Safety Performance Indicator 2012s

SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 2012 DATA
Report No. 2012s

(June 2013)
OGP DATA SERIES
International Association of Oil & Gas Producers
ublications
Global experience
The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers has access to a wealth of technical
knowledge and experience with its members operating around the world in many different
terrains. We collate and distil this valuable knowledge for the industry to use as guidelines
for good practice by individual members.
Consistent high quality database and guidelines

Our overall aim is to ensure a consistent approach to training, management and best
practice throughout the world.
The oil and gas exploration and production industry recognises the need to develop
consistent databases and records in certain fields. The OGPs members are encouraged
to use the guidelines as a starting point for their operations or to supplement their own
policies and regulations which may apply locally.
Internationally recognised source of industry information

Many of our guidelines have been recognised and used by international authorities and
safety and environmental bodies. Requests come from governments and non-government
organisations around the world as well as from non-member companies.
Disclaimer
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication,
neither the OGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless
of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which
liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipients own risk on the basis that any use
by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform
any subsequent recipient of such terms.
Copyright notice
The contents of these pages are The International Association of Oil and Gas Producers.
Permission is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of OGP
and (ii) the source are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. Any other use requires the prior
written permission of the OGP.
These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England
and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of
England and Wales.
OGP safety performance indicators

2012 data
Report No: 2012s
June 2013
Revision history
Version
Date
Amendments
1.0
June 2013
First issued
1.1
June 2013
Corrections to Executive Summary
1.2
June 2013
Corrections to page 2-5
1.3
November 2013
Correction to contributing companies list
ii
OGP
Safety performance indicators 2012 data
Preface
Safety
OGP has been collecting safety incident data from its
member companies globally since 1985. The data collected
are entered into the OGP safety database, which is the
largest database of safety performance in the exploration
and production (E&P) industry.
The principal purpose of the data collection and analysis is
to record the global safety performance of the contributing
OGP member companies on an annual basis. The
submission of data is voluntary and is not mandated by
OGP membership. The annual reports provide trend
analysis, benchmarking and the identification of areas and
activities on which efforts should be focused to bring about
the greatest improvements in performance.
The OGP incident reporting system covers worldwide
E&P operations, both onshore and offshore, and includes
incidents involving both member companies and their
contractor employees.
The key indicators presented are: number of fatalities,
fatal accident rate, fatal incident rate, number of lost
work day cases and number of lost work days, lost time
injury frequency, number of restricted work day cases and
restricted work day case days, number of medical treatment
cases and total recordable injury rate. The report presents
contributing OGP members global results for these
indicators, which are then analysed by region, function and
company. A code is used to preserve the anonymity of the

reporting company, which will typically report its own data
as well as that of its associated contractors (see Appendix B).
In 2010, data collection was initiated to capture causal
factors associated with fatal incidents and high potential
events. These data are presented in section 2.11 of report
2012s.
Wherever practicable, results are presented graphically. The
data underlying the charts are presented in Appendix B.
These data are available to OGP members in editable format
from the members area of the OGP web-site. The tables are
organised according to the section in the report where the
chart appears.
Fatal incident and high potential event descriptions
previously included in this report as appendices C and D
are now available for download on the OGP Safety Zone
website, http://info.ogp.org.uk/safety.
The main change to the 2012 Safety performance indicators
report is:
For the purposes of clarity the presentation of Fatal
Incident Rate has been changed.
This change reflects the Safety Data Sub-Committees aim
to improve the reliability of the data and its interpretation.
Data series
Other OGP data reports include the Environmental
Performance Indicators, published every autumn and the
Health Performance Indicators, published simultaneously
with this report. These are available from the OGP website:
http://www.ogp.org.uk/publications/
OGP
iii
The safety statistics for 2012 were derived from data

provided by the following companies:
Contributing OGP Members

Oil Search
OMV
Pan American Energy
Pemex
Perenco
Petrobras
Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd
Premier Oil
PTTEP
Qatar Petroleum
Rasgas
Repsol
RWE Dea AG
Sasol
Shell Companies
Statoil
Suncor
Talisman Energy
TNK-BP
Total
Tullow Oil
Wintershall
Woodside
Yemen LNG
ADDAX
ADNOC
Anadarko
BG Group
BHP
BP
Cairn Energy
Chevron
CNOOC
ConocoPhillips
Dolphin Energy
DONG E&P
Eni
E.ON
ExxonMobil
GDF Suez E&P International
Hess Corporation
INPEX
KOSMOS
Kuwait Oil Company
Maersk Oil
Marathon
MOL
NCOC (North Caspian Operating Co.)
Nexen Inc
iv
OGP
Contents
Executive Summary
1.Summary
1-1
1.1 General................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Fatalities................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1-2
1.3
Total recordable injuries.....................................................................................................................................................................1-4
1.4
Lost time injuries................................................................................................................................................................................. 1-5
2. Overall results
2-1
2.1 Fatalities.................................................................................................................................................................................................2-1
2.2
Fatal accident rate (FAR)...................................................................................................................................................................2-2
2.3
Fatalities by incident category and activity....................................................................................................................................2-3
2.4
Number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours............................................................................................................. 2-4
2.5
Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)...............................................................................................................................................2-5
2.6
Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)..................................................................................................................................................2-6
2.7
Lost work day cases by category and activity.................................................................................................................................2-7
2.8
Severity of lost work day cases.........................................................................................................................................................2-13
2.9
Severity of restricted work day cases..............................................................................................................................................2-15
2.10 Incident triangles...............................................................................................................................................................................2-17
2.11 Causal factors analysis......................................................................................................................................................................2-19
3. Results by region
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3-1
Fatalities by region...............................................................................................................................................................................3-1
Fatal Accident Rate (FAR) by region..............................................................................................................................................3-2
Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by region.............................................................................................................................3-2
Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) by region................................................................................................................................3-3
FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages by region....................................................................................................... 3-4
Severity of lost work day cases by region........................................................................................................................................3-5
Individual country performance by region....................................................................................................................................3-5
Incident triangles by region...............................................................................................................................................................3-7
4. Results by function
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4-1
Fatalities by function..........................................................................................................................................................................4-1
Fatal accident rate (FAR) 3-year rolling average by function................................................................................................4-2
Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by function.........................................................................................................................4-3
Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 3-year rolling average by function...............................................................................4-3
Severity of lost work day cases by function................................................................................................................................... 4-4
Exploration performance by function............................................................................................................................................4-5
Drilling performance by function...................................................................................................................................................4-7
Production performance by function.............................................................................................................................................4-9
Construction performance by function.......................................................................................................................................4-11
Unspecifed performance by function.......................................................................................................................................... 4-13
5. Results by company
5.1
5.2
5-1
Overall company results.....................................................................................................................................................................5-1

Company results by function............................................................................................................................................................5-8
Appendix A: Database dimensions
A-1
Appendix B: Data tables
B-1
Appendix C: Contributing companies
C-1
Appendix D: Countries represented
D-1
Appendix E: Glossary of terms
E-1
OGP
vi
OGP
Executive Summary
Forty work force fatalities were identified as being related

to process safety events (39 fatalities were related to six
separate process safety events).
There are a number of common causal factors related to the
fatal incidents and high potential events from 2010 to 2012.
The top 6 causal factors each year were:
Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment
Inadequate supervision
Inadequate work standards/procedures
Improper decision making or lack of judgment
Unintentional violation (by individual or group)
Inadequate training/competence.
Personal injury performance shows the lost time injury
frequency has increased by 12%, and total recordable
injury rate is virtually unchanged in 2012 compared with
2011 results.
Fig 2.1.1: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate

2003-2012 [data page B-2]
120
Fatalities
FAR
100
80
4
60
3
40
2
20
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
FAR - Fatal accidents per 100 million hours worked
Analysis of the fatal incident description has shown that

following an OGP Life Saving Rule may have helped to
prevent 79% of the fatal incidents reported in 2012, see
OGP report 459.
Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate

2003-2012
Number of fatalities
The 2012 OGP safety performance indicators show that the

fatal accident rate for reporting companies has increased
by 27% compared with 2011. The number of fatalities has
increased from 65 in 2011 to 88 in 2012. 31 of the fatalities
occurred in one incident.
Lost
time
frequency
From OGP
Safety injury
Performance Indicators
2012 dataand total recordable injury rate
per million hours worked
5
TRIR
LTIF
4
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Fatal accident rate (FAR)

The number of company/contractor fatalities per
100,000,000 (100 million) hours worked.
Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)
The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost
work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical
treatment cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.
Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)
The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work
day cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.
OGP
vii
viii
OGP
1.Summary
The OGP safety performance indicators report
summarises the safety performance of contributing
OGP member companies for 2012.
The key performance indicators (KPI) used to benchmark
safety performance are: number of fatalities, fatal
accident and incident rates, total recordable injury rate
and lost time injury frequency.
Third party fatalities are not included in this report.
1.1 General
The safety performance of contributing OGP member
companies in 2012 is based on the analysis of 3,691
million work hours of data.
Submissions were made by 49 of the 63 operating
company OGP members (45 reported in 2011).
The data reported cover operations in 107 countries.
Hours worked
millions [data page B-2]
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
work hours contractor

1000
500
work hours company

1985
1990
1995
2000
OGP
2005
2010
2012
1-1
1.2 Fatalities
Fatality categories, 2012
% fatalities associated with each reporting category [data page B-3]
Overexertion,
strain 1.1%
Other 2.3%
Water related, drowning 1.1%
Confined space 2.3%

Falls from height 3.4%
Exposure electrical 3.4%
Assault or violent act 3.4%
Pressure release 4.5%
Struck by 15.9%
Explosions or
burns 44.3%
Caught in, under or between 18.2%
Transport air 2.3%
The reported fatalities are divided into activity and

category. The activity with the highest number of fatalities
reported by the OGP member companies is Maintenance,
inspection, testing with 41 fatalities in 9 separate incidents.
These included included a gas leak and explosion following
the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico in
which 5 company and 26 contractor employees lost their
lives. There were 14 fatal incidents reported in the activity
Construction, commissioning, decommissioning which
resulted in 14 fatalities.
With regard to the incident category, the largest proportion
of the fatalities reported in 2012 (44%) were categorised as
Explosions or burns and were related to 5 fatal incidents
involving 39 fatalities (6% of fatal incidents reported in
2011 were in the category Explosions or burns).
Fatality activities, 2012

% fatalities associated with each activity [data page B-3]
Transport water, inc.
marine activity 2.3%
Against the background of a 7% increase in work hours

reported, the number of fatalities has increased from 65 in
2011 to 88. The fatalities occurred in 52 separate incidents
in 2012. The resulting Fatal Accident Rate (2.38) is 27%
higher than last years figure (1.88). The company and
contractor FAR are 1.58 and 2.59 respectively. Onshore and
offshore FAR are 2.87 and 0.89 respectively.
Fatalities categorised as Caught in, under or between were

the second greatest contributors to the fatality statistics,
accounting for 18% of the fatalities (25% in 2011).
Unspecified other 2.3%
Seismic/survey operations 2.3%

Production operations 3.5%
Transport land 10.5%
Drilling, workover,
well services 12.8%
Construction, commissioning,
decommissioning 16.3%
1-2
Maintenance, inspection,
testing 47.7%
OGP
The Fatal Accident Rate for North America (7.5) is high

compared with a global average of 2.38. This is mainly
due to a single incident caused by a gas leak and explosion
following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in
Mexico in which 31 people died.
Fatal accident rate - company and contractors

per 100 million hours worked [data page B-2]
8
Contractor FAR
Company FAR
Overall
0
2003
OGP
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
1-3
1.3 Total recordable injuries

Total recordable injury rate company & contractors
per million hours worked [data page B-2]
6
The rate for all recordable injuries (fatalities, lost workday

cases, restricted workday cases and medical treatment cases)
was 1.74 injuries per million hours worked (1.76 in 2011).
Overall
Contractor
Company
The region that showed an increase in TRIR compared with

the TRIR for 2011 was the Middle East (24%).
A reduction in TRIR from 2011 to 2012 was shown in
Africa (7%), Asia/Australasia (7%), Europe (6%), North
America (13%) and South America (4%). The TRIR for the
FSU was unchanged.
0
2003
1-4
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
OGP
1.4 Lost time injuries

The overall Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) increased
from 0.43 in 2011 to 0.48 in 2012. This represents an
increase of 12% compared with 2011 and 307 more lost
time injuries.
This increase is similar in both company and contractor
performance. The company and contractor LTIF both show
an increase compared with 2011 (12% and 14% respectively).
The onshore and offshore LTIF both also show an increase
compared with 2011 (12% and 9% respectively).
There were 1,699 reported injuries resulting in at least one
day off work; 1,356 incidents were contractor related and
343 were company related.
53,325 lost work days were reported.
The greatest number of incidents was reported as
Struck by (408 cases accounting for 24% of the total;
2011 results showed 357 cases accounting for 25% of
the total).
Caught in, under or between accounted for 21% of the
total reported cases (19% in 2011).
Lost time injury frequency company & contractors

per million hours worked [data page B-3]
2.0
Overall
Contractor
Company
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Lost work day cases by category [data page B-3]


Exposure noise, chemical,

biological, vibration 2.0%
Confined space 0.1%

Struck by 24.0%
Cut, puncture, scrape 3.6%
Other 6.6%
Explosions or burns 7.5%
Overexertion, strain 7.8%

Caught in, under
or between 20.7%
Slips and trips
(at same height) 15.6%
Lost work day cases by activity [data page B-3]

Seismic/survey
operations 1.4%
Transport land 4.1%
Transport water, including
Diving, subsea,
ROV 0.6%
Transport air 0.5%
Drilling, workover,
well services 21.2%
Office, warehouse,
accommodation,
catering 7.7%
Lifting, crane,
rigging, deck
operations 7.8%
Construction,
commissioning,
OGP
Maintenance,
inspection,
testing 16.9%
1-5
1-6
OGP
2. Overall results
In this section the primary indicators used to measure
contributing OGP member companies safety
performance are: the number and nature of fatalities,
total recordable injury rate (TRIR), fatal accident rate
(FAR), fatal incidents per 100 million work hours, and
lost time injury frequency (LTIF).
Third party incidents are not included in this report.
2.1 Fatalities
Fatalities
Onshore 2012
(2011)
Offshore 2012
(2011)
Total 2012
(2011)
Company
10 (9)
2 (1)
12 (10)
Contractor
70 (43)
6 (12)
76 (55)
Total
80 (52)
8 (13)
88 (65)
Company/contractor fatalities
2003-2012 [data page B-2]
120
Fatalities
FAR
100
80
4
60
3
40
2
20
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
FAR - Fatal accidents per 100 million hours worked

2003-2012 [data page B-2]
88 company and contractor fatalities were reported in

2012. This is 23 more than were reported in 2011 and
6 fewer than in 2010. The 88 fatalities occurred in 52
separate incidents.
In 2012 there were 31 fatalities as a result of a single
incident caused by a gas leak and explosion following
the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico
There were 6 incidents that involved 2 fatalities.
These were:
two pilots died when a seismic helicopter crashed
on its approach to a landing zone in a forested area
in Gabon;
a drill rig explosion in Nigeria;
in Chad a gas accumulation from wellbore fluids in an
open-top tank combusted;
a security incident in Nigeria where two people were
shot and killed whilst gathering environmental data;
pressure release and fire while routine testing a mobile
air compressor in Kuwait; and
in Qatar a flash fire was caused by the ignition of
liquid oxygen.

