Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
School Of Business
Summer 2013
Name
ID
Riad Ahmed
1310266030
1310693630
Tanzirul Islam
1310784630
Md. Naim
Akhi Shikder
1310427630
1311200630
Introduction
We have decided to select ceramics industry of Bangladesh for our project. We will be comparing
and analyzing the performance of the two major ceramic companies. RAK Ceramics Ltd and
SHINEPUKUR Ceramics Ltd. We decided to select this industry because of its huge contribution
to improve the economic condition of our country.
Ceramics has a high demand in the world. Bangladesh apparently has the perfect geographical
position, supply of raw materials and labor available to meet this demand. Ceramics industry of
Bangladesh produces wall and floor tiles, sanitary ware, ceramics plate and cup, tableware etc.
Ceramic industry of Bangladesh is a booming sector and the great potential of both domestic and
foreign market.
tea plates, soup tureens to soup spoons, retail tabletop to industrial. They export their products in
Australia, Argentina, Canada, Denmark, France, India and many other countries.
Competitors
Some of the major competitors of these two companies are Peoples Ceramics Industry Ltd, FARR
Ceramics, Mirpur Ceramics Works Ltd, Fu-Wang Ceramic Industry Ltd.
2011
Amount in
Taka
2012
Amount in
Taka
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant & EquipmentCarrying Value
Investment in Shares
Capital Work In progress
4,493,055,46
1
4,384,003,40
2
225,870,721
121,705,206
817,891,743
817,891,743
Current Assets
Inventories
Account& Other Receivables
Advances, Deposits& Prepayments
Cash and cash equivalents
5,536,817,9
25
5,323,600,3
51
891,674,750
845,059,407
586,933,889
853,413,145
112,190,532
81,930,381
25,432,780
16,009,871
Difference
in Taka
109,052,05
9
104,165,51
5
0
213,217,5
74
-46,615,34
3
Percenta
ge
-2.4%
-46.1%
0
-3.9%
-5.2%
45.4%
-27%
-37.1%
266,479,25
6
-30,260,15
1
-9,422,909
1,617,231,9
51
1,796,412,8
04
Total Assets
7,154,049,8
76
11.1%
179,180,8
53
-0.5%
7,120,013,1
55
-34,036,7
21
1,111,274,53
0
2,953,318,42
0
1,277,965,70
0
2,907,734,98
9
435,167,473
358,761,360
166,691,17
0
15%
-1.5%
-17.6%
-45,583,43
1
-76,406,11
3
4,499,760,4
23
4,544,462,0
49
1%
44,701,62
6
-25.3%
396,579,272
598,837,779
9,965,449
296,189,631
100,389,64
1
498,837,779
8,456,579
100,000,00
-16.7%
15.1%
Sales Revenue
Cost of goods sold
Gross Profit
Operating expenses:
Administrative expenses
Selling and distribution expenses
Exchange loss
2011
Amount in
Taka
2012
Amount in
Taka
1,901,129,1
92
(1,248,024,9
42)
1,942,350,7
52
(1,268,312,9
98)
653,104,25
0
674,037,75
4
(61,433,037)
(54,107,127)
(49,547,627)
(51,765,185)
----
Difference
in Taka
Percentage
41,221,560
(20,288,056)
3.8%
1.6%
20,933,504
3.2%
(-7,325,910)
(2,217,558)
-10,120,204
-11.9%
4.5%
-1%
(-15,228,556)
36,162,060
(19,334,394)
(58,020,290)
-12.6%
6.8%
-41,823,364
-18.5%
(-1,991,589)
-18.5%
-39,831,775
(38,651,270)
-18.5%
18%
(10,120,204)
In total
Profit from operations
Gain/Loss on sale share
Finance cost
Profit before contribution to WPFF
Contribution to workers Profit
participation/welfare funds
Net Profit before Tax
Income Tax expense
Net Profit after Tax for the year
Other comprehensive Income:
Revaluation surplus on Property,
Plant & Equipments
Fair value loss on investment in
Shares
(121,100,86
8)
(105,872,31
2)
532,003,38
2
568,165,44
2
315,370
(19,649,764)
(306,604,93
8)
(364,625,22
8)
225,713,81
4
183,890,45
0
(10,748,277)
(8,756,688)
214,965,53
7
175,133,76
2
18.9%
(46,197,435)
(84,848,705)
168,768,10
2
90,285,057
-78,483,045
-1,612,405,062
-46.5%
-1%
---(32,211,836)
1,612,405,0
62
241%
(45,583,431)
(13,371,595)
Total Comprehensive Income
for the year
-1,723,099,943
1,767,801,
569
-97.5%
44,701,626
Horizontal analysis also known as Trend analysis is a financial statement analysis technique
that shows changes in the amounts of corresponding financial statement items over a period of
time. It is a useful tool to evaluate the trend situations. Its purpose is to determine the increase or
decrease that has taken place.
