Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Volume 27 Issue 2
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Chloride in cement
Isabel Galan
Fredrik P. Glasser
Portland cementsteel composites frequently take up chloride from their service environment. The degradation
processes and test methods are described through a critical review of the literature. Plain cement paste is not much
affected by chloride except for increased solubilisation of cement solids, but chloride is detrimental to the passivation
of embedded steel. Emphasis is placed on establishing the underlying physicochemical concepts and mechanisms of
corrosion, and integrating these into a holistic picture. Simplistic calculations and test conditions probably do not
reproduce well the complex reactions with cement components occurring at the steelcement interface and the
concept of a threshold defined in terms of a critical chloride content or chloride:hydroxide ratio is just an
approximation at best: other cement components are involved, as is the oxygen activity at the interface. Chloride
binding can retard the migration of chloride in concrete and specimen calculations are presented showing that the
main binding mechanism arises from the AFm, [Ca2(Al,Fe)(OH)6].X.nH2O, content of the paste. Suggestions are made
to enhance the value of experimental approaches to corrosion.
Notation
C
D
D0
E
E0
Eh
e
F
J
k
Kw
R
r
T
t
V
v
x
z
G0ads
0
0
()
(0)
concentration
diffusion coefficient
pore solution diffusivity
electrical potential
standard redox potential
redox potential
electron charge
Faraday constant
flux
Boltzmanns constant
ion product of water
gas constant
interaction parameter
temperature
time
voltage drop across the membrane
ion velocity
length
electrical charge
free energy of adsorption of chloride
surface coverage, ratio between surface concentration
and maximum surface concentration of adsorbed species
standard chemical potential
defined in Equation 15
sample conductivity
pore solution conductivity
voltage-enhanced time-lag
passive time-lag
Introduction
The role of chloride in cement has had a mixed history. On the
one hand, chloride has long been used to accelerate cement
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
However, its physical presence increases the tortuosity of diffusion paths and forms interfacial transition zones, and so on. So,
in the real world, the diffusion of chloride and other chargebalancing species is affected by the presence of aggregate and the
role of concrete must often be considered, not just cement.
j
j
j
Mediterranean
Atlantic
Mean seawater
(35 g/l salinity)
21 .4
17 .8
19 .8
64
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
80
Pore solution
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Monosulfate
Hemicarbonate
Hydrotalcite
Monocarbonate Ettringite
Gypsum Brucite
Portlandite
Ferrite
Belite
Aluminate
Calcium silicate hydrate
Alite
0
001
01
1
10
Hydration time: d
100
1000
(C-S-H), and the families of phases called AFm and AFt, with
general formula [Ca2(Al,Fe)(OH)6].X.xH2O and [Ca3(Al,Fe)
(OH)6.12H2O]2.X3.xH2O, respectively, phases coexisting with an
aqueous solution. The solubility of the phases is dominated by
portlandite and the resulting pH is 12 .5 at 208C. During the
first few days of cement hydration, the sulfate solubility is
dominated by calcium sulfate (gypsum, anhydrite) but Portland
cement is typically formulated to be undersaturated with respect
to calcium sulfate with the result that free calcium sulfate is
rapidly consumed, leaving AFm and AFt (both of which contain
sulfate) to buffer the aqueous sulfate concentration, typically at
millimolar concentrations. The buffering action of the solid
aqueous trio was explained by Matschei et al. (2007a), as
discussed later.
1a:
1b:
pH log[OH ]
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
contact with air so, normally, Eh values do not much change from
the range +100 mV to +300 mV. Exceptions do occur, as for
example when tin salts containing tin(II) are deliberately added to
hydrating cement to lower Eh and thereby chemically reduce
chromium(VI) to the less hazardous chromium(III) state. However, when steel is added to cement it liberates hydrogen, leading
to a decrease in Eh: any dissolved oxygen is scavenged and, once
consumed, the Eh becomes strongly negative, being dominated by
liberation of hydrogen (gas).
