Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ledges and steps could all provide hospitable seating. Plazas that were devoid of life and activity did not provide
such seating. In fact, some private owners of these plazas went out of their way to deter people from sitting
altogether by placing spikes on surfaces, designing planters too high for sitting or simply providing no seating at
all.
At the end of the film, Whyte stated, The street is the river of life of the city. They come to these places not to
escape but to partake of it. In fact, the relationship between the street and a plaza is another key element to its
success (or failure). As a result of this study, Whyte recommended to the Planning Commission that the zoning
regulations limit plazas to no more than three feet above or three feet below street level to allow for visibility and
easy access. Typically, plazas that were a full level below the street or one or more stories above street level
tended to be vacant spaces that attracted few visitors. The street, of course, is the means of egress to a public
plaza or park.
Their study found that tree canopies, water features, sculptures and food vendors all played a role in attracting
people to urban plazas and parks. The study concluded that the greater the number of these key features, the more
people gravitated to these public spaces. And in the words of William H. Whyte: What attracts people most, it
would appear, is other people. These popular gathering spots are where people have voted with their feet.
Failed projects cited in the film included places where streets faced blank walls and were devoid of shops,
windows or doors. For example, Houston, Texas is complete with streets designed primarily for cars, without
much consideration for pedestrian traffic. Reaching a critical mass is also important in attracting people to public
spaces. Less densely populated cities need to concentrate their public spaces in order to generate activity.
One of the examples the film described as an unsafe space was New York Citys Bryant Park adjacent to the New
York Public Library on Fifth Avenue between 41st & 42nd Streets. This eight-acre park was elevated to
accommodate the library stacks below and surrounded by a high hedge. The interior of the park space was not
visible from the street and thus became a haven for drug dealing and derelicts. Based on the recommendations of
the Street Life Project, Bryant Park was redesigned and rebuilt in the 1980s opening up the entrances from the
street, taking down the hedge and adding more benches and gardens at the perimeter of the interior lawn.
Today, Bryant Park is full of life and activity with more than 1,000 movable chairs plus several food kiosks and
an active program of events and entertainment. In 1965, Whyte wrote The Organization Man, a best-selling book
about corporate culture and the suburban middle class. After this classic book, Whyte focused on the issues of
urban sprawl and urban revitalization. As reflected in the film, Whyte demonstrated how social life in public
spaces plays such a critical role in the quality of life for those who live in urban areas.
Whytes 1980 book shared the same title as the film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces in which he wrote:
I end then in praise of small spaces. The multiplier effect is tremendous. It is not just the number of people
using them, but the larger number who pass by and enjoy them vicariously, or even the larger number who feel
better about the city center for knowledge of them. For a city, such places are priceless, whatever the cost. They
are built of a set of basics and they are right in front of our noses. If we will look.
The book describes cities as inherently messy places, but the human interaction and commerce that takes place on
the street cultivates an inviting, engaging environment unlike the bland, car-dominated milieu of the suburbs.
The main aspects discussed in the book Social life of small urban spaces are :
1. seating space the book recommends 6% to 10%, but the idea of more than enough should apply.
Especially with concerns of over-capacity, the problem with urban spaces has mostly been underuse, not
overuse
2. sun, wind, trees, water these features make the sitting experience pleasant.
3. food the draw of food, especially with seating, creates a cafe-like atmosphere amiable to visitors.
4. the street urban space should be seen from the street, and a part of the street experience. Secluded and
unseen urban space is unused urban space.
5. triangulation street acts, public art, music, magicians, all add character and distinction to a space.
The elements of small urban spaces haven't changed much since 1980. Almost each element has his
own chapter:
The Life Plazas
Sitting Space (Grouping and Meeting behavior)
Sun, Wind, Trees, Water (Design elements)
Food
The Street (access to the small places)
The "Undesirables" (characterstics of people)
Effective Capacity (space design)
Indoor Spaces
Concourses and Megastructures
Smaller Cities and Places
Triangulation (Artists, Events at Small Urban Places)
The book revealed that sitting spaces are an important condition for small urban environments. Sitting
spaces provide an infrastructure for grouping and communication between people. A garden does almost
exactly the same. Gardening brings people together and they also talk during gardening activities. The
sitting elements could be steps (the size of the steps matters very much), ledges (the height matters),
benches (mostly static elements), and chairs (flexible elements).
