Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1. PENHITUNGAN UNIVARIAT
Retensio Placenta
Frequency
Valid
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
ya
33
50.0
50.0
50.0
tdk
33
50.0
50.0
100.0
Total
66
100.0
100.0
Resiko (<20,
>35)
Tdk (20-35th)
Total
USIA IBU
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
21
31.8
31.8
45
66
68.2
100.0
68.2
100.0
Cumulative Percent
31.8
100.0
RIW.KURETASE
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
9
13.6
13.6
13.6
57
86.4
86.4
100.0
66
100.0
100.0
Ya
Tdk
Total
KERJA
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Ya
24
36.4
36.4
36.4
Tdk
42
63.6
63.6
100.0
Total
66
100.0
100.0
Paritas
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Resiko (>3)
23
34.8
34.8
34.8
Tdk (<3)
43
65.2
65.2
100.0
Total
66
100.0
100.0
Jarak Hamil
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Resiko (<2th)
13
19.7
19.7
19.7
Tdk (>2th)
53
80.3
80.3
100.0
Total
66
100.0
100.0
2. PENHITUNGAN BIVARIAT
USIA IBU * ASFIKSIA
Crosstab
Retensio Placenta
ya
Usia Ibu
Tdk (20-35th)
Total
tdk
Total
12
21
42.9%
57.1%
100.0%
27.3%
36.4%
31.8%
% of Total
13.6%
18.2%
31.8%
24
21
45
53.3%
46.7%
100.0%
72.7%
63.6%
68.2%
% of Total
36.4%
31.8%
68.2%
33
33
66
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Count
Count
% within Usia Ibu
% within Retensio Placenta
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Df
Pearson Chi-Square
.629a
.428
Continuity Correctionb
.279
.597
Likelihood Ratio
.630
.427
.598
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.619
N of Valid Cases
66
.431
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.299
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower
Upper
.656
.231
1.864
.804
.457
1.413
1.224
.754
1.988
N of Valid Cases
66
Crosstab
Retensio Placenta
ya
Riw. Kuret Ya
Count
Total
Total
100.0%
.0%
100.0%
27.3%
.0%
13.6%
% of Total
13.6%
.0%
13.6%
24
33
57
42.1%
57.9%
100.0%
72.7%
100.0%
86.4%
% of Total
36.4%
50.0%
86.4%
33
33
66
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Tdk
Tdk
Count
Count
% within Riw. Kuret
% within Retensio Placenta
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
df
10.421a
.001
8.234
.004
13.904
.000
Likelihood Ratio
.002
Linear-by-Linear
Association
10.263
N of Valid Cases
66
.001
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
For cohort Retensio
Placenta = ya
N of Valid Cases
Lower
2.375
66
1.752
Upper
3.220
.001
Ya
Tdk
Total
Count
tdk
Total
14
10
24
% within Kerja
58.3%
41.7%
100.0%
42.4%
30.3%
36.4%
% of Total
21.2%
15.2%
36.4%
19
23
42
% within Kerja
45.2%
54.8%
100.0%
57.6%
69.7%
63.6%
% of Total
28.8%
34.8%
63.6%
33
33
66
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Count
Count
% within Kerja
% within Retensio Placenta
% of Total
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower
Upper
1.695
.615
4.671
1.289
.802
2.072
.761
.440
1.315
N of Valid Cases
66
Resiko (>3)
Tdk (<3)
Total
Count
tdk
Total
17
23
% within Paritas
73.9%
26.1%
100.0%
51.5%
18.2%
34.8%
% of Total
25.8%
9.1%
34.8%
16
27
43
% within Paritas
37.2%
62.8%
100.0%
48.5%
81.8%
65.2%
% of Total
24.2%
40.9%
65.2%
33
33
66
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Count
Count
% within Paritas
% within Retensio Placenta
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
Likelihood Ratio
df
8.075a
.004
6.673
.010
8.328
.004
.009
Linear-by-Linear
Association
7.952
N of Valid Cases
66
.005
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Paritas (Resiko
Lower
Upper
4.781
1.564
14.616
1.986
1.257
3.140
.415
.201
.858
.005
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
8.075a
Pearson Chi-Square
.004
.383
1
.004
df
.010
1 Value
.862a
1
Continuity Correctionb
6.673
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
8.328
.868
.005
.353
.009.536
.351
.005
.537
N of Valid Cases
Linear-by-Linear66
.849
1
.357
a. 0 cells (,0%) have Association
expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,50.
Valid
66
b. Computed only forNa of
2x2
tableCases
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,50.
Risk Estimate
b. Computed
only for a95%
2x2Confidence
table Interval
Value
Lower
Odds Ratio for Paritas (Resiko
4.781
1.564
Upper
14.616
66
.269
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower
Upper
1.792
.518
6.197
1.305
.779
2.185
.728
.350
1.515
N of Valid Cases
66