SHINEPUKUR Ceramics: The comparative balance sheet of SHINEPUKUR states that a
number of significant changes have occurred from 2011 to 1012.
Total non-current assets decreased by 3.9% and non-current liabilities increased by 20.1%
which suggests that the company isnt expanding its business rather its been selling off its
assets to pay for the non-current liabilities.
SHNINEPUKURs current assets increased by 11.1% and current liabilities increased by
7.5%. So this company is more than able to pay for its day to day operations expenses
8
Increase in issued share capital by 15% indicates that the company issuing 15% more
share than before probably to pay-off its fixed debts or to finance its operations.
Its retain earnings decreased by 17.6% which suggests that the companys been earning
less.
In short, SHINEPUKUR isnt doing very well. Its been reducing its business and not getting
enough profit.
The comparative income statement of SHINEPUKUR shows some changes like:
Sales revenue increased by 3.8% and COGS increased by only 1.6%. It suggests that the
companys selling enough products and it also means that their operational activities are
good
Operating expense decreased by 12.6%.
Although gross profit increased by 3.2% net income decreased by 97.5% in 2012. It
indicates that 2012 was not a good time for SHINEPUKUR.
In short, SHINEPUKUR Ceramics doesnt appear to be favorable.
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant & Equipment
Equity Accounted Investees
Intangible Assets
Capital Work in Progress
Investment in Shares of Listed
companies
Loan to Associates
Preliminary & Pre-operating
Expenses
Total Non-Current Assets
Current Assets
Inventories
Trade & Other Receivables
Loan Associates
Advances, Deposits and Prepayments
Advance Income Tax
Cash & Cash equivalents
2011
Amount in
Taka
2012
Amount in
Taka
2,725,576,10
2
3,000,994,83
4
82,955,354
99,935,330
113,928,723
112,670,334
36,578,205
30,955,703
3,176,995
---
2,189,065
10,926,364
2,973,141,7
43
1,658,062,56
9
95,204,185
--3,341,949,4
51
1,777,888,71
8
621,590,397
526,123,351
----194,219,227
948,002,438
1,442,035,67
9
Total Current assets
Total Assets
4,768,443,2
64
4,795,815
217,599,738
1,303,890,75
5
Difference
in Taka
275,418,732
16,979,976
-1,258,389
-5,622,502
-987,930
95,204,185
10,926,364
Percentag
e
10.1%
20.5%
-1.1%
-15.4%
-31.2%
-100%
12.4%
368,807,
708
119,826,149
95,467,046
4,795,815
23,380,511
355,888,317
7.2%
18.1%
---12.3%
37.5%
-31.5%
-453,736,774
988,298,905
4,913,984,3
28
3.1%
145,541,
064
6.6%
8,255,933,7
79
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Share Capital
Share Premium
Retained Earnings
Non-Controlling Interests
Total Equity
Non-Current Liabilities
Borrowings
7,741,585,0
07
514,348,
772
2,530,808,50
0
1,473,647,97
9
1,318,178,60
8
2,783,889,35
0
1,473,647,97
9
1,293,599,64
0
173,866,834
5,496,501,9
21
108,824,662
6,659,961,6
31
253,080,850
0
-24,578,968
10%
0
-1.9%
-37.6%
-65,421,172
1,163,45
9,710
21.2%
-43.6%
10
2011
Amount in
Taka
Sales
Cost of goods sold
Gross Profit
Other Income
Administrative expenses
Marketing and Selling expenses
4,580,008,2
09
(2,693,596,2
90)
1,886,411,
919
6,076,938
(255,823,05
5)