People's interaction on sun, wind, trees, and water depends heavily on the seasons. Usually people try to
avoid wind, for this reason trees and other plants are used as protection. They look for sitting places
closely to a tree or bushes. The same is valid if the sun is too strong and the temperature are too hot.
Especially, trees provide a huge space of shadow and wind protection (page 46). Moreover, people feel
very comfortable surrounded by trees and bushes. An additional interesting design element of small
urban places is water. Water is really vital for the surviving of a plant. At small places and parks water
provides a well-being feeling to people. Especially, in summer water is used a for cooling down. People
have the desire to put their feet and hands into the water ..
The chapter about food does reveal snack bars and cafes are a critical success factor for plazas and parks.
They satisfy a demand. In some special cases, the employee(s) of a snack bar or cafe create a special aura
/atmosphere of a place. For instance, some hot dog vendors are really great entertainers. At least one
point is obvious, the desire of food at these kind of places is strong. In this context it makes sense to
consider that plants are able to provide a certain amount of food. Why not integrating plants which
provide food at these places. A good example for this is the community garden Prinzessinnengarten in
Berlin.
GENIUS LOCI NORBERG SCHULZ
Each city has a unique spirit of place, or a distinctive atmosphere, that goes beyond the built
environment. This urban context reflects how a city functions in real time as people move through time
and space. Viewed through this lens, the architecture and physical infrastructure of a city give way to the
rhythms of the passing of the day and transition of the seasons. This provides the temporal spectacles
that define a city.
This context of a city is more formally known as genius loci, or the genetic footprint of a place. Latin
for the genius of the place, this phrase refers to classical Roman concept of the protective spirit of a
place. In contemporary usage, genius loci usually refers to a locations distinctive atmosphere, or the
afore-mentioned spirit of place, rather than a guardian spirit.
The concept of genius loci falls within the philosophical branch of architectural phenomenology. This
field of architectural discourse is most notably explored by the theorist Christian Norberg-Schulz in his
book, Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture.
Norberg-Schulz and Genius Loci
1. The Norwegian architect and phenomenologist Christian Norberg-Schulz is a key theorist in
elucidating the concept of genius loci, which he explores in several works spanning three
decades.
2. In his 1963 thesis, his original intention was to investigate the psychology of architecture
(Norberg-Schulz, 1963).
3. Norberg-Schulz (1980) explores the character of places on the ground and their meanings for
people, Norberg-Schulz uses a concept of townscape (although not as Cullen defined it) to denote
skyline or image.
4. He sees the skyline of the town and the horizontally expanded silhouette of the urban buildings as
keys to the image of a place.
5. He promotes the traditional form of towns and buildings, which he sees as the basis for bringing
about a deeper symbolic understanding of places (Norberg-Schulz, 1985, pp. 3335, 48).
6. The concept of genius loci is described as representing the sense people have of a place,
understood as the sum of all physical as well as symbolic values in nature and the human
environment.
Concept genius loci
In Norberg-Schulzs description of the genius loci, as well as in his own use of the concept, four
thematic levels can be recognized: the topography of the earths surface; the cosmological light
conditions and the sky as natural conditions; buildings; symbolic and existential meanings in the
cultural landscape.
1. The natural conditions of a place are understood as being based on features in the topographical
landscape, including a cosmological and temporal perspective that includes continual changes of light and
vegetation in the annual cycle. These characteristic rhythmic fluctuations contrast with the stability of
physical form. This is the genius loci as a place in nature that we have to interpret when we are changing
our built environment (Norberg-Schulz, 1980, pp. 2532).
2. Norberg-Schulz gives a special place in this conception of the genius loci to natural conditions,
distinguishing three basic landscape characters: romantic, cosmic and classical (Norberg-Schulz, 1980;
1985, p. 48). These are also understandable as ideal types.
3. Both buildings and the symbolic meaning of a settlement are important for the genius loci concept as
expressions of societys cultural interpretation of place. Norberg-Schulzs analyses range from visual
impressions to the lived or experienced realm.
4. His four methodological stagesimage, space, character and genius lociillustrate peoples
experience of the physical environment. His aim, however, is to achieve the atmosphere, light conditions
and sense-related experiences of the genius loci.