From OGP Safety Performance Indicators 2012 data
OGP
2-1
2.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR)

Fig 2.2.1: Fatal accident rate company & contractors
per 100 million hours worked [Data page B-2]
8
Contractor FAR
Company FAR
Overall
2012 (2011) FAR
Relative to 2011 FAR
Company
1.58 (1.33)
(19% higher)
Contractor
2.59 (2.03)
(28% higher)
Overall
2.38 (1.88)
(27% higher)
Onshore
2.87 (1.94)
(48% higher)
Offshore
0.89 (1.67)
(47% lower)
In 2012 there were 12 company fatalities (10 in 2011) as

a result of 6 separate incidents.
5 of the company fatalities were as a result of a
single incident involving a gas leak and explosion
following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline
in Mexico.
In 2012 there were 76 contractor fatalities (55 in 2011).
26 of the contractor fatalities were as a result of a
single incident involving a gas leak and explosion
following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline
in Mexico.
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Fig 2.2.2: Fatal accident rate onshore & offshore

8
The difference between the onshore and offshore FAR

displays a large variation over the 10-year period shown.
Neither is consistently lower. This is generally attributable
to single transportation or fire and explosion incidents
involving high numbers of fatalities.
Overall
Offshore
Onshore
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012

2-2
OGP
2.3 Fatalities by incident category and activity

The largest proportion of the fatalities reported in
2012 were categorised as Explosions or burns (44%)
(6% in 2011).
31 of the fatalities were the result of a single gas
leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical
integrity of a pipeline in Mexico.
18% of the fatalities reported in 2012 were categorised
as Caught in under or between (25% in 2011).
Two fatalities involved being run over by reversing
trucks.
Nine of the fatalities occurred during construction,
commissioning or decommissioning activities,
two separate incidents were related to excavations,
two separate incidents involved the roll-over of a
front end loader and a bull dozer and two further
separate incidents involved being crushed by moving
construction equipment.
16% of the fatalities reported in 2012 were the result
of individuals being struck by falling or moving objects
(18% in 2011).
Two fatalities involved separate motor vehicle crashes.
Two separate fatalities involved being struck by a
bulldozer or backhoe bucket.
A reduction is seen in the number of deaths resulting
from land transport incidents (9 fatalities) compared
with 2011 (15 fatalities in 2011, 8 in 2010).
Nine fatalities were associated with nine separate
land transport incidents, one of which was a shooting.
45 of the fatal incidents involved one fatality.
Incidents which involved two or more fatalities were
reported under the categories:
Caught in, under or between (1 incident);
Explosions or burns (4 incidents); and
Assault and violent act (1 incident).
There were no fatal incidents reported under the
following categories:
Cut, puncture, scrape;
Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration; and
Slips, trips, falls (at same height).
There were no fatalities reported under the following
activities:
Diving, subsea, ROV; and
Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering.
Fig 2.3.1: Fatalities by activity, 2012

% fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3]
Overexertion,
strain 1.1%
Other 2.3%
Confined space 2.3%

Struck by 15.9%
Explosions or
burns 44.3%
Caught in, under or between 18.2%
Fig 2.3.2: Fatalities by category, 2012

% fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3]
Transport water, inc.
Transport air 2.3%

Transport land 10.5%
Drilling, workover,
well services 12.8%
OGP
Maintenance, inspection,
testing 47.7%
2-3
Assault or violent act
Caught in, under or between
Confined space
Explosion or burns
Exposure electrical
Falls from height
Overexertion, strain
Pressure release
Struck by
Water related, drowning
Other
Total
Fatalities by incident category and activity, 2012
9
1
1
0
0
1
0
3
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
1
1
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
14
Unspecified other
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
Total
16
39
14
88
Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

Drilling, workover, well services
Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations
Maintenance, inspection, testing
Production operations
Seismic/survey operations
Transport air
Transport land
Transport water, including marine activity
2-4
OGP
11
2
41
3
2
2
9
2
2
2.4 Number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours

Fig 2.4.1: Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours
company & contractors
Number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours

2012 (2011)
Relative to 2011
Company
0.79 (0.8)
(1% lower)
Contractor
1.57 (1.63)
(4% lower)
Overall
1.41 (1.45)
(3% lower)
Onshore
1.58 (1.57)
(1% higher)
Offshore
0.89 (1.03)
(14% lower)
The number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours

is a measure of the frequency with which fatal incidents
occur, in contrast to the FAR which measures the frequency
of fatalities. Accordingly, for company and contractor
fatalities, the number of fatal incidents per 100 million work
hours will be less than or equal to the FAR. Comparison of
FAR and number of fatal incidents per 100 million work
hours gives an indication of the magnitude of the incidents
in terms of lives lost.
Overall the number of fatal incidents per 100 million
work hours has decreased by 3% compared with last
year and is the lowest on record (52 fatal incidents in
2012, 50 fatal incidents in 2011).
The number of fatal incidents per 100 million work
hours offshore continues to reduce, showing a rate
14% lower than the 2011 result. The number of offshore
fatalities has reduced (8 fatalities in 2012 and 13
in 2011).
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Fig 2.4.2: Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours

onshore & offshore
8
Overall FAR
Overall
Offshore
Onshore
Fig 2.4.3: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents

10 year trend [Data page B-5]
140
Contractor
Company
Overall
Overall FAR
Fatalities
Fatal incidents
120
100
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
80
60
40
Number of fatal incidents per 100 million

work hours
20
0
The number of incidents that result in one or more

fatalities per 100,000,000 (100 million) hours.
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
OGP
2-5
2.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)

Fig 2.5.1: Total recordable injury rate company & contractors
per million hours worked [Data page B-2]
6
Overall
Contractor
Company
2012 (2011) TRIR
Relative to 2011 TRIR
Company
1.12 (1.32)
(15% lower)
Contractor
1.9 (1.88)
(1% higher)
Overall
1.74 (1.76)
(1% lower)
Onshore
1.49 (1.45)
(3% higher)
Offshore
2.53 (2.84)
(11% lower)
Submissions without information on medical treatment

cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3,651 million
hours, 99% of the database (see Appendix A).
An overall reduction in TRIR of 1% can be seen in 2012,

with company TRIR down by 15% and offshore TRIR
down by 11% compared with 2011 results. Contractor and
onshore TRIR show an increase of 1% and 3% respectively.
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Fig 2.5.2: Total recordable injury rate onshore & offshore

7
Overall
Offshore
Onshore
1
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012

2-6
OGP
2.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)

2012 (2011) LTIF
Relative to 2011 LTIF
Company
0.47 (0.42)
(12% higher)
Contractor
0.49 (0.43)
(14% higher)
Overall
0.48 (0.43)
(12% higher)
Onshore
0.38 (0.34)
(12% higher)
Offshore
0.81 (0.74)
Fig 2.6.1: Lost time injury frequency company & contractors

2.0
Overall
Contractor
Company
1.5
(9% higher)
The overall LTIF increased by 12% from 0.43 in 2011

to 0.48 in 2012.
The contractor LTIF increased by 14% compared
with 2011.
There were 1,699 reported lost work day cases resulting in
at least one day off work, which equates to an average of 33
injuries resulting in at least one day off work every week of
the year. Although the absolute number of LWDCs has
increased (1,415 in 2011), the time away from work has
reduced compared with 2011. See Section 2.8 for further
information on Lost Work Day Case severity.
1.0
0.5
0.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Fig 2.6.2: Lost time injury frequency onshore & offshore

2.0
Overall
Offshore
Onshore
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012

The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work
day cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.
OGP
2-7
2.7 Lost work day cases by category and activity

Fig 2.7.1: Lost work day cases by category
% LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3]
Lost work day cases by category


Confined space 0.1%

Struck by 24.0%
Other 6.6%

Caught in, under
or between 20.7%
Number
17
1.0
352
20.7
Confined space
0.1
Cut, puncture, scrape
61
3.6
Explosion or burns
127
7.5
Exposure electrical
12
0.7
Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration
34
2.0
Falls from height
158
9.3
133
7.8
Pressure release
16
0.9
Slips and trips (at same height)
265
15.6
Struck by
408
24.0
0.2
Other
112
6.6
Total
1,699
Slips and trips

Of the 1,699 reported lost work day cases resulting in at

least one day off work, 1,356 incidents were contractor
related and 343 were company related.
The lost work day case category was provided for all of the
Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 7% of the cases
were categorised as Other.
The pie chart shows the percentage of LWDCs within each
of the reporting categories for 2012.
The greatest number of incidents was reported as
Struck by (408 cases accounting for 24% of LWDCs),
(2011 results showed 357 cases accounting for 25%).
Caught in, under or between accounted for 21% of the
total reported cases (19% in 2011).
In comparison with 2011, the 2012 results were very
similar; the only categories that differed by more than
2% were Explosions or burns which increased by 4%
and Other which decreased by 4% compared with 2011.
Lost work day case (LWDC)

A Lost Work Day Case is an incident resulting
in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are
not included.
2-8
OGP
Lost work day cases by category company & contractors
Company
Contractor
15
37
315
Confined space
54
Explosion or burns
31
96
Exposure electrical
12
Exposure noise, chemical, biological,

vibration
29
Falls from height
35
123
33
100
Pressure release
12
69
196
Struck by
70
338
Other
49
63
Total
343
1356

Company [Data page B-4]
Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.5%

Struck by 20.4%
Caught in, under or

between 10.8%
Slips and trips

(at same height)
20.1%
Other 14.3%
Of the 1,699 reported lost work day cases resulting in

at least one day off work, 343 were company related and
1,356 incidents were contractor related, (309 and 1,106
respectively for 2011).

Contractor [Data page B-4]
Confined space 0.1%


Struck by 24.9%

Other 4.6%

Slips and trips
(at same height)14.5%
OGP
Caught in, under

or between 23.2%
2-9
Lost work day cases by category onshore & offshore

Onshore [Data page B-4]

Assault or violent
act 1.4%

Struck by 22.9%

Other 8.8%
Falls from
height 9.3%
Caught in, under or

between 16.8%
Onshore
Offshore
14
163
189
Confined space
37
24
Explosion or burns
114
13
Exposure electrical
Exposure noise, chemical, biological,

vibration
23
11
Falls from height
90
68
56
77
Pressure release
148
117
Struck by
223
185
Other
86
26
Total
972
727
Slips and trips (at same height)15.2%

Offshore [Data page B-4]
Other 3.6%

least one day off work, 972 incidents were related to onshore
activity and 727 were related to offshore activity (858 and
557 respectively for 2011).

Water related,
drowning 0.3%
Confined space 0.1%
Caught in, under

or between 26.0%
Falls from
height 9.4%
Overexertion,
strain10.6%
Slips and trips

2-10
Struck by 25.4%
OGP
Lost work day cases by activity
Fig2.7.6: Lost work day cases by activity

% LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3]
Number
168
9.9
Diving, subsea, ROV
10
0.6
360
21.2
133
7.8
Transport land 4.1%
287
16.9
Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering
131
7.7

211
12.4
23
1.4
Transport air
0.5
Transport land
69
4.1
89
5.2
Unspecified other
210
12.4
Total
1,699
Seismic/survey
operations 1.4%
Diving, subsea,
ROV 0.6%
Transport air 0.5%
Drilling, workover,
well services 21.2%
Office, warehouse,
accommodation,
catering 7.7%
Lifting, crane,
rigging, deck
operations 7.8%
Construction,
commissioning,
Lost work day case activities were reported for all of the
1,699 Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 12% of the
cases were reported as Unspecified-other. In 2011, 10%
were reported as Unspecified-other.
Maintenance,
inspection,
testing 16.9%
In comparison with 2011 data only 2 activities varied by

more than 2% of the total:
Production operations reduced by 4% of the total
from 2011 to 2012
Maintenance, inspection, testing increased by 3% of
the total from 2011 to 2012
OGP
2-11
Lost work day cases by activity company & contractor
Fig 2.7.7: Lost work day cases by activity

Company [Data page B-4]
Transport water,
including marine activity 1.2%
Diving, subsea, ROV 0.3%
Transport air 1.5%

Lifting, crane, rigging,
deck operations 3.2%
Production
operations 23.0%
Transport land 5.5%
Drilling, workover,
well services 12.5%
Office, warehouse,
accommodation,
catering 13.4%
Diving, subsea, ROV
43
317
11
122
69
218
Office, warehouse, accommodation,

catering
46
85
79
132
22
3
Transport air
Transport land
19
50
Transport water, including marine

activity
85
Unspecified other
61
149
Total
343
1356
Diving, subsea,
ROV 0.7%
Transport air 0.2%
Drilling, workover,
well services 23.4%
Lifting, crane,
rigging, deck
operations 9.0%
Production
operations 9.7%
Maintenance,
inspection,
testing 16.1%
2-12
164
Transport water,
including marine activity 6.3%
Office, warehouse,
accommodation,
catering 6.3%

least one day off work, 343 (20%) were company related
and 1,356 (80%) incidents were contractor related (22% and
78% respectively in 2011).

Contractor [Data page B-4]
Transport land 3.7%
Contractor
Maintenance,
inspection, testing 20.1%
Seismic/survey
operations 1.6%
decommissioning
Company
OGP
Lost work day cases by activity onshore & offshore
Onshore
Offshore
decommissioning
113
55
Diving, subsea, ROV
189
171
52
81

Onshore [Data page B-4]
Seismic/survey
operations 1.9%
162
125
94
37
Transport land 6.7%
105
106
Office, warehouse,
accommodation,
catering 9.7%
18
Transport land
65
Transport water, including marine

activity
15
74
Unspecified other
153
57
Total
972
727
Transport air 0.5%

Diving, subsea, ROV 0.1%

Office, warehouse, accommodation,

catering
Transport air

Drilling, workover,
well services 19.4%
Production
operations 10.8%
Maintenance,
inspection,
testing 16.7%

least one day off work, 972 (57%) incidents were onshore
related and 727 (43%) were offshore related (61% and 39%
respectively in 2011).

Offshore [Data page B-4]
Diving, subsea,
ROV 1.2%
Seismic/survey
operations 0.7%
Office, warehouse,
accommodation, catering 5.1%
Transport land 0.6%

Transport air 0.4%
Drilling, workover,
well services 23.5%
Unspecified
other 7.8%
Transport water,
including marine
activity 10.2%
Maintenance,
inspection,
testing 17.2%

OGP
2-13
2.8 Severity of lost work day cases

Fig 2.8.1: Severity of lost work day cases company & contractors
average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-4]
2012 (2011)
severity
Relative to
2011 severity
Relative to
2007-2011
average severity
Company
38.81 (41.06)
5% lower
9% higher
Contractor
41.28 (42.58)
3% lower
6% higher
60
50
40
Overall
40.74 (42.26)
4% lower
7% higher
Onshore
36.83 (39.84)
8% lower
5% higher
Offshore
45.99 (46.42)
1% lower
2% higher
30
20
Overall
Contractor
Company
10
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Fig 2.8.2: Severity of lost work day cases onshore & offshore
60
50
40
30
20
Overall
Offshore
Onshore
10
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Severity of lost work day cases

Severity is defined as the average number of days
lost (where reported) for each lost work day case.
Lost work day case days are not reported by
all companies. The database for this analysis is
therefore reduced to 2,876 million work hours, 78%
of all reported hours
2-14
OGP
OGP member companies reported 53,325 days of

work lost through injuries.
The number of days lost was reported for 78% of the
lost work day cases.
The difference between company and contractor
severity levels is 7% (contractor is 7% higher).
The offshore LWDC severity is 25% higher than
onshore.
The figures show the average number of days lost per LWDC
in 2012 compared with the average for the previous 5-year
period. An increase is shown in LWDC severity in all areas
of activity when compared with the previous 5-year period;
an increase of 7% overall.
Fig 2.8.3: Severity of lost work day cases company & contractors
2007-2011
2012
Company
Contractor
Overall
10
20
30
40
50
Fig 2.8.4: Severity of lost work day cases onshore & offshore
2007-2011
2012
Offshore
Onshore
Overall
OGP
10
20
30
40
50
2-15
2.9 Severity of restricted work day cases

Fig 2.9.1: Severity of restricted work day cases
average days lost per RWDC [Data page B-5]
2012 (2011)
severity
40
Overall
35
Contractor
Company
30
Relative to
2011 severity
Relative to 20072011 severity
Company
13.84 (12.92)
7% higher
6% lower
Contractor
12.05 (10.17)
18% higher
1% higher
Overall
12.21 (10.4)
17% higher
(no change)
Onshore
11.48 (11.67)
2% lower
2% lower
Offshore
13.41 (8.55)
57% higher
2% higher
25
A total of 12,006 days were restricted (RWDC days) as a

result of restricted workday cases, in the sense that normal
duties could not be performed. This compares with 53,325
days lost (LWDC days) on a 24% larger dataset.
The number of days lost overall is virtually unchanged
compared with the previous 5-year period but has
increased by 17% compared with 2011 results.
The average number of days lost to restricted work per
case increased most noticeably in offshore operations
13.41 days, compared with 8.55 days in 2011 (an
increase of 57%), however 2012 is within 10% of the
2010 figure of 14.35 days.
The number of days lost among company employees has
fallen by 6% compared with the previous 5-year period
but has risen by 7% compared with 2011 results.
20
15
10
5
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Fig 2.9.2: Severity of restricted work day cases

onshore & offshore
average days lost per RWDC [Data page B-5]
40
Overall
35
Offshore
Onshore
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Severity of restricted work day cases

The average number of days of restricted work per
restricted work day case.
Restricted work day case days are not reported
by all companies. The database for this analysis is
therefore reduced to 2,183 million work hours, 59%
of all reported hours.
2-16
OGP
The figures show the average number of days lost per

