Suitability Analysis For Locating Kacha Bazaar in Khulna City

Suitability analysis for locating Kacha Bazaar in Khulna city 2016
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Background of the study ....................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Objective of the study ........................................................................................................... 3
1.4 Scope of the Study ................................................................................................................ 4
1.5
Limitation of the Study .................................................................................................... 4
Chapter 2: Literature Review .......................................................................................................... 5

2.1 Kacha bazaar ......................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 A Case study analysis ........................................................................................................... 5
2.2.1 Matthew J. Peters, Locating Kacha bazaars: an evaluation methodology to inform site
selection for Kacha bazaars, 2008 ......................................................................................... 5
Chapter 3: Study area ...................................................................................................................... 6
3.1 Study area.............................................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Existing Condition of Kacha Bazaar..................................................................................... 6
Chapter 4: Methodology ................................................................................................................. 9
4.1 Working procedure over view .............................................................................................. 9
4.1.1 Data Collection method ................................................................................................. 9
4.1.2 Data Preparation method................................................................................................ 9
4.1.3 Data Analysis method .................................................................................................... 9
4.2 Criteria Introduction............................................................................................................ 10
4.2.2 Locational characteristics............................................................................................. 10
4.2.3 Physical characteristics ................................................................................................ 11
4.3 Criteria measure .................................................................................................................. 13
4.4 Working procedure in ArcGIS ............................................................................................ 14
4.4.1 Process with reclassify ................................................................................................. 14
4.4.2 Process with Network analyst ...................................................................................... 15
4.4.3 Calculating Traffic Intensity ........................................................................................ 17
4.4.4 Calculating Population Density ................................................................................... 21
4.4.3Process with reclassify .................................................................................................. 22
| 1

4.4.4 Process with Weighted Overlay ................................................................................... 23
Chapter 5: Analysis and Findings ................................................................................................. 24
5.1 Placement of farmer market ................................................................................................ 25
5.2 Determine the day of weekly market: ................................................................................. 25
5.3 Service Area ........................................................................................................................ 26
5.3.1 Served area ................................................................................................................... 26
5.3.2 Over served area .......................................................................................................... 26
5.3.3 Un-served area ............................................................................................................. 26
5.4 Compari between Proposed and Existing Market place ..................................................... 26
5.3 Facilities at new locations ................................................................................................... 27
Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 36
References ..................................................................................................................................... 39
1.
Matthew J. Peters ,Locating Farmers Markets: an evaluation methodology to inform
site selection for farmers markets, 2008 ............................................................................. 39
Appendix ....................................................................................................................................... 40
Figure 1: Study area ........................................................................................................................ 7

Figure 2: Existing Location of Kacha bazaar ................................................................................. 8
Figure 3: Working Procedure.......................................................................................................... 9
Figure 4: Suitable location for farmer market............................................................................... 24
Figure 5: Population dot map ........................................................................................................ 28
Figure 6: proposed Farmer market ................................................................................................ 29
Figure 7: Proposed Farmers market .............................................................................................. 30
Figure 8: Google Earth Image....................................................................................................... 31
Figure 10 Service area .................................................................................................................. 32
Figure 11 Distance from Residential landmark ............................................................................ 33
Figure 13 Suitable Locaion base on residential core .................................................................... 34
Figure 14 Suitable location base on traffic density....................................................................... 35
Table 1 Criteria measurement ....................................................................................................... 13

Table 2 Day of weekly market ...................................................................................................... 26
Table 3 Space Standards for Urban Community Facilities in acres by Population size ............... 40
| 2
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Background
Increasingly, farmers markets in the Seattle area are finding it difficult to situate in a stable
location. Seattle farmers markets are moving due to increased development pressures resulting
in a loss of spaces large enough to accommodate a market. When a farmer market is going to be
located than some criteria must be followed. Demand is the most important factor for locating a
farmer market. Some stakeholder of the city area, including business and property owners, would
like to see the market stay close to their business place. Similarly the farmers have some
requirement for locating farmer market. Social advocates would like to see the market stay in the
area due to the equity issues surrounding access to healthy options for people on food assistance
programs, such as the Women, Infants and Children and Food Stamps program.
1.2 Background of the study

