Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Composite Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct
BLK 301, #09-64 Jurong East Street 32, Singapore 600301, Singapore
Department of Innovation Engineering, University of Salento, Via per Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
DICAM Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento, 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 8 August 2016
Accepted 28 August 2016
Available online 31 August 2016
Keywords:
Vibration
Thermal buckling
FGM
FSDT
FEM
a b s t r a c t
This paper is aimed at studying the free vibration and thermal buckling behavior of moderately thick
functionally graded material (FGM) structures including plates, cylindrical panels and shells under thermal environments. A numerical investigation is performed by applying the finite element method (FEM).
A formulation based on the first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT) is proposed for the purpose,
which considers the effects of the transverse shear strain and rotary inertia. A graded concept is
employed to allow the material property to vary gradually inside the elements. The proposed FGM
structures are characterized by two constituents (ceramic and metal) whose material properties are
dependent on the temperature and vary continuously throughout the thickness according to a power
law distribution proportional to the volume fraction of the constituents. Two different sets of power
law distribution are used to describe the volume fraction of the constituents, based on a single, or four
parameters. Based on a parametric analysis, we demonstrate the potentials of the proposed method
through its comparison with results available from the literature and by means of a convergence study.
Several numerical examples are further presented to investigate the effects of material compositions,
geometrical parameters, specified thermal loading and boundary conditions on the free vibration and
thermal buckling behavior of these structures. The effect of initial thermal stresses on the vibration
behavior is also investigated for plate and shell structures.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Structural elements such as plates, cylindrical panels and shells
are widely used in civil, marine and offshore engineering. In addition to the respect to fatigue requirements, these structures also
need to satisfy the dynamic and stability requirements [1]. The
application of coatings in marine and offshore engineering is
becoming even more popular in order to protect structures against
thermal environments, which can significantly influence the
mechanical properties of the materials and structures. Because of
severe service conditions and greater expectations on the life time,
thermal stability and durability of these structures are the major
concern for the industry [2]. Thus, it is crucial to understand the
vibration and thermal buckling characteristics in designing these
structures [3]. Due to such adverse operating conditions, the marine and offshore structures should have, in good balance, enough
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: francesco.tornabene@unibo.it (F. Tornabene).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.037
0263-8223/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
208
8 9
>
<u >
=
8
9
>
< zwx >
=
v
v 0 zwy Hqe
>
>
>
: >
:
:
; >
;
; >
w
w0
0
8
9
>
< u0 >
=
fqe g fu0
v0
w0
wx
wy gT ;
3
1 0 0 z 0
6
7
H 4 0 1 0 0 z 5
0 0 1 0 0
209
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the FGM plate and (b) nodal displacements and grading scheme.
Fig. 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the FGM cylindrical panel, (b) nodal displacements and grading scheme and (c) schematic diagram of the FGM cylindrical shell.
8
9
>
< ex >
=
ey
>
:c >
;
xy
8 @u
0
>
>
< @x
9
>
>
=
@v 0
@y
>
>
>
: @u0 @ v 0 >
;
@y
8 0 9
>
< ex >
=
@x
8
9
>
< kx >
=
feg e0y
z ky ;
>
>
>
>
: 0 ;
:
;
kxy
cxy
8 @wx
>
@x
>
< @w
9
>
>
=
@y
>
>
: @wx
>
;
@wy >
@y
cyz
cxz
( @w
@y
@w0
@x
wy
wx
)
;
A B
B
"
D
fe0 g
fkg
"
fNT g
fM T g
#
;
fQ g ASij fc0 g;
where feg0 is the mid-plane strain vector, fkg is the mid-plane curvature vector, and fc0 g is the transverse shear strain vector. The
membrane stress resultants fNg and the bending stress resultants
fMg for the FGM plate under thermal environments can be related
to fe0 g and fkg through the constitutive relations given by
8
9
>
< Nx >
=
Ny
Aij fe0 g Bij fkg fNT g;
>
>
:
;
Nxy
3
)
c0yz
;
c0xz
fNg
fMg
@x
(
fcg
8
9
>
< Mx >
=
My
Bij fe0 g Dij fkg fM T g;
>
>
:
;
M xy
3 2
32 0 3 2 T 3
A B 0
fNg
fe g
fN g
6
7 6 B D 0 76
7 6
7
fMg
fkg
4
5 4
5 4 fMT g 5;
54
fQg
fc0 g
0 0 AS
f0g
10
where the matrices Aij ; Bij and Dij (i, j = 1,2,6) refer to the extensional, bending-extensional and bending stiffness coefficients.