5. Nature, he feels, is the basis for peoples interpretation and it is in relation to nature that places and
objects take on meaning. He discusses the way in which morphological and cosmic connections are given
physical expression in societys dwelling and living. He seeks meaning and symbolic function by
understanding the systematic pattern of the settlement. In summary, Norberg-Schulz conceives of
peoples life world as a basis for orientation and identity (Norberg-Schulz, 1980, p. 203; 1985, pp. 15
25).
second category of conceived ruinous uses such as bars and theaters are a threat in grey areas, but not
harmful in diverse city districts. The final category includes parking lots, large or heavy truck depots, gas
stations, gigantic outdoor advertising and enterprises harmful due to their wrong scale in certain streets.
Jacobs suggests that exerting controls on the scale of street frontage permitted to a use would alleviate
such a use.
Part 3
Part three of the book is designated to analyzing four forces of decline and regeneration in city cycles:
successful diversity as a self-destructive factor, deadening influence of massive single elements in cities,
population instability as an obstacle to diversity growth, and effects of public and private money.
Self destruction of outstanding successful districts occurs by ousting less affluent dwellers and
businesses, to replace them with more affluent or profitable ones, probably as the multiplication of those
already existing in that district. This not only erodes the variety of dwellers and businesses as the base for
diversity in that specific district, but also has a cross-effect on the diversity of other localities by
depriving them from such profitable businesses and affluent residents needed for mutual support. Massive
single facilities such as railroad tracks, enormous parks, and college campuses create vacuums in areas
immediately next to their borders because such areas (adjoining borders) are a terminus of generalized
use. Jacobs suggests to figure out border-line cases, such as special park uses (chess or checker
pavilions), in order to blend the border and the immediate neighboring area together and yet keep the city
as city and the massive element (such as the park) as itself.
Population instability is the third factor in the life cycle of cities. For instance, the reason that slums
remain slums is the unstable population of residents there, ready to get out when they have the choice.
Therefore, Jacobs suggests that the real slumming process, as opposed to slum shifting through renewal
projects or slum immuring practices of orthodox planning, is to make slum dwellers desire to stay and
develop neighborhoods. This could possibly be done by gradual incremental monies which make
continual improvements in the quality of lives of individual residents of slums.
The last factor is public and private money. Jacobs argues that money has its limitations, incapable of
buying inherent success for cities lacking the success factors. She classifies money into 3 forms: credit
extended by traditional, non-governmental lending institutions, money provided by government through
tax receipts or borrowing power, and money from the underworld of cash and credit. Jacobs argues that
despite the differences, these three kinds of money behave similarly in one regard: They shape
cataclysmic, rather than gradual, changes in cities. She matches the cycles in city districts with these
types of money: First the withdrawal of all conventional money, then ruination financed by shadowworld money; then selection of the area by the Planning Commission as a candidate for cataclysmic use
of government money to finance renewal clearance. These cataclysmic monies, in the absence of gradual
money, waste city districts which are indeed fit for city life and possess a potential for rapid
improvements.
Part 4
Part four of the book is dedicated to effective tactics to actually improve city performance. These include:
subsidized dwellings, attrition of automobiles as opposed to erosion of cities by cars, improvement of
visual order without sacrificing diversity, salvaging projects, and redesigning governing and planning
districts.
Jacobs suggests subsidized dwellings be offered to those who cannot afford normal housing. Unlike the
current practice in which the government acts as the landlord, these people can and should be housed by
private enterprises in regular buildings, not projects. The government guarantees a rent to the landlords.
Tenants pay subsidized rents, calculated based on their income level, and the government pays the
difference. This way, under circumstances that tenants incomes increase, they are not forced to leave, for
their rents would be adjusted. Therefore, diversity would be enhanced by keeping those wishing to remain
at their choice. Tenants might be encouraged to stay by letting them own the house gradually, after years
of paying rents. Jacobs admits that there are potentials for corruption, but argues that corruption grows as
the target of corruption remains unchanged. Thus, she suggests that methods of subsidized dwelling be
revised and varied every eight or ten years.
