Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Expressions of Cambodia
Little more than a decade ago, Cambodia witnessed a series of rapid transitions, from civil war to peace, from a socialist-style authoritarianism to
multi-party democracy, and from geographic isolation to a free-market
economy. Requiring the United Nations to undertake its biggest ever peacetime operation, the elections of 1993 triggered an influx of foreign aid
unparalleled in Southeast Asia. Intense international interest since then
has been accompanied by a re-emerging field of scholarship that has principally sought explanations for genocide and war, or attempted to map
more recent economic and political developments. The social and cultural
implications of a society that has undergone such profound change has
received little scholarly examination until now.
Drawing upon multidisciplinary theoretical perspectives and up-to-date
empirical research, Expressions of Cambodia reveals the tensions and contradictions involved in post-conflict nation building and socio-cultural
recovery. Together a team of international contributors take scholarship on
the country in new directions, focusing on the politics of tradition and
modernity, tourism, the performance of identity, post-conflict nation building, and the on-going renewal of ties between diaspora and home. Timely
and much needed, the book brings Cambodia back into dialogue with its
neighbors and as such, makes a valuable contribution to the growing field
of cultural studies in Asia. Written in an accessible style, Expressions of
Cambodia will be of particular interest to those working in the fields of
Asian studies, tourism, diaspora, and postcolonial and cultural studies.
Leakthina Chau-Pech Ollier is a writer and lives in Siem Reap, Cambodia.
Tim Winter worked on this book as part of his Postdoctoral Fellowship
at the Asia Research Institute, Singapore. He is now based at the University
of Sydney.
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Expressions of Cambodia
The politics of tradition,
identity, and change
Edited by
Leakthina Chau-Pech Ollier
and Tim Winter
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Contents
List of figures
Notes on contributors
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
1
ix
x
xiii
xv
PART ONE
Re-scripting Angkor
2
21
23
PENNY EDWARDS
37
TIM WINTER
54
PANIVONG NORINDR
PART TWO
71
73
viii Contents
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
86
KHATHARYA UM
101
PART THREE
Performing tradition
8 Weaving into Cambodia: negotiated ethnicity in the
(post)colonial silk industry
117
119
133
ROBERT TURNBULL
150
KLAIRUNG AMRATISHA
PART FOUR
Engaging modernity
165
167
IAN HARRIS
181
193
ANNUSKA DERKS
Bibliography
Index
205
223
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Figures
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.2
9.1
9.2
29
31
33
45
46
137
138
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Notes on contributors
Notes on contributors xi
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Acknowledgments
First and foremost, we wish to extend our heartfelt thanks to our contributors for agreeing to add their voices to ours, for their enthusiastic support
of the volume since its inception, and for their thought-provoking work.
Though we are scattered across three different continents, Cambodia
brought us together within the space of this project and elsewhere when
our paths happened to have crossed.
Ingrid Muan was one of the first scholars to whom we brought this
book project. Her knowledge of and dedication to Cambodia, its people,
culture, and language, was an inspiration to both of us. Her generosity in
sharing her knowledge and insights, providing direction, names, contacts
and critiques, helped us shape this book, and her voice, even after she
was gone, continued to resonate in our heads and kept us on our toes.
Her untimely death on January 29, 2005 was a big loss for Cambodian
Studies and for the whole community of scholars, students, researchers
and artists in Cambodia. To Ingrid we dedicate this book.
David Chandler and Penny Edwards have taken time from their busy
schedules to read drafts of the introduction, posed the important questions,
provided guidance and insightful comments. Michel Rethy Antelme has
generously and patiently lent his expertise to help us with many linguistic
difficulties. Many individuals have contributed to enhance our understanding of Cambodia. Among them we wish to acknowledge Fabienne
Luco, John Shapiro, Boreth Ly and Toni Shapiro-Phim for many enlightening conversations, and Sophiline Cheam-Shapiro and Sopheap Pich for
being amazing sources of inspiration. We are very much indebted to them.
Extra special thanks are owed to Laavanya Kathiravelu, for her dedication to the project. Generously giving over her weekends during our
moments of panic, her editorial efforts ensured the book was delivered
on time and free of all our errors and inconsistencies. Now an expert on
Cambodia, we wish her all the best with her PhD studies. We also wish
to thank Stephanie Rogers, our editor, for her belief in this project and
the whole editorial team at Routledge for their invaluable support.
