Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Array
Johannes Koppenborg, Hardy Halbauer, Stephan Saur, Cornelis Hoek
Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs
Stuttgart, Germany
{Johannes.Koppenborg, Hardy.Halbauer, Stephan.Saur, Cornelis Hoek}@alcatel-lucent.com
I.
INTRODUCTION
PRINCIPLE OF 3D BEAMFORMING
A. Overview
Adaptation of the vertical beam pattern in addition to the
horizontally applied multi-antenna scheme is the key element
for the extension towards 3D beamforming. But whereas in
horizontal direction usually an angle between -60 to +60
relative to the eNodeB boresight must be covered, the situation
in vertical direction is different. For the example of an inter-site
distance (ISD) of 500 m and a eNodeB height of 30 m, a
simple geometrical consideration (Figure 1) shows that the
minimum downtilt at cell edge is 6, and 95% of the downtilts
needed to cover the cell area are below 20.
1
CDF (P downtilt < x-axis)
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0
10
20
Downtilt []
30
,
2 d
= arcsin
d
direction of beam with
downtilt
antenna elements
RF transmission
signal
UEs via the active antenna array using vertical beam steering.
The received signals at the test UEs are analyzed and the
optimum beamforming weights for each subcarrier are reported
via a fixed link or a generic wireless link to the eNodeB and
applied for the following time interval. This setup allows lab
and field trials with quasi-real-time channel feedback in the
uplink and is therefore suitable for proof-of-concept field trials
covering different deployment scenarios and algorithms
designed to feed back optimum beam pattern weights.
20 MHz@2.6 GHz
eNodeB
Emulator
CPRI
(Baseband)
UE 0
UE 1
Uplink feedback
Garbage
Container,
Metal fences
and trees
2
AAA mounted on
wall of building
(height over
street level 7 m)
The two test UEs where located in a test van and connected
with two receive antennas mounted on the roof of the van with
a separation of 50 cm.
Figure 4. Received Power for two UEs by using a zero forcing algorithm
Figure 6. Separation of the wanted and unwanted signal for LOS condition
Figure 9. Separation of the two signals for non line of sight condition for one
UE and line of sight to the other with beam reflected from a wall
Figure 7. Separation of the two signals for non line of sight condition
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The research leading to these results has received funding
from the European Commissions seventh framework
programme FP7-ICT-2009 under grant agreement n 247223
also referred to as ARTIST4G.
[6]