These coefficients are defined as
fAij ;
Bij ;
Dij g
l Z
X
k1
hk
hk1
Q f1;
z;
z2 gdz
11
210
fASij g S
l Z
X
hk
Q dz
12
hk1
k1
6
m1 V f 1 m2 V f 2
:
hk
hk1
14
where Tz is the temperature rise and fagk is the vector of the coefficients of a linear thermal expansion in the kth layer for the FGM
plate consisting of a certain number of layers. The displacement
components are approximated by the product of the shape function
matrix Si and the nodal displacement vector as follows
fqg
4
X
Si fqei g
15
i1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
Q 66
Q 44
Q 55
19
Q 11 Q 22
13
k1
Q 12
Q 22
Q 11
6
6 Q 21
6
fQg 6
60
6
40
Q 66
Ez; T
;
1 m2 z; T
Ez; T
;
21 mz; T
Q 12
mz; TEz; T
;
1 m2 z; T
20
Q 44 Q 55 Q 66 ;
21
where E is the Youngs modulus and m is the Poissons ratio. The displacement field considered in this study is based on the FSDT and is
represented in the following form
8 9
>
>
<u =
8
9
>
< zwx >
=
v
v 0 zwh ;
>
>
>
: >
:
:
; >
;
; >
w
w0
0
8
9
>
>
< u0 =
22
where u0 ; v 0 and w0 are the displacement components of the midsurface along the axial, circumferential, and radial directions,
respectively, while wx and wh refer to the slope in the x-z and h-z
planes. The kinematic relationships between strains and displacements for a cylindrical panel or shell are
8
9
8
9
@ 2 w0
>
>
@u0
>
>
2
>
>
>
>
@x
ex
>
>
>
>
< @x
<
=
=
2
@
w
@
v
1
0
0
@
v
eh 1R @h0 w0 z R2 @h2 @h
;
>
> >
>
>
2
>
:
>
>
: @ v 0 1 @u0 >
>
;
>
cxh ; >
>
>
: 1 2@ w0 @ v 0 ;
R @h
@x
8
>
<
9
>
=
cxz
chz
wx
wh
@w0
@x
@w
1
0
vR0
R @h
@x@h
23
@x
)
:
24
frg fQ gfeg:
16
The stress vector, strain vector, and reduced stiffness matrix are
defined as
frgT frx
fegT fex
17
18
fNx
Nh
fM x
Mh
Nxh g
h=2
h=2
Z
Mxh g
frx
h=2
h=2
rh sxh gdz
frx
25
rh sxh gzdz
26
Z
fQ xz
Q hz g
h=2
h=2
Sfsxz
shz gdz
27
8
9 2
Nx >
A11
>
>
>
>
>
6 A21
>
>
>
>
N
h
6
>
>
>
>
>
> 6
>
60
>
>
Nxh >
>
>
>
>
6
>
<M >
= 6B
x
6 11
6
>
6 B21
M
h >
>
>
>
>
6
>
>
>
>
60
>
>
Mxh >
>
6
>
>
>
>
6
>
>
>
>
40
Q
>
>
xz
>
>
:
;
0
Q hz
A12
B11
B12
A22
B21
B22
A66
B66
B12
D11
D12
B22
D21
D22
B66
D66
A66
A66
38
ex 9
>
>
>
>
>
7>
>
eh >
>
7>
>
>
>
>
7>
>c >
>
7>
>
xh >
>
>
7>
<k >
=
7>
x
7
7
>
7>
> kh >
>
7>
>
>
>
7>
>
>
7>
> kxh >
>
>
7>
>
>
>
5> cxz >
>
>
>
:
;
chz
28
where Aij ; Bij , and Dij (i, j = 1, 2 and 6) are the extensional, coupled
and bending stiffness, respectively. The stressstrain relation for a
211
8
rx
>
>
>
>
>
>
< rh
9
>
>
>
>
>
>
=
Q 11
6
6 Q 21
6
sxh 6
60
>
>
>
>
6
>
>
s
>
>
xz
>
> 40
>
>
:
;
0
shz
Q 12
Q 22
Q 66
Q 44
91
9 8
308
ex >
a x DT >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>C
>
7B> e >
>