Under the course Urban planning Studio, course no. URP 3182, offered by Department of
Urban & Regional Planning of Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET) the
project was given to the students to understand the existing location of farmer market and also
understand the factor that affected a farmer market. And then find some suitable location for
locating farmer market base on some criteria by using GIS. Firstly course teacher give some
knowledge about GIS among the all students. After that, course teacher divided the student into
several groups. Then each group was assigned an identical site. Then the course teachers made
the students about their work procedures during the project very efficiently. Then, the groups
were sent to complete the project.
1.5 Objective of the study
Applying GIS knowledge to perform practical analytical study.

Determining some suitable locations for locating kacha bazaar.
| Chapter 1: Introduction 3
1.4 Scope of the Study

The objective of the study is to examine the existing condition of Kacha Bazaar in Khulna City.
This study covers the technique of finding suitable location of Kacha Bazaar in Khulna city on
basis of some specific criteria. This report describes the methodology of GIS analysis to
accomplish the objective.
1.5
Limitation of the Study
Like any other studies this report has some specific limitation for some obvious reasons:
Firstly, the data sources provided is limited for this kind of study, which made many
difficulties
Secondly, the man power and time limit for this study is quite short, which made a rush
to make this report.
| Chapter 1: Introduction 4
Chapter 2: Literature Review

2.1 Kacha bazaar
Kacha Bazaar is a public and recurring assembly of farmers or their representatives, selling
directly to the consumers which they have produced themselves. Kacha bazaars vary in size and
shape, a kacha bazaar operates multiple times per year.
2.2 A Case study analysis

2.2.1 Matthew J. Peters, Locating Kacha bazaars: an evaluation methodology to
inform site selection for Kacha bazaars, 2008.
As the amount of money that is spent at kacha bazaars continues to increase across the country,
the benefiting markets are undergoing the need to relocate due to development pressures. In
Seattle, WA, markets managed by the Neighborhood kacha bazaar Alliance (NMFA), which is
responsible for organizing seven kacha bazaars in the city, are succumbing to development
pressures and being forced to relocate. The purpose of this professional project is to create a tool
to evaluate possible sites for a relocating market. Using a multi-criterion approach, this project
establishes criteria, appropriate weights for stakeholders, and evaluates potential sites for the
relocation of the Columbia City kacha bazaar. In comparing three sites to the current location,
the top choice is the street-closure site of South Edmunds Street in the Columbia City Historic
District. With some improvements, a vacant lot in the Rainier Vista development on the corner
of South Alaska Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Way South is a close second. The evaluation
tool is meant to inform NFMA when making future decision and to continue the discussion
concerning how kacha bazaars can be permanently integrated into the built environment while
meeting the needs of the vendors, customers, and market organizers.
| Chapter 2: Literature Review 5
Chapter 3: Study area

3.1 Study area
Khulna is the third-largest city in Bangladesh. It is the administrative seat of Khulna District and
Khulna Division. As of the 2011 census, the city has a population of 1078000. Khulna is an old
river port located on the Rupsha River. It is an important hub of Bangladeshi industry and hosts
many national companies. It is served by Port of Mongla, the second largest seaport in the
country. It is also one of the two principal naval command centers of the Bangladesh Navy.
Khulna city is consisting of total 31 wards. CBD of the Khulna city is located near Dak-bangla.
Along Dak-bangla, population density is relatively higher than others.
3.2 Existing Condition of Kacha Bazaar