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
J D
@C @J
@2C
D 2
@t
@x
@x
NernstPlanck equation
@C
@C zF
@E
D
DC
Cv
@t
@x RT
@x
NernstEinstein equation
RT
z2 F 2 C
Formation factor
FF
D
0 D0
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Increasing solubility
85
128
204
217
55
144
219
25
201
277
236
264
05
10
Sodium chloride: mmol/l
Increasing solubility
Temperature: C
266
15
Mechanism
Example
Comment
Sorption of chloride
Calcium silicate
hydrate/calcium aluminium
silicate hydrate
AFm ! Friedels salt
Destabilisation of portlandite
and formation of
hydroxychloride phases
(e.g. xCaO.yCaCl2.zH2O)
68
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
The different AFm phases are only partially miscible with each
other. Figure 3 (Matschei et al., 2007b) shows the composition
and coexistence of AFm phases in typical cement environments
(i.e. under conditions such that the pH is buffered by the free
portlandite and chloride is absent). Portlandite is abundant in
Portland cement pastes where its pH buffering action depends on
the presence and accessibility of portlandite, but not on its
amount, so this conclusion about AFm stability has generic
relevance. From Figure 3 it can be anticipated that several AFm
types may coexist in a cement paste. This coexistence seems
complicated until it is realised that the activity of some species
essential to AFm formation are also buffered. For example, many
modern cements contain added calcite. This calcite has a low and
nearly fixed solubility conditioned by the presence of a
portlanditecalcium carbonatecarbon dioxide buffer, with the
result that pH and carbonate activity vary only over narrow limits
and do not depend on how much calcite is added in excess of
saturation, saturation being achieved at low calcite contents
(24% calcium carbonate). So, as a first approximation, all
carbonate-filled Portland cements will either develop hemicarboaluminate or, more likely, monocarboaluminate AFm coexisting
with monosulfate AFm (i.e. the bulk composition of the AFm
A
Monosulfoaluminate (Ms)
Ms-type ss
Limiting Ms-type ss
(C4As05Hx)
Ms-type ss
Hc
Ms Hc
Monosulfoaluminate
monocarboaluminate
Ms Hc Mc
Limiting Ms-type ss
C4AHx Hc
C
C4AHx
Hc Mc
D
E
Hemicarboaluminate (Hc)
Monocarboaluminate (Mc)
Hc C4AHx
69
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
SO4-AFm
(C4ASH12)
OH-AFm
(C4AH13)
CO3-AFm
(C4ACH11)
OH.0 .5CO3-AFm
(C4AC0 .5H12)
11 .4 wt%
12 .7 wt%
12 .5 wt%
12 .6 wt%
70
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
10
y 047001
08
264987x
1 264987x
06
04
02
0
0
10
2
3
4
Chloride concentration: mol/l
(a)
y 061602
08
264947x
1 264947x
06
04
02
0
0
2
3
4
Chloride concentration: mol/l
(b)
71
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
At low chloride concentrations (in the millimolar range), appropriate calcium silicate hydrate sorption values would cluster at
the left-hand edge of Figure 4 and, in this view, it is apparent that
chloride binding in calcium silicate hydrate, while not zero, is
negligible in terms of offering a significant retardation potential.
This is in accordance with the results presented by Elakneswaran
et al. (2009), shown in Figure 5, where experimental data are
interpreted using a surface complexation model in which chloride
is adsorbed on calcium silicate hydrate surface creating additional
negative surface charge due to the formation of SiOHCl from
un-ionised SiOH. The experimental values from Figure 5 were
deduced from the chloride binding isotherms of hydrated cement
paste and those of portlandite by an equilibrium concentration
technique (Tang and Nilsson, 1993) and from the chemical
binding of chloride forming Friedels salt, measured by XRD
Rietveld analysis.
Friedels salt is also said to adsorb a small amount of chloride
ions at its surface (Elakneswaran et al., 2009; Florea and
Brouwers, 2012). However, the authors view is that insufficient
evidence exists to support this: Friedels salt often contains minor
hydroxide (for chloride) substitution, and the data on the final
stages of hydroxide replacement by chloride are, in the authors
view, insufficient to distinguish structural replacement from
surface sorption.