>
> >
0 7B>
a h DT >
>
>
>
h >
<
<
=C
=
7B
C
7
C
B
0 7B cxh 0
C
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
7B>
C
>
>
>
cxz >
0
0 5@>
>
>
A
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
:
;
; :
chz
0
Q 55
0
29
where rx and rh are the normal stresses and sxh is the in-plane
shear stresses. ex and eh are the normal strains and cxh is the inplane shear strain. The coefficient of thermal expansion in the
two principal directions (x; h) is ax and ah . DT is the temperature
variation from a stress-free state. The displacement components
are approximated by the product of the shape function matrix Si
and the nodal displacement vector: fu0i ; v 0i ; w0i ; wxi ; wyi gT . The
procedure for calculating the structural stiffness matrix and mass
matrix of each element includes the transverse shear deformation
as in [44]. All the details about the finite element formulation can
be found in [44]. By applying the main concepts of [42] for the plate,
we compute the geometric stiffness matrix and thermal load vector
for the cylindrical panels and shells for our study.
Eq. (32). On the other hand, the bottom surface of the structure is
rich of metal, whereas the top surface is rich of ceramic by setting
a = 1 and b = 0 in Eq. (33). One can get various power-law distribution profiles by modifying the parameters a; b; c and p. Additionally, a single-parameter power law distribution [42] is proposed
here to understand the influence of various power law functions
for the given constituents of volume fraction on the thermal buckling and vibration behavior
n
FGM3 : V c 2z h=2h ;
34
35
36
37
38
c p
39
FGM2
P P0 P1 T 1 1 P1 T P 2 T 2 P3 T 3 ;
30
Peff P c V c Pm V m 1;
31
40
41
42
FGM3
n
E Ec Em 2z h=2h Em ;
43
q qc qm 2z h=2hn qm ;
44
p
45
m mc mm 2z h=2hn mm ;
46
d
dTz
Kz
0
dz
dz
c p
32
c p
33
47
c p
48
c p
49
212
FGM3
n
K K c K m 2z h=2h K m ;
50
Fig. 3. A typical FGM (a) plate, (b) cylindrical panel and (c) shell.
213
P 1
P0
P1
P2
P3
Zirconia
Al2 O3
Ti-6Al-4V
0
0
0
244.27e9
349.55e9
122.56e9
1.317e3
3.853e4
4.586e3
1.214e6
4.027e7
0
3.681e10
1.673e10
0
Zirconia
Al2 O3
Ti-6Al-4V
0
0
0
0.2882
0.2600
0.2884
1.133e4
0
1.121e4
0
0
0
0
0
0
qkg=m3
Zirconia
Al2 O3
Ti-6Al-4V
0
0
0
5700.0
3750.0
4429.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a1=k
Zirconia
Al2 O3
Ti-6Al-4V
0
0
0
12.766e6
6.826e6
7.578e6
1.491e3
1.838e4
6.638e4
1.006e5
0
3.147e6
6.778e11
0
0
KW=mK
Zirconia
Al2 O3
Ti-6Al-4V
0
1123.6
0
1.70
14.087
1.0
1.276e4
6.227e3
1.704e2
6.648e-8
0
0
0
0
0
EN=m2
Table 2
Convergence study for varying mesh refinements of a FGM Al/Alumina plate.