At present, around 22 Kacha bazaar exist in Khulna city.Which fullfills the demand of Kacha
bazaar of approximately 1078000 people. Average area of those Kacha bazaar is around 1.2 acre.
According to space standard there need minimum .04 acre space per 1000 population. So the
demand area will 43 acre (.04/1000*1078000=43.12) for kacha bazaar. That means existing
kacha bazaar is not enough for fulfill demand. It is only serves a little portion of the demand.
| Chapter 3: Study area 6
Figure 1: Study area
Figure 2: Existing Location of Kacha bazaar
Chapter 4: Methodology
4.1 Working procedure over view
4.1.1 Data Collection method
Course teacher gives us some data of Khulna and some data is collected from using Google map
services. Location of existing kacha bazaar is determined by Google earth and reconnaissance
survey.
4.1.2 Data Preparation method
Data is prepared by using various tool of ArcGIS software. Microsoft excel is also used for data
preparation.
4.1.3 Data Analysis method
Data analysis is also done with help of ArcGIS.
Step 1
Step 2
Literature Review on kacha bazaar location
Select criteria with measurement based on step 1

Reclassify the measurment
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Give weight to criteria.
Analyze the data by using ArcGIS.
Find suitable location for locating kacha bazaar
Figure 3: Working Procedure
| Chapter 4: Methodology 9
4.2 Criteria Introduction

After reviewing various study and analyze exiting data, some criteria are selected for suitability
analysis for locating kacha bazaar in Khulna city. There are many considerable factors thats
play important role for criteria selection. Criteria are selected by combination and modification
of planning standard thats found by literature review of various countries and available planning
standard that exist in Bangladesh. As in Bangladesh, theres available a minimum planning
standard for located kacha bazaar and planning context of Bangladesh and other country is not
same so a small modification is done.
4.2.2 Locational characteristics
4.2.2.1 Distance to Residential Neighborhood Core
Distance to Residential Neighborhood Core is the measurement, in meter, to the closest
community business district. The criterion measures the proximity to the existing residential
core for the community. This takes into account the existing traffic and centrality that the
neighborhood core would give to the market. This criterion is important to the greater planning
community as cities try to reduce their vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capita. Locating uses
in central spots throughout the community decreases VMT, which has impacts on greenhouse
gas emissions, losses through time spent in travel or congestion, and dependence on nonrenewable fuel sources
4.2.2.2 Distance to Community Landmark
This criterion is the measurement, in meter along with road, to the nearest landmark that is well
known to the community. The reason for this criterion is to measure the distance from a nearby
landmark for purposes of branding and connectivity of the site with the community. Possibilities
of such a landmark include a park, library, or even a well-known sign or business. Care must be
taken to maintain a similar level of community connection for the chosen landmark for each of
the alternative sites.

4.2.2.3 Traffic Density
Traffic density is the amount of traffic that may pass through a road. As Kacha Bazaar is
depended on the retailers day to day supply. Too much traffic density may cause delay or time
consumption for products to reach its destination in time. So places with optimal traffic density
are required for Kacha Bazaar placement.
4.2.2.4 Traffic accessibility
Where there is two or more road beside market place there traffic accessibility is good. In this
location freight movement become easier. It helps the market to attract Vendor. This also helps
to reduce congestion.
4.2.3.5 Supply center
Supply center is most important consideration for locating farmers market. If there are any
existing supply centers beside market then its more preferable because in supply center, goods
supply and storage process is done. Vendors storage and collect goods from supply center and
bring it to market place. So if supply center is near market place than transportation and physical
cost become minimum thats why this location become demandable for locating market
4.2.3 Physical characteristics

4.2.3.1 Size
This criterion is measured in acre. Space standard base on population by private land
development act 2004 is used for determine the size of kacha bazaar.
4.2.3.2 Grade
This criterion is the class of the slope of the site. Class 0 is for a steep slope. Class 3 is for a
moderate incline. Class 2 is for a slight slope. Class 1 is for a flat or fairly flat site. This class
system is used instead of measuring the actual grade change of a site due to the complexities and
resources required to measure the actual topography of the site. The class system is formatted to

realize the preference that a flat site, as compared to a more sloped site, is preferable for a
successful farmers market
4.2.3.3 Population density
The site must have enough population to support buying and selling activity. Site with low
population may cause decrease in demand of products which may because retailers account for
loss. Places with high density have more demand of products and which will also attract retailers
to come. So obtaining an optimal population density is an important site selection criterion.
4.3 Criteria measure
Table 1 Criteria measurement
Criteria
Classify
Good
Medium
bad
Good
Medium
bad
good
Medium
bad
Good
Medium
bad
Good
Medium
bad
Good
Medium
bad
Distance from neighborhood retail core
Distance from community land mark
Grade
Traffic Density
Population Density
Distance from supply center