RWDC in 2012 compared with the average for the previous
5-year period. The overall average is virtually unchanged
compared with the average for the previous 5-year period.
Fig 2.9.3: Severity of restriced work day cases

average days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-5]
2007-2011
2012
Company
Contractor
Overall
12
15
18
Fig 2.9.4: Severity of restriced work day cases

onshore & offshore
average days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-5]
2007-2011
2012
Offshore
Onshore
Overall
OGP
12
15
18
2-17
2.10 Incident triangles
Year
Ratio of lost time

injuries to fatalities
Ratio of total recordable

2012
20:1
72:1
2011
22:1
93:1
2010
15:1
60:1
2009
16:1
63:1
2008
17:1
61:1
In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational

injury are shown in the form of incident triangles. The
ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in
some data submissions, of medical treatment cases.
2012 incident triangles

Overall
1 fatality
20
lost time injuries
72 recordable injuries
Company
1 fatality
28
lost time injuries
Contractor
1 fatality
18
lost time injuries
2011 incident triangles

Lost time injuries
Overall
Lost work day cases and fatalities
1 fatality
Recordable injuries
22
Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work

day cases and medical treatment cases. Data are
only included where medical treatment cases are
reported for the data set.
lost time injuries
Company
1 fatality
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

31
lost time injuries
The number of lost time injuries divided by the

total number of fatalities (Lost time injuries/
fatalities)
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
Contractor
1 fatality
The number of recordable injuries divided by the total

number of fatalities (recordable injuries/fatalities)
21
lost time injuries
2-18
OGP
The varying ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries to

recordable injuries for 20112012 challenges the traditional
notion of recordable injuries and lost time injuries overall as
a precursor to fatalities as shown in the incident triangles. In
some incident categories however such as confined space,
assault or violent act and water related, drowning, the
ratio will be higher as shown in the tables below.
Category
LTIs (fatalities+LWDCs)
Fatalities
Ratio LTI: Fatality
20
7:1
368
16
23:1
Confined space
2:1
61
n/a
Explosions or burns
166
39
4:1
Exposure electrical
15
5:1
34
n/a
Falls from height
161
54:1
Other
114
57:1
134
134:1
Pressure release
20
5:1
265
n/a
Struck by
422
14
30:1
4:1
Activity
LTIs (fatalities+LWDCs)
Fatalities
Ratio LTI: Fatality
182
14
13:1
Diving, subsea, ROV
10
n/a
Drilling, workover, well Services
371
11
34:1
135
68:1
328
41
8:1
131
n/a
214
71:1
Seismic / survey operations
25
13:1
Transport air
10
5:1
Transport land
78
9:1
Transport water, incl. marine activity
91
46:1
Unspecified other
212
106:1
OGP
2-19
2.11 Causal factors analysis

The allocation of causal factors to fatal incidents and high
potential events was requested for the 2012 data reported
to OGP. This request was first made in 2010, therefore a
comparison of three years of data is possible.
To standardise the response an OGP list of causal factors
and a glossary was provided to the member companies as
part of the OGP User Guide. The causal factors list is
divided into two sections:
People (Acts) classifications usually involve either the
actions of a person or actions which were required but
not carried out or were incorrectly performed. There
are four major categories of actions, with an additional
level of detail under each of the major categories.
Process (Conditions) classifications usually involve
some type of physical hazard or organizational aspect
out of the control of the individual. There are five major
classification categories, with an additional level of
detail under each of the major categories
2-20
OGP
2.11.1 Fatal incident causal factors

47 of the 52 fatal incidents reported were assigned
causal factors (42 of 50 in 2011)
212 causal factors were assigned for the 47 fatal incidents
92 were People (Acts) (81 in 2011, 109 in 2010)
120 were Process (Conditions) (122 in 2011,
133 in 2010)
Between 1 and 11 causal factors were assigned per
incident (1 to 12 in 2011, 1 to 18 in 2010).
to 2011 and 2010; seven of the ten were the same for all
three years.
Additional information on the fatal incidents reported
by region can be found on the OGP Safety Zone website:
http://info.ogp.org.uk/Safety/. The information provided includes
a narrative description of the incident, the corrective actions
and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the
reporting company.
The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown

below. The highlighted content indicates the top 10
causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 2012 compared
Note: the top 12 causal factors have been shown

for 2012, as four of the causal factors were each
assigned 7 times.
Causal factors assigned for fatal incidents
2012
2011
2010
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment
17
15
30
18
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision
16
18
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures
15
10
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence
13
10
13
People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group)
13
12
People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire)
13
16
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment
11
16
14
People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems
People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/
materials/products
Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/specification/management of change
10
Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/

materials/products
People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading
Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers
11
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication
12
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress
Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices
5
4
Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing
Process (conditions):Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment
People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard
Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads
People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly
People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured
People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group)
12
Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion
Process (conditions): Organisational: Poor leadership/organisational culture
Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems
People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energised equipment/inadequate
energy isolation
People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence
6
1
Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant)
People (acts): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awarenes: Fatigue
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Use of drugs or alcohol
People (acts): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task
Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature
Process (conditions): Organisational: Failure to report/learn from events
OGP
2-21
2.11.2 High potential event causal factors

169 of the 195 high potential events were assigned
causal factors (69 of 76 in 2011)
603 causal factors were assigned for the 169 high
potential events (317 in 2011)
225 were People (Acts) (131 in 2010)
378 were Process (Conditions) (186 in 2011)
Between 1 and 14 causal factors were assigned per event
(1 to 19 in 2011)
causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 2012 compared to

2011 and 2010, seven of the ten were the same for both years.
Additional information on the fatal incidents reported
by region can be found on the OGP Safety Zone website:
http://info.ogp.org.uk/Safety/. The information provided includes
a narrative description of the incident, the corrective actions
and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the
reporting company
The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown

below. The highlighted content indicates the top 10
2-22
Note: the top 11 causal factors have been shown

for 2010, as two of the causal factors were each
assigned 15 times.
Causal Factors assigned for high potential events
2012
2011
2010
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment
61
24
47
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures
54
20
37
Process (conditions):Organisational: Inadequate supervision
44
18
31
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment
38
21
23
Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing
37
12
21
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication
36
15
19
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence
36
15
22
People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard
31
13
Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/

materials/products
27
13
16
People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group)
23
15
27
Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers
22
10
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress
21
15
People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/
materials/products
21
17
People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems
19
12
Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/specification/management of change
16
18
13
People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured
15
People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire)
13
People (acts):Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading
11
Process (conditions): Organisational: Poor leadership/organisational culture
10
15
Process (conditions):: Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices
15
13
People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly
People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group)
Process (conditions):: Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant)
Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion
Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads
People (acts): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed
People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energised equipment/inadequate
energy isolation
People (acts):Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices
Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems
Process (conditions): Organisational: Failure to report/learn from events
Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature
Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Fatigue
People (acts): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task
OGP
The following 6 causal factors were common to the top ten

for both fatal incidents and high potential events in 2012,
these were also all in the top ten in 2011 and 2010.
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate
hazard identification or risk assessment
Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work
standards/procedures
supervision
People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness:
Improper decision making or lack of judgement
training/competence
People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation
unintentional (by individual or group)
2.12 OGP Life-Saving Rules

OGP has released a set of life-saving rules (OGP LifeSaving Rules, OGP report 459, released Feb 2012),
intended for use by the oil & gas industry to mitigate risk
and reduce fatalities. Each OGP Life-Saving Rule consists
of a simple icon and descriptive text, providing clear, simple
and consistent communication about risks in the workplace.
Fig 2.12.1: OGP Life-Saving Rules applicable to 2012 fatal incidents

per cent of total 2012 incidents
No appropriate rule 21%
Supplementary rules 50%
These Rules were developed by using the fatal incident and

high potential event data from the 1991 to 2010 Safety
Performance Indicators reports to identify the events and
activities that are the highest risk and therefore provide clear
instructions on how to avoid them. The Life-Saving Rules are
split into eight core rules and ten supplementary rules.
Analysis of the fatal incident descriptions for 2012 data has
shown that 79% of the fatal incidents reported are covered
by the OGP Life-Saving Rules and may have been prevented
by the adoption of this system.
Core rules 29%
OGP
2-23
2-24
OGP
3. Results by region
In this section the safety performance of the contributing
OGP members is presented for regions and individual
countries within those regions.
A list of countries from which companies have reported
information and the division of countries into regions is
provided in Appendix D.
Regions and countries throughout the Safety performance

indicators are grouped in the same geographic regions
as have been historically used in this report so as to
ensure consistency.
FSU
North America
Europe
Middle
East
Asia/
Australasia
Africa
South
America
3.1 Fatalities by region
Fatalities
FAR
Fatal incidents
2012 (2011)
2012 (2011)
2012 (2011)
Africa
17 (7)
2.83 (1.25)
13 (7)
Asia/Australasia
10 (20)
1.35 (3.28)
10 (12)
Europe
2 (3)
0.52 (0.87)
2 (3)
FSU
2 (7)
0.55 (1.59)
2 (6)
Middle East
13 (12)
1.95 (1.74)
11 (9)
North America
42 (6)
7.50 (1.50)
12 (6)
South America
2 (10)
0.54 (2.42)
2 (7)
The table shows the number of fatal incidents and fatalities

in each of the 7 regions into which the data are partitioned.
Further analysis of the fatality statistics is presented in
Section 3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of FAR are
presented for each of the regions.
OGP
3-1
3.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) by region

Fig 3.2.1: Fatal accident rate
per 100 million hours worked
8
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2011
2010
2009
2008
2.83
1.25
3.38
2.21
4.40
Asia/
Australasia
1.35
3.28
4.14
1.58
1.24
Europe
0.52
0.87
0.97
6.58
4.19
FSU
0.55
1.59
2.17
3.14
4.05
Middle East
1.95
1.74
1.63
2.16
2.40
North America
7.50
1.50
5.08
4.37
1.64
South America
0.54
2.42
1.57
2.37
5.17
Overall
2.38
1.88
2.76
2.76
3.12
Further fatal accident rate analysis is presented in Section

3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of FAR are presented for
each of the regions.
2012
Africa
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
South
America America
Overall

3.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by region

Fig 3.3.1: Total recordable injury rate
6
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
4
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
Africa
1.14
1.22
1.40
1.65
2.18
Asia/
Australasia
1.37
1.46
1.30
1.22
1.34
Europe
2.64
2.81
3.05
3.48
3.89
FSU
0.99
0.99
1.08
1.21
1.22
Middle East
1.02
0.78
0.98
0.92
0.83
North America
2.82
3.19
2.89
3.08
4.25
South America
3.05
3.17
2.76
3.17
3.15
Overall
1.74
1.76
1.68
1.75
2.09

hours, almost 100% of the database (see Appendix A).
0
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
South
America America
Overall

3-2
OGP
3.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) by region
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
Africa
0.33
0.30
0.36
0.42
0.61
Asia/
Australasia
0.26
0.30
0.29
0.29
0.29
Europe
0.91
1.08
1.06
1.31
1.38
FSU
0.28
0.31
0.31
0.35
0.45
Middle East
0.24
0.18
0.25
0.26
0.29
North America
0.94
0.59
0.48
0.51
0.55
South America
0.69
0.64
0.61
0.69
0.90
Overall
0.48
0.43
0.42
0.45
0.55
Fig 3.4.1: Lost time injury frequency

1.5
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
1.0
0.5
Further analysis of the lost time injuries is presented in

Section 3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of LTIF are
presented for each of the regions.
0.0
Africa
Asia/ Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle North
South Overall
East America America

The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost
workday cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.
OGP
3-3
3.5 FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages by region
The five year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of incidents of the five previous years,
and dividing by the sum of the work hours for these years. For example, the five year rolling average for 2012 is
calculated by:
(Number of injuries in 2008+2009+2010+2011+2012)
(Total work hours in 2008+2009+2010+2011+2012)
The number series involved in the calculation is frame shifted along by one each year, e.g. 2011 will calculate
from 2007-2011.
3.5.1: FAR 5-year rolling average

per 100 million hours worked [Data from B-7]
7
All regions
Africa
Asia/Australia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North America
South America
In order to smooth out variability in the annual values of the

regional TRIR, FAR and LTIF, 5-year rolling averages are
computed which should provide a more reliable indicator of
performance trends.
The figures show TRIR, FAR and LTIF 5-year rolling
averages for each of the seven regions, and includes the all
regions curve.
The increase in the North America FAR in 2012 can be
attributed to the effect of a gas leak and explosion following
the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico
(onshore) in which 31 individuals lost their lives.
1
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
3.5.3: LTIF 5-year rolling average

per million hours worked [Data from B-7]
3.5.2: TRIR 5-year rolling average

7
All regions
Africa
Asia/Australia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North America
South America
2.5
All regions
Africa
Asia/Australia
Europe
2.0
FSU
Middle East
North America
South America
1.5
1.0
2
0.5
1
0
0.0
2007
3-4
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2007
OGP
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
3.6 Severity of lost work day cases by region
2012 LWDC severity
Relative to 2007-2011
average LWDC severity
Africa
35.94
51% higher
Asia/Australasia
24.23
11% lower
Europe
38.06
5% lower
FSU
41.42
16% higher
Middle East
26.21
49% higher
North America
36.66
2% lower
South America
69.53
1% higher
Overall
40.74
7% higher
Fig 3.6.1: Severity of LWDC

Average days lost per LWDC [Data from B-7]
80
20072011 Average
2012
70
60
50
2012 Average 40.7
40
30
The number of days lost was reported for 78% of lost work
day cases.
The severity of lost workday cases is the highest in the South
American region compared with the other regions (70 days
lost per LWDC in 2012).
20
10
0
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America

A Lost Work Day Case is an incident resulting in at
least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included.
Severity is defined as the average number of days
lost (where reported) for each lost work day case.
3.7 Individual country performance

The safety performance reported by participating OGP
member companies of individual countries is presented in
terms of the lost time injury frequency of companies jointly
with contractors. To preserve the anonymity of companies,
performance is only published for those countries for which
at least 2 companies have reported statistics. Countries
with less than 50,000 reported hours worked are excluded,
since results for such small populations of hours would be
unrepresentative. Overall averages and regional averages
include data from all countries regardless of work hours or
number of contributing companies.
Of the 107 countries from which data have been reported,
23 are excluded by these constraints.
The chart of relative performance for the remaining 84

countries compares the 2012 performance with that of 2011
and 2010
The majority of countries in Asia/Australasia, FSU, the
Middle East and South America achieved an LTIF equal to
or lower than the overall average LTIF (0.48). The majority
of countries in Africa, Europe and North America show an
LTIF higher than the global average.
For comparison, the 5-year rolling average FAR is shown
for each of the regions. There appears to be little if any
correlation between these values and the regional average
LTIF values.
OGP
3-5
Fig 3.7.1: Lost time injury frequency companies with contractors

Africa
Morocco
Ivory Coast
Sierra Leone
Tunisia
Ghana
Tanzania
Mozambique
Gabon
DR Congo
Mauritania
Cameroun
Libya
Kenya
Uganda
Congo
Equatorial Guinea
Egypt
Algeria
Angola
Nigeria
South Africa
Madagascar
Liberia
FAR
5-year rolling average
2.8
Asia-Australasia
5-year rolling average FAR
New Zealand
Australia
Vietnam
Myanmar
India
Philippines
South Korea
Malaysia
China
Indonesia
Papua New Guinea
Thailand
Pakistan
Singapore
Japan
Bangladesh
Brunei
2012 regional average LTIF

2012
2011
2010
FAR
2.3
One or more fatalities (2012)

country listed in orange
Europe
Poland
Hungary
Italy
Croatia
Denmark
Norway
Germany
UK
Netherlands
Spain
Romania
France
Ireland
Greenland
FAR
2.5
FSU
12.50
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Russia
Azerbaijan
FAR
2.3
Middle East
Turkey
Iraq
Jordan
Yemen
Qatar
UAE
Kuwait
Oman
Syria
Iran
FAR
2.0
6.98
North America
Mexico
Cuba
USA
Canada
FAR
4.4
South America
Brazil
Bolivia
Trinidad & Tobago
Peru
Colombia
Venezuela
Ecuador
Argentina
Uruguay
Surinam
French Guiana
FAR
2.4
0
3-6
Global average LTIF 1

(2012): 0.48
OGP
3.8 Incident triangles by region

In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational
injury are shown in the form of incident triangles. The
ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in
some data submissions, of medical treatment cases.
The triangles are shown for comparison overleaf.
N/A is used where there are no fatalities and no ratio can
be derived.
Lost time injuries