Power law index
20 20
30 30
40 40
50 50
n=1
22.74
21.66
21.52
21.43
21.43
Table 3
Convergence study for varying number of layers of a FGM Al/Alumina plate.
Power law index
n=1
10 layers
15 layers
20 layers
25 layers
21.56
21.41
21.38
21.37
21.37
Table 4
Convergence study for varying size of elements of a FGM Al/Zirconia cylindrical shell.
Power law index
30
40
50
n=1
150.22
150.20
150.19
150.19
Table 5
Convergence study for varying number of layers of a FGM Al/Zirconia cylindrical shell.
Power law index
n=1
10 layers
15 layers
20 layers
150.20
150.19
150.18
150.18
214
Table 6
Comparative critical buckling temperature rise (DT cr ) for an Al/Alumina FGM plate.
n0
n 0:5
n1
n2
n5
BCs
a=h
Present
[17]
Present
[17]
Present
[17]
Present
[17]
Present
[17]
SSSS
50
100
70.1
17.5
67.9
17.3
39.7
9.9
38.2
9.8
32.3
8.0
31.1
7.9
28.3
7.1
29.6
6.9
28.7
7.2
29.6
7.4
CCCC
50
100
186.3
46.8
175.8
44.1
105.7
26.5
99.1
24.8
86.0
21.5
82.3
20.7
75.4
18.9
71.0
18.4
76.4
19.2
74.56
19.1
Table 7
Comparative results in terms of buckling temperature rise (DT cr ) with respect to
power-law index for FGM cylindrical shells.
Power law
index, n
0.0
0.5
1
2
5
TD
Present
[49]
[50]
Present
[49]
[50]
80.2
94.2
99.2
108.2
125.4
36.4
81.6
88.8
117.2
143.3
86.6
106.5
118.4
132.4
150.2
78.9
87.1
92.5
101.1
116.0
32.3
58.6
79.4
97.0
125.6
82.2
99.8
110.2
122.2
137.1
Table 8
Comparative results in terms of natural frequency of FG cylindrical panel (CFFF) as a function of the power-law index. a 0:8; b 0:2; c 3.
FGM type
FGM 2
Mode no.
1
2
3
4
p0
p1
p5
p 50
Present
[36]
Present
[36]
Present
[36]
Present
[36]
61.5
95.9
151.2
243.0
61.0
94.8
153.1
241.4
61.0
94.7
151.2
241.7
60.0
93.4
150.4
237.6
61.5
95.9
151.2
243.0
61.0
94.8
153.1
241.4
61.0
94.7
151.2
241.7
60.0
93.4
150.4
237.6
Table 9
Comparative results in terms of natural frequency of FG cylinder (CF) as a function of the power-law index. a 1; b 0:5; c 2.
FGM type
FGM 2
Mode No.
1
2
3
4
p0
p1
p5
p 50
Present
[36]
Present
[36]
Present
[36]
Present
[36]
151.79
151.79
220.34
220.34
152.93
152.93
220.06
220.06
150.46
150.46
220.39
220.39
151.10
151.10
217.83
217.83
147.16
147.16
219.12
219.12
147.58
147.58
215.22
215.22
142.84
142.84
208.79
208.79
144.55
144.55
210.43
210.43
Fig. 5. Variation of the critical buckling temperature rise with a1 =h ratio for CCCC
boundary conditions.
215
Fig. 6. Variation of the critical buckling temperature rise with a1 =h ratio for SSSS
boundary conditions.
Fig. 7. Variation of the critical buckling temperature rise with respect to power-law
index for 3 different FGM types (a 1; b 0:5; c 2, SSSS boundary conditions).
Fig. 8. Variation of the critical buckling temperature rise with respect to power-law
index for 3 different FGM types (a 1; b 0:5; c 2, CCCC boundary conditions).