Total
Measure
Weighted (%)
0-350 m
350-600 m
20
600-800m
0-350
350-500
20
500-800
0-.36 D
.37-1 D
10
>1 D
Low
Medium
10
High
>150/acre
100-50/acre
20
< 50/acre
0-200 m
200-350 m
20
350-500 m
100
4.4 Working procedure in ArcGIS

After fixation of criteria and their weighted, suitability analysis is done with ArcGIS software.
Here Euclidean distance, Reclassify, and Weighted overlay is used.
4.4.1 Process with reclassify
The outcome of Euclidean distance is in raster format. The next step for find suitable location is
Reclassify the raster. Reclassify is done, based on criteria measure that describe in table 2
Reclassify is also found in spatial analysis tools that are in Arc Toolbox.
Arctoolbox
Spatial
Analyisis
Tools
Reclassify
Flow diagram 1Process with reclassify

4.4.2 Process with Network analyst
Distances along the road, services area etc. can be are calculated from network analyst tool.
Before use this tool, a network data set must be introduce from the central line of the road.
Network dataset is creating by using ArcCAT.
4.4.2.1 Preparing data for network analysis tool
1. Road center line data was added from KDA DAP
2. Road data was clipped with ward map
3. New file geodatabase was created including a new feature dataset
4. The shapefile was exported as feature class in the feature dataset
5. New network dataset was created from the feature class.
6. The dataset was created with proper conditions as two way and define length attribute to
cost
7. The network analyst toolbar was opened from the ribbon.
8. A new service area feature was created from the list provided in the toolbar.
Add road Centerline

Clipped with wardmap
Create service area
Create new GDB
Open Network
Analyist toolbar
Export shapefile as
feature in the
feature dataset
Create New
Netowrk Dataset
Flow diagram 2Preparing data for network analysis tool

4.4.2.2 Preparing data for network analysis tool
Calculating distance from community land mark:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Add structure polygon from the data provided by the KDA dap
Use polygon to point conversion tool to convert them.
Select all the feature with a unique name
Add mosque, school, playground, park to the selection by select by attribute tool
Export the data in a new shape file
In the network analysis tab right click on feature, lick on load location add community
land mark point feature.
7. A layer will appear named service area
8. Go to service area properties
9. In Analysis settings set impadance to length
10. Default break to the distance value
11. In the generate polygons tab set trim polygon to distance value
12. Repeat Step 10-11 for medium and bad distance values
13. Export the polygon generated from all the steps
14. Add a new field with 1,2,3 value for good, medium and bad respectively
15. Create raster from polygon
Add Structure
Poly
Convert to
Point
Extraction
All feature with
unique name
Mosque, School,
Playground,
Park
Creating
Polygon
Distance
value
for each
factor
Generate
Export
Repeat
Merge
Field for
grades
Polygon to
Raster
Feature load location

Community land
mark points.
Flow diagram 3Preparing data for network analysis tool

4.4.2.3 Calculating Distance from Supply Center
1. From the structure polygon create points for potential supply center such as store house,
go-down, ghat etc.
2. Follow Steps from 6-15 from Calculating distance from community land mark process.
3. Output See figures 13.
4.4.3 Calculating Traffic Intensity
4.4.3.1 Sorting Road Type
As there was no data provided for road type. A method was assumed to find the road type of the
city. The area and perimeter can be used to find length and height ratio of any shape. This
method was used to find the roads width. A mathematical
formula was determined to get an approximate width of
the road.
For both rectangular and curved roads,
.All the roads connected to primary roads are secondary

roads. Rests of the roads are tertiary.
1. The road polygon was added
2. Four new fields Road_Type ,Road_Score , C
and Width
3. In the field C, by using field calculator
the following code:
was calculated by
!Shape_Length!* !Shape_Length!)/4 4*!Shape_area!