Cities offer multiple choices. However, one cannot take advantage of this fact without being able to get
around easily. Thus, accommodating city transportation is important, and this should not destroy the
related intricate and concentrated land use. She proposes tactics of giving room to other desired city uses
which compete with automobile traffic needs such as widening sidewalks for street displays which would
narrow the vehicular roadbed and thereby automatically reduce car use, and traffic congestion. Jacobs
argues that visual cohesiveness should not be regarded as a goal. She stresses the importance of the visual
announcement that a high number of streets would make by picturing an intense life. On the down side, if
such streets go on and on to the distance, the intricacy and intensity of the foreground appears to be
repeated infinitely. Therefore the endless repetition and continuation should be hampered, by introducing
visual irregularities and interruptions into the city scene, such as irregular street patterns with bends,
special buildings, etc.
Finally Jacobs argues that cities are a problem of organized complexity. Unlike simple two-variable or
disorganized-complexity problems of statistical randomness, problems of organized complexities are
composed of numerous interrelated factors. Therefore, horizontal structures in city planning would work
better than vertical structures, which aim at oversimplifying problems of such complexity.
JAN GEHL Life in between buildings
Because of the continued appeal of his unfettered approach to pedestrian-based design and the growing
demand for his firms consulting work, Copenhagen architect and urban designer Jan Gehl has become
something of an international celebrity. Perhaps that is why Island Press has recently released not one, but
two of his books. Life Between Buildings is more or less a reprint of his first text published in Danish in
1971 and subsequently translated into nineteen languages. Cities for People was cited by the
popular city planning website Planetizen as one of its top ten selections for 2010. The real story behind
both books harkens back to the year after Jane Jacobss book Life and Death of Great American Cities
turned the mindset of urban planning upside down. In fall 1962, Gehl and his like-minded peers
succeeded, despite vehement resistance from commercial interests, in a radical plan to convert
Copenhagens longest shopping street, Strget, to a car-free zone. Their stunning victory spawned a
gradual succession of street closings that ultimately led to the reconfiguration of central Copenhagen into
a pedestrian-dominated precinct. Additional government sponsored measures included the long overdue
elimination of parking from the citys medieval squares and the curtailment of off-site parking.
Gehl and his students at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts decided to continue monitoring changes in
street-level activity through on-site traffic counts and user interviews. By the mid-1990s, the evidence
proved conclusive: the number of people in downtown Copenhagen had more than tripled, and the
amount of ground-level public space had increased by a factor of six. By then, other cities in Denmark
and elsewhere in western Europe had instituted their own car-free zones.
Life between buildings, the people and events that can be observed in a given space, is a product of the
number and duration of individual events, Gehl writes in the first book The attributes and characteristics
of the ritual stroller, the frontyard gardener, the babysitter, the walker with a cane, the lunchtime
sunbather, the edge-of-plaza idler, and the everyday cyclist are what matter most. Like colonies of lions,
ants, and penguins, urban humans respond in predictable ways to elements of visual scale, wind,
sunlight, and soundand perhaps most of all, to the attraction to the daily walkabouts of fellow humans.
These are the central themes espoused by Gehl since he first began studying Copenhagens streets and
squares. And had not the small-scale vitality of city spaces been overwhelmed by the auto, perhaps the
need to put these thoughts into words would not have been as compelling.
A later publication, one not been given the attention it deserves, is a slim paperback titled Public Spaces,
Public Life (1996, 2004 / Lars Gemze co-author / The Danish Architectural Press). It summarizes 37
years of successful transformation in downtown Copenhagen with before-and-after photographs maps and
user profiles. This Copenhagen model is now used by Gehls consulting firm to assist an everwidening
arc of cities worldwide with similar desires to reclaim their urban spaces. By far the most stunning
example of a Gehl-inspired car-free design was attempted in fall 2009 at a location where one would least
expect itTimes Square in central Manhattan. Here the installation of stacked rows of bright red
bleachers gave thousands of pedestrians a claim to a safe haven and lofty perch above the incessant
flow of motor vehicles.
Life Between Buildings deals mostly with Copenhagen and other cities of north western Europe and Italy.
..
Martin Zimmerman writes frequently for Urban Land from Charlotte, North Carolina.
https://charlottebikes.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/gehl-life-between-buildings-cities-for-people-6-1811.pdf
GENDER & SPACES