216
Fig. 9. Variation of the lowest natural frequencies with a1 =h ratio for CCCC
boundary conditions a 1; b 0:5; c 2.
Fig. 11. Variation of the lowest natural frequencies with the critical buckling
temperature rise for CCCC boundary conditions a 1; b 0:5; c 2.
Fig. 10. Variation of the lowest natural frequencies with a1 =h ratio for SSSS
boundary conditions a 1; b 0:5; c 2.
Fig. 12. Variation of the lowest natural frequencies with the R=h ratio for CFCF
boundary conditions a 0:8; b 0:2; c 3.
217
on the modal numbers. For example, as previously noticed in Section 3.2.1, the critical buckling temperature rise (DT cr ) is equal to
199 for a FGM plate with a1 =h 50, an aluminum-alumina mixed
material, and p 0. For the material, BCs, geometry and power law
index, the lowest natural frequency is calculated as 308.4 Hz (as
given in Section 3.2.1.1). From Fig. 11, it is clearly seen that the natural frequency of the FGM plate drops to its minimum value when
the critical buckling temperature rise reaches the value 199.
3.2.3. Free vibration of FGM cylindrical panel
3.2.3.1. Influence of R/h ratio and boundary conditions. The FGM
cylindrical panel here analyzed has a length of 2 m, radius of
1 m, h 1200 , and is made of Al/Zirconia [36]. The influence of
the R=h ratio and boundary conditions is evaluated on the vibration
characteristics. The FGM type is assumed as FGM2a=b=c=p . Figs. 12
and 13 plot the variations of the lowest frequencies of the FGM
cylindrical panel with respect to the R=h for a CFCF boundary condition (two ends at the axial directions are clamped and the other
two ones are free) and a CCCC boundary condition, respectively.
Between the two boundary conditions here considered, the CCCC
cylindrical panels seem to have an higher fundamental frequency
than the CFCF one.
Furthermore, it can be seen from Figs. 12 and 13 that the lowest
natural frequency of the FGM cylindrical panel decreases as the
ratio R=h increases for both the boundary conditions. The reason
of this phenomenon is due to the reduced bending stiffness of
the panel. It is also shown that the natural boundary conditions,
such as the stress resultants, affect the frequencies of the FGM
cylindrical panel than geometrical (essential) boundary conditions
especially for a CFCF boundary condition. As also expected, Figs. 14
and 15 show that the frequencies increase with respect to its
modal numbers, independently of the boundary conditions and
the volume fraction of the FGM constituents. However, it can be
seen that the boundary conditions and power-law index have some
effects on the modal behavior. For example, in Fig. 15, it is worth
noticing a decay in the frequency of the CCCC panel for mode 3
and increasing values of p. This is less evident in Fig. 14 for the case
of a CFCF panel.
3.2.3.2. Influence of the ceramic volume fraction V c and its type on the
thermally pre-stressed vibration behavior. A FGM cylinder with the
same geometry parameters as in the previous section, is now considered to study the influence of the ceramic volume fraction V c
and its type (case-1:FGM2 and case-2: FGM3 ) on the thermally
Fig. 13. Variation of the lowest natural frequencies with the R=h ratio for CCCC
boundary conditions a 0:8; b 0:2; c 3.
Fig. 14. Variation of the natural frequencies R=h 30 with the mode number for
CFCF boundary conditions a 0:8; b 0:2; c 3.
Fig. 15. Variation of the natural frequencies R=h 30 with the mode number for
CCCC boundary conditions a 0:8; b 0:2; c 3.
218
Fig. 16. Variation of the lowest natural frequencies R=h 30 with the critical
buckling temperature rise for CCCC boundary conditions. a 0:8; b 0:2;
c 3; p varying).
Fig. 18. Variation of the lowest natural frequencies with the R=h ratio for the CC
boundary conditions.
Fig. 17. Variation of the critical buckling temperature rise with the R=h ratio for CC
boundary conditions.