Leakthina Chau-Pech Ollier would like to acknowledge the support of
the Henry Luce Foundation for a fellowship at the Center for Khmer
xiv Acknowledgments
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Studies in Siem Reap and the Asia Research Institute, Singapore for a
visiting affiliate. Tim Winter would like to thank the British Academy for
his postdoctoral funding. He would also like to acknowledge the support
of the Asia Research Institute, Singapore for the opportunity to work on
this book over the course of a two-year fellowship. We also wish to thank
the wonderful and supportive staff from the Center for Khmer Studies,
Siem Reap and the Asia Research Institute, Singapore.
As always, no work would ever be possible without the love and friendship of those closest to us. They have lent us their shoulders, their ears,
and their eyes to read multiple versions of several articles and even the
entire manuscript: Jerry Gorman, Winnie Wong, Amanda Summerscales,
Fabienne Luco, Toby Anderson, Jacob Ramsay, and Christiane Lalonde,
thank you!
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Abbreviations
ABCP
AEKE
AKW
APSARA
BFD
CLA
CMAC
CPP
CPR
DC-Cam
DK
EFEO
FUNCINPEC
GDP
GTZ
IKTT
IMF
KAA
KAF
KI
MOT
NGO
NPRD
PDR
PPP
PRC
PRK
RUFA
RUPP
SOC
xvi Abbreviations
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
UN
UNDP
UNESCO
UNTAC
United Nations
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization
United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Introduction
Cambodia and the politics of
tradition, identity, and change
Tim Winter and Leakthina Chau-Pech Ollier
Cambodia stands encapsulated within two dominant, and somewhat contradictory, narratives. On the one hand, it is commonly suggested that an
era of civil war and genocide inflicted irrevocable damage and that Pol
Pots attempt to return to year zero annihilated, even erased, the countrys culture, whereas for others, Cambodian culture is being successfully
restored, rejuvenated and, perhaps, even enjoying a renaissance. For those
with an unshakeable investment in Cambodian culture, such as our three
speakers above, the coexistence of these two narratives has paired feelings
of hope with despair, optimism with anguish.
2
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Introduction
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
4
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
travel in time and space to discover the history and the cultures of Cambodia
in just a few hours and with all the comfort a modern and immaculately
clean theme park can provide. Its purpose is to edutain. Its imperative is
the staging of a nation (Edensor 2002: 85). Showcasing reproductions of
several ethnic villages in Cambodiaamong them, the Cham village, the
Chinese Village, the Phnong Village, just to name a fewit also includes
a traditional Cambodian millionaire house and a Khmer Association
Overseas village comprising a typical Californian house with a church
next door. Miniature replicas of major historical buildings and structures
feature, among others, such landmarks as the Royal Palace, the National
Museum, and the Central Market in Phnom Penh, the former capital of
Cambodia Ou Dong, and the reclining Buddha from Mount Kulen in the
province of Siem Reap. Performances ranging from traditional Khmer
wedding ceremonies to the folkloric coconut shell dance or a variety of
ball and water team games, in which visitors are encouraged to participate, entertain with their mixture of the ceremonial and the burlesque.
The wax museum brings guests on a walk through Cambodian history
with figures of important Cambodian personalities, kings and queens,
ministers, and Buddhist patriarchs mixed together with mythical and
symbolic figures such as the apsara dancer, Princess Liu-Yeh, an important
character in one of the versions of the countrys myth of origin, a movie
star of the 1960s, and a happiness family (sic) represented by a father,
a mother, and their three children in their modern living room; and, lastly,
as one is about to leave the museum, a figure of an UNTAC election
officer shown exiting a bar in an amorous embrace with a taxi girl
provides a surprising end to the tour. When asked if they have had
complaints from the UN, an English-speaking guide responded that they
did, but he justified it thus: we dont see this as bad. We want to show
that UNTAC came here to bring peace, bring elections, worked hard
through the day, and then enjoyed themselves at night. We wanted to
show their enjoyment.3
While it does not strive to be anything other than a theme park for
family entertainment, the Cultural Village in fact provides a progressive
and inclusive representation of Cambodian culture, one that is plural, transnational, popular, and forward-looking. Its commemorative approach to
history, albeit selective, is free-flowing and seamless. In the words of
Gillis (1994: 6), the Villages narratives on popular memory dance and
leap through time in a joyous celebration of Cambodian history and
cultural achievements, free of the angst often felt in other discursive realms,
namely the loss of culture and identity, and the distinction between myth
and reality. It makes no effort to single out the glory of the Khmer Empire
or the temples of Angkor, placing such histories alongside other events
and achievements created along a continuum of history that speaks little
of tragedy or burden (Chandler 1993b, 1998). And yet, while entire
Cambodian families travel to the Village from around the country, it
Introduction
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
remains snubbed by the intellectual elite and most Western visitors who
decry it as a disneyfied caricature of the country.