Fatalities and lost work day cases
Recordable injuries
Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work
day cases and medical treatment cases. Data are
only included where medical treatment cases are
reported for the data set.
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities
The number of lost time injuries divided by the
total number of fatalities (Lost time injuries/
fatalities)
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
The number of recordable injuries divided by the total
number of fatalities (recordable injuries/fatalities)
OGP
3-7
2012 incident triangles Africa
2012 incident triangles Asia/Australsia
2012 incident triangles Europe
2012 incident triangles FSU
2012 incident triangles Middle East
2012 incident triangles North America
2012 incident triangles South America
3-8
Year
Ratio of lost time injuries

to fatalities

2012
11:1
40:1
2011
23:1
97:1
2010
10:1
41:1
2009
18:1
74:1
Year

to fatalities

2012
19:1
101:1
2011
9:1
43:1
2010
7:1
31:1
2009
18:1
77:1
Year

to fatalities

2012
174:1
507:1
2011
124:1
315:1
2010
108:1
309:1
2009
19:1
52:1
Year

to fatalities

2012
51:1
179:1
2011
19:1
61:1
2010
14:1
50:1
2009
11:1
38:1
Year

to fatalities

2012
12:1
52:1
2011
10:1
44:1
2010
15:1
60:1
2009
12:1
42:1
Year

to fatalities

injuries to fatalitiess
2012
12:1
35:1
2011
39:1
213:1
2010
9:1
57:1
2009
11:1
70:1
Year

to fatalities

2012
129:1
570:1
2011
26:1
130:1
2010
38:1
175:1
2009
29:1
133:1
OGP
1 fatality
lost time injuries
11
40
recordable injuries
Africa
21
73
Overall (region)
Companies
Contractors
11
38
1 fatality
19
11
40
101
lost time injuries

recordable injuries
Asia/Australasia
21
107
18
100
1 fatality
lost time injuries
recordable injuries
Europe
174
507
91
195
256
819
1 fatality
lost time injuries
51
179
recordable injuries
n/a
n/a
FSU
42
151
1 fatality
lost time injuries
12
52
recordable injuries
Middle East
13
35
12
57
1 fatality
lost time injuries
12
35
recordable injuries
North America
20
33
11
35
1 fatality
lost time injuries
129
570
recordable injuries
South America
n/a
11
n/a
38
113
518
OGP
3-9
3-10
OGP
4. Results by function
In this section the safety performance within different
functions performed in the E&P industry is presented.
Functions are defined as exploration, drilling,
production, construction and unspecified. The
category other is no longer in use. See the Glossary
of Terms at Appendix E for definitions.
4.1 Fatalities by function

The distribution of company and contractor fatal incidents
and fatalities between the functions is shown for both 2012
and 2011.
2012
2011
Fatal
incidents
Fatalities
Fatal
incidents
Fatalities
Exploration
Drilling
11
12
12
Production
12
15
22
32
Construction
17
19
16
16
Unspecified
38
Total
52
88
50
65
The percentage of work hours reported under each function

has been detailed below. See Appendix B for further data.
% of 2012 work hours
Exploration
Drilling
18
19
15
10
Production
33
35
28
26
30
Construction
25
24
25
30
27
Unspecified
22
20
29
32
31
OGP
4-1
4.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) 3-year rolling average by function
The three year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of incidents of the three previous years,
and dividing by the sum of the work hours for these years. For example, the three year rolling average for drilling
FAR 2012 is calculated by:
(Number of fatalities in drilling function 2010+2011+2012)
(Total work hours in drilling 2010+2011+2012)
The number series involved in the calculation is frame shifted along by one each year, e.g. 2011 will calculate from
2009-2011, inclusive.
Fig 4.2.1: Fatal accident rate 3-year rolling average

per 100 million hours worked [Data from B-9]
10
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
In order to smooth out variability in the annual fatal

accident rate values 3-year rolling averages are presented.
These should provide a more reliable indicator of
performance trends.
In this section, 3 year rolling averages are used rather than 5
year rolling averages, as the function other was replaced by
construction for the first time in 2006.
The increase in 2012 unspecified FAR is as a result of a
single incident involving a gas leak and explosion following
the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico, in
which 31 individuals lost their lives.
The increase in the 2010 drilling FAR can be attributed

to the effect of a fire and explosion offshore in the USA in
which 11 individuals lost their lives.
.
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Note: The function other was replaced by

construction for the first time in 2006, thus the
2007 3-year average figure for construction is
not available.
4-2
OGP
4.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by function
2012
TRIR
2011
TRIR
2010
TRIR
2009
TRIR
2008
TRIR
Exploration
2.14
2.70
2.30
2.31
3.81
Drilling
2.59
2.84
2.94
3.81
4.63
Production
1.92
2.05
2.14
2.32
2.64
Construction
1.32
1.13
0.99
0.78
1.00
Unspecified
1.21
0.95
1.13
1.53
1.72
All functions
1.74
1.76
1.68
1.75
2.09
Fig 4.3.1: Total recordable injury rate

5
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008

hours, almost 100% of the database (see Appendix A).
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
4.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 3-year rolling average by function
Lost time injury frequency 3-year rolling average
2.0
Exploration
Drilling
Production
1.5
Construction
Unspecified
1.0
0.5
0.0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Note: The function other was replaced by

construction for the first time in 2006, thus
2007 3-year average figure for construction is
not available.
OGP
4-3
4.5 Severity of lost work day cases by function

Fig 4.5.1: Severity of LWDC
average lost days per LWDC [Data from B-10]
60
20072011 Average
2012
50
The 2012 average number of days lost per Lost Work Day
Case (LWDC) offshore is 46.0 days compared with 36.8
days for onshore activities (46.4 and 39.8 respectively for
2011). See Section 2.8 for additional information and
Section 3.6 for LWDC severity by region.
2012 Average 40.7

40
30
20
10
4-4
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
OGP
4.6 Exploration performance

4.6.1 Exploration total recordable injury rate
The figures show the TRIR for companies and contractors
for exploration related activities, in different regions of
the world.
82 million work hours were used in this analysis of which
company activities represent 27% and contractor activities
represent 73%. This represents an increase of 10 million
work hours over 2011, with the same ratio of company to
contractor activities.
In 2012 the overall TRIR values for companies and
contractors engaged in exploration activities are 0.67 and
2.69 respectively; the overall average TRIR for exploration
activities is 2.14.
The TRIR for companies has more than doubled for

exploration activities in Europe compared with the average
for the previous 5-year period. Company TRIR has reduced
for exploration activities in all other regions.
The TRIR for contractors in exploration activities has
increased in Asia/Australasia by 31% and in the Middle East
where it has risen to 2.5 times the average for the previous
5-year period. 2012 contractor rates have fallen by between
13% (Europe) and 63% (FSU) for all other regions.
Fig 4.6.1.1: Total recordable injury rate exploration

6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor 2012
2012 Contractor
average 2.69
2012 Company
average 0.67
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Exploration
Geophysical, seismographic and geological
operations, including their administrative and
engineering aspects, construction, maintenance,
materials supply and transportation of personnel
and equipment; excludes drilling.
OGP
4-5
4.6.2 Exploration lost time injury frequency

The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors
for exploration related activities, in different regions of the
world. The 2012 result is compared with average LTIF
results in the previous 5-year period.
Company LTIF values associated with exploration show

a reduction in LTIF in all regions except Europe and the
Middle East where the LTIF has risen to three times and
nine times the regional averages for the previous 5-year
period respectively.
LTIF results associated with exploration activities for
contractors have reduced in all regions except the Middle
East where it has risen to three times the regional average
for 2007-2011.
In 2012 the overall LTIF values for companies and

contractors engaged in exploration activities are 0.53 and
0.63 respectively; the overall average LTIF for exploration
activities is 0.60. The company result is up by 83% compared
with the 2007-2011 average and the contractor result is
down by 10%.
Note: In many instances where the LTIF or

TRIR is reported as 0.00, the number of work
hours reported for the specific function and region
are relatively low. A detailed breakdown of
the hours by region and function is presented in
Appendix B..
Fig 4.6.2.1: Lost time injury frequency exploration

6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor 2012
2012 Contractor
average 0.63
2012 Company
average 0.53
4-6
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
OGP
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
4.7 Drilling performance

4.7.1 Drilling total recordable injury rate
The figures show the TRIR for companies and
contractors for drilling related activities in different regions
of the world.
work hours compared with 2011, with a similar ratio
company to contractor activities (12% to 88% respectively).
Company TRIR for drilling operations shows a

reduction in all regions of between 11% (South America)
and 70% (Africa) compared with the average for the
previous 5-year period.
A reduction can be seen in TRIR results for contractors
in drilling operations of between 3% (South America) and
39% (Africa) in all regions when compared with the 20072011 regional averages.

contractors engaged in drilling activities are 1.23 and 2.79
respectively; the overall TRIR for drilling activities is 2.59.
Fig 4.7.1.1: Total recordable injury rate drilling
6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor
2012
4
2012 Contractor
average 2.79
2012 Company
average 1.23
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Drilling
All exploration, appraisal and production drilling
and workover as well as their administrative,
engineering, construction, materials supply and
transportation aspects. It includes site preparation,
rigging up and down and restoration of the drilling
site upon work completion. Drilling includes ALL
exploration, appraisal and production drilling.
OGP
4-7
4.7.2 Drilling lost time injury frequency

673 million work hours were used in this analysis, of which
work hours compared with 2011, with the same ratio
company to contractor activities.
The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors in
drilling related activities in different regions of the world. In
2012 the overall LTIF for both companies and contractors
engaged in drilling activities is 0.82.
contractors engaged in drilling activities are 0.94
and 0.80 respectively.
The company LTIF has increased by 57% compared

with the 2007-2011 average and the contractor LTIF has
fallen by 21%.
Company LTIF for drilling operations shows an increase
in the Middle East (71%) and South America (22%) and
notably North America where the average is 90 times the
average for the previous 5-year period.
A reduction can be seen in LTIF results for contractors in
drilling operations in all regions except Europe, where it is
unchanged, and North America, where it has increased by
18%, when compared with the 2007-2011 regional averages.
Fig 4.7.2.1: Lost time injury frequency drilling

6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor 2012
2
2012 Company
average 0.94
4-8
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
2012 Contractor
average 0.80
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
OGP
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
4.8 Production performance

4.8.1 Production total recordable injury rate
The figures show the TRIR for companies and contractors
for production related activities in different regions of
the world.
1,211 million work hours were used in this analysis of which
work hours compared with 2011, with a similar ratio of
company to contractor activities (29% to 71% respectively).
contractors engaged in production activities are 1.53 and
2.06 respectively; the overall average TRIR for production

activities is 1.92.
TRIR for companies in production activities has reduced
for all regions with the exception of South America
where it has risen by 2.7% when compared with the 20072011 average.
TRIR for contractors when compared with the average
for the previous 5-year period, a reduction is shown in all
regions when compared with the 2007-2011 average with
the exception of South America.
Fig 4.8.1.1: Total recordable injury rate production

6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor
2012
2012 Contractor
average 2.06
2012 Company
average 1.53
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Production
Petroleum and natural gas producing operations,
including their administrative and engineering
aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance
and servicing, materials supply, and transportation
of personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream
production operations including wireline. It does
not cover production drilling and workover. See the
Appendix E: Glossary of Terms for details.
OGP
4-9
4.8.2 Production of lost time injury frequency

The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors
for production related activities in different regions of
the world.
1,220 million work hours were used in this analysis of which
work hours over 2011, with a similar ratio of company to
contractor activities (30% to 70% respectively).
contractors engaged in production activities are 0.48 and
0.49 respectively; the overall average LTIF for production

activities is 0.49.
The LTIF for companies working in production activities
has reduced in all regions by between 2% (South America)
and 48% (Middle East and Africa) compared with the
2007-2011 regional averages.
The 2012 LTIF associated with contractors working in
production activities has reduced in all regions by between
7% (North America) and 45% (Africa) compared with the
2007-2011 average.
Fig 4.8.2.1: Lost time injury frequency production

6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor 2012
2012 Contractor
average 0.49
2012 Company
average 0.48
4-10
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
OGP
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
4.9 Construction performance

The company and contractor results for 2012 construction
performance are presented below.
are much greater than those reported for company employees.

Refer to Appendix B for detailed information.
Construction activities are predominately conducted by

contractors therefore the work hours reported for contractors
4.9.1 Company total recordable injury rate


contractors engaged in construction activities are 0.50 and
1.38 respectively; the overall average TRIR for construction
activities is 1.32.
The TRIR in Europe and North America is high compared
with the FSU and the Middle East for contractors.
Fig 4.9.1.1: Total recordable injury rate construction

6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor 2012
2012 Contractor
average 1.38
2012 Company
average 0.50
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Construction
All major construction, fabrication activities and also
disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning)
at the end of the facility life. Includes construction
of process plant, yard construction of structures,
offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning,
and removal of redundant process facilities.
OGP
4-11
4.9.2 Construction lost time injury frequency

911 million work hours were used in this analysis, of which
work hours compared with 2011, with the same of ratio
company to contractor activities.

contractors engaged in construction activities are 0.21 and
0.24 respectively; the overall average LTIF for construction
activities is 0.24.
The LTIF is high for contractors employed in construction
activities in Europe and South America compared with
other regions.
Fig 4.9.2.1: Lost time injury frequency construction

6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor 2012
2012 Contractor
average 0.24
2012 Company average 0.21

0
4-12
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
OGP
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
4.10 Unspecifed performance

4.10.1 Unspecified total recordable injury rate

contractors engaged in activities where the work function
was not specified are 0.73 and 1.43 respectively; the overall
average TRIR for unspecified activities is 1.21.
Fig 4.10.1.1: Total recordable injury rate unspecified

6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor 2012
2012 Contractor
average 1.43
2012 Company
average 0.73
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Unspecified
Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated
with office personnel whos work hours and
incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to
the administrative support of one of the function
groupings of exploration, drilling, production or
construction. Corporate overhead support function
personnel such as finance or human resources staff
may be examples where work hours cannot be
specifically assigned to a particular function.
OGP
4-13
4.10.2 Unspecified lost time injury frequency

contractors engaged in activities where the work function
was not specified are 0.33 and 0.52 respectively; the overall
average LTIF for unspecified activities is 0.46.
Reported under the unspecified function in 2012 were:

7 company and 31 contractor fatalities
79 company and 254 contractor lost work day cases
Reported under the unspecified function from 2007 to
2011 were:
36 company and 77 contractor fatalities
468 company and 1,122 contractor lost work day cases
Fig 4.10.2.1: Lost time injury frequency unspecified

6
Company 20072011
Contractor 20072011
Company 2012
Contractor 2012
2012 Contractor
average 0.52
2012 Company
average 0.33
0
4-14
Africa
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
Africa
OGP
Asia/
Europe
Australasia
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South
America
5. Results by company
This section compares the safety performance of
individual companies with each other and with their
performance in previous years.
5.1 Overall company results

For reasons of anonymity each of the 48 companies that
has contributed relevant data and is to be included in
this analysis has been allocated a unique code letter (A
to VV). These codes change every year in line with LTIF
performance. One company was excluded from this analysis
as they did not report contractor data. One company did
not report MTC so their data could not be included in

the TRIR analysis, and to protect their anonymity their
company/contractor results are not shown on the LTIF and
FAR graphs but their data have been included within the
overall average figures.
5.1.1 Fatal accident rate by company

Ten of the 20 companies with their contractors
performed below the overall average for companies
with contractors reporting more than 50 million hours
worked (1.40).
The range in 2012 was between 0 and 5.15 fatalities per
100 million hours worked.
17 of the 20 companies suffered one or more fatalities.
In the figure below the FAR is presented for those companies

that, with their contractors, reported more than 50 million
hours worked. 20 companies met this criterion in 2012,
compared with 18 in 2011. Companies are shown in rank
order of company-with-contractor FAR.
Fig 5.1.1.1: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours >50 million fatal accident rate
6
Company with contractors

Fatality in 2012
Top quartile
Average company with contractors 1.40
0
GG
CC
PP
JJ
FF
SS
OO
HH
OGP
II
KK
QQ
DD
LL
AA
5-1
5.1.2 Total recordable injury rate