Fig. 19. Frequencies associated with the first 8 modes for the CC boundary
conditions, R=h 10.
219
Fig. 22. Comparison (UTR and NLTD) of the lowest natural frequencies with respect
to the critical buckling temperature rise of FGM cylinder under CC boundary
conditions.
Fig. 20. Selected modal shapes of the FGM cylindrical shell with R=h 10 for CC
boundary conditions.
Fig. 21. Variation of the lowest natural frequencies with the critical buckling
temperature rise for CC boundary conditions.
220
References
[1] Tornabene F, Viola E. 2-D solution for free vibrations of parabolic shells using
generalized differential quadrature method. Eur J Mech A/Solids
2008;27:100125.
[2] Le Gac PY, Choqueuse D, Paris M, Recher G, Zimmer C, Melot D. Durability of
polydicyclopentadiene under high temperature, high pressure and seawater
(offshore oil production conditions). Polym Degrad Stab 2013;98:80917.
[3] Almeida CA, Romero JC, Menezes IFM, Paulino GH. On the modeling of
structural dynamics of risers composed of functionally graded materials. In:
Proceedings of the XIV international symposium on dynamic problems of
mechanics (DINAME 2011). 13th 18th March, Brazil; 2011.
[4] Giunta G, Belouettar S. Hierarchical theories for a linearized stability analysis
of FGM beams. In: 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural
Dynamics and Materials Conference. 4-7 April. Denver, Colorado; 2011.
[5] Lee WY, Stinton DP, Berndt CC, Erdogan F, Lee Y, Mutasim Z. Concept of
functionally graded materials for advanced thermal barrier coating
applications. J Am Ceram Soc 1996;79(12):300312.
[6] Hasselman DPH, Youngblood GE. Enhanced thermal stress resistance of
structural ceramics with thermal conductivity gradient. J Am Ceram Soc
1978;61(12):4952.
[7] Javaheri R, Eslami MR. Buckling of functionally graded plates subjected to
uniform temperature rise. In: Proceeding of the 4th International Congress on
Thermal Stresses. June 811. Osaka. Japan; 2001.
[8] Javaheri R, Eslami MR. Thermal buckling of functionally graded plates. AIAA J
2002;40(1):1629.
[9] Javaheri R, Eslami MR. Buckling of functionally graded plates under in-plane
compressive loading. ZAMM-J Appl Math Mech 2002;82(4):27783.
[10] Javaheri R, Eslami MR. Thermal buckling of functionally graded plates based on
higher order theory. J Therm Stresses 2002;25:60325.
[11] Croce LD, Venini P. Finite elements for functionally graded ReissnerMindlin
plates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2004;193:70525.
[12] Matsunaga H. Thermal buckling of functionally graded plates according to a
2D higher-order deformation theory. Compos Struct 2009;90:7686.
[13] Kant T, Babu CS. Thermal buckling analysis of skew fiber-reinforced composite
and sandwich plates using shear deformable finite element models. Compos
Struct 2000;49:7785.
[14] Babu CS, Kant T. Refined higher order finite element models for thermal
buckling of laminated composite and sandwich plates. J Therm Stresses
2000;23:11130.
[15] Zenkour AM. Generalized shear deformation theory for bending analysis of
functionally graded plates. Appl Math Model 2006;30:6784.
[16] Lee YY, Zhao X, Reddy JN. Postbuckling analysis of functionally graded plates
subject to compressive and thermal loads. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng
2010;199:164553.
[17] Zhao X, Lee YY, Liew KM. Mechanical and thermal buckling analysis of
functionally graded plates. Compos Struct 2009;90:16171.
[18] Tran LV, Thai CH, Nguyen-Xuan H. An isogeometric finite element formulation
for thermal buckling analysis of functionally graded plates. Finite Elem Anal
Des 2013;73:6576.
[19] Zhang LW, Zhu P, Liew KM. Thermal buckling of functionally graded plates
using a local Kriging meshless method. Compos Struct 2014;108:47292.
221