Experiment
12
Model
10
8
6
4
2
0
1
10
100
Chloride concentration: mmol/l
1000
72
10
Portlandite
Friedels salt
8
7
y 03105x0458
R 2 099
6
5
4
y 00867x0617
R 2 099
3
2
1
0
1
10
100
Chloride concentration: mmol/l
1000
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Steel
Steel passivation
AFm
AFt
Transition
Corrosion
Transition region
Calcium
silicate
hydrate
Calcium
hydroxide
Breakdown
10
Breakdown
Chch
100
Chloride: mM
1000
Transition
region
10 000
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
and, finally to
The effect of caesium, lithium and sodium, accompanying the
chloride, on the ability of calcium silicate hydrate to adsorb
chloride has been reported. Henocq et al. (2006) did not find
differences in the chloride-adsorption capability of calcium
silicate hydrate, with calcium/silicon ratio ranging from 0 .6 to
2 .4, and with hydrated tricalcium silicate pastes in the presence
of caesium, lithium and sodium chlorides for chloride concentrations ranging up to 100 mmol/l. The binding was measured by
several methods (change in concentration and zeta potential in
the aqueous phase and microprobe analysis of the solid) and all
showed similar results, namely that sorption of chloride was
independent of the cation. In all cases, at 100 mmol/l of chloride,
bound chloride was below 0 .03 mol of chloride per mole of
silicon. Note this latter value is equivalent to 5 .3 mg of chloride
per gram of calcium silicate hydrate, taking values for the
calculation from Henocq et al. (2006) (the molar weight of
calcium silicate hydrate with calcium/silicon 1 .5 was given as
200 g/mol).
The authors thus conclude that cation effects are either absent or
3 or 7
Maximum chloride
binding in 1 cm3
concrete: mg
Maximum chloride:
% mass of cement
6 .3 (3%) or 14 .6 (7%)
10 .4 or 24 .4
2 .1 or 4 .9
74
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Steel in concrete
Concrete porosity:
% volume
7 or 15
7 or 15
Initial sodium
chloride in pore
solution: g/ml
Chloride in pore
solution per cm3 of
concrete: mg
0 .03
0 .36
1 .3 or 2 .7
15 .3 or 32 .8
There is general agreement that in normal chloride-free conditions, steel embedded in concrete spontaneously develops a
passivating coating that partially protects the metal surface
against further corrosion. This film contains iron in two oxidation
states, iron(II) and iron(III), as will be further explained. The film
has a spinel-type structure and is well known to have low
permeation by analogy with the same type of film, but composed
of aluminium and oxygen, which passivates aluminium exposed
to moist air and water.
Steel, with its low concentration of (mainly) carbon, receives
broadly the same protection as iron so low-alloy steels are
generally treated using data for iron. This assumption is almost
universally made but it is noted that actual proof seems to be
lacking.
Corrosion rates are often used to define passive regimes, thus the
boundary conditions between regimes may reflect kinetics as well
as equilibrium. Reaction between iron and water in the passive
regime results in the disruption of water with liberation of
hydrogen. The reaction is slow: rates vary, but are typically a few
microns per year (expressed as thickness of iron/steel lost to
corrosion products). Thus, at normal temperatures and cement pH
1213, a passive regime for mild steel is established. However,
iron metal is never thermodynamically stable in contact with
water at high pH: slow diffusion of oxygen to the steel interface
and slow hydrogen release accompanying electrolysis of water
occur. These processes allow oxidative corrosion reactions to
proceed, albeit slowly.
Departures from the regime of spinel stability may occur. For
example, pH may drop as a consequence of carbonation of the
cement and, as a result, other and less protective solid corrosion
products develop. This allows a transition to occur between regimes
of passivation and corrosion. In theory, the transition between
regimes could be sharp, although as will be shown, a number of
perturbing factors, as yet incompletely understood, could lead to
fuzziness in defining the boundary conditions for passivation.
Stresses at a steelconcrete interface are generated because the
volume of corrosion products is frequently much greater than that
of the volume of iron that is oxidised, particularly in regimes of
active corrosion. The corrosion product layer may lose adherence
or crack, thus allowing corrosion to accelerate as aggressive
agents penetrate more readily.