The TRIR for companies together with their contractors
is presented below. Data are only included where Medical
Treatment Cases (MTC) are reported. Data from 47 of the
49 participating companies qualified for inclusion.
20 of the 47 companies presented below suffered one or

more fatality.
In 5 instances, contractors achieved a lower TRIR than
the companies they were employed by.
The TRIR for company alone is plotted alongside the TRIR

for company and contractors jointly. The incidence of a
fatality in either company or contractor operations is also
indicated. Details of results are tabulated in Appendix B.
Fig 5.1.2.1: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors total recordable injury rate
6
Fatality in 2012
Top quartile
Company only
5
Average companies with contractors 1.74
5-2
MM Q X
F N D U
Z M G B
O R
V C
P RR JJ BB L NN K LL Y AA II CC FF KK W DD QQGG PP EE OO HH UU SS TT VV
OGP
In the figure below the TRIR is presented for those

companies that, with their contractors, reported more than
50 million hours worked. 20 companies met this criterion
in 2012, compared with 18 in 2011. Companies are shown
in rank order of the company-with-contractor TRIR.
12 of the 20 companies with their contractors

worked (1.53).
The range in 2012 was between 0.33 and 4.17 injuries
per million hours worked.
17 of the 20 companies suffered one or more fatalities.
Fig 5.1.2.2: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours >50 million total recordable injury rate
6
Top quartile
Fatality in 2012
Company only
5
JJ
LL
AA
II
CC
OGP
FF
KK
DD
QQ
PP
GG
OO
HH
SS
5-3
The remaining 27 companies which, with their contractors,

reported less than 50 million hours worked are presented
below in rank order of the company-with-contractor TRIR.
Eight of the 27 companies with their contractors

performed below the overall average for smaller
companies with contractors (1.94).
The range in 2012 was between 0.00 and 4.88 injuries
per million hours worked.
Three of the 27 smaller companies suffered one or more
fatalities.
Fig 5.1.2.3: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours <50 million total recordable injury rate
6
Top quartile
Fatality in 2012
Company only
5
3
0 MM
5-4
OGP
RR
BB
NN
EE
UU
VV
TT
5.1.3 Lost time injury frequency

The figure shows, in rank order, the LTIF for companies
together with their contractors. 48 of the 49 participating
companies (A to VV) contributed both company and
contractor data, although not always for every country in
which operations were conducted. One company did not
report medical treatment cases (MTC) so their data could
not be included in the TRIR analysis, and to protect their
anonymity their company/contractor results are not shown
in the graphs but their data have been included within the
overall average figures. The remaining 47 companies are
therefore shown below.
The LTIF for the company alone is plotted alongside the

LTIF for company and contractors jointly. The incidence of
a fatality in either company or contractor operations is also
indicated. Details of results are tabulated in Appendix B.
42 companies with their contractors delivered a LTIF
of less than 1.
20 of the 47 companies presented below suffered one
or more fatality.
In 7 instances, contractors achieved a lower LTIF than
the companies they were employed by.
Fig 5.1.3.1: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors lost time injury frequency
1.8

1.6
Top quartile
Fatality in 2012
Company only
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
Average companies with

contractors 0.48
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
B
Z AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH
OGP
II
JJ
KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU VV
5-5
In the figure below the LTIF is presented for those

companies that, with their contractors, reported more than
50 million hours worked. 20 companies met this criterion
in 2012, compared with 18 in 2011. Companies are shown
in rank order of the company-with-contractor LTIF.
Eleven of the 20 companies with their contractors

worked (0.39).
The range in 2012 was between 0.04 and 1.19 lost time
injuries per million hours worked.
Seventeen of the 20 companies suffered one or
more fatalities.
Fig 5.1.3.2: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours>50 million lost time injury frequency
1.8
Top quartile
Fatality in 2012
1.6
Company only
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
5-6
AA
CC
DD
FF
GG
OGP
HH
II
JJ
KK
LL
OO
PP
QQ
SS
The remaining 27 companies which, with their contractors,

reported less than 50 million hours worked are presented
below in rank order of the company-with-contractor LTIF.
23 of the 27 companies with their contractors
performed below the overall average for smaller
companies with contractors (1.03).
The range in 2012 was between 0.00 and 1.62 lost time
injuries per million hours worked.
Three of the 27 smaller companies presented below
suffered one or more fatalities.
Fig 5.1.3.3: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours 50 million lost time injury frequency
1.8
1.6
Top quartile
Fatality in 2012

Company only
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
B
OGP
BB
EE
MM NN
RR
TT
UU
VV
5-7
5.2 Company results by function

Results of companies together with their contractors
have been analysed by function to allow more in-depth
benchmarking between companies. The TRIR indicator
has been selected, and the ranked results are shown in the
following charts. Only companies that provided data by
function are included, and then only those companies
that reported more than 100,000 hours worked. Results

against smaller numbers of hours would not have statistical
significance. The company code letters are the same as used
elsewhere in this section.
Fig 5.2.1: Total recordable injury rate exploration

per million hours worked - company with contractors [Data page B-15]
Fig 5.2.2: Total recordable injury rate drilling

Exploration was the only function where the top quartile

company with contractors shows a TRIR of zero.
12
12
Top quartile
10
10
Overall 2.14
(all companies with contractors)
12
Overall 2.59
G MM K I PP X J D Q V U M H S Z JJ B O AA P RR L LL FF N Y T NN BB GG DD CC HH EE OO KK SS QQ C R
Fig 5.2.4: Total recordable injury rate construction

Top quartile
10
10
Top quartile
12
5-8
I J H G R C V T O P NN D S CC FF LL L Q M N QQ EE B JJ DD GG AA BB HH MM OO PP TT U Y Z
Fig 5.2.3: Total recordable injury rate production

12.9
Overall 1.92
B Q Z N MM H D T I U S V BB JJ M J G AA K CC NN Y L OO R LL O FF RR P PP QQ DD GG W EE HH UU SS
OGP
Top quartile
Overall 1.32
R X I O G NN MM H S T D V FF W Y QQ JJ DD J BB CC RR AA L P GG LL OO UU SS PP HH K N Q U VV
Appendix A
Database dimensions
Fig A-1: Hours worked
millions
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
work hours contractor

1000
500
work hours company

1985
1990
1995
2000
The database for the year 2012 covers 3,691,040,000 hours

worked in the exploration and production sector of the oil
and gas industry. The database is 7% larger than it was in
2011.
76% of the hours reported were associated with onshore
activities, 24% with offshore activities.
107 countries are represented in the database, 9 more
than in the 2011 database. Countries are listed in
appendix D.
49 companies contributed data. All but one contributed
contractor statistics, though not in every case for each
country of operation.
Of the 49 companies, 45 had contributed data in 2011.
Since these 45 accounted for 100% of the database in
2011 and 97% of the database in 2012, comparison of
the year 2012 results with those of 2011 is meaningful.
41 of the companies submitting 2012 data had also
provided data in 2010.
22 of the companies contributed 90% of the hours. 7
companies between them covered 52% of the hours,
and the largest contributor accounted for 12%.
21% of the reported work hours were related to company
personnel and 79% were related to contractors.
2005
2010
2012
Hours reported (000s)

Onshore
Offshore
Company
609,342 (16.5%)
150,258 (4.1%)
Contractor
2,178,961 (59.0%)
752,479 (20.4%)
A summary of the key elements of the database is shown in

the table at the end of this section.
OGP
A-1
Fig A-2: Exposure hours by region, 2012

FSU 10%
Fig A-3: Exposure hours by region, 2011

Asia/Australasia 20%
Europe 10%
Middle East 20%
South America 10%

North America 11%
Europe 11%
South America 12%
Middle
East 18%
North America 15%
Asia/
Australasia 18%
FSU 13%
Africa 16%
Fig A-4: Exposure hours by function, 2012
Africa 16%
Fig A-5: Exposure hours by function, 2011
Exploration 2%
Exploration 2%
Production 35%
Production 33%
Drilling 18%
Drilling 19%
Unspecified 20%
Unspecified 22%
Construction 25%
Construction 24%
Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with

office personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot
be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of
one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling,
production or construction. Corporate overhead support
function personnel such as finance or human resources staff
may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically
assigned to a particular function. All other data that are not
separated out by function are reported as unspecified.
A-2
OGP
Proportion of database used in analysis

For calculations of FAR, fatal incidents per
100 million work hours, and LTIF:
For calculations of lost work day severity:

Submissions without information on days off work
were filtered out, leaving a database of 2,876 million
hours, 78% of the total database.
In 2011, this database was 2,728 million hours, 79% of
the total database.
North America and Europe have only 44% and 53%
severity information respectively, whereas more than
97% of the Middle East database was useable.
All hours in the database were used.
For calculations of TRIR:

Submissions without information on medical
treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of
3,651 million hours, 99% of the database.
In 2011, the TRIR database was 3,428 million hours,
99% of the total database.
The region where the smallest proportion of the
database could be used was North America (93%). In
all other regions 100% of the database was used.
For calculations of restricted work day severity:

Submissions without information on days assigned to
restricted activities were filtered out, leaving a database
of 2,183 million hours, 59% of the total database.
In 2011 this database was 2,041 million hours, 59% of
the total database
More detailed information is shown in the tables below.
Percent. of useable data functions
Percent. of useable data regions
Africa
TRIR
analyses
LWDC
severity
analyses
Restricted
workday case
severity analyses
100%
88%
65%
Asia/
Australasia
100%
77%
73%
Europe
100%
53%
42%
FSU
100%
89%
24%
Middle East
100%
97%
75%
North America
93%
44%
33%
South America
100%
95%
84%
TRIR
analyses
LWDC
severity
analyses
Restricted
workday case
severity analyses
Exploration
96%
90%
69%
Drilling
98%
84%
49%
Production
99%
75%
65%
Construction
99%
83%
64%
Percent. of useable data overall

TRIR
analyses
LWDC severity
analyses
Restricted workday case

severity analyses
99%
78%
59%
OGP
A-3
A-4
OGP
Appendix B
Data tables
Summary of data
Region
Type
Hours
worked
(000s)
Africa
Company Onshore
92,966
13
22
0.00
0.10
0.47
Company Offshore
14,976
10
11
6.68
0.73
1.87
Contractor Onshore
388,076
12
92
90
170
3.09
0.27
0.94
Contractor Offshore
104,460
69
70
107
3.83
0.70
2.39
Sub Total
600,478
17
180
179
310
2.83
0.33
1.14
Company Onshore
99,200
17
13
39
0.00
0.17
0.70
Company Offshore
33,622
10
13
15
2.97
0.33
1.14
Contractor Onshore
421,115
77
202
326
1.90
0.20
1.46
Contractor Offshore
187,586
78
108
106
0.53
0.42
1.57
Sub Total
741,523
10
182
336
486
1.35
0.26
1.37
Company Onshore
113,300
65
11
40
0.88
0.58
1.03
Company Offshore
29,112
27
45
0.00
0.93
2.71
Contractor Onshore
110,377
73
43
102
0.00
0.66
1.98
Contractor Offshore
131,880
182
123
295
0.76
1.39
4.56
Sub Total
384,669
347
184
482
0.52
0.91
2.64
Company Onshore
59,906
18
31
0.00
0.30
0.86
Company Offshore
9,882
0.00
0.10
0.51
Contractor Onshore
246,765
63
10
149
0.81
0.26
0.91
Contractor Offshore
47,390
19
24
36
0.00
0.40
1.67
Sub Total
363,943
101
37
220
0.55
0.28
0.99
Company Onshore
83,147
35
12
55
3.61
0.46
1.13
Company Offshore
9,433
0.00
0.32
1.35
Contractor Onshore
522,731
10
92
83
295
1.91
0.20
0.92
Contractor Offshore
51,604
18
10
64
0.00
0.35
1.78
Sub Total
666,915
13
148
106
422
1.95
0.24
1.02
Company Onshore
125,693
81
29
110
4.77
0.69
1.45
Company Offshore
20,495
36
11
0.00
1.76
1.48
Contractor Onshore
343,336
36
270
350
589
10.49
0.89
3.47
Contractor Offshore
70,503
98
47
65
0.00
1.39
2.33
Sub Total
560,027
42
485
431
775
7.50
0.94
2.82
Company Onshore
35,130
11
16
13
0.00
0.31
1.14
Company Offshore
32,738
20
41
0.00
0.61
1.95
Contractor Onshore
146,561
69
208
223
1.36
0.48
3.43
Contractor Offshore
159,056
156
125
253
0.00
0.98
3.36
Sub Total
373,485
256
352
530
0.54
0.69
3.05
Company Onshore
609,342
10
236
97
310
1.64
0.40
0.98
Company Offshore
150,258
107
35
135
1.33
0.73
1.72
Contractor Onshore
2,178,961
70
736
986
1,854
3.21
0.37
1.64
Contractor Offshore
752,479
620
507
926
0.80
0.83
2.68
Grand Total
3,691,040
88
1,699
1,625
3,225
2.38
0.48
1.74
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North America
South America
Total
No.
fatalities
No.
LWDCs
No.
RWDCs
No. MTCs
FAR
LTIF
TRIR
OGP
B-1
Section 1
Summary
Section 1 summary intentionally excluded.
Section 2 Overall results

Total recordable injury rate
Year
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
Company
Contractor
2003
3.74
4.87
4.00
1.79
4.72
2004
3.17
6.36
3.94
3.71
4.00
2005
2.82
3.87
3.05
1.76
3.50
2006
2.68
3.66
2.92
1.85
3.24
2007
2.51
3.26
2.68
2.41
2.76
2008
1.75
3.09
2.08
1.49
2.23
2009
1.45
2.79
1.75
1.28
1.89
2010
1.41
2.45
1.68
1.19
1.81
2011
1.45
2.84
1.76
1.32
1.88
2012
1.49
2.53
1.74
1.12
1.90
Hours 2012 (000s)
2,766,911
884,470
3,651,381
747,901
2,903,480
Fatal accident rate

Year
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
Company
Contractor
2003
5.18
4.16
4.94
2.26
6.06
111
2004
5.00
6.02
5.24
2.82
6.18
120
2005
3.94
1.99
3.53
1.25
4.36
84
2006
4.64
1.58
3.92
2.04
4.54
115
2007
3.01
2.92
2.99
1.65
3.39
87
2008
3.38
2.25
3.12
2.81
3.20
103
2009
2.75
2.78
2.76
1.58
3.11
99
2010
2.62
3.16
2.76
3.17
2.64
94
2011
1.94
1.67
1.88
1.33
2.03
65
2012
2.87
0.89
2.38
1.58
2.59
88
Hours 2012 (000s)
2,788,303
902,737
3,691,040
759,600
2,931,440
Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours
B-2
Year
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
Company
Contractor
2003
4.66
3.97
4.49
1.96
5.56
2004
4.32
4.55
4.32
2.82
4.90
2005
3.41
1.99
3.11
1.25
3.79
2006
4.10
1.58
3.51
1.91
4.04
2007
2.74
1.69
2.51
1.35
2.85
2008
2.71
1.72
2.48
2.53
2.47
2009
1.86
1.90
1.87
1.22
2.06
2010
1.70
1.69
1.70
1.10
1.86
2011
1.57
1.03
1.45
0.80
1.63
2012
1.58
0.89
1.41
0.79
1.57
Hours 2012 (000s)
2,788,303
902,737
3,691,040
759,600
2,931,440
OGP
Lost time injury frequency

Year
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
Company
Contractor
2003
1.13
1.27
1.16
0.79
1.32
2004
1.04
1.26
1.09
0.87
1.17
2005
0.92
1.12
0.97
0.83
1.02
2006
0.95
1.13
0.99
0.89
1.03
2007
0.62
0.82
0.66
0.54
0.70
2008
0.47
0.81
0.55
0.52
0.56
2009
0.38
0.70
0.45
0.44
0.46
2010
0.35
0.62
0.42
0.41
0.42
2011
0.34
0.74
0.43
0.42
0.43
2012
0.38
0.81
0.48
0.47
0.49
Hours 2012 (000s)
2,788,303
902,737
3,691,040
759,600
2,931,440
Fatalities by category, 2012
Fatalities by activity, 2012
Category
Number
Activity
Number
3.4
14
15.9
16
18.2
Diving, subsea, ROV
N/A
Confined space
2.3
11
12.5
N/A
2.3
Explosions or burns
39
44.3
41
46.6
Exposure electrical
3.4
N/A
N/A
3.4
Falls from height
3.4
2.3
1.1
Transport air
2.3
Pressure release
4.5
Transport land
10.2
N/A
2.3
Struck by
14
15.9
Unspecified other
2.3
1.1
Other
2.3
Lost work day cases by category, 2012
Lost work day cases by activity, 2012
Category
Number
Activity
Number
17
1.0
168
9.9
352
20.7
Diving, subsea, ROV
10
0.6
Confined space
0.1
360
21.2
61
3.6
133
7.8
Explosions or burns
127
7.5
287
16.9
Exposure electrical
12
0.7
131
7.7
34
2.0
211
12.4
Falls from height
158
9.3
23
1.4
133
7.8
Transport air
0.5
Pressure release
16
0.9
Transport land
69
4.1
265
15.6
89
5.2
Struck by
408
24.0
Unspecified other
210
12.4
0.2
Other
112
6.6
OGP
B-3
Lost work day cases by category, 2012

