Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
4th Grade
Alice Beal Elementary School
Springfield, MA
September 26th-October 25th
Linnea Borjestedt
Grade Level 4
Unit Outcomes
Reference
MA
CF
Standards
by number
Assessments
MA CF
5.1
MA CF
5.1
MA CF
5.6
MA CF
5.2
MA CF
5.5
MA CF
5.2
Day 2
Day 3
Focus/Outcomes/Essential
Qs:
Focus/Outcomes/Essential
Qs :
Focus/Outcomes/Essential
Qs :
Supplies/Materials/Technol
ogy
Smart board
Words to build
sentences
Hula hoops
Supplies/Materials/Technol
ogy
Smart board
Bullying form
Worksheet for
homework
Learning activities
including
pedagogical strategies :
Learning activities
including
pedagogical strategies:
Supplies/Materials/Technolo
gy:
Homework Sheets
Smart board
Types of bullying
chart
Empathy
brainstorming flow
chart on smart board
Bulling scenarios
Assessment(s):
The students will be given a
homework assignment that
will be graded as a test.
The students will be asked:
Why do you think its
important for us to
Brainstorm ways to
handle and manage
emotions
Define the
difference between
a bystander and an
upstander
Anti-Bullying
sentence builder
Assessment(s):
The students will be given
a word search with
different words to know
about emotional
management and a
bystander.
Assessment(s):
The students will be given
a sheet. They will
unscramble the words to
reveal adults in the school
that they can trust an
report to.
Supplies/Materials/Technolo
gy:
Posters
Walk to school
Pledge to make a
difference in your
community
Be an upstander
Assessment(s):
The students will walk to
school and sign a pledge to
make a difference in their
community.
Grading Policy
Effort (70%)- Student comes to class prepared everyday in school
uniform. The student actively participates in every activity. The
student follows all directions and responds to the teacher signals.
Skill (10%)- Student shows the ability to perform daily tasks/activities.
Students show improvement throughout the unit.
Knowledge (20%)- Student correctly completes written/oral
assessments of the basics of anti-bullying.
5- Outstanding: Student comes to class prepared with proper attire
and follows all class rules and expectations. Student excels in all three
domains or shows major improvement throughout the unit. Student
respects the teacher, classmates, and all equipment.
4- Good: Student comes prepared to class 90% of the time and follows
class rules and expectations. Student respects all other students, the
teacher, and equipment. Student shows significant improvement
throughout the unit or excels in all three domains.
3- Average: Student comes prepared to class 80% of the time.
Students behavior is inconsistent but shows effort most of the time.
The student shows some improvement or performs in all three
domains.
2- Below Average: Student does not come to class prepared on a
consistent basis. Student is disruptive and does not show full effort
throughout the unit. Student shows little improvement and does not
perform in all three domains.
Daily Observation
Students are scored daily on a scale of 1-5.
5- Outstanding: Student comes prepared to class and follows all rules
and expectations. The student always responds to teachers signals
and actively participates in each lesson.
4- Good: Student comes prepared for class and follows all rules and
expectations. The student responds to teachers signals most of the
time and participates in most activities.
3- Average: Student comes to class prepared. Student does not
consistently follow class rules and expectations. The student responds
to teachers signals most of the time and participates in most
activities.
2- Below Average: Student comes to class prepared and does not
follow class rules and expectations for most of the lesson. The student
does not respond to teachers signals and has to be reminded
frequently of them. The student participates in some of the activities.
1- Unsatisfactory: Student comes to class prepared but does not
follow class rules. The student has to be sat out frequently. The
student participates in some of the activities.
0- No Participation: The student is unprepared for class and does not
fill out the unprepared student evaluation.
DATE: 10/4/2016
TIME: 40 mins
LESSON#: 1
FACILITIES: Gymnasium
CLASS SIZE: 25
GRADE: 3-5
EQUIPMENT:
3.) Invitations
http://www.shapeamerica.org/standards/health/
SEQUENCE OF LESSON
1 min
Students will enter the gymnasium and line up on the green line.
3 mins
10 mins
11 mins
23 mins
24 mins
34 mins
35 mins
ORGANIZATION
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
T
X
^
X
^ X
X
T
X
X^
X
^
X
X X
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
T
T
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
will move students based on their shirt color (light blue, white,
dark blue).
38 mins
39 mins
40 mins
Closure:
Assessments:
Affective: The teacher will be assessing students behavior
throughout the lesson. At the end of the lesson the teacher will
ask students how they thought they behaved during the lesson.
Cognitive: Identify the reasons why we walk to school.
Behavioral: Explain how you could change your schedule at
home to be able to walk to school.
-Why is it important to be an upstander? How can you be an
upstander in your community?
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
T
T
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Results of Assessment
During the course of the four-day bullying unit I used a variety of
assessments. I carried these assessments our for the fourth grade
students. My primary assessment was homework given out to the
students. The assessments I used were written homework, word
searches, unscramble words, and taking a pledge to not bully. I could
not compare each student to each other so I had to use a variety of
assessments to meet the needs of all of my learners. I was able to see
how my students grew and learned throughout the course of the unit. I
tried to focus on all three domains behavioral, cognitive, and affective.
I had students complete a word search during the unit. This
helped my students because it gave them an enjoyable way to look for
key words. There were many key words that students should have
found such as upstander and bystander. This should also have
prompted students to remember what each word meant when filling
out the worksheet. For a future lesson I could have my students pick
out three of the key words and use them in a sentence as well as the
word search. This would have helped me check for student
understanding of the key words.
I chose to give a written homework as my measure of student
learning. Students were assessed during the intro of the lesson to see
what they knew about bullying. Many students knew the basics of
what bullying was. No one in the class raised their hand to answer
what empathy was. The students were asked two questions:
Why do you think its important for us to see the world through
the other persons eyes?
What happens when we dont take the time to consider someone
elses feelings or point of view?
They had to use the information that they learned in class in order to
answer the questions. During the lesson I went over what bullying
was, what empathy was, and how to use empathy in their life. The
students were told that this homework assignment was going to be
graded as a test and was due the next day. They were also told that
they needed to use three to four sentences for each answer.
The results of the assessment shocked me. There were a few
students who brought back their work on time and were completed
using three to four sentences. Out of the 20 students in room 10, 14
were completed and well done, three were handed in on time but
lacked effort, and three were not handed in. In room 10 70% of
students had a high measure of learning, 15% had a medium measure
of learning, and 15% had a low measure of learning. Out of the 22
students in room 6, seven were completed using three to four
sentences, five were handed in on time but lacked effort, and ten were
not handed in. In room 6, 32% of students had a high measure of
Room 10
Low; 15%
High
Medium
Medium; 15%
Low
High; 70%
Room 6
High; 32%
Low; 45%
High
Medium
Low
Medium; 23%
References
Anti-Bullying Curriculum, Springfield Public Schools
Graham, G., Holt-Hale, S A., & Parker, M. (2013). Children moving: A
reflective approach to teaching physical education (9th ed.). New
York, New York: McCraw Hill.
Joint Committee on National Health Education Standards. (2007).
National Health Education Standards, Second Edition: Achieving
Excellence. Washington, D.C.: The American Cancer Society.
Ludwig, T., & Prevost, M. (2008). Trouble talk. Berkeley: Tricycle Press.
Massachusetts comprehensive health curriculum framework. (1999).
Malden, MA: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Dept. of
Education.