4. The fields having C< 0 were removed by definition query, (mostly circles)
5. In the width field, using field calculator, width was calculated by the following code:
(!Shape_Length! / 2 - math.sqrt( !C! )) / 2
6. The roads that had width > 6.5m were selected
7. Few extra shapes were selected and few were missing; those were fixed by the selection
tool.
8. These roads were marked primary in the attributes table.
9. The roads that intersects primary roads were selected and was marked as secondary
10. The rest of the roads that had width < 3m were marked tertiary.
11. Roads that still had NULL in Type field, mark them secondary
12. The primary, secondary and tertiary were scored 3, 2 and 1 respectively.
Process with Arc GIS
Add field
Add Road Poly
Type
Score
C
Width
Select by
location :
Field Calculator :
Type
Intersect
primary
"Primary"
Field Calculator :
Secondary
Select by
attributes:
Field Calculator:
C
!Shape_Length!
*
!Shape_Length!)
/4
4*!Shape_area!
Selection tool,
remove
unneccessary
shapes
Select by
attributes
C > 0
Field Calculator:
Width
(!Shape_Lengt
h! / 2 math.sqrt( !C! ))
/ 2
Field Calculator:
Type IS NULL
Width < 3
Tertiary
Field Calculator:
Select by
attributes:
Score
Primary : 3
Secondary: 2
Tertiary : 1
Secondary
Type IS NULL

4.4.3.1 Calculating Method
As no data for traffic flow was given, the traffic density was calculated in a unique scoring
method. The roads that serve area with most population density will be the roads that have most
traffic density. The roads with higher hierarchy level have higher traffic density. The traffic
congestion occurs mostly at traffic junctions. So a method was created with these common
criteria to create a traffic density map. This method sets an incremental score for all road types. It
sums up all the road score according to its hierarchy (Primary roads = 3, Secondary = 2, Tertiary
= 1). The score for traffic density probability is then calculated as:
Score = log (Population Density * Junction Score)
The higher the score in a junction the higher the traffic density in the area will be.
The calculation was done in GIS as follows:
1. The road junction points were imported from network dataset created before.
2. Spatial join with intersection was used as a selection method with a search radius of 10
meters to find the entire junctions that are present. In the statistical method set field
Road_Score to Sum. ( This will create a score for each junction on the basis of road
counts and hierarchy )
3. Spatial join was used to get population data from ward map.
4. A new field was created to get traffic density score
5. In the field calculator the score was calculated as:
Score = log(Pop_density * Junction_Score)

6. Use Krigging Spatial Interpolation method to get a raster map of probable traffic density.
7. Output See figures 12.
Process with Arc GIS
import
Junction Points
Krigging Spatial
Interpolation
Z value : Score
Spatial join
Spatial join
With Road Poly

Method: Intersection
Search radius: 10m
Statistical Method :
Road_Score, Sum
With Population Map

Method: Intersection
Search radius: 10m
Statistical Method :
Road_Score, Sum
Add Field :Traffic_Density_Score

Field Calculator :
Score = log (Pop_density * Junction_Score)

4.4.4 Calculating Population Density
The population density was calculated with the precision of each housing unit. The population
density in every ward was calculated as:
Population Density = Total population in the ward * total housing unit area in the ward
Then the population was distributed in each residential building as
Residential Unit Population = Population Density * Residential Unit Area * (Floors if any)
Then a heat map was created with residential Unit Population
The process was done in GIS as follows:
1. A new field was added in ward map named pop_dens
2. In the field calculator [population]/[Area] formula was inputted to get population
density
3. Select all the structure with structure type residential from structure poly and export.
4. Use spatial join to insert population density.
5. Add a new field Res_pop_dens
6. Use field calculator to calculate residential unit population density
7. Convert the polygon to points
8. Use Krigging Spatial Interpolation method and set Z value as res_pop_dens
9. Output See figures 5 .