Category
Company
Contractor
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
15
17
14
37
315
352
163
189
Confined space
54
61
37
24
Explosions or burns
31
96
127
114
13
Exposure electrical
12
12
Exposure noise, pressure, chemical, biological, vibration
29
34
23
11
Falls from height
35
123
158
90
68
33
100
133
56
77
Pressure release
12
16
69
196
265
148
117
Struck by
70
338
408
223
185
Other
49
63
112
86
26
343
1,356
1,699
972
727
Activity
Company
Contractor
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
164
168
113
55
Diving, subsea, ROV
10
43
317
360
189
171
11
122
133
52
81
69
218
287
162
125
46
85
131
94
37
79
132
211
105
106
22
23
18
Transport air
Transport land
19
50
69
65
85
89
15
74
Unspecified other
61
149
210
153
57
343
1,356
1,699
972
727
Lost work day cases by activity, 2012
Lost work day case severity
B-4
Year
Company
Contractor
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
2003
41.40
18.60
24.16
21.33
36.71
2004
21.01
24.85
23.79
23.42
25.10
2005
25.59
23.74
24.18
24.46
23.11
2006
20.59
26.22
24.85
24.66
25.48
2007
32.73
35.55
35.00
33.04
42.02
2008
35.21
34.58
34.72
32.05
41.01
2009
35.30
38.25
37.53
34.77
44.40
2010
35.43
46.02
43.90
39.39
52.56
2011
41.06
42.58
42.26
39.84
46.42
Ave 07-11
35.66
38.86
38.17
35.20
45.26
2012
38.81
41.28
40.74
36.83
45.99
Hours 2012 (000s)
567,256
2,309,135
2,876,391
2,224,660
651,731
OGP
Restricted work day case severity

Year
Company
Contractor
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
2003
11.85
11.78
11.79
8.91
18.95
2004
13.75
11.20
11.44
10.98
12.90
2005
12.45
13.77
13.66
14.74
9.55
2006
11.78
11.07
11.15
10.33
13.01
2007
15.28
10.46
10.93
8.90
15.95
2008
16.08
13.39
13.72
13.34
14.35
2009
15.26
13.80
13.94
12.42
15.75
2010
14.72
13.78
13.88
13.59
14.35
2011
12.92
10.17
10.40
11.67
8.55
Ave 07-11
14.80
11.98
12.25
11.74
13.10
2012
13.84
12.05
12.21
11.48
13.41
Hours 2012 (000s)
429,928
1,752,726
2,182,654
1,615,502
567,152
Section 3 Results by region

Fatalities
Region
Fatal accident rate

Fatalities
2012 (2011)
Africa
FAR
2012 (2011)
Fatal incidents
2012 (2011)
17 (7)
2.83 (1.25)
13 (7)
10 (20)
1.35 (3.28)
10 (12)
Europe
2 (3)
0.52 (0.87)
2 (3)
FSU
2 (7)
0.55 (1.59)
2 (6)
13 (12)
1.95 (1.74)
11 (9)
North America
42 (6)
7.5 (1.5)
12 (6)
South America
2 (10)
0.54 (2.42)
2 (7)
Asia/Australasia
Middle East
Region
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
Africa
2.83
1.25
3.38
2.21
4.40
Asia/Australasia
1.35
3.28
4.14
1.58
1.24
Europe
0.52
0.87
0.97
6.58
4.19
FSU
0.55
1.59
2.17
3.14
4.05
Middle East
1.95
1.74
1.63
2.16
2.40
North America
7.50
1.50
5.08
4.37
1.64
South America
0.54
2.42
1.57
2.37
5.17
All regions
2.38
1.88
2.76
2.76
3.12

Year
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South
America
All regions
2007
1.96
1.43
4.10
3.22
2.06
4.53
3.31
2.68
2008
2.18
1.34
3.89
1.22
0.83
4.25
3.15
2.09
2009
1.65
1.22
3.48
1.21
0.92
3.08
3.17
1.75
2010
1.40
1.30
3.05
1.08
0.98
2.89
2.76
1.68
2011
1.22
1.46
2.81
0.99
0.78
3.19
3.17
1.77
2012
1.14
1.37
2.64
0.99
1.02
2.82
3.05
1.74
OGP
B-5

Region
2012
2011
Hours 2012 (000s)
Africa
0.33
0.30
600,478
Asia/Australasia
0.26
0.30
741,523
Europe
0.91
1.08
384,669
FSU
0.28
0.31
363,943
Middle East
0.24
0.18
666,915
North America
0.94
0.59
560,027
South America
0.69
0.64
373,485
All regions
0.48
0.43
3,691,040
Hours worked (000s)

Year
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South
America
All regions
2003
443,101
377,806
187,209
201,375
368,936
458,471
210,128
2,247,026
2004
453,714
364,929
191,992
364,741
370,625
242,906
301,546
2,290,453
2005
472,879
348,806
191,127
443,782
383,968
224,603
315,505
2,380,670
2006
473,646
473,100
282,856
451,036
447,657
302,632
506,047
2,936,974
2007
496,830
540,809
296,407
418,534
553,424
285,769
321,028
2,912,801
2008
499,818
562,677
310,237
444,106
835,031
304,076
348,223
3,304,168
2009
542,110
697,524
319,178
350,792
1,018,682
320,541
337,015
3,585,842
2010
562,121
725,171
308,870
461,827
676,337
295,339
381,479
3,411,144
2011
558,573
609,466
344,762
439,420
690,171
400,902
412,784
3,456,078
2012
600,478
741,523
384,669
363,943
666,915
560,027
373,485
3,691,040
Total recordable injury rate 5-year rolling average

Year
B-6
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South
America
All regions
2003
2.5
2.3
7.9
2.0
4.3
7.7
5.9
4.4
2004
3.1
2.3
7.5
2.1
3.8
7.3
5.7
4.3
2005
3.0
2.1
6.4
1.9
3.6
6.5
5.2
3.8
2006
3.0
1.9
6.0
1.9
3.3
5.7
4.5
3.4
2007
2.9
1.7
5.3
2.2
3.0
5.2
4.1
3.2
2008
2.8
1.6
4.7
2.1
1.9
4.9
3.8
2.8
2009
2.2
1.4
4.3
1.9
1.5
4.4
3.5
2.4
2010
2.0
1.4
3.9
1.8
1.3
4.0
3.2
2.2
2011
1.7
1.3
3.4
1.6
1.1
3.6
3.1
2.0
2012
1.5
1.3
3.1
1.1
0.9
3.2
3.1
1.8
OGP
Fatal accident rate 5-year rolling average

Year
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South
America
All regions
2003
8.9
2.8
4.3
6.3
5.9
4.7
5.0
5.4
2004
8.3
2.6
3.5
6.8
6.1
5.0
4.6
5.4
2005
7.0
2.1
3.5
6.6
4.9
4.5
3.8
4.7
2006
6.6
1.8
3.5
6.3
4.3
4.0
3.9
4.4
2007
6.0
1.5
3.0
5.5
4.2
3.6
3.8
4.1
2008
5.1
1.4
3.5
5.2
3.6
2.8
3.9
3.7
2009
4.1
1.4
4.6
4.4
2.8
2.4
3.7
3.2
2010
3.8
2.1
4.0
3.7
2.5
3.1
3.3
3.1
2011
2.9
2.3
3.4
2.9
2.3
2.7
2.9
2.7
2012
2.8
2.3
2.5
2.3
2.0
4.4
2.4
2.6

Year
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South
America
All regions
2003
1.0
0.6
2.3
0.8
1.6
1.4
2.5
1.4
2004
1.0
0.6
2.2
0.9
1.4
1.4
2.5
1.3
2005
0.8
0.5
2.0
0.8
1.2
1.2
2.3
1.2
2006
0.7
0.4
1.8
0.8
1.0
1.0
2.2
1.1
2007
0.7
0.4
1.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
2.0
1.0
2008
0.7
0.3
1.5
0.7
0.6
0.8
1.7
0.8
2009
0.6
0.3
1.5
0.6
0.4
0.7
1.4
0.7
2010
0.5
0.3
1.4
0.5
0.4
0.6
1.2
0.6
2011
0.5
0.3
1.2
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.8
0.5
2012
0.4
0.3
1.1
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.7
0.5
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South
America
All regions
2007
22.16
21.98
37.68
32.06
20.56
37.3
58.76
35.00
2008
21.63
27.32
43.47
29.85
16.01
37.16
56.66
34.72
2009
23.08
31.77
42.26
32.55
20.37
38.92
68.87
37.53
2010
27.22
27.61
32.83
42.23
14.68
46.63
98.54
43.90
2011
27.63
26.74
44.50
46.44
12.31
31.29
71.60
42.26
Ave 07-11
23.80
27.33
40.15
35.74
17.59
37.39
68.99
38.17
2012
35.94
24.23
38.06
41.42
26.21
36.66
69.53
40.74
Hours 2012 (000s)
529,148
574,634
204,661
323,773
644,401
244,083
355,691
2,876,391

Year
OGP
B-7
Lost time injury frequency by country

Region
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
B-8
Country
LTIF
2011
2010
One or
more
fatalities
in 2012
Region
2012
Morocco
4.67
0.00
0.00
no
Europe
Ivory Coast
3.33
0.00
0.00
no
Sierra Leone
2.78
n/a
n/a
Tunisia
1.61
1.89
Ghana
1.43
Tanzania
2012
2011
2010
One or
more
fatalities
in 2012
Poland
3.66
0.00
0.00
no
Hungary
1.76
2.44
1.17
no
no
Italy
1.55
1.55
1.76
no
1.61
no
Croatia
1.38
1.78
2.61
no
0.52
1.19
no
Denmark
1.04
1.93
1.55
no
0.87
3.24
3.55
no
Norway
0.98
1.27
1.24
no
Mozambique
0.78
1.11
0.00
yes
Germany
0.92
0.92
0.23
no
Gabon
0.70
0.72
0.75
yes
Europe average
0.91
Congo DR
0.63
0.64
0.56
no
UK
0.82
0.95
0.95
yes
Mauritiana
0.63
1.57
2.11
no
Netherlands
0.65
0.88
0.93
no
Cameroun
0.59
0.62
1.36
no
Spain
0.64
2.00
2.70
no
Libya
0.54
0.52
0.48
no
Romania
0.60
0.53
0.72
yes
Kenya
0.43
1.29
n/a
no
France
0.27
0.43
0.73
no
Uganda
0.37
0.40
0.41
no
Ireland
0.00
0.53
0.39
no
Congo
0.34
0.37
0.06
yes
Greenland
0.00
4.27
1.04
no
Africa average
0.33
Equatorial Guinea
0.32
0.11
0.30
no
Ukraine
3.55
12.50
0.00
no
Egypt
0.27
0.29
0.28
no
Kazakhstan
0.33
0.29
0.33
no
Algeria
0.24
0.19
0.88
no
Turkmenistan
0.32
0.46
0.27
no
Angola
0.23
0.28
0.13
yes
FSU average
0.28
Nigeria
0.15
0.16
0.23
yes
Russia
0.27
0.32
0.31
yes
South Africa
0.00
0.00
0.00
no
Azerbaijan
0.11
0.17
0.04
no
Madagascar
0.00
0.00
0.00
no
Liberia
0.00
n/a
n/a
no
Turkey
2.61
0.92
0.00
no
1.15
1.00
1.77
yes
Jordan
0.75
0.00
0.00
no
Yemen
0.43
0.34
0.46
yes
Qatar
0.26
0.22
0.16
yes
Middle East average
0.24
UAE
0.16
0.06
0.31
yes
Kuwait
0.12
0.14
0.30
yes
Oman
0.00
0.00
0.00
no
Syria
0.00
0.33
0.41
no
Iran
0.00
0.00
0.98
no
Mexico
6.98
2.18
0.00
yes
Cuba
1.80
0.00
0.00
no
North America avg.
0.94
USA
0.56
0.65
0.49
yes
Canada
0.35
0.39
0.46
no
Brazil
0.78
0.66
0.58
yes
Bolivia
0.76
0.19
0.23
no
South America avg
0.69
Trinidad & Tobago
0.63
0.50
0.55
no
Peru
0.62
1.53
0.75
no
Colombia
0.35
1.61
0.74
no
Venezuela
0.21
0.69
0.37
no
Ecuador
0.16
0.63
0.31
no
Argentina
0.15
0.46
0.73
no
Uruguay
0.00
n/a
n/a
no
Surinam
0.00
0.00
0.00
no
French Guiana
0.00
0.00
0.00
no
New Zealand
3.11
2.07
2.01
no
Australia
0.64
0.60
0.71
no
Vietnam
0.52
0.38
0.45
no
Myanmar
0.46
0.86
0.39
no
India
0.43
0.74
0.41
no
Philippenes
0.37
0.40
1.05
no
South Korea
0.34
0.00
0.00
no
Malaysia
0.27
0.25
0.20
yes
China
0.26
0.48
0.27
yes
Asia/Australasia avg.
0.26
Indonesia
0.16
0.17
0.12
yes
Papua New Guinea
0.13
0.25
0.49
yes
Thailand
0.11
0.25
0.28
no
Pakistan
0.05
0.28
0.80
no
Singapore
0.00
0.00
0.15
no
Japan
0.00
1.50
0.00
no
Bangladesh
0.00
0.00
0.10
no
Brunei
0.00
0.00
0.00
no
FSU
Country
Middle East Iraq
North
America
South
America
OGP
LTIF
Section 4 Results by function

Fatal incidents and fatalities by function (000s)
2012
Exploration
2011
Fatal incidents
Fatalities
Fatal incidents
Fatalities
Drilling
11
12
12
Production
12
15
22
32
Construction
17
19
16
16
Unspecified
38
All functions
52
88
50
65
Exposure hours by function (000s)

2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
Exploration
84,947
74,306
83,397
61,435
67,962
Drilling
672,728
642,462
518,505
348,515
298,855
Production
1,220,365
1,208,473
965,145
948,771
1,001,303
Construction
911,045
839,178
869,540
1,076,322
906,142
Unspecified
801,955
691,659
974,557
1,150,799
1,029,906
All functions
3,691,040
3,456,078
3,411,144
3,585,842
3,304,168
Construction
Unspecified
Fatal accident rate 3-year rolling average

Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
2007
8.01
4.17
3.20
2008
6.11
4.49
3.60
2.41
3.13
2009
2.88
3.74
4.06
1.99
2.49
2010
2.35
5.23
3.70
1.51
2.50
2011
1.37
4.04
3.14
1.51
1.92
2.06
3.11
1.97
1.72
2.96
2012
3.19
Note: the method of calculating rolling averages changed with the publication of 2010 data. Historic figures presented above have been recalculated accordingly.
Fatal accident rate

Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
2007
2.55
2.43
3.14
3.00
3.03
2008
2.94
4.02
4.19
1.88
2.91
2009
3.26
4.59
4.85
1.49
1.65
2010
1.20
6.36
2.07
1.15
3.08
2011
0.00
1.87
2.65
1.91
0.72
2012
4.71
1.78
1.23
2.09
4.74
Note: the method of calculating FAR on a functional basis has changed with the publication of 2010 data to use the incident function instead of the function of the victim.
Historic figures presented above have been recalculated acordingly.
OGP
B-9

Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
2007
2.66
5.34
3.03
1.62
2.23
2008
3.81
4.63
2.64
1.00
1.72
2009
2.31
3.81
2.32
0.78
1.53
2010
2.30
2.94
2.14
0.99
1.13
2011
2.70
2.84
2.05
1.13
0.95
2012
2.14
2.59
1.92
1.32
1.21
Construction
Unspecified

Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
2007
0.91
1.53
1.05
2008
0.83
1.46
0.89
0.35
0.59
2009
0.69
1.21
0.72
0.27
0.42
2010
0.55
1.01
0.63
0.23
0.34
2011
0.47
0.81
0.57
0.22
0.29
2012
0.52
0.78
0.53
0.23
0.31
0.69
Note: the method of calculating rolling averages changed with the publication of 2010 data. Historic figures presented above have been recalculated accordingly.

Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
2003
1.19
1.73
2004
0.61
2005
1.12
2006
Construction
Unspecified
Other
Overall
1.11
1.93
0.64
1.16
1.71
1.23
1.12
0.77
1.09
1.53
1.22
0.69
0.76
0.97
0.91
1.73
1.16
0.50
0.84
0.99
2007
0.79
1.31
0.82
0.38
0.49
0.66
2008
0.78
1.33
0.70
0.27
0.41
0.55
2009
0.47
1.02
0.64
0.21
0.36
0.45
2010
0.42
0.82
0.54
0.24
0.25
0.42
2011
0.53
0.70
0.55
0.21
0.22
0.43
2012
0.60
0.82
0.49
0.24
0.46
0.48
Hours 2012 (000s)
84,947
672,728
1,220,365
911,045
801,955
3,691,040
B-10
Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
All functions
2007
25.6
40.6
37.9
24.2
30.7
35.1
2008
37.6
42.2
30.2
26.9
37.6
34.7
2009
45.5
44.3
38.4
34.7
29.9
37.5
2010
28.7
55.8
49.8
27.3
22.6
43.9
2011
42.4
51.8
40.4
36.4
22.8
42.3
Ave 07-11
34.0
47.1
38.7
29.8
30.7
38.2
2012
37.6
50.4
39.6
36.8
26.2
40.7
Hours 2012 (000s)
76,224
571,216
924,049
757,977
545,271
2,874,737
OGP
Exploration TRIR for company & contractor by region

Company hours worked
Contractor hours worked
Region
Company
2012
20072011
2012
Contractor
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.00
1.84
1.69
2.72
2,720
20,160
Asia/Australasia
0.19
0.48
3.10
2.37
5,215
16,749
Europe
1.72
0.58
2.44
2.79
5,233
4,922
FSU
0.00
1.03
0.85
2.32
214
1,181
Middle East
0.00
0.80
5.28
2.11
1,842
4,544
North America
0.78
0.96
3.89
4.87
5,136
5,397
South America
0.52
3.11
2.42
5.78
1,935
6,603
All regions
0.67
1.07
2.69
3.32
22,295
59,556
Exploration LTIF for company & contractor by region

Company
Contractor
Region
2012
20072011
2012
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.00
0.57
0.50
0.58
2,720
20,160
Asia/Australasia
0.19
0.23
0.36
0.46
5,215
16,821
Europe
1.15
0.29
1.42
1.65
5,233
4,922
FSU
0.00
0.95
0.00
1.39
214
1,181
Middle East
2.62
0.26
2.20
0.53
1,912
4,544
North America
0.00
0.16
0.37
0.51
5,340
8,147
South America
0.00
0.31
0.45
1.00
1,935
6,603
All regions
0.53
0.29
0.63
0.70
22,569
62,378
Drilling TRIR for company & contractor by region

Region
Company
2012
20072011
Contractor
2012
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.52
1.74
2.38
3.93
5,774
70,136
Asia/Australasia
0.66
0.91
2.07
2.98
7,614
76,489
Europe
1.73
1.97
5.09
5.49
20,194
36,714
FSU
1.36
1.89
1.09
1.49
28,764
168,436
Middle East
1.14
1.60
3.09
3.98
5,258
38,489
North America
0.38
0.64
3.90
5.86
7,969
97,122
South America
1.38
1.55
4.68
4.81
10,847
88,756
All regions
1.23
1.57
2.79
3.92
86,420
576,142
Drilling LTIF for company & contractor by region

Company
Contractor
Region
2012
20072011
2012
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.17
0.34
0.78
1.25
5,774
70,136
Asia/Australasia
0.00
0.34
0.71
0.77
7,614
76,489
Europe
0.89
1.22
2.07
2.06
20,194
36,714
FSU
0.31
0.58
0.27
0.37
28,764
168,436
Middle East
1.30
0.76
0.57
0.90
5,374
38,489
North America
3.73
0.04
1.04
0.88
11,789
103,352
South America
0.55
0.45
1.16
1.27
10,847
88,756
All regions
0.94
0.60
0.80
1.01
90,356
582,372
OGP
B-11
Production TRIR for company & contractor by region

Region
Company
2012
20072011
Contractor
2012
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.86
1.98
1.02
1.68
45,454
178,481
Asia/Australasia
1.26
1.51
0.93
1.35
55,673
166,188
Europe
1.78
2.28
4.40
5.40
70,399
98,560
FSU
0.38
1.94
0.88
1.86
23,428
40,743
Middle East
1.46
1.78
1.10
1.64
41,155
121,076
North America
2.42
2.99
3.59
4.54
47,136
104,425
South America
1.89
1.84
2.92
2.89
44,948
173,124
All regions
1.53
2.02
2.06
2.57
328,193
882,597
Production LTIF for company & contractor by region

Region
Company
2012
20072011
Contractor
2012
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.26
0.50
0.29
0.53
45,454
178,481
Asia/Australasia
0.29
0.42
0.24
0.31
55,913
166,664
Europe
0.82
0.88
1.22
1.69
70,399
98,560
FSU
0.29
0.51
0.29
0.41
23,844
40,743
Middle East
0.43
0.83
0.27
0.43
41,480
121,076
North America
0.50
0.72
0.70
0.75
50,091
109,588
South America
0.53
0.54
0.61
0.66
44,948
173,124
All regions
0.48
0.65
0.49
0.64
332,129
888,236
Construction TRIR for company & contractor by region

Company
Contractor
Region
2012
20072011
2012
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.20
1.18
1.32
1.68
9,781
80,578
Asia/Australasia
0.58
0.40
1.92
1.58
17,189
235,722
Europe
0.29
0.61
2.33
4.23
6,890
40,765
FSU
0.41
0.66
1.22
1.05
4,936
60,597
Middle East
0.67
0.57
0.64
0.53
7,496
360,640
North America
0.73
0.68
2.61
4.13
8,261
53,320
South America
0.77
0.94
3.66
2.60
1,294
19,970
All regions
0.50
0.58
1.38
1.09
55,847
851,592
Construction LTIF for company & contractor by region

Company
B-12
Contractor
Region
2012
20072011
2012
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.00
0.10
0.30
0.39
9,781
80,578
Asia/Australasia
0.41
0.08
0.21
0.25
17,215
236,327
Europe
0.29
0.11
0.69
1.40
6,890
40,765
FSU
0.00
0.28
0.38
0.36
4,936
60,597
Middle East
0.26
0.15
0.10
0.13
7,711
360,640
North America
0.12
0.05
0.59
0.45
8,365
55,976
South America
0.00
0.51
0.70
1.02
1,294
19,970
All regions
0.21
0.13
0.24
0.26
56,192
854,853
OGP
Unspecified TRIR for company & contractor by region

Region
Company
2012
20072011
Contractor
2012
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.63
0.61
0.87
1.08
44,210
143,181
Asia/Australasia
0.45
0.73
0.77
0.88
46,824
112,392
Europe
0.61
1.36
1.48
3.26
39,258
61,296
FSU
0.50
2.79
0.34
1.20
12,030
23,198
Middle East
0.97
0.67
1.31
1.92
36,103
49,586
North America
1.05
1.13
2.86
3.76
67,877
126,776
South America
0.23
0.74
1.51
1.60
8,844
17,164
All regions
0.73
1.20
1.43
1.69
255,146
533,593
Unspecified LTIF for company & contractor by region

Region
Company
2012
20072011
Contractor
2012
20072011
2012 (000s)
2012 (000s)
Africa
0.16
0.16
0.26
0.25
44,213
143,181
Asia/Australasia
0.09
0.25
0.13
0.16
46,865
112,400
Europe
0.23
0.64
0.41
1.21
39,696
61,296
FSU
0.25
0.38
0.13
0.34
12,030
23,198
Middle East
0.25
0.23
0.38
0.41
36,103
49,586
North America
0.75
0.25
1.35
0.54
70,603
136,776
South America
0.11
0.17
0.12
0.40
8,844
17,164
All regions
0.33
0.33
0.52
0.37
258,354
543,601
OGP
B-13
Section 5 Results by company

Company
code
B-14
Company & Contractor

FAR

TRIR
Company only
TRIR

LTIF
Company only
LTIF
3.25
3.81
1.62
1.27
2.47
3.81
1.23
3.83
2.56
1.19
0.99
3.17
4.17
2.21
1.11
0.86
4.12
2.55
1.03
0.71
11.31
3.28
2.35
0.99
0.78
4.14
2.82
0.94
1.10
4.14
2.10
0.92
1.05
2.98
0.61
0.85
0.24
1.79
1.09
0.82
0.55
1.40
1.88
1.22
0.80
0.72
0.73
3.30
1.94
0.79
0.63
3.86
1.32
0.75
0.59
2.25
2.84
0.47
0.71
0.26
2.16
0.68
0.70
0.34
4.45
1.41
0.70
2.77
2.00
0.69
0.67
3.02
1.38
0.62
0.23
3.37
3.00
0.35
0.61
0.17
3.42
1.08
0.59
2.64
1.58
0.54
1.03
1.04
0.51
1.04
4.40
0.49
Overall
2.38
1.74
1.12
0.48
0.47
6.26
1.56
1.16
0.44
3.39
0.42
AA
1.52
1.50
0.41
0.56
BB
1.95
0.52
0.41
0.26
CC
2.59
1.41
0.53
0.41
0.15
DD
0.83
0.97
0.54
0.39
0.28
EE
0.76
0.38
FF
1.69
1.40
0.78
0.34
0.33
GG
5.15
0.88
0.63
0.34
0.33
HH
1.37
0.55
0.15
0.32
0.07
II
1.37
1.48
0.50
0.31
0.07
JJ
1.96
2.07
1.57
0.29
0.30
KK
1.16
1.19
1.38
0.27
0.30
LL
0.65
1.60
0.70
0.27
0.10
MM
4.88
3.72
0.21
0.62
NN
1.87
1.84
0.19
0.26
OO
1.40
0.73
0.56
0.15
PP
2.25
0.88
2.14
0.13
0.29
QQ
1.16
0.96
0.71
0.12
0.05
RR
2.08
0.12
SS
1.41
0.33
0.15
0.04
0.14
TT
UU
0.34
0.29
VV
OGP
Total recordable injury rate by function

Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Company
code
Company &
Contractor
Company
code
Company &
Contractor
Company
code
Company &
Contractor
Company
code
Company &
Contractor
10.97
12.9
9.07
9.90
10.28
MM
8.23
5.97
8.67
8.33
7.45
5.91
5.17
7.68
7.27
5.39
4.95
6.49
PP
6.83
MM
5.02
3.94
6.14
6.09
4.73
NN
3.89
5.81
4.96
4.48
MM
3.81
5.30
4.86
4.36
3.63
4.02
4.82
3.36
3.63
3.89
4.68
3.36
3.58
NN
2.89
4.66
3.31
2.32
2.62
4.62
3.28
2.15
2.47
4.08
BB
2.92
FF
1.97
CC
2.39
3.96
JJ
2.82
1.88
Overall
2.14
3.72
2.80
1.84
FF
1.95
JJ
3.61
2.63
QQ
1.70
LL
1.81
3.55
2.25
JJ
1.38
1.69
3.47
AA
2.20
DD
1.36
1.64
AA
3.45
2.20
Overall
1.32
1.33
3.25
Overall
1.92
1.28
1.30
RR
3.23
CC
1.86
BB
1.20
QQ
1.14
2.91
NN
1.85
CC
1.17
EE
1.12
LL
2.91
1.76
RR
1.00
1.07
FF
2.75
1.74
AA
0.95
JJ
0.53
Overall
2.59
OO
1.48
0.90
DD
0.44
2.57
1.47
0.87
GG
0.26
2.54
LL
1.39
GG
0.73
AA
2.53
1.37
LL
0.60
BB
NN
2.47
FF
1.24
OO
0.59
HH
BB
2.24
RR
1.19
UU
0.54
MM
GG
2.20
1.14
SS
0.40
OO
DD
2.18
PP
1.06
PP
0.26
PP
CC
1.98
QQ
0.90
HH
TT
HH
1.82
DD
0.75
EE
1.34
GG
0.66
OO
1.30
0.62
KK
1.19
EE
0.49
SS
1.15
HH
0.41
VV
QQ
0.90
UU
0.28
0.83
SS
0.10
OGP
B-15
Database dimensions (Appendix A)

Total exposure hours
Exposure hours by region (000s)

Hours worked (millions)
B-16
2012
2011
Year
Overall
Company
Contractor
Africa
600,478
558,573
1985
656
410
245
Asia/Australasia
741,523
609,466
384,669
344,762
1986
544
306
238
Europe
1987
602
356
247
FSU
363,943
439,420
1988
616
364
253
Middle East
666,915
690,171
560,027
400,902
1989
656
331
325
North America
1990
721
332
389
South America
373,485
412,784
1991
941
441
499
All regions
3,691,040
3,456,078
1992
944
431
513
1993
919
410
509
1994
872
397
475
1995
841
356
485
1996
912
360
551
1997
1,161
389
772
1998
1,131
386
746
1999
1,197
395
802
2000
1,634
572
1062
2001
1,977
633
1,344
2002
2,121
636
1,484
2003
2,247
664
1,583
2004
2,290
639
1,652
2005
2,381
639
1,741
2006
2,937
734
2,203
2007
2,913
668
2,245
2008
3,304
712
2,592
2009
3,586
822
2,764
2010
3,411
726
2,685
2011
3,456
753
2,703
2012
3,691
760
2,931
Exposure hours by function (000s)

2012
2011
Exploration
84,947
74,306
Drilling
672,728
642,462
Production
1,220,365
1,208,473
Construction
911,045
839,178
Unspecified
801,955
691,659
All functions
3,691,040
3,456,078
OGP
Appendix C
Contributing companies
The table below shows the size of the database in thousands of hours worked for each contributing company and
whether reported data include information on contractor statistics, breakdown by function, medical treatment
cases, restricted work day cases, days lost following lost work day and restricted work day cases. All company
submissions include data on numbers of fatalities and lost work day cases.
Company
Hours
(000)
Contractor
data
Data by
function
MTCs
RWDCs
LWDC
days
RWDC days
yes
ADDAX
15,987
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
ADNOC
214,000
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Anadarko
63,063
yes
no
yes
yes
partly
partly
BG Group
89,085
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
BHP
9,727
yes
yes
mostly
mostly
mostly
mostly
BP
154,575
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
Cairn Energy
346
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Chevron
431,173
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
CNOOC
73,128
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
ConocoPhillips
145,946
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
Dolphin Energy
8,909
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
DONG E&P
2,361
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
E.on
2,044
yes
yes
mostly
mostly
partly
partly
Eni
240,395
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
ExxonMobil
254,611
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
GDF Suez E&P International
6,792
yes
no
mostly
mostly
mostly
mostly
Hess Corporation
44,644
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
INPEX
2,892
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kosmos
1,622
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kuwait Oil Company
133,534
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
Maersk Oil
22,775
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
Marathon
30,712
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
partly
MOL
15,698
no
yes
mostly
partly
yes
NCOC
4,122
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
Nexen Inc
30,456
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
mostly
Oil Search
12,877
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
OMV
71,248
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Pan American Energy
17,270
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
Pemex
36,608
yes
yes
no
no
yes
no
Perenco
35,365
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Petrobras
273,294
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd
97,119
yes
yes
mostly
mostly
mostly
mostly
Premier Oil
6,130
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
PTTEP
32,074
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Qatar Petroleum
131,814
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Rasgas
70,686
yes
yes
mostly
mostly
partly
partly
Repsol
29,709
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
RWE Dea AG
5,542
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
SASOL
5,233
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
no
yes
Shell Companies
296,661
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Statoil
93,366
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
Suncor
4,717
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Talisman Energy
52,037
yes
yes
yes
yes
partly
no
TNK-BP
171,788
yes
yes
yes
partly
yes
no
Total
192,973
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Tullow Oil
18,557
yes
yes
mostly
mostly
mostly
mostly
Wintershall
8,546
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Woodside
19,105
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Yemen LNG
9,724
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
yes = reported for all data rows

mostly = reported for more than 50% of data rows
partly = reported for less than 50% of data rows
no - not reported at all
Note: a data row is a single entry for a company for one country and
location (one of company onshore, company offshore, contractor
onshore, contractor offshore), e.g. Acompany, UK, company offshore.
OGP
C-1
C-2
OGP
Appendix D
Countries represented
The tabulation shows the breakdown of reported hours worked in regions and countries. Also shown is the number
of companies reporting data in each country. The table does not necessarily show all hours worked in the exploration
& production sectors of the oil & gas industry in each country.