A slow rate of formation of corrosion product is helpful to
preserving passivation: stresses arising from the thickening skin
of corrosion products can, in part, be relieved by slow diffusion
of cement components away from stressed interfaces. Indeed, the
passivating layer may persist and slowly thicken but without loss
of protection, as is evidenced by field examples of old (.100
125 years) reinforced concrete (RC) (Gode, 2010; Jackson, 1996;
Veto, 2010).
75
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Passivation
The Pourbaix diagrams (Figures 8 and 9) (Pourbaix, 1966) for the
ironoxygenwater system identify a regime of passivation at
high pH and low Eh coincident with the field of Fe3O4. Iron
(III) oxide (Fe2O3) forms at high Eh and pH, giving a solid and
relatively insoluble oxidation product but, unlike spinel, it is not
adherent to metal and is porous with the result that ferric oxide is
much less protective than spinel. On the other hand, at low pH
and all Eh conditions which cannot normally be obtained in
cement pore water iron corrosion products are somewhat
soluble. These regimes, as usefully expressed in a Pourbaix
diagram, one of soluble iron(II) and the other of solid but nonprotective iron(III), are termed regimes of corrosion. From the
shape of the Pourbaix diagram in Figure 8, one of the conclusions
that might be made is that a definite set of pHEh conditions
exists that divides regimes of corrosion from those of passivation.
16
20
14
b
12
FeO4?
0 2 4 6
Fe
10
08
10
FeOH
3
4
5
11
06
Fe(OH)2
E: V
04
28
Fe2O3
02
0
Fe
7
8
02
04
26
23
06
0
2
4
6
17
Fe3O4
08
6
HFeO2
27
13
10
24
Fe
12
14
16
18
2 1
76
7
pH
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
2a:
22
20
18
0
9
16
Fe
14
12
10
08
10
FeOH
3
4
5
06
04
E: V
FeO4?
21
20
11
Fe(OH)2
28
6
a
Fe
7
8
02
04
Fe2O3
Fe(OH)3
02
18
23
06
16
0
2
4
6
29
Fe(OH)2
19
12
08
6
4
HFeO2
10
24
12
Fe
14
16
18
2 1
7
pH
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
cement matrices are (18) and (19); these are defined by (18)
Fe2+ + H2O FeO + 2H+, log(Fe2+) 13 .20 2pH and (19)
FeO + H2O HFeO2 + H+, log(HFeO2) 18 .30 + pH
77
2b:
Fe 2OH ! Fe(OH)2
2c:
2d:
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Lin et al., 1981 also recognise the limitations of the model, for
example that it does not take into account surface structure,
physical inclusions or grain boundaries within the metal. Nevertheless, it includes many relevant factors and it explains why
corrosion often initiates at special sites (pitting) before progressing to general corrosion. It can be concluded that the model is
conceptually correct but needs scaling: it attempts to embrace
processes occurring across a range of scales from atomistic to
macroscopic and it is difficult to see how these mechanisms relate
to each other and how they impact on the observed property
changes.
G 0ads
G 0ads: kcal/mol
35
40
30
35
30
25
20
08
06
04
02
07
05
03
V/NHE
04 V/NHE
Borate buffer (pH 84)
Breakdown
4
01 V
: 10-9 mol/cm2
Transition
region
Bare iron
Passive layer
r: kcal/mol
10
02 V
05
1
Jovancicevic et al. (1986) conclude that desorption and absorption of chloride on iron are two distinct processes. Adsorption,
being potential and concentration dependent, is stronger in the
passive layer than on bare iron, which is explained by a charge
transfer between chloride (Cl) and iron (Fe2+ and/or Fe3+). The
adsorbed chloride displaces water molecules from the passive
layer, giving rise to further charge transfer. The adsorption on
bare iron and passive layer surfaces is described by a Temkintype isotherm
3:
G0ads RT
ln C
r
r
103
102
Chloride concentration: mol/l
101
79
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
04
Fe(OH)2
FeOOH
16
4
0
2
15
Eh: V
FeOH
Fe
04
HFeO2
19
0
2
Fe4(OH)8Cl
17
14
10
12
13
11
pH
(a)
04
Fe(OH)2
Fe2O3
26
0
23
80
Eh: V
13
6
Fe(OH)2
Fe
08
11
18
27
15
HFeO2
FeOH
24
Fe
04
Fe
0
2
4 (O
14
H)
8 Cl
17
21
4
6
Fe(
OH
)2 ,
6
11
Fe(
Fe
08
2Fe
OO
7
18
25
9
pH
(b)
11
22
20
OH
)2
12
13
4b:
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
4c:
3Cl 8H 5e
6a:
4d:
5a:
5b:
Eh E0 0.0197log[Cl ] 0.0788 pH
17
0 24 6
Eh: V
-FeOOH
1
20
a
04
06
Fe(OH)2
16
Fe
02
FeOH
GR(Cl )
12
13
6
Fe
6
19
18
FeOOH
10
0 11
2
4
6
02
6d:
Fe(
OH
)2
6
8
10
pH
11
12
15
6
14
13
14
81
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
08
06
04
Eh: V
02
Iron hydroxide
0
Mag.
