limited resources
available. Even when sufficient technical support exists, for many faculty members
learning and remaining current with BIM software presents an unattractive and intimidating additional responsibility.
To meet this challenge, the authors elected to create the BIM educational modules using Adobe1 Captivate1 5 software (Adobe, 2010). This program is capable of
creating a rich electronic learning experience using software demonstrations, interactive simulations, branching scenarios, and quizzes outside the original, native software platform. Once created using the native BIM software, the published products
105
are stand-alone, software independent, and executable using an Abode flash player
or an internet browser. Such an approach, once the training modules are created,
relieves professional educators of the burden of native software management and
training thus addressing one of the major obstacles facing educators wishing to
implement BIM in the classroom. In addition, these stand-alone, viewable modules
relieve the student of the need for direct access to potentially expensive software and
computer equipment, as well as provide the opportunity for remote, 24=7 learning
environments accessible through the WorldWideWeb. Once published, the educational material supports a range of formats including on-line or in-class delivery.
Adobe1 Captivate1 5 software can also track student responses when they interact
with the software, thereby making automated student assessments possible. Such
features are capable of tracking both correct and incorrect entries. Scores can be
recorded directly through a web-based learning environment or saved and emailed
to the instructor.
The development of these modules collaboratively between industry and academia enabled the leveraging of state-of-the-art modeling skills and real-world case
studies with the unique teaching expertise provided by educators. To test this opportunity the authors developed three pilot educational modules.
Construction Sequencing Educational Module
The first educational module focuses on teaching construction sequencing. The
authors used a professionally created 3D visualization of a brick veneer wall
mock-up for content. Mortenson Construction had created the Sketch-up model
to provide specific multi-story masonry construction sequencing instruction to their
sub-contractors on the job-site. As a company they are beginning to routinely
develop virtual mock-ups to complete construction detailing prior to building full
scale-mock-ups to test constructability and save time and money. They also use virtual mock-ups for safety demonstrations and analysis of scaffolding sequencing (see
Bilingual Safety Training Module Section).
The authors research team divided the professional Sketch-Up model into individual frames prior to exporting it to Google Layout. Layout is a software platform
that allows for the capture of screen shots for enlargement, rotation and flipping
within their frames. The researchers manipulated the model into the most ideal
views for the chosen sequence and desired detail. The construction sub-assemblies
slides were then edited and labeled (Figure 3a, b). The ability to rotate the individual
slides allowed particular details of the mock-up wall to be displayed. An example of
the importance of these features includes horizontal joint reinforcing used to
strengthen the mortar joints (Figure 3d). Without the ability of the modeling software to rotate the 3D image, such detail would be lost as it is in a typical 2D architectural elevation view. A self-grading test format was chosen for this project to
provide immediate test score feedback to the student (Figure 3c). When the correct
construction sequence is chosen by the students, the program displays the correct
construction sequence by activity; i.e., foundation first, stud wall, sheathing, moisture control, masonry veneer, etc. This reinforces the students choice in a visual manner while the student is able to view the 3D visual sequencing of the assembly.
Curriculum designers have the option of inserting both audio and visual instructions for the students as well as action activated videos and pop-ups. In this module,
the audio function was added as a voice-over to the written instructions on the first
106
C. Clevenger et al.
Figure 2. 3D model of parapet top cap of the masonry wall virtual mock-up (Mortenson
Construction).
Figure 3. Example content from the construction sequencing teaching module, including: a)
Four assembly elements presented with roll-over on Wall Assembly showing the thumbnail
depiction. b) Four assembly elements presented with two dragged and dropped; Continuous
Moisture=Air Barrier thumbnail shown c) Student results d) Complete video sequence played;
close-up of steel lintel re-enforcement detail shown.
107
slide. The written instructions informed the students that they were viewing a list of
out of sequence construction steps shown as components. Students were then asked
to correctly sequence the assembly of the masonry veneer wall system. Visual cues
were provided when the students rolled over the title of individual assembly elements. Due to a restriction in Captivate1 5 (i.e., size of images) the number of
assembly stages portrayed on a single slide was limited to four. Figure 3a and b show
a two part question, each consisting of a sequence of four assembly stages to be
dragged and dropped by the students into the proper sequence on the right hand side
of the slide. In each question the students are allowed three chances to properly
sequence the wall construction. In either question the third sequencing failure automatically advances the student to the next section. After completing both sequences
the students are shown their score.
Structural Analysis Educational Module
A second module was developed provide the opportunity to teach students in the
departments of construction management and civil engineering about the integrated
nature of information used to design and construct buildings. The module uses interactive exercises to engage students and requires them to perform basic structural calculations and information gathering exercises related to their discipline. It also
allows them to view the calculations and techniques used by other disciplines. The
learning objective was to encourage fuller understanding of the diverse and interrelated construction processes by illustrating how information in structural models
is used in practice by multiple disciplines. A professionally developed BIM provided
by KL&A, Inc. was used as the basis for this educational module (Figure 4).