Sitting down over a drink afterwards, it seemed easy to criticize the
Cultural Village for its superficiality, its lack of authenticity, or its apparent irreverence. But to judge or dismiss it merely because it challenged,
perhaps even offended, our mental and aesthetic maps of what Cambodia
is, or should be, would be a denial of its validity and its integrity as part
of contemporary Cambodian society. It was clear that the Cultural Village
posed a series of important questions that warranted greater attention: questions that, we concluded, should be essential points of focus for a scholarly
enterprise attempting to understand the New Trends in Cambodian society.
Scanning the shelves of any academic librarys collection of books written in English on Cambodia reveals two dominant, and antithetical, focal
points of interest: the ancient glories of Angkorean splendor and the horrors of the modern Khmer Rouge regime.4 A reading of Edwards (2006)
account of an emergent Cambodge under a French protectorate offers some
insight into why countless pages have been dedicated to Angkor over the
course of the twentieth century. Her analysis depicts Angkors pivotal role
in fashioning visions of a noble Khmer and an emergent Cambodian
nationalism. Through their transformation of Angkors monuments into a
socio-political totem of an ethnically and culturally unifying historiography, scholars from the Ecole Franaise dExtrme-Orient (EFEO), such as
George Coeds and Henri Marchal, would foreground stone as the key for
unlocking the secrets of the past.5 By the time a localized independence
movement began to flourish in the 1930s, Angkor had already solidified
as the idealized apogee of a largely monolithic, mono-cultural nationalism.
As Panivong Norindr illustrates in his chapter here, the fascination for
Angkor back in the Mtropole would also accelerate its path towards global
fame.
Together, these accounts form part of a growing interest in this era of
colonialism spanning from 1863 to 1954. In recent years, authors such as
Cooper (2001), Muller (2006), Norindr (1996), Robson and Yee (2005),
Tully (2002), and Wright (1991) have all pursued a critical postcolonial
studies perspective to examine the relationship between politics and culture
across Indochina in this period within a variety of contexts, including
cinema, literature, grand expositions, art, education, and urban planning. In
detailing such themes these authors have added further texture to the now
seminal and wide-ranging works on Cambodian history written by Chandler
(1991, 1996a, 1996b) and Vickery (1998). Books by Harris (2005a) and
Marston and Guthrie (2004) on religion, Stewart and May (2004) on literature, Ayres (2003) on education, Jacobsen (2006) and Lilja (2006) on
gender, and Phim and Thompson (1999) on dance, as well as a number of
publications produced by the Reyum Institute of Arts and Culture in Phnom
Penh,6 have also enabled a more holistic understanding of Cambodias social
and vernacular past to emerge.
6
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Given the countrys recent turmoil, it is little surprise to find that the
majority of scholarship focusing on the decades after independence has
been dedicated to an episode lasting a few short, but devastating, years.
Understandably, numerous scholars have attempted to comprehend the
complex reasons, factors, and motives that caused a small political elite
to turn a country in upon itself and pursue one of the most brutal social
experiments ever inflicted upon a nation and its population (e.g. Chandler
1993a, 2000; Kiernan 2004; Kissi 2003; Ponchaud 1978; Short 2004;
Vickery 1999). The broader geo-political dynamics that invariably shape
university-based and journalistic research also meant Cambodia received
considerable interest from commentators based in the US, Australia,
France, and the UK attempting to ascertain and disentangle complicities
for a region that became the coalface of a cold war conflict (e.g. Evans
and Rowley 1990; Grant et al. 1971; Haas 1991; Shawcross 1993).
Party politics, along with macro-economic and political transitions, have
also been recurring themes within studies examining Cambodias recovery
from the 1980s onwards. Authors such as Brown and Timberman (1998),
Curtis (1998), Gottesman (2003), Hughes, C. (2003), Ledgerwood (2002),
Ong (2003), Peou (2000), and Roberts (2001), to name just a few, have
all attempted to document a series of transitions: from civil war to peace;
from a socialist-style authoritarianism to multi-party democracy; from
geographic isolation to a free-market economy; and from refugees to diaspora. Significantly less attention, however, has been paid to the sociocultural transformations that have accompanied these transitions. One
early and notable attempt is the 1994 volume by Ebihara et al. entitled
Cambodian Culture since 1975: homeland and exile. While the contributions by Ayres, Harris, Lilja, Marston and Guthrie, and Stewart and May
highlighted above have valuably updated many of the themes explored by
Ebihara et al., we believe the rapid and profound changes that have
occurred since the early 1990s demand further analysis and new viewpoints of reflection. Accordingly, Expressions of Cambodia sets out with
a number of goals.