(641,800,85
7)
(891,546,97
4)
994,864,94
5
147,136,340
(61,462,408)
85,673,732
(56,644,648)
1,023,894,
029
2012
Amount in
Taka
4,908,171,27
9
(2,979,160,0
88)
Difference
in Taka
Percentage
328,163,070
(285,563,798)
7.2%
10.6%
1,929,011,1
91
9,570,670
(297,250,162
)
(730,822,714
)
42,599,272
3,494,732
(41,427,107)
(89,021,857)
2.3%
57.5%
16.2%
13.9%
(1,018,502,2
06)
910,508,98
5
102,831,687
(25,867,434)
76,964,253
(126,955,232)
-84,356,960
-44,304,653
(-35,594,974)
-8,709,479
14.2%
-8.5%
-30.1%
-57.9%
10.2%
(16,375,376)
28.9%
-109,440,815
-10.7%
(73,020,024)
914,453,21
4
(-5,692,736)
(63,193,326)
960,700,70
3
(57,500,590)
856,952,62
4
(323,570,13
6)
4,606,626
(318,963,51
0)
641,737,19
3
(370,221,049
)
13,479,410
(356,741,639
)
500,210,98
5
756,952,645
(115,215,45
2)
608,123,157
(107,912,172
)
-9%
-103,748,079
-10.8%
(46,650,913)
8,872,784
(37,778,129)
1.4%
192.6%
11.8%
-141,526,208
-22.1%
-148,829,488
(-7,303,280)
-19.7%
-6.3%
11
641,737,19
3
500,210,98
5
-141,526,208
-22.1%
RAK Ceramics: The important changes in the comparative balance sheet from 2011 to 2012 are
as follows:
Total non-current assets have increased by 12.4% which means that the company is
buying more fixed assets probably for expanding its business.
Non-current liabilities decreased by 16.6% which suggests improvement.
Its current asset increased by 3.2% whereas current liabilities increased 18.2%. It indicates
that RAK isnt able to pay off its current debts even if its doing well.
Its retained earnings decreased by only 1.9%.
In short, RAK ceramics is doing better. Its been expanding its business which means its getting
enough profit from business.
Sales grew by 7.2% and COGS grew by 10.6% which means that RAK isnt selling as
much as it should probably because of its poor operating activities.
Operating expenses grew by 14%.
Gross profit increased by 2.3% and net income decreased by 22.1%
The changes above suggests that although gross profit increased, the net income decreased by
22.1%..
12
13
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant & EquipmentCarrying Value
Investment in Shares
Capital Work In progress
Total Non-Current Assets
Current Assets
Inventories
Account& Other Receivables
Advances, Deposits& Prepayments
Cash and cash equivalents
2011
Amount in
Taka
2012
Amount in
Taka
Percentag
e
2011
Percentag
e
2012
4,493,055,46
1
4,384,003,4
02
62.8%
3.2%
11.4%
61.6%
1.7%
11.5%
225,870,721
121,705,206
817,891,743
5,536,817,9
25
817,891,743
5,323,600,
351
77.4%
74.8%
12.5%
8.2%
1.6%
0.4%
11.9%
12%
1.2%
0.2%
22.6%
25.2%
100%
100%
15.5%
41.9%
6.1%
17.9%
40.8%
5%
62.9%
63.8%
5.5%
4.2%
8.4%
0.14%
7%
0.12%
891,674,750
845,059,407
586,933,889
853,413,145
112,190,532
81,930,381
25,432,780
1,617,231,9
51
16,009,871
1,796,412,
804
Total Assets
7,154,049,8
76
7,120,013,
155
1,111,274,53
0
2,953,318,42
0
1,277,965,7
00
2,907,734,9
89
435,167,473
358,761,360
4,499,760,4
23
4,544,462,
049
396,579,272
296,189,631
598,837,779
9,965,449
498,837,779
8,456,579
1,005,382,5
00
1,147,673,70
8
14.1%
11.3%
803,483,98
9
1,183,795,7
49
91,818,692
143,242,382
16%
1.3%
16.6%
2.1%
5.7%
6.3%
14
Sales Revenue
Cost of goods sold
Gross Profit
Operating expenses:
Administrative expenses
Selling and distribution expenses
Exchange loss
2011
Amount in
Taka
2012
Amount in
Taka
1,901,129,19
2
(1,248,024,9
42)
1,942,350,75
2
(1,268,312,9
98)
653,104,25
0
Percentage
2011
Percentage
2012
100%
65.6%
100%
65.3%
34.4%
34.7%
3.2%
2.6%
0.5%
2.8%
2.7%
0%
6.4%
28%
0.02%
16.1%
5.5%
29.3%
1%
18.8%
11.9%
9.5%
0.6%
0.5%
11.3%
2.4%
9%
4.4%
674,037,75
4
(61,433,037)
(54,107,127)
(49,547,627)
(51,765,185)
----
(10,120,204)
In total
Profit from operations
Gain/Loss on sale share
Finance cost
Profit before contribution to WPFF
Contribution to workers Profit
participation/welfare funds
Net Profit before Tax
Income Tax expense
Net Profit after Tax for the
year
Other comprehensive Income:
Revaluation surplus on Property,
Plant & Equipments
Fair value loss on investment in
Shares
Total Comprehensive Income
for the year
(121,100,868
)
(105,872,312
)
532,003,38
2
568,165,44
2
315,370
(19,649,764)
(306,604,938
)
(364,625,228
)
225,713,81
4
183,890,45
0
8,756,688
(10,748,277)
214,965,53
7
175,133,76
2
(46,197,435)
(84,848,705)
15
168,768,10
2
8.9%
4.6%
84.8%
0%
0.7%
2.3%
93%
2.3%
90,285,057
---1,612,405,06
2
(45,583,431)
(13,371,595)
1,767,801,5
69
44,701,626
Vertical Analysis: Vertical analysis is the proportional analysis of a financial statement, where
each line item on a financial statement is listed as a percentage of another item. Typically, this
means that every line item on an income statement is stated as a percentage of gross sales, while
every line item on a balance sheet is stated as a percentage of total assets.
SHINEPUKUR Ceramics: In the comparative balance sheet , we can see that:
16
Like mentioned before, SHINEPUKUR isnt expanding its business. Its paying for its liabilities
and financing its operation by issuing more bonds and selling off its fixed assets. Retained
earnings decreased means they arent doing well enough.
This emphasizes on the assumption that, SHINEPUKURs net income went down from 93% to
2.3% because it didnt have a huge revaluation surplus on plant and assets like it had in 2011.
17
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant & Equipment
Equity Accounted Investees
Intangible Assets
Capital Work in Progress
Investment in Shares of Listed
companies
Loan to Associates
Preliminary & Pre-operating
Expenses
2011
Amount in
Taka
2012
Amount in
Taka
2,725,576,10
2
3,000,994,83
4
82,955,354
99,935,330
113,928,723
112,670,334
36,578,205
30,955,703
3,176,995
---
2,189,065
10,926,364
2,973,141,7
43
1,658,062,56
9
526,123,351
-----
948,002,438
1,442,035,67
9
Total Current assets
Total Equity
Non-Current Liabilities
Borrowings
1,777,888,71
8
621,590,397
194,219,227
Total Assets
95,204,185
--3,341,949,4
51
4,768,443,2
64
Percentag
e
2011
Percentag
e
2012
35.2%
1.1%
1.5%
0.5%
0.04%
0%
0.1%
36.3%
1.2%
1.4%
0.4%
0.03%
1.2%
0%
38.5%
40.5%
21.4%
6.8%
0%
2.5%
12.2%
18.6%
21.5%
7.5%
0.06%
2.6%
15.8%
12%
61.6%
59.5%
100%
100%
32.7%
19%
17%
2.2%
33.7%
17.8%
15.7%
1.3%
71%
80.7%
0.4%
0.2%
4,795,815
217,599,738
1,303,890,75
5
988,298,905
4,913,984,3
28
8,255,933,7
79
7,741,585,0
07
2,530,808,50
0
1,473,647,97
9
1,318,178,60
8
2,783,889,35
0
1,473,647,97
9
1,293,599,64
0
173,866,834
5,496,501,9