4.4.3 Process with reclassify
After doing all the analysis with all the criteria found, raster map of each criteria analysis were
be generated. These maps had raw data which are needed to be converted to grades. This process
was done for each image by converting values of each grading range with a number (1 = Good, 2
= Medium, 3 = Bad).
Open
Reclassify
Proceed
with the
next Image
Add New
Raster
Set Graded
Range
Flow diagram 4 process with reclassify

4.4.4 Process with Weighted Overlay
After the grading all the range of values with reclassify tool, the average grades of all criteria
were computed with weighted overlay. This tools uses weight allocated for each criteria and
makes a new raster of all the raster combined. This output shows the final output of suitability
analysis of the desired feature. Output Figure 4.
Add
Reclassifed
Images
Set Weight
Reclassify
Flow diagram 5 Process with Weighted Overlay
Chapter 5: Analysis and Findings

The
outcome
of
suitability
analysis
Figure 4: Suitable location for farmer market
| Chapter 5: Analysis and Findings 24
is:

In map Green area is good for locating farmer market. And red area is not good for locating
farmer markets.
5.1 Placement of farmer market

For placement of market there need some extra analysis. One of them is population dot map
analysis. In population density map (see figure 5) it realize that the population density is not
same at all portion of the study area. The two red circles indicate that high dense populated area.
As population is proportional to demand of Farmer market so intensity of farmers market in this
area should be high..
Another consideration is analysis of Google Earth Image.
After analysis of Google earth image theres some area of wards no 3, 9,15,13,31 where there is
exist vacant agriculture land. Residence density is too much low so there no need to be locates
farmer market just beside this area.
By considering demand, 15 new locations is finalize for locating farmer market. (see figure 6)
5.2 Determine the day of weekly market:

Day of weekly market is determining by theoretically. Two markets that located just near each
other are not opening in a same day. There is a relation between day of weekly market and
relative location of market. Its done because if a person fail to attend to go market on the day of
weekly market than he can go another market easily without travelling a long distance. Figure 9
shows the day of weekly market.
Another consideration is land use area. Where administrative and office building density is
high, there Friday and Sunday is selected. Because Friday and Saturday is off day of government
office But Sunday is off day on some non-government office. So Friday and Sunday is selected
for high dense administrative area.

Table 2 Day of weekly market
FID
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Day of weekly market

Friday,tuesday
Sunday
Wednesday
Friday
Tuesday
Friday
Thusday
Friday
Monday
Monday
Monday
Saturday
Saturday,tuesday
saturday
5.3 Service Area

5.3.1 Served area
After analysis of proposed area it show that most of the area is served by kacha bazaar (As A
kacha bazaar can served highest 800m distance along the road).
5.3.2 Over served area
There found some area that area over served (see figure 10 ) found the location of maximum
over served area is in high dense populated area. The logic behind this, the concentration of
people that is higher in over served area.
5.3.3 Un-served area
And there found some un-served area. Almost all un-served area are in a place where this either
agriculture land or water body. (Source: By analyzing Google earth image)
5.4 Compari between Proposed and Existing Market place

Some of existing market was in less suitable area. There are some high dense populated are
where there is no existing kacha bazaar. So residence of this areas have to travel a long distance
for daily shopping. Distribution of kacha bazaar in proposed design is done by maintaining
Population density, distance from neighborhood core and many other factors. It conform that all
most all people get this facility equally in proposed design . (See figure 7 )
5.3 Facilities at new locations