The first is to open up new spaces of analysis, identify fresh topics of
study, and offer rich theoretical perspectives that treat phenomena such
as the Cambodian Cultural Village as important and worthy points of
enquiry. Accordingly, we began this volume by asking what expressions
the Village makes about relationships between tradition and modernity,
diaspora and home, memory and identity, and the citizen and the state.
Concerned that existing accounts on Cambodian economic, political and
social relations too often presume objectivity and a stability of meaning,
the book pursues Reynoldss (2006) call for a cultural studies perspective
that opens up, questions, and destabilizes these links. Familiar topics such
as Angkor and the Khmer Rouge are thus re-examined from new perspectives, ones that challenge the distinction between history and historiography
in order to explore their interplay in the contemporary moment.
Introduction
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
A traditional modernity?
A Klee painting named Angelus Novus shows an angel looking as
though he is about to move away from something he is fixedly contemplating. His eyes are staring, his mouth is open, his wings are spread.
This is how one perceives the angel of history. His face is towards
the past. Where we perceive a chain of events, he sees one catastrophe, which keeps piling wreckage upon wreckage and hurls it in
front of his feet. The angel would like to stay, awaken the dead, and
make whole what has been smashed. But a storm is blowing from
Paradise; it has got caught in his wings with such violence that the
angel can no longer close them. This storm irresistibly propels him
into the future to which his back is turned, while the pile of debris
before him grows skyward. This storm is what we call progress. 7
Taken from Walter Benjamins musings on the rise of a European modernity, this 1940 description of Paul Klees painting Angel of History strikingly
captures the dynamics of early 1990s Cambodia. The storm of progress, a
rush towards modernity, would find its energy and its momentum by staring
back at the countrys past, a past that would be contemplated for both its
wreckage and its immutable grandeur. As the decade began, profound and
8
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
rapid changes were desperately required. The country needed to move from
a centrally planned economic system to a market oriented one . . . from a
war economy to a peace economy, and from a poor and under-developed
economy to a more prosperous and developed one (Tith 1998: 102). With
85 percent of the population living in rural communities, agriculture
accounted for more than 50 percent of the countrys GDP (Quintyn and
Zamarczy 1998). Export manufacturing industries were virtually nonexistent and the limited economic growth at that time was principally fuelled
by the UNs effects on the service and construction industries, the vast
majority of which centered on Phnom Penh (Ledgerwood 1998; Shawcross
1994). Nonetheless, the prospect of macro-economic stabilitysomething
Cambodia had been denied for over two and a half decadesprovided the
country with the opportunity to make far-reaching, and desperately needed,
reforms in the context of one of the lowest levels of per capita income in
the world (Ministry of Planning 2003: 5).
After nearly two decades of isolation, the future was about regional reintegration and embracing the multitude of cultural and economic flows
that process would bring. Accordingly, the country would liberalize its
markets and politically realign itself towards a Western international donor
audience (Hughes, C. 2003). In lieu of an effective state, a broader civil
society was installed, comprised of bilateral donors, multilateral banks,
and numerous non-governmental organizations (NGOs). In addition to the
2.2 billion US dollars provided by the international community for the
United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC), a further
2.3 billion US dollars was pledged for the period of 199295 alone.8 No
fewer than 40,000 personnel would descend on the country to ensure the
elections passed off in a peaceful and transparent manner. In a few short
months, satellite dishes, Toyota Landcruisers, and advertisements for
imported electronic goods would appear in Phnom Penh. International
standard hotels would open, offering Australian wines, steaks, and French
cheeses. The opening up of the country would also foster a new form of
migration: A number of those who had fled the country in the early 1970s
returned to resurrect political or business interests.