21
108,824,662
6,659,961,6
31
18
2011
Amount in
Taka
Sales
Cost of goods sold
Gross Profit
Other Income
Administrative expenses
Marketing and Selling expenses
4,580,008,2
09
(2,693,596,2
90)
1,886,411,
919
6,076,938
(255,823,05
5)
(641,800,85
7)
(891,546,97
4)
994,864,94
5
147,136,340
(61,462,408)
85,673,732
2012
Amount in
Taka
4,908,171,27
9
(2,979,160,0
88)
100%
60.7%
1,929,011,1
91
9,570,670
(297,250,162
)
(730,822,714
)
41.2%
0.1%
5.6%
14%
39.3%
0.2%
6.1%
14.9%
(1,018,502,2
06)
910,508,98
5
102,831,687
(25,867,434)
76,964,253
19.5%
21.7%
3.2%
1.3%
1.9%
20.8%
18.6%
2.1%
0.5%
1.6%
1.2%
1.5%
22.4%
18.6%
1.4%
1.2%
21%
17.5%
7.1%
0.1%
7%
7.5%
0.3%
7.3%
14%
10.2%
16.5%
2.5%
12.4%
2.2%
(56,644,648)
(73,020,024)
1,023,894,
029
914,453,21
4
(63,193,326)
960,700,70
3
Percentage
2012
Percentage
2011
100%
58.8%
(57,500,590)
856,952,62
4
(323,570,13
6)
4,606,626
(318,963,51
0)
641,737,19
3
(370,221,049
)
13,479,410
(356,741,639
)
500,210,98
5
756,952,645
(115,215,45
2)
608,123,157
(107,912,172
)
19
641,737,19
3
500,210,98
5
14%
10.2%
Above changes suggest that the company is doing well enough to expand its business and thats
why its buying more fixed assets. Decrease in non-current liabilities suggests that its been
paying off its long term debts. Rise in share capital by 1% only indicates that RAK Ceramics is
earning enough profit to run its business thats why they didnt need to issue that much share.
The changes above indicates that RAKs COGS and operating expenses both have risen and thats
why its net income decreased.
20
Rati
os
SHINEPUKUR
Ceramics
2011
2012
Analysis
Current Ratio
0.98:1
1.01:1
Acid-test(Quick) Ratio
0.37:1
0.49:1
3.57 Times
2.70 Times
8.82%
4.64%
0.31Times
0.27Times
1.4 Times
1.5 Times
Return on Asset(ROA)
2.75%
1.27%
Return on Equity(ROE)
4.67%
2.00%
A net income of 2.0 taka is earned for every 100 taka invested by
the owners.
30%
40%
1.32
0.71
21
Rati
os
RAK
Ceramics
2011
2012
Analysis
Current Ratio
2.30:1
2:1
Acid-test(Quick) Ratio
0.95:1
0.66:1
10.73Times
7.98Times
14.01%
10.19%
0.62Times
0.61Times
1.71Times
1.73Times
Return on Asset(ROA)
8.68%
6.25%
Return on Equity(ROE)
12.33%
8.23%
A net income of 8.23 taka is earned for every 100 taka invested by
the owners.
29%
31 %
22
2.72
2.18
Comments:
Current Ratio: For RAK ceramic, in 2012 Ratio of 2:1 means that for every TK of current
liability RAK has TK 2 current assets. RAK current Ratio has decreased in the current year than
previous year. For SHINEPUKUR ceramic, In 2012 Ratio of 1.01:1 means that for every TK of
current liability SHINEPUKUR ceramic has TK 1.01 current assets. SHINEPUKUR current Ratio
has increased in the current year than previous year.
Profitability Ratio: As per profit margin ratio shows that SHINEPUKUR ceramics profit margin
is more than 2 times greater than RAK ceramics profit margin.
Asset Turnover Ratio: Asset Turnover Ratio shows that RAK ceramics assets turnover Ratio is
more than 2 times greater than SHINEPUKUR ceramics.
Return on Asset (ROA) Ratio: In RAK ceramics, return on asset is about 4 times greater than
SHINEPUKUR ceramics, so RAK ceramics generates more profits from its asset which is good
for the company.