Through manipulation of the professionally developed BIM (Figure 4), the educational module presents a basic overview of BIM software related to structural elements, highlights standard modeling capabilities and information available for both
disciplines, and shows the interoperability capabilities between BIM software and
analysis programs (e.g., Revit Architecture and Revit Structures). Figure 5 is an
example of a students view in the demonstration portion of the educational module.
Here students are shown how to extract information from the BIM including
material properties or take-off quantities and told how this information is relevant
to both construction managers and structural engineers.
Figure 4. View of the 3D model that forms the basis for BIM-based teaching demonstration
and assessment for both SE and CM students (KL&A).
108
C. Clevenger et al.
Figure 5. Drop-down menu simulating Revit Structures as used by SE students to select the
correct beam size.
109
Figure 6. Example material schedule that CM students create as it relates to beam size
selection (Figure 5).
By contrast, CMs generally concentrate on material quantities, cost, constructability, construction sequence and schedule. The implementation of BIM technology in
this educational module effectively teaches students in both fields about the interrelation of information required throughout the building delivery process. Traditional curriculum for SE students does not address issues of constructability or
economy of size in either lecture or coursework. Traditional CM classes while more
applied with regard to surveying, estimating, scheduling and management are generally focused on basic concepts and material properties related to structures and
not the engineering details. Academically today, neither discipline fully addresses
the information exchange necessary between disciplines to construct real-world
projects.
By providing an interactive e-learning environment where students have access
to 3D visualization and associated property databases (i.e., size, material properties,
cost, etc.), the educational module provides an enhanced platform for teaching. In
this environment students have the capability to view the design and the structural
sub-component beams and connections in the virtual world to develop a greater
understanding of the properties of single elements as well as a more complete understanding of how the building systems fit together as a whole. In executing the educational modules, students gain practice in their disciplines respective skills, and
also develop an understanding of the role and responsibilities of other disciplines.
In our example, providing students the capability to visualize a pin connection
within the context of an entire building model improves their understanding of
how the connection works as well as how engineers and construction managers need
to work together. The goal is to have students develop an appreciation and buy-in
of the importance and relevance of the other disciplines and not to think of their role
in isolation. While no formal data has been gathered to date about the effectiveness
of this educational module, initial feedback from other faculty in the Department of
Structural Engineering has been sufficiently positive to have them agree to test it
upcoming Steel Structures courses.
110
C. Clevenger et al.
Figure 7. Example audio and visual description of basic education on OSHA laws and workers rights provided in the safety training module for Hispanic workers.
111
Figure 9. Job-site 3D visualization using roll-over feature to activate Spanish words and
audible narrations to highlight construction layout and safety controls on the job-site.
112
C. Clevenger et al.
project information, and understand its relevance to the building process. The modules also simulate the experience of navigating BIM software to find information. To
date the macro benefits of using 3D BIM educational modules include: better communication of complex ideas, increased faculty and students interaction across
departments and disciplines, and opportunities to reach broader audiences. Specifically, students manipulate construction details, learn the roles and responsibilities
of other disciplines, and get job-site specific information in multiple formats and
languages.
While more formal assessment of the impact of these modules on learning will be
part of future research, 88 students in the core level Materials and Methods construction management class at Colorado State University were given the construction
sequencing module as a homework assignment in April, 2011. Following completion
of the assignment 81 out of 88 students completed a survey (92% response rate).
Initial feedback is promising. Highlights include:
When asked, if they would like to see more of these types of exercise used in the
class 80% said yes while only 20% said no.
. When asked, after completing the homework assignment on masonry construction, which best describes your level of understanding, 62% of the students
responded either slightly better or much better than before, 33% of the
students responded, the same as before with only 5% of the student responded
either slightly worse or much worse than before.
. When asked, identify the level of impact you think the use of three dimensional
(3D) models could have on your understanding of complex course material in the
class, 52% responded either high or very high impact, 41% of the students
responded, some impact, while only 7% responded either limited or no
impact.
.
Students experienced some technical glitches while interacting with the pilot construction sequencing module that may have impacted their responses. For example,
if the student completed the homework assignment once and wanted to restart, the
assignment would not fully reset, but instead would only allow part of the assignment to re-play. Survey results included a question on difficulties experienced.
Sample feedbacks included, Was not easy to pause; Unclear directions on how to
drag the terms to the answer box; No indications if some of the parts were right when
the overall answer was incorrect.
Based on the authors experiences developing the educational modules, additional current limitations include: 1) lack of customization as assessment tools.