While this influx of foreign aid would cause the value of real estate in
the capital to rocket, hospitals, universities, schools, airports, water, and
power supplies across the country all desperately needed reconstructing,
a task made considerably worse by the isolation from Phnom Penh of
many provinces. One of the most pernicious legacies of the conflict, both
in terms of its cost to lives and its effects on agricultural production, was
the silent threat posed by millions upon millions of landmines. In December
1993, only 19,000 of an estimated 10 million mines scattered across the
countryside had been cleared (Shawcross 1994: 80).9
A year after the 1993 UNTAC elections, the first full-scale national modernization program was launched. The National Program to Rehabilitate
and Develop Cambodia (NPRD) outlined six specific aims, which together
Introduction
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
10
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Introduction
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
11
rites, traditions, and symbols. As our title suggests, we see tradition, identity, and change as processes that are, implicitly or explicitly, bound up in
social networks of power, political cultures, and an array of institutional
relations. In this respect, some of the themes we have sought to explore in
this collection draw inspiration from the field of Latin American cultural
studies, which, through the work of Ydice, Canclini, Escobar and Alvarez
among others, has examined how and why a multitude of social actors
adopt culture as a resource to serve certain purposes or goals. Over the
years these authors have brought notions of citizenship, civil society, development, the state, and globalization into the fold of cultural studies and,
perhaps more importantly, foregrounded culture within debates over such
issues for a variety of countries in the region. In justifying this approach,
Ydice argues that the embedding of culture within the economic and sociopolitical spheres of growth and development has set in motion a particular
performative force, whereby the cultural has a social imperative to perform (2003: 12). A number of the chapters contained here pursue such
analytical themes to reveal what is being accomplished socially, politically
and discursively (Domnguez 1992: 21) through culture.
As we have already seen, the 1990s was a time characterized by a series
of major transformations. With scholarship on this period primarily focusing on key political transitions, few attempts have been made to interpret
a near overnight shift from virtual isolation to networks of cultural globalization (Featherstone 1990). The arrival of billions of dollars of financial
assistance would transform this small, largely rural, nation into one of
the worlds most aid-dependent countries of the late twentieth century.
Far more than merely a monetary intervention, reconstruction would
involve a process of NGOization, which, as Alvarez et al. (1998) and
Canclini (2001) point out, draws upon culture as a resource for achieving
its developmental goals. In other words, culture becomes subsumed within,
and co-opted by, an industry oriented around the geo-political criteria of
economic progress or sustainability.
To see such a situation merely in terms of exploitation would, however,
inadequately recognize the other part of an ongoing dynamic of expediency. Far from being passive victims of developmental economics, the
countrys arbiters of culture would frequently embrace foundationspeak
as a vital engine of cultural production (Ydice 2003: 347). Harriss
chapter, for example, traces the rise of a Buddhist entrepreneurialism
that seeks the support of either local politicians or foreign NGOs and
foundations. He demonstrates how a complex network of relationships
thriving on reciprocity and mutual benefit provides monks with both political power and financial gain, which some of them in turn use to help the
most destitute in the community. Harriss account vividly illustrates how
rampant capitalism and a fluid political environment are challenging and
transforming both modernist and traditional forms of Buddhism across the
country today.
12
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Introduction
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
13
14
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Introduction
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
15
16
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Spaces of culture
With their focus on diaspora, returnees, and border towns, a number of
the chapters here raise important questions about our understanding of
Cambodian geographies. In this final section of the introduction we push
this spatial theme further by considering how Expressions of Cambodia
explores a number of places and sites of cultural production that have,
hitherto, largely been ignored. Over approximately the last 100 years, a
series of values, beliefs, and normative wisdoms have solidified to define
the parameters of what constitutes Cambodia and its culture as a field of
scholarly enquiry. A defining feature of this process has been the reification and subsequent reliance upon certain knowledge of how culture
is, and has been, spatially enunciated and iterated. We suggest that such
understandings have served to simultaneously erase and reify, conceal and
celebrate, different elements of the country, its culture and its cultural
history. Pop culture, electronic virtual spaces, and other forms of print
and visual media are just a few of the areas that demand our greater attention if we are to better understand Cambodia as a multitude of identities,
citizenships, and vernacular cultures.
Introduction
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
17
To return to Angkor, modern scholarship has relied upon a limited number of intellectual keys for unlocking its history. With decades of study
built around reading shifting architectural styles or the interpretation of
bas-relief carvings and stele inscriptions, architectural historians and epigraphers have been revered as the ultimate gatekeepers to past glories.