02
04
GR1
c
Hydroxide
06
FeCl24H2O
d
Iron
08
5
1
3
2
log(Cl): mol/l
82
Oxygen
Electrolyte
Chloride
Chloride
GR(chloride)
-FeOOH
Steel
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
The body of evidence showing the formation of these chloridebearing phases, many of which seem to occur under equilibrium
Sequence
Fe (iron) (II)
Mixed states
Notes
Fe (iron) (III)
Fe (iron)!
Fe(OH)2
!
Fe3O4
! FeOOH (iron(III) oxide-hydroxide),
(ferrous hydroxide)
(iron(II,III) oxide)
Fe(OH3) (ferric hydroxide)
Fe (iron)! -Fe2(OH)3Cl (ferrous
Fe(OH)3(iron(III) oxide-hydroxide),
hydroxychloride)
-FeO(OH) (iron(III) oxide-hydroxide)
83
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Passivating
layer
A
PO2 (Eh)
B
Air
Concrete
cover
Steel
Surface
Depth
84
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
index of 1 .7 and is said to be composed of iron(III) oxidehydroxide (FeOOH) and calcium hydroxide.
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Calcium hydroxide
10 104 M
50 103 M
10 103 M
200
25 103 M
50 10
10 102 M
Saturated calcium
hydroxide
250
300
16
15
110
400
450
50
100
150
Time: min
(a)
200
250
300
175
200
225
Efin: mV (SCE)
17
105
500
250
275
300
325
350
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10
log CCa(OH)2: M
(b)
18
350
19
50 105 M
030
115
120
pH
(a)
125
130
135
028
026
024
022
020
018
016
014
012
010
00030
00031
00032
00033
1/T: K1
(b)
00034
00035
division, and the associated analytical methods used to determine acid- and water-soluble fractions, have physical significance.
The chloride concentration gradients in concrete may be determined from drilled cores cut into slices at selected intervals. The
sampling method restricts the spatial resolution of the technique.
Drilled powders can also be used. Solid slices are ground and the
resulting powders are either dissolved in dilute nitric acid solution
for subsequent chloride concentration measurement or else
pressed into pellets for X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF).
The free chloride content is measured from the concrete either by
applying high-pressure pore fluid expression or by mixing ground
concrete samples with a solvent, nominally acid or water. For
some types of calculation it is desirable to determine chloride in
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Measurement
Sample preparation
Analysis
Pressed powder
Powder dissolution in dilute nitric acid
log C b a log C b
11:
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
02
04
06
08
Free chloride: mol/l
10
12
87
12:
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
1
1 1
1
C b kC bm C C bm
20
w/c 04 adsorption
w/c 06 adsorption
R2 0953
10
w/c 08 adsorption
w/c 04 desorption
w/c 06 desorption
w/c 08 desorption
0001 0002
02
05
12
w/c 04 OPC paste
1/Cb 0002438/C 01849
10
R2 0997
08
06
04
02
100
200
300
1/C: l solution/mol chloride
(b)
88
400
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
concrete does depend on the sample size and method of preparation, values obtained for crushed specimens being greater than
for non-crushed concrete.