1. Suitable distance from residential neighborhood.
2. As slope is too low so it reduces cost for implementation.
3. As existing Supply center is nearby so goods can easily storage near farmer market.so the
location is more suitable for farmers or vendors as well as neighborhood residence.
4. As visible form road so the market attracts more people that makes vendors happy.
Figure 5: Population dot map
High dense kacha bazaar area
Figure 6: proposed Farmer market
Figure 7: Proposed Farmers market
Figure 8: Google Earth Image
Figure 9 Service area
Figure 10 Distance from Community landmark
Figure 11 Suitable Location base on residential core
Figure 12 Suitable location base on traffic density
Figure 13 Suitable location base on supply center
| 36
| 37
Conclusion
From this work, suitable location for farmer market (kacha bazaar) is determine by maintaining
some planning standard that satisfy some criteria selected by base on literature review. Fixation
the Size and count of kacha bazaar is conforming by using space standard provided by RAJUK.
This developed model can be used for increase the function of Khulna city more effective.
| Conclusion 38
References
1. Matthew J. Peters ,Locating Farmers Markets: an evaluation methodology to inform
site selection for farmers markets, 2008
(https://farmersmarketcoalition.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/10/peters_locating_farmers_
markets_2008.pdf )
2. http://foodwithinreach.org/designing-the-physical-space-for-your-farmers-market
3. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x4026e/x4026e06.htm
4. Google map services .
(map.google.com)
5. ArcGIS Desktop Help: http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/
6. ESRI Support (http://support.esri.com/en/
7. GIS StackExchange a GIS Q&A community: http://gis.stackexchange.com
8. GeoNet ESRIs GIS Q&A community: https://geonet.esri.com/welcome
9. Spatial References: http://spatialreference.org/
10. ESRI
Tutorials
(Help->Essentials
Library->ArcGIS
Tutorials):
http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//00v20000000t000000.htm
| 39
Appendix
Table 3 Space Standards for Urban Community Facilities in acres by Population size
Community
Facilities
EDUCATION
Nursery
Primary School
Secondary School
College*
HEALTH
Small Clinic*
Hospital*
COMMUNITY
ORGANIZATION
Community
Center/Mosque
RECRIATION
Play-Ground/
Play-field
Park
COMMERCIAL
Corner Shop/
Market/Kutcha
Bazaar*
ROADS
Residential
Roads**
Total Area for
community
Facilities
(minimun)
Net Residential
Area
Gross Residential
Area
Persons per Area
Size of Population
2500
5000
10000
15000
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Facility per
1000
Population
20000
25000
50000
100000
150000
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.2
1.6
1.6
2.0
1.6
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
4.0
8.0
8.0
10.0
8.0
12.0
12.0
15.0
12.0
0.08
0.08
0.10
0.08
0.6
0.8
1.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
0.04
0.04
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
0.04
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.6
2.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
0.08
0.5
1.0
1.5
1.8
2.4
3.0
6.0
12.0
18.0
0.12
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
0.04
0.9
1.7
3.5
5.0
6.8
8.5
17.0
34.0
51.0
0.34
2.7
5.2
10.0
14.90
20.0
25.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
1.00
4.44
9.08
18.5
27.95
37.14
46.43
92.85
185.71
278.57
7.14
14.28
28.57
42.85
57.14
71.43
142.85
285.71
428.57
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
Source:RAJIK
| Appendix 40

For rectangular roads,
x
Let,
A = Area
2P = Perimeter
Here,
A = X * Y --- (i)
P = X + Y --- (ii)
P2 = X2 + 2XY + Y2
P2 = X2 - 2XY + Y2+4XY
P2 = (X-Y) 2 + 4A
P2 -4A = (X-Y) 2
X-Y =
----- (iii)
From (i) and (ii) we get,
Y=
So we get,
---- (iv)
--- (v)
(!Shape_Length! / 2 - math.sqrt( !Width! )) / 2

(!Shape_Length! * !Shape_Length! / 4) -( 4 * !Shape_Area!)
| Appendix 41

For curved roads,
L1
L2
Here,
Width, Y = R r --- (vi)
Area, A =
A=
A=
A=
---- (vii) [ From (vi) ]
Perimeter, 2P = L1 + L2 + 2y
P =
P =
--- (viii)
Let,
x=
So,
From (vii) and (viii) we get,
A= x+y
P = xy
So, comparing with rectangular equations we get,
Y=
So for curved roads,
| Appendix 42
| Appendix 43

Suitability Analysis For Locating Kacha Bazaar in Khulna City

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Suitability Analysis For Locating Kacha Bazaar in Khulna City

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Suitability analysis for locating Kacha Bazaar in Khulna city 2016

Limitation of the Study .................................................................................................... 4

Chapter 2: Literature Review .......................................................................................................... 5