Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MIMO Systems
I.
I NTRODUCTION
,(((
S YSTEM M ODEL
A. System Set-Up
We consider a massive MIMO system with Nt transmit
antennas and a single receive antenna (Nt 1), as shown in
Fig. 1. At the k-th symbol time, the received signal is given
by
y k = hH
k sk + wk ,
k = 1, 2, . . .
(1)
(3)
$VLORPDU
1
dk
(k
/ Ip )
Tracking
(k Ip )
Fig. 1.
(k
/ Ip )
hk
MMSE
lter
sk
yk
k|k
h
k|k := E hk |yp(k ) . During the data transmission
where h
period, the channel is predicted without the measurement
update step, based on the last channel estimate of the previous
training period as [12]
sk
(k Ip ) Tracking
Nt
lM+M +i|lM+M = ai h
lM+M |lM+M
h
p
p
p
p
2i
H
For stationarity, Rb = E{bk bH
k } = Rh = E{hk hk } for all
k.
k = lM + m Ip .
(4)
Then, (2) and (4) form a state-space model and the optimal
channel estimation is given by Kalman ltering and prediction
applied to this state-space model [12]. During the training
period, a measurement update step at each symbol time is
available due to the known pilot pattern, and the Kalman
channel estimate and the error covariance matrix are given
by [12]
k|k1 + Kk (yk sH h
k|k = h
h
k k|k1 ),
Pk|k1 = a2 Pk1|k1 + (1 a2 )Rh ,
Pk|k = Pk|k1 Kk sH
k Pk|k1 ,
(5)
(6)
(7)
lM+M +i|lM+M
h
p
p
d ,
lM+M +i|lM+M 2 k
h
p
(10)
B. Channel Estimation
(9)
2i
(12)
2 1 H 2
sk Pk|k1 sk .
arg max tr (sH
k Pk|k1 sk + w )
sk
(13)
(14)
,
2
2
2
p Nt + w
p 1 + w
sH
k Pk|k1 + w /p INt sk
(15)
(16)
arg maxsk 22 =p var sH
k (hk hk|k ) .
Note that to obtain the (sequentially) optimal sk , we
need to perform the eigen-decomposition (ED) of the Kalman
prediction error covariance matrix with size Nt Nt at each
pilot symbol time k and this is computationally expensive
=: Uk U .
(18)
Thus, Pk|k and Pk|k1 are simultaneously diagonalizable.
Furthermore, it is easy to see that after the prediction step
(6), Pk+1|k and Pk|k are simultaneously diagonalizable. Since
P1|0 = Rh = U1 UH , Pk|k and Pk|k1 in the rst training
period have the same set of eigenvectors as Rh .
Now consider a symbol time k during the rst data transmission period. In this case, the prediction error covariance
matrix is given by
PMp +i|Mp = a2i PMp |Mp + (1 a2i )Rh
Mp ) UH ,
= U 1 a2i (1
(19)
s k = p ui
2
w
i p ii +
2
w
end if
a2 + (1 a2 )1
end for
end while
3 Such an initial parameter is a typical value for the Kalman lter, there will
be no loss.
k|k
Orthogonal
Random
Proposed
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
40
Time (k)
50
60
70
80
Orthogonal
Random
Proposed
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
40
Time (k)
50
60
70
80
18
Received SNR (dB)
16
14
12
10
Orthogonal
Random
Proposed
8
0
10
20
30
40
Time (k)
50
60
70
16
14
12
10
Orthogonal
Random
Proposed
8
80
(a)
10
20
30
40
Time (k)
50
60
70
80
(b)
Fig. 2. MSE and SNR versus time index k, SNR=20dB, v = 3km/h: (a) r = 0.4 and (b) r = 0.8. (The dotted rectangles denote the pilot transmission
periods.)
IV.
N UMERICAL R ESULTS
|sH
k hk|k |
2
sH
P
s
+
k|k k
w
k
imposed
0.8
k|k
Orthogonal
Random
Proposed
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0
10
20
30
40
Time (k)
50
60
70
80
Orthogonal
Random
Proposed
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
40
Time (k)
50
60
70
80
16
14
12
10
Orthogonal
Random
Proposed
8
0
10
20
30
40
Time (k)
50
60
70
16
14
12
10
Orthogonal
Random
Proposed
8
80
10
(a)
Fig. 3.
V.
C ONCLUSIONS
R EFERENCES
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
40
Time (k)
50
60
70
80
(b)
[2]
30
MSE and SNR versus time index k, SNR=20dB, v = 30km/h: (a) r = 0.4 and (b) r = 0.8.
[1]
20
[8] J. Nam, J.-Y. Ahn, A. Adhikary, and G. Caire, Joint spatial division
and multiplexing: Realizing massive MIMO gains with limited channel
state information, in Proc. IEEE CISS, Johns Hopkins Univ., Maryland,
Mar. 2013.
[9] J. Choi, Z. Chance, D. J. Love, and U. Madhow, Noncoherent trellis
coded quantization for massive MIMO limited feedback beamforming,
in Proc. IEEE ITA, San Diego, CA, Feb. 2013.
[10] J. Choi, D. J. Love, and U. Madhow, Limited feedback in massive
MIMO systems: Exploiting channel correlations via noncoherent trelliscoded quantization, in Proc. IEEE CISS, Johns Hopkins Univ.,
Maryland, Mar. 2013.
[11] W. C. Jakes, Microwave Mobile Communication, Wiley, New York,
NY, 1974.
[12] T. Kailath, A. H. Sayed, and B. Hassibi, Linear Estimation, PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2000.
[13] E. Telatar, Capacity of multi-antenna Gaussian channels, Europ.
Trans. Telecommun., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 585 595, Nov. 1999.
[14] B. Hassibi and B. M. Hochwald, How much training is needed in
multiple-antenna wireless links?, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 49, no.
4, pp. 951 963, Apr. 2003.
[15] G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, 3rd ed., Johns
Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD, 1996.
[16] T.-S. Chu and L. J. Greenstein, A semi-empirical representation of
antenna diversity gain at cellular and PCS base stations, IEEE Trans.
Commun., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 644 656, Jun. 1997.
[17] V. Erceg et al., IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs TGn Channel Models,
in IEEE P802.11-03-0940, http://www.ieee802.org/11/.
[18] W. Santipach and M. L. Honig, Optimization of training and feedback
overhead for beamforming over block fading channels, IEEE Trans.
Inf. Theory, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 6103 6115, Dec. 2010.