Castellote et al. (1999a) used electrochemically assisted methods
on non-steady-state chloride migration experiments at constant
voltage (12 V) with 0 .05 M to 1 M sodium chloride solutions for
21 d and with 0 .5 M solutions for 7, 14, 21 and 28 d. The results
obtained were fitted to a BrunauerEmmettTeller (BET) isotherm (Brunauer et al., 1938, 1940) (Figure 21); they extended
the trends to higher concentrations to compare them with
published data on natural diffusion (i.e. not electrically accelerated) (Sergi et al., 1992). However, the isotherms (Figure 22)
show different shapes, with convex isotherms being obtained in
the migration experiments. The data extensions of the isotherms
allowed the authors to find a chloride concentration at which
combined chlorides were similar. The classification of isotherms
proposed by Brunauer, Deming, Deming and Teller (BDDT)
(Brunauer et al., 1940) was applied. The classification differentiates five types of isotherms, the different shape of each type
corresponding to a different adsorption process.
In the migration process, both the shape of the isotherm and the
value of the fitting parameters correspond to the so-called type III
or V isotherms. Type V isotherm has an inflection point at high x
values, as opposed to type III, where the convex character persists
over the range of values shown on the x-axis. This fact, as well as
the proposed existence of a limit in the percentage of combined
chlorides, enabled the authors to conclude that the chloride
isotherm in migration experiments should be of type V. The
differences in the ratio between free and combined chlorides in
migration and diffusion were attributed, at least partly, to a
change in the controlling step of the process, the transport being
012
009
006
003
0
003
0
005
010
015
[Cl]/[Clsat]
020
025
20
15
10
05
Obtained from migration data
0
0
20
40
60
80
Free chloride: g/l
100
120
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Theoretical base
Test method
Measurement
Test duration
Reference
Chloride flux
Chloride profile
Chloride profile
Chloride flux
Chloride flux
Penetration depth
Breakthrough time
Anolyte conductivity
Several months
.35 d
.35 d
Several weeks
Several days
2472 h
Several weeks
Several days
Samsons method
Friedmanns method
Lus method
Andrades method
Formation factor method
ASTM C1202/Aashto T227
Conductivity test method
Aashto T 259
Water pressure method
Current
Current
Resistivity
Resistivity
Resistivity
Charge passed
Conductivity
Chloride profile
Penetration depth
120 h
Several
Several
Several
Several
6h
Several
90 d
Several
AC impedance method
Integral method
Impedance
Electrical potential
Several minutes
Several days
NernstPlanck
equation
NernstEinstein
equation
Formation factor
Other
weeks
minutes
minutes
minutes
minutes
weeks
Saline
solution
Saline
solution
Concrete
specimen
Concrete
specimen
13:
@C
@ 2 C zFE @C
D
@t
@x2
RT @x
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Cathode
Chloride-rich
solution
Concrete
Anode
Chloride-free
solution
14:
()
6
2 [ coth(=2) 2]
(0)
where
15:
zeV
kT
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
tests to be used in models of prediction for long term performance. The prediction through modelling is out of the scope of
present exercise.
Conclusions
Chloride is not now allowed in concretes involving steel
reinforced construction. However, chloride is present in many
service environments where it migrates into concrete. Concrete
itself is little damaged by chloride unless its concentration
exceeds several molar, although portlandite solubility is enhanced
relative to pure water even at low (0 .1 M) concentrations.
However, the paste mineralogy of calcium aluminate hydrates
(AFm) is affected and Friedels salt stabilises at a few tens of
millimolar chloride.
Steel in concrete is normally well passivated by the cement
environment and a chemically reducing environment forms spontaneously in the vicinity of steel. This passivation, however,
breaks down in the presence of chloride. The transition between
regimes of passivation and corrosion is the subject of debate.
Does it depend on chloride content alone or on the ratio of
hydroxide/chloride? And should a distinction be made between
free and bound chloride? The state or condition of the steel
cement interface is complicated by the involvement of other
cement components (e.g. oxygen partial pressure and the activities of other anions such as sulfates and carbonates) so
laboratory simulations based on simplistic considerations give
numerical values that cannot be expected to be universally
applicable. The proposed concept of thresholds dividing regimes
of corrosion from passivation is likely to be fuzzy.
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Acknowledgement
The work reported here was funded through research grant
number ENG016 RGG0593, awarded by the Gulf Organization of
Research and Development (GORD), Qatar.
REFERENCES