For example, randomization of assignment inputs could allow each student to complete unique assignments. This would encourage study groups and collaboration
while eliminating copying. 2) lack of ability to track the number of attempts it takes
the student to successfully input the fill-in-the-blank answer sequence. Specifically,
no record can be created of number of times greater than two that a student
attempted an answer prior to successful completion.
While many improvements can be made to the educational modules to increase
usability and assessment quality, overall student and teacher feedback suggests that
further development is worthwhile. In addition, initial feedback from industry has
been positive and suggests that these educational modules can be used by industry
to enhance learning and provide project specific core content irrespective of language
and cultural barriers.
113
114
C. Clevenger et al.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank KL&A, Inc. for providing a building information model for use
in the prototype educational module integrating structural engineering and construction management. The authors thank Mortenson Construction for generous and
expert support of the research involving BIM and safety. Project examples and illustrations regarding BIM and safety were provided and discussed by Ricardo Khan.
Ricardo Khan is an Integrated Construction Manager and leads the development
of new processes for virtual design and construction for Mortenson Construction
in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Eric Richards and Dale Porter were Colorado State
University graduate students who were primarily responsible for the technical set-up
and development of the modules. Finally, the authors would like to acknowledge the
contributions of The Institute for Learning and Teaching at Colorado State
University for its help in implementing Adobe1 Captivate1 5 in the creation of
all of the educational modules.
Parts of this paper are based on the following previously published conference
proceedings:
Clevenger, C., Lopez del Puerto, C., (2011). Using 3D Visualization to Train
Hispanic Construction Workers, 47th ASC Annual International Conference
Proceedings, Associated Schools of Construction, Omaha, Nebraska, pp. 311316.
Glick, S., Clevenger, C., Porter, D., (2011). Integrating 3D Models in Construction Management Education: Masonry Interactive Homework, 47th ASC Annual
115
References
Adobe1 Captivate1 5. (2010). Adobe Systems, 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA 951102704.
Available from: http://www.adobe.com/products/captivate/
Brunette, M., (2005). Development of Educational and Training Materials on Safety and
Health: Targeting Hispanic Workers in the Construction Industry. Journal of Family
and Community Health, (28), 253266.
Clevenger, C., Ozbek, M., Glick, S., Porter, D. (2010). Integrating BIM into Construction
Management Education. EcoBuild Proceedings of the BIM-Related Academic Workshop,
Washington D.C.
Davis, D. (September, 2003). BIM (Building Information Modeling) update. American
Institute of Architects, [WWW document]. URL http://www.aia.org/tap_a_0903bim
Deno, J. (1995). The relationship of previous spatial visualization ability. Engineering Design
Graphics Journal, 59(3), 517.
Gambatese, J. (2004). An overview of design-for-safety tools and technologies, Proceedings of
the Designing for Safety and Health in Construction Research and Practice Symposium,
Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press, 109117.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ku, K. & Mills, T. (2010). Research needs for Building Information Modeling for Construction Safety, International Proceedings of Associated Schools of Construction 45nd Annual
Conference, Boston, Ma.
Leopold, C., Gorska, R. A., & Sorby, S. A. (2001). International experiences in developing the
spatial visualization abilities of engineering students. Journal for Geometry and Graphics,
5(1), 8191.
Lopez del Puerto, C., Clevenger, C. (2010). Enhancing Safety throughout Construction using
BIM=VDC, EcoBuild Proceedings of the BIM-Related Academic Workshop, Washington
D.C.
Lord, T. R. (1985). Enhancing the Visio-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 22, 395405.
Mourgues, C., Fischer, M. (2008). A Work Instruction Template for Cast-In-Place Concrete
Construction Laborers. CIFE Working Paper #WP109, Available from: http://cife.
stanford.edu/online.publications/WP109.pdf [Accessed January, 2011]
Olkun, S. (2003). Making connections: Improving spatial abilities with engineering drawing
activities. Retrieved April 22, 2009, from http://www.ex.ac.uk/cimt/ijmtl/ijabout.htm
OSHA (2010). [WWW document]. http://www.osha.gov/dep/standards-policy-statementmemo-04-28-10.html
OSHA (n.d.). [WWW document]. URL http://www.osha.gov/dte/grant_materials/fy08/
sh-17792-08/falls_spanish_r6.pdf
OSHA 2 (n.d.). [WWW document]. URLhttp://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3165.pdf
Sorby, S., & Baartmans, B. (1996). A course for the development of 3D spatial visualization
skills. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 60(1), 1320.
Strong, S. & Smith, R. (2002). Spatial visualization: Fundamentals and trends in engineering
graphics. Journal of Industrial Technology, 18(1), 16.
116
C. Clevenger et al.
Appendix
117
Table 1. Continued
Guideline
118
C. Clevenger et al.
Table 1. Continued
Guideline