Although the translation of Sanskrit and Khmer texts has provided us with
invaluable accounts about regal wealth and power, and about deities, population sizes, and agricultural outputs, the study of Angkor has been one
that has consistently cast aside more vernacular and social histories in favor
of a high culture. The chapter by Penny Edwards here calls into question the validity of such distinctions and priorities. Edwards draws our
attention to a number of recent inscriptions in order to de-familiarize
Angkor as a place bereft of life, bereft of modern cultural productions.
Against the backdrop of these non-official yet historically meaningful
inscriptions, she goes on to look at contemporary graffiti written elsewhere in Cambodia contesting the perception that Cambodian culture is
largely oral. Far from being mere acts of vandalism, these graffiti are reflections of Cambodian cultural practices connected with religious beliefs and
the spiritual realms, and in significant ways they are indicators of the trends
of different periods in Cambodian history. Her account thus opens up an
intellectual space for further readings of key episodes in Cambodias modern historyincluding the 1980s, the Khmer Rouge years, and the French
colonial periodall of which continue to be documented through the textual and photographic evidence found in official archives and publications.
The other two papers in the section Re-scripting Angkor also look at
the sites circulation within particular texts and cultural industries. The
contribution by Norindr considers the narratives and representations at the
heart of an enduring, and now global, fascination for Angkor, and in particular Angkor Wat; a situation that, he suggests, needs to be traced back
to its French cinematic and literary origins. To reflect critically on the
legacy of a colonial past, Norindr examines the recent film The People of
Angkor by Rithy Panh in order to argue that we need to move away from
representations that petrify Angkor as a site of architectural grandeur
towards accounts that focus more on the invisible, the marginal, and the
subaltern. The chapter by Winter turns to consider Angkors circulation
within the socio-cultural landscape of international tourism. Tourism in
the post-conflict era has come to revolve around two historical episodes,
the Khmer Rouge and Angkor, framed and represented as modern tragedy
and ancient glory. While seemingly incongruent and polarized, Winter
argues that these two histories actually come to weave in and out of each
other and mutually constitute one another in unexpected ways. In this
light, tourism and its cultural artifacts emerge as forces that have
contributed to, and mobilized, particular conceptions of heritage, development, and memory since Cambodia re-established itself as a major
destination in Southeast Asia.
18
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Winters analysis of tourism brings into the fold a number of publications and cultural texts designed to help navigate Cambodia as the other
within a coupling of home and abroad. This mediation of transnational geographies through texts is also paralleled, but this time reversed, by Um and
Poethig in their analyses of the internet as a forum for diasporic expressions of the homeland. Poetry and other online postings are examined to
explore questions of active citizenship and public participation, but also
questions of cultural citizenship (Featherstone and Lash 1999: 7). Their
accounts reveal how the internet has emerged as a vital cultural space for
political dialogues across borders, for articulating and sharing thoughts
about exile, banishment, longing, and homeland for members of the communities still straddling the hyphenated and non-hyphenated typologies
of CambodianAmerican and AmericanCambodian. In a similar vein,
Olliers chapter on rap music, a discursive practice not commonly associated with Cambodia, also offers us a rich point of focus for understanding
how a diasporic identity is contingently negotiated. She suggests that rap
music constitutes part of a signifying system of identity that engages with,
and thus responds to, a shifting US political climate. In other words, by
foregrounding a reading of Prach Lys lyrics, Ollier analytically draws out
a series of connections between the artist, his audience, and the broader
public sphere within which that diaspora resides.
Away from the technologies of the internet and online virtual communities, Klairung Amratisha tells us about the emergence of women writers
in post-Khmer Rouge Cambodia who, for lack of a publishing industry
and due to the high cost of printing, began their career by renting in
Phnom Penhs market stalls copies of their novels written in pencil to
fiction-starved readers in the 1980s. But just a decade later, these same
women would write made-for-television soap-opera scripts and short stories
for newspapers, thus bringing to the mainstream this literary genre, which
was never popular before in Cambodia.
While in a previous section we pointed to the undeniable link between
culture and social networks of power, politics, and capitalism, in this
section we see signs of more spontaneous, scripted or unscripted, expressions of Cambodia; expressions that together account for the circularity,
hybridity, creation, and recreation of culture and identity in its multiple
forms, and open the field of Cambodian studies to alternative spaces where
identity and culture are constantly being expressed, performed, debated,
and contested.
Notes
1 Excerpts from Sam 1996: 85; Norodom Sihanouk cited in Sam 1996: 88 and
Ranariddh 1998: 23 (our translation).
2 A term adopted by Mehta and Mehta (1999).
3 www.talesofasia.com/cambodia-update-dec03.htm.
Introduction
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
19