Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
USDA/NCAUR/ARS, Food and Industrial Oil Research, 1815 N. University Street, Peoria, IL 61604, USA
Received 19 November 2001; received in revised form 6 March 2002; accepted 9 March 2002
Abstract
Crystallization and wax appearance temperatures of a series of vegetable oils (natural, genetically and chemically modified)
were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The fatty acid chains of a triacylglycerol molecule have a bend
tuning fork conformation and undergo molecular stacking during the cooling process. Wax crystallization at low temperature is
controlled by steric and geometrical constrains in these molecules. This study describes an approach to quantify and predict wax
appearance temperature of vegetable oils based on the statistical analysis of DSC and NMR data. A molecular modeling program
was used to design triacylglycerol molecules with different fatty acid (e.g. oleic and linoleic) chains to illustrate their effect on
the crystallization process. Effect of pour point depressant (PPD) additives on vegetable oil crystallization is also discussed.
Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords: DSC; Vegetable oils; Wax formation; NMR; Molecular modeling; Statistical analysis
1. Introduction
Vegetable oils when subjected to low temperature
environment undergo solidification through crystallization and therefore are a major hurdle for use in industrial
applications. The relatively poor low temperature flow
properties of vegetable oils arise from the appearance
of waxy crystals that rapidly agglomerate resulting in
the solidification of the oil. Vegetable oil is a complex
$
192
193
Table 1
Wax appearance temperature of SBO at different cooling rates
range 50 to 50 8C, sample size: 9.9646 mga
Base
fluid
Cooling rate
(8C/min)
Wax appearance
temperature TC1 (8C)
Delta change
in TC1 (8C)
SBO
SBO
SBO
SBO
SBO
SBO
SBO
SBO
1.0
2.0
3.0
5.0
7.0
10.0
12.0
15.0
8.34
9.29
10.26
11.07
12.13
13.16
14.14
14.52
11.39
10.44
7.89
9.57
8.49
7.44
2.68
a
DSC data reported is the average value of duplicate
experiments.
194
Table 2
Wax appearance temperature of vegetable oils from cooling curve;
rate 10 8C/min; range 50 to 100 8Ca
Vegetable oils
TC1 (8C)
TC2 (8C)
10.76
25.29
24.16
26.24
21.28
14.92
21.50
13.16
19.90
35.04
43.44
43.69
48.94
39.84
36.68
45.76
35.48
45.41
195
Table 3
Fatty acid composition of the vegetable oils by GC analysisa
Vegetable oils
Palmitic (16:0)
Stearic (18:0)
Oleic (18:1)
Linoleic (18:2)
Linoleic (18:3)
Saflr oil
HO saflr oil
HL saflr oil
Sunflr oil
HO sunflr oil
SBO
HO soybean oil
6.4
4.6
6.7
6.1
3.5
6.0
6.2
2.5
2.2
2.6
5.3
4.4
5.2
3.0
17.9
77.5
14.6
21.4
80.3
21.2
83.6
73.2
13.2
75.2
66.4
10.4
65.7
3.7
0.5
1.7
196
197
Fig. 7. Minimum energy conformation of 2-linoleic acid pairs forming the 2-end side of tuning fork structure with the third oleic chain
forming the stem in the bent conformation.
198
Table 4
Calculated geometrical data obtained from energy-minimized structures of triacylglycerol molecules
2-Linoleic acid chainsa
Distance between two Hs on extreme
ends on the same chainb
Distance between two Hs on extreme
ends on the same chainb,c
Distance between two Hs on extreme
ends on the same chainb,d
Distance between the closest
Hs on adjacent chainsb
CH2CHCH2
CH2CHO (corresponding angle
with the middle chain)
OCOCH2
OCOCH2d
CH2CH=CH
=CHCH2CH=
CH=CHCH2
CH2CH=CHd
13.73 A
11.40 A
11.39 A
,
Linoleic chain L 10:77 A
11.69 A
2.553.75 A
11.69 A
11.69 A
2.62 A
2.64 A
112.538
111.118, 106.388
112.518
109.238, 106.608
112.368
109.318, 106.638
109.418
118.438
123.978
110.818
124.248
123.908
109.698
118.788
127.398
127.418
123.908
L 109.618, O 110.258
118.578
L 127.408, O 127.508
L 115.328
L 124.378, O 127.398
123.898
Forming the 2-end side of the tuning fork structure of triacylglycerol molecule.
Perpendicular distance, viewed along the chain length of the fatty acid moiety.
c
Linoleic acid chain formed the 1-end side of the tuning fork structure.
d
Oleic acid chain formed the 1-end side of the tuning fork structure.
b
the current study. There are however several limitations for using a single structural parameter to explain
the wax appearance and freezing characteristics of
vegetable oils due to the complexity of triacylglycerol
structures and presence of various fatty acid moieties.
The relative extent to which these structures affect TC
can be reliably determined by adopting a logical
approach of multi-component statistical analysis of
the NMR data.
Table 5
Quantitative 1 H NMR derived structural parameters of vegetable
base oilsa
Vegetable oils
Olefin
proton (%)
Bis-allylic CH2
proton (%)
Allyl CH2
(%)
8.80
10.04
11.15
7.18
10.99
10.15
6.90
10.26
2.83
3.38
4.25
0.75
4.38
3.85
0.62
4.13
8.76
10.51
10.86
10.75
10.88
9.56
10.55
10.40
199
(1)
(2)
4. Conclusions
200
[14] J.W. Hagemann, W.H. Tallent, K.E. Kolb, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
49 (1972) 118.
[15] J.W. Hagemann, J.A. Rothfus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60 (1983)
1123.
[16] A. Adhvaryu, J.M. Perez, I.D. Singh, Energy and Fuels 13
(1999) 493.
[17] A. Adhvaryu, J.M. Perez, I.D. Singh, O.S. Tyagi, Energy and
Fuels 12 (1998) 1369.
[18] A. Adhvaryu, Y.K. Sharma, I.D. Singh, Fuel 78 (11) (1999)
1293.
[19] Y. Miyake, Y. Kazuhisa, N. Matsuzaki, J. Am. Oil. Chem.
Soc. 75 (9) (1998) 1091.
[20] M.M. Bergana, T.W. Lee, J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc. 73 (1996)
5.
[21] A. Adhvaryu, S.Z. Erhan, Z.S. Liu, J.M. Perez, Thermochim.
Acta 364 (2000) 87.
[22] H.H. Rosenbrock, C. Storey, Computational Techniques for
Chemical Engineers, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1966, 64 pp.
[23] E.-L. Heino, Thermochim. Acta 114 (1987) 125.
[24] J.W. Hagemann, J.A. Rothfus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 65 (4)
(1988) 638.
[25] J. Denis, Lub. Sci. 1 (2) (1989) 103.
[26] J. Denis, J.P. Durand, Revue IFP 46 (5) (1991) 637.
[27] A. Adhvaryu, J.M. Perez, J.L. Duda, Tribol. Trans. 43 (2)
(2000) 245.
[28] A.S. Sarpal, G.S. Kapur, S. Mukherjee, S.K. Jain, Energy and
Fuels 11 (1997) 662.
[29] Y. Miyake, K. Yokomizo, N. Matsuzaki, J. Jpn. Oil. Chem.
Soc. 47 (4) (1998) 333.
[30] C.M. Yang, A.A. Grey, M.C. Archer, W.R. Bruce, Nutr.
Cancer 30 (1) (1998) 64.
[31] G. Vlahov, A.D. Shaw, D.B. Kell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76 (10)
(1999) 1123.