Return on Equity (ROE) Ratio: ROE position is very good for RAK ceramics than
SHINEPUKUR ceramics so it generates higher return for the shareholders.
Earnings per Share (EPS) Ratio: In 2012 RAK ceramics EPS is 3 times more than in 2011 and
SHINEPUKUR ceramics EPS in 2012 is less than EPS in 2011 here RAK ceramics EPS is greater
than SHINEPUKUR ceramics.
23
Now, judging by the ratio analysis of these two companies, it is clear that both companies have
suffered loss in 2012. But RAK Ceramics is still profitable and much more better than
SHINEPUKUR Ceramics because in 2012:
RAK Ceramics current ratio is 2:1whereas SHINEPUKURs is 1.01:1.
RAKs profit margin is almost 3times bigger than that of SHINEPURS
Return on asset of RAK Ceramics is 6.25% but SHINEPUKURs return on asset is only 1.27%.
Creditors provide money 31% of RAKs assets whereas creditors provide money for 40% of
SHINEPUKURs assets.
Lastly, RAK earns 2.18 taka in each share, but SHINEPUKUR earns only 0.71 taka per every
share.
The points above make it obvious that RAK Ceramics is doing much more better than
SHINEPUKUR. So, its clear that investing in RAK Ceramics is a comparatively safe, profitable,
and smart choice.
Appendix 01:
RAK Ceramics Ltd.
Ratio
2012
2011
Current Ratio
4913984328
2456242485
= 2:1
4768443264
2077509374
= 2.30:1
Acid-Test(Quick) Ratio
988298905+621590397
2456242485
= 0.66
1442035679+526123351
2077509374
= 0.95
4580008209
(621590397+526123351)/2
= 7.98 Times
4908171279
(526123351+388310742)/2
=10.73 Times
500210985*100
4908171279
= 10.19%
641737193*100
4580008209
= 14.01%
24
4908171279
(8255933779+7741585007)/2
= 0.61 Times
4580008209
(7741585007+7041094354)/2
= 0.62 Times
2979160088
(1658062569+1777888718)/2
= 1.73 Times
2,693,596,290
139,729,663+2,456,242,495
(1487724337+1658062569)/2
= 1.71 Times
167,573,712+2,077,509,374
7,741,585,007
8255933779
= 0.31 Times
= 0.29 Times
Return on Asset(ROA)
500210985*100
(8255933779+7741585007)/2
= 6.25%
641737193*100
(7741585007+7041094354)/2
=8.68%
Return on Equity(ROE)
500210985*100
(5496501921+6659961631)/2
= 8.23%
641737193*100
(5496501921+4910792692)/2
=12.33%
2.18
2.72
Appendix 02:
SHINEPUKUR Ceramics Ltd.
Ratio
2012
2011
Current Ratio
1796412804
1772067117
= 1.01:1
1617231951
1648906953
= 0.98:1
Acid-Test(Quick) Ratio
16009871+853413145
1772067117
= 0.49:1
25431780+586933889
1648906953
= 0.37:1
1942350752
(853413145+856933889)/2
= 2.70 Times
1901129192
(586933889+477473540)/2
=3.75 Times
25
90285057*100
1942350750
= 4.64%
168768102*100
1901129192
= 8.82%
1942350752
(7120013155+7154049876)/2
= 0.27 Times
1901129192
(7154049876+5125726997)/2
= 0.31 Times
1,268,312,998
1,248,024,942
(891,674,750+845,195,056)/
(845059407+891,674,750)/2
= 1.5 Times
(803483989+1772067117)
7120013155
= 0.4Times
2
=1.4 Times
(1,005,382,500+
1,648,906,953)
7,154,049,876
= .3 Times
Return on Asset(ROA)
90285057*100
(7120013155+7154049876)/2
= 1.27%
168768102*100
(7154049876+5125726997)/2
=2.75%
Return on Equity(ROE)
90285057*100
(4544462049+4499760423)/2
= 2.00%
168768102*100
(4499760423+2731958854)/2
=4.67%
0.71
1.32
All information regarding the two competitor companies has been obtained from
their respective sites.
The annual reports have been attached for your convenience.
The sites and persons from which information has been used are listed below.
http://www.fuwanggroup.com/financial.html
http://www.amclpran.com/investor.php
26