Carlos has no criminal liablity.

Under the law any person acting in diligence and due care causes injury to another by mere accident
and without itent and fault of causing it, is not criminally liable.

Here, Carlo was acting in diligence and due care causes injury to another by mere accident and without
itent and fault of causing the death of tricycle driver.
In order to prevent Paolo in successfully taking the car of Carlo he used a reasonable force to stop the
car by firing the
rear wheel using a gun hitting the same and the car veered out of control hitting the a tricycle and
immediately killed the tricycle driver.
Firing the rear wheel using a gun car will be Carlo's last resort to stop felonious act of Paolo,
he without intent and fault to cause damage and death to a tricycle driver thus, Carlo has no criminal
liability.

Carlo is criminally liable for Carnapping with Homicide.

Carnapping is taking with intent to gain, of any motor vehicle belonging to another without latter's the
consent.
Here, Paolo a thieft with intent to gain took and drove the car of Carlo without his consent constitute
the crime carnapping.
Paolo in the course of taking the car of Carlo the latter upon seeing his car driven away without his
consent employ the reasonable means by firing the rear wheel in order
to stop Paolo from taking his car which veered and lost control thereafter collided with an incoming
tricycle resulted to the death of the tricycle driver.

No, the charge is not proper.

Under the law, who kills another not falls under the circumstances that constitute murder which is
premeditation and intent.
Here, Olimpio died after he intake the medicine given by the pharmacist believing it was a paracetamol
that supposedly given to ease his fever but found to be pill in which he was allergic. Having no intent to
poison Olimpio it was just gross negligence in the part of the pharmacist that she hand to the deceased
wrong prescriptive drug. Should the pharmacist expected to perform with due diligence by giving exact
medicine .Having no deceit, intent and premeditation to cause such grave harm the accused should only
be charged of the crime Homicide.

Eman is criminally liable for theft.

The law provides, any person found a lost item belong to another and fails to deliver the same to
athorities or owner shall be guilty of crime theft.
Here, Eman having found a bag containing identification card and a diamond ring proposed to PO1
Melvin to pawn the item in case they are not able to find the owner. The intent of Eman to gain is
apparent when he proposed to pawned the item and share 50/50 with PO1 Melvin thus, Eman is
criminally liable for theft.

PO1 Melvin is guilty of crime malversation of property.

The law provides, Any public officer who, by reason of the duties of his office, is accountable for
property, shall appropriate the same or shall take or misappropriate shall be criminally liable for
malversation of property.
Here, PO1 Melvin being a public officer should act with justice having been entrusted by Eman who
found the diamnond ring to safekeep and return the precious item to its owner instead misappropriate
the same thus, PO1 Melvin is guily for malversation of property.

No, the case will not prosper.

Under the principle of territoriality, the Philippine cannot prosecute crime committed outside its
jurisdiction.
Here, Hubert being married to Eunice contracted another marriage with Eula his former girlfriend in
New York which is outside the jurisdiction of the Philippines. Hubert cannot be prosecuted of crime of
bigamy in the Philippines by reason of territoriality
thus, the case will not prosper.

Yes, Francis is criminally liable for the death of Joan.

The law provides, any person who shall assist another to commit suicide to the extent of doing the
killing himself shall be criminally liable.
In this case, Francis agreed with Joan his sweetheart to commit suicide by shooting each other's head
however Francis survived in the fatal acts. The action of Francis constitute assistance to Joan to commit
suicide thus, Francis is criminally liable for the death of Joan.