No. reporting
Hours
Country
companies (000)

No. reporting
Hours
Country
companies (000)
Africa
Europe (continued)
Algeria
11 29,140
Angola
8 77,962
Cameroun 3 8,487
Chad
1 13,423
Congo
3 34,841
Congo (Democratic Republic of) 2
4,726
Egypt
8 59,340
Equatorial Guinea
4
9,352
Ethiopia
1 1,555
Gabon
6 34,444
Ghana
5 8,382
Ivory Coast
2
600
Kenya
3 4,641
Liberia 2 191
Libya
14 18,639
Madagascar 3 488
Mauritiana 4 1,600
Morocco 4 214
Mozambique 5 15,290
Namibia 1 3
Nigeria
9 254,700
Senegal 1 6
Sierra Leone
2
360
South Africa
3
399
Sudan 1 49
Tanzania 3 3,460
Tongo
1 398
Tunisia
6 12,443
Uganda
2 5,345
Greenland 3 587
Hungary 2 5,123
Ireland
2 1,900
Italy
4 14,856
Latvia 1 1
Monaco 1 17
Netherlands 8 20,135
Norway
21 119,060
Poland
8 1,638
Portugal 1 71
Romania
2 49,841
Spain
3 1,555
Switzerland 1 475
UK
27 119,907
Asia/Australasia
Australia
15 101,211
Bangladesh 2 10,062
Brunei
2 1,461
Cambodia 3 42
China
11 96,516
India
3 4,624
Indonesia 18 210,745
Japan
3 1,359
Malaysia
10 132,907
Myanmar 4 8,620
Nepal 1 6
New Zealand
3
644
Pakistan
7 20,029
Papua New Guinea
3
83,693
Philippines 2 5,380
Singapore 4 517
South Korea
4
5,851
Taiwan 1 8
Thailand
7 53,988
Timor Leste
1
7
Vietnam
7 3,853
Europe
Austria
Croatia
Denmark
Faroe Islands
France
Germany
1 2,771
2 9,431
5 11,512
1
273
7 14,643
5 10,873
FSU
Azerbaijan 5 28,465
Kazakhstan 10 135,437
Russia
14 189,509
Turkmenistan 6 9,359
Ukraine 3 282
Uzbekistan 1 891
Middle East
Bahrain 1 106
Iran
5 1,269
Iraq
13 24,368
Israel 1 9
Jordan
3 1,340
Kuwait
5 152,034
Oman
4 4,141
Qatar
9 238,442
Saudi Arabia
1
97
Syria 2 99
Turkey
3 2,297
UAE
11 219,243
Yemen
6 23,470
North America
Canada
Cuba
Mexico
USA
11 106,569
2 556
5 36,981
20 415,921
South America
Argentina 5 26,219
Bolivia
3 9,271
Brazil
13 290,759
Chile
1 159
Colombia 8 8,533
Ecuador 2 6,114
French Guiana
2
1,107
Guatamala 1 2,204
Guyana 1 2
Peru
4 12,958
Surinam 3 175
Trinidad & Tobago
6
11,135
Uruguay 2 91
Venezuela 7 4,758
OGP
D-1
D-2
OGP
Appendix E: Glossary of terms

Assault and violent act (as an incident/
event category)
Cut, puncture, scrape (as an incident/

event category)
Intentional attempt, threat or act of bodily injury by a person

or person(s) or by violent harmful actions of unknown intent,
includes intentional acts of damage to property.
Abrasions, scratches and wounds that penetrate the skin.
Caught in, under or between (as an incident/

event category)
The personnel, equipment and management systems to support

a person who dives. A person Dives if he enters water or any
other liquid, or a chamber in which he is subject to pressure
greater than 100 millibars above atmospheric pressure: and in
order to survive in such an environment he breathes air or other
gas at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. Or for such
a purpose uses a vehicle, capsule or suit where a sealed internal
atmospheric pressure is maintained and where the external
pressure differential is greater than 100 millibars.
Diving operations
Injury where injured person is crushed or similarly injured

between machinery moving parts or other objects, caught
between rolling tubulars or objects being moved, crushed
between a ship and a dock, or similar incidents. Also includes
vehicle incidents involving a rollover.
Company employee
Any person employed by and on the payroll of the reporting
Company, including corporate and management personnel
specifically involved in E&P. Persons employed under shortservice contracts are included as Company employees provided
they are paid directly by the Company.
Confined space (as an incident/

event category)
Spaces that are considered confined because their
configurations hinder the activities of employee who must
enter, work in, and exit them. Confined spaces include, but are
not limited to underground vaults, tanks, storage bins,
manholes, pits, silos, process vessels and pipelines.
Construction (as a work function)

Major construction, fabrication activities and also disassembly,
removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the
facility life. Includes construction of process plant, yard
construction of structures, offshore installation, hook-up and
commissioning, and removal of redundant process facilities.
decommissioning (as a type of activity)
Activities involving the construction, fabrication and
installation of equipment, facilities or plant, testing activities to
verify design objectives or specification, and also disassembly,
removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the
facility life.
Diving, subsea, ROV (as a type of activity)

Operations involving diving (see definition for diving
operations), subsea equipment or activities and/or operations
involving underwater remotely operated vehicles (ROV).
Drilling (as a work function)

All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and workover
as well as their administrative, engineering, construction,
materials supply and transportation aspects. It includes site
preparation, rigging up and down and restoration of the
drilling site upon work completion. Drilling includes ALL
exploration, appraisal and production drilling.
Drilling/workover/well services (as a type of

activity)
Activities involving the development, maintenance work or
remedial treatments related to an oil or gas well.
Event
An unplanned or uncontrolled outcome of a business operation
or activity that has or could have contributed to an injury,
illness, physical or environmental damage.
Exploration (as a work function)

Geophysical, seismographic and geological operations,
including their administrative and engineering aspects,
construction, maintenance, materials supply, and
transportation of personnel and equipment; excludes drilling.
Explosion or burn (as an incident/event

category)
Contractor
A Contractor is defined as an individual or organisation
performing work for the reporting company, following
verbal or written agreement. Sub-contractor is synonymous
with Contractor.
Burns or other effects of fires, explosions and extremes of

temperature. Explosion means a rapid combustion, not an
overpressure.
Contractor employee
Any person employed by a Contractor or Contractors SubContractor(s) who is directly involved in execution of
prescribed work under a contract with the reporting Company.
Exposure: electrical (as an incident/event

category)
Exposure to electrical shock or electrical burns etc.
OGP
E-1
Exposure: noise, chemical, biological,

vibration (as an incident/event category)
Key performance indicators (KPI)
Exposure to noise, chemical substances (including asphyxiation

due to lack of oxygen not associated with a confined space),
hazardous biological material, vibration or radiation.
In this report, these include: number of fatalities, fatal

accident and incident rates, lost time injury frequency,
restricted work day case + lost time injury frequency and total
recordable injury rate.
Lost time injury (LTI)
Falls from height (as an incident/event

category)
A fatality or lost work day case. The number of LTIs is the sum
of fatalities and lost work day cases.
A person falls from one level to another.

The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100,000,000
(100 million) hours worked.
The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day

cases) incidents per 1,000,000 hours worked.
Fatality
Any work related injury other than a fatal injury which results
in a person being unfit for work on any day after the day of
occurrence of the occupational injury. Any day includes rest
days, weekend days, leave days, public holidays or days after
ceasing employment.
Cases that involve one or more people who died as a result of a

work-related incident or occupational illness.
First aid case

Cases that are not sufficiently serious to be reported as
medical treatment or more serious cases but nevertheless
require minor first aid treatment, e.g. dressing on a minor cut,
removal of a splinter from a finger. First aid cases are not
recordable incidents.
LWDC severity
The average number of lost days per lost work day case.
High potential event
Maintenance, inspection and testing (as a

type of activity)
Any incident or near miss that could have realistically resulted

in one or more fatalities.
Activities related to preserving, repairing, examining and

function testing assets, equipment, plant or facilities.
Hours worked
Medical cause of death
The actual hours worked, including overtime hours, are

recorded in the case of onshore operations. The hours worked
by an individual will generally be about 2,000 per year. For
offshore workers, the hours worked are calculated on a 12
hour work day. Consequently, average hours worked per year
will vary from 1,600 to 2,300 hours per person depending
upon the on/off shift ratio. Vacations and leaves are excluded.
This is the cause of death given on the death certificate. Where

two types of causes are provided, such as pulmonary oedema
caused by inhalation of hot gases from a fire, both are
recorded.
Medical treatment case (MTC)

Cases that are not severe enough to be reported as fatalities or
lost work day cases or restricted work day cases but are more
severe than requiring simple first aid treatment.
Hours worked in year (000s)

Hours are rounded to the nearest thousand.
Near miss
Incident
An unplanned or uncontrolled event or chain of events that has

not resulted in recordable injury, illness, physical or
environmental damage but had the potential to do so in other
circumstances.
An unplanned or uncontrolled Event or chain of Events that

has resulted in at least one fatality, recordable injury or illness,
or physical or environmental damage.
Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations (as a

type of activity)
Activities related to the use of mechanical lifting and hoisting
equipment, assembling and dis-assembling drilling rig
equipment and drill pipe handling on the rig floor.
Number of days unfit for work

The sum total of calendar days (consecutive or otherwise) after
the days of the occupational injuries on which the employees
involved were unfit for work and did not work.
Number of employees
Average number of full-time and part-time employees involved
in exploration & production, calculated on a full-time basis,
during the reporting year.
E-2
OGP
Process safety event (PSE)
The total number of Companys employees and or Contractors

employees who died as a result of an incident. Delayed deaths
that occur after the incident are included if the deaths were a
direct result of the incident. For example, if a fire killed one
person outright, and a second died three weeks later from lung
damage caused by the fire, both are reported.
A process safety event, which can also be referred to as an asset

integrity event, is a Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) and
is recordable if:
the consequence was a reportable employee or contractor
injury or fatality, a third party hospital admission or fatality,
a community or site evacuation or a fire / explosion; or
a pressure relief device discharge or material release occurs
which exceeded defined thresholds (even if none of the
consequences above occurred)
as specified within OGP report 456, Process safety
recommended practice on key performance indicators which
provides consequence and threshold definitions consistent
with API Recommended Practice No.754 http://www.ogp.
org.uk/pubs/456.pdf, the supplement to this report provides
Process Safety Upstream PSE examples http://www.ogp.org.uk/
pubs/456supp.pdf.
Occupational injury
Any injury such as a cut, fracture, sprain, amputation, etc., or
any fatality, which results from a work-related activity or from
an exposure involving a single incident in the work
environment, such as deafness from explosion, one-time
chemical exposure, back disorder from a slip / trip, insect or
snake bite.

(as a type of activity)
Production (as a work function)
Activities related to work conducted in offices, warehouses,

workshops, accommodation and catering facilities.
Offshore work
All activities and operations that take place at sea, including
activities in bays, in major inland seas such as the Caspian Sea,
or in other inland seas directly connected to oceans. Incidents
including transportation of people and equipment from shore
to the offshore location, either by vessel or helicopter, should be
recorded as offshore.
Onshore work
All activities and operations that take place within a landmass,
including those on swamps, rivers and lakes. Land-to-land
aircraft operations are counted as onshore, even though flights
are over water.
Other (as an incident/event category)

Used used to specify where an incident cannot be logically
classed under any other category. In the case of incident
activities, includes air transport incidents.
Note: the work function Other was replaced by construction for
the first time in 2006.
Overexertion or strain (as an incident/

event category)
Physical overexertion e.g. muscle strain
Pressure release (as an incident/

event category)
Failure of or release of gas, liquid or object from a
pressurised system.
Petroleum and natural gas producing operations, including

their administrative and engineering aspects, minor
construction, repairs, maintenance and servicing, materials
supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment. It
covers all mainstream production operations including
wireline. Gas processing activities with the primary intent of
producing gas liquids for sale including;
work on production wells under pressure
oil (including condensates) and gas extraction and
separation (primary production)
heavy oil production where it is inseparable from upstream
(i.e. stream assisted gravity drainage) production
primary oil processing (water separation, stabilisation)
primary gas processing (dehydration, liquids separation,
sweetening, CO2 removal)
Floating Storage Units (FSUs) and sub-sea storage units
gas processing activities with the primary intent of
producing gas liquids for sale
secondary liquid separation (i.e. Natural Gas Liquids
[NGL] extraction using refrigeration processing)
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and Gas to Liquids
(GTL) operations
flow-lines between wells and pipelines between facilities
associated with field production operations
oil and gas loading facilities including land or marine
vessels (trucks and ships) when connected to an oil or gas
production process
pipeline operations (including booster stations) operated by
company E&P business
Production excludes:
production drilling or workover
mining processes associated with the extraction of heavy oil
tar sands
heavy oil when separable from upstream operations
secondary heavy oil processing (upgrader)
refineries
OGP
E-3
Production operations (as a type of activity)
Transport air (as a type of activity)
Activities related to the extraction of hydrocarbons from source

such as an oil or gas well or hydrocarbon bearing geological
structure, including primary processing, storage and transport
operations. Includes normal, start-up or shut-down operations.
Involving aircraft, either fixed wing or helicopters. Injuries

caused by accidents on the ground at airports are classified in
one of the other categories.
Recordable
A type of event, incident, injury, illness, release or other
outcome which has been determined to meet or exceed
definitions, criteria or thresholds for inclusion and classification
in reported data.
Restricted work day case (RWDC)

Any work-related injury other than a fatality or lost work day
case which results in a person being unfit for full performance
of the regular job on any day after the occupational injury.
Work performed might be:
an assignment to a temporary job;
part-time work at the regular job;
working full-time in the regular job but not performing all
the usual duties of the job
Where no meaningful restricted work is being performed, the
incident is recorded as a lost work day case (LWDC).
Transport land (as a type of activity)

Involving motorised vehicles designed for transporting people
and goods over land, e.g. cars, buses, trucks. Pedestrians struck
by a vehicle are classified as land transport incidents. Incidents
from a mobile crane would only be land transport incidents if
the crane were being moved between locations.
Transport water, including Marine Activity

(as a type of activity)
Involving vessels, equipment or boats designed for transporting
people and goods over water (including inland, marine, ice
roads and marsh/swamp) e.g. supply vessels, crew boats.
Unspecified other (as a type of activity)

Incidents that cannot be logically classed under other headings
or where the activity is unknown.
Unspecified (as a work function)

Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with office
personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot be
reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the
function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or
construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel
such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where
work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular
function. All other data that are not separated out by function
are reported as unspecified.
Seismic/survey operations (as a type

of activity)
Activities relating to the determination of sub-surface
structures for the purpose of locating oil and gas deposits
including geophysical and seismic data acquisition.
Slips and trips (at the same height) (as an

incident/event category)
Slips, trips and falls caused by falling over or onto something at
the same height.
Struck by (as an incident/event category)

Incidents/events where injury results from being hit by moving
equipment and machinery, or by flying or falling objects. Also
includes vehicle incidents where the vehicle is struck by or
struck against another object.
Water related/drowning (as an incident/

event category)
Incidents/events in which water played a significant role
including drowning.
Work-related injury
See occupational injury.
Third party
A person with no business relationship with the company
or contractor.

The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day
cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per
1,000,000 hours worked.
E-4
OGP
For further information and publications,

please visit our website at
www.ogp.org.uk
209-215 Blackfriars Road

London SE1 8NL
United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7633 0272
Fax: +44 (0)20 7633 2350
International
Association
of Oil & Gas
Producers
165 Bd du Souverain
4th Floor
B-1160 Brussels, Belgium
Telephone: +32 (0)2 566 9150
Fax: +32 (0)2 566 9159
Internet site: www.ogp.org.uk
e-mail: reception@ogp.org.uk

Safety Performance Indicator 2012s

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Safety Performance Indicator 2012s

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 2012 DATA

Report No. 2012s

OGP DATA SERIES

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

Consistent high quality database and guidelines

Internationally recognised source of industry information

OGP safety performance indicators

Corrections to Executive Summary

Corrections to page 2-5

Correction to contributing companies list

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

Safety performance indicators 2012 data

company. A code is used to preserve the anonymity of the

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

The safety statistics for 2012 were derived from data

Contributing OGP Members

Safety performance indicators 2012 data

1.1 General................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1

Overall company results.....................................................................................................................................................................5-1

Appendix A: Database dimensions

Appendix B: Data tables

Appendix C: Contributing companies

Appendix D: Countries represented

Appendix E: Glossary of terms

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

Safety performance indicators 2012 data

Forty work force fatalities were identified as being related

Fig 2.1.1: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate

FAR - Fatal accidents per 100 million hours worked

Analysis of the fatal incident description has shown that

Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate

The 2012 OGP safety performance indicators show that the

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

Fatal accident rate (FAR)

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

Safety performance indicators 2012 data

work hours contractor

work hours company

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

Water related, drowning 1.1%

Confined space 2.3%

Caught in, under or between 18.2%

Transport air 2.3%

The reported fatalities are divided into activity and

Fatality activities, 2012

Against the background of a 7% increase in work hours

Fatalities categorised as Caught in, under or between were

Unspecified other 2.3%

Seismic/survey operations 2.3%

Transport land 10.5%

Safety performance indicators 2012 data

The Fatal Accident Rate for North America (7.5) is high

Fatal accident rate - company and contractors

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

1.3 Total recordable injuries

The rate for all recordable injuries (fatalities, lost workday

The region that showed an increase in TRIR compared with

Safety performance indicators 2012 data

1.4 Lost time injuries

Lost time injury frequency company & contractors

Lost work day cases by category [data page B-3]

Exposure electrical 0.7%

Exposure noise, chemical,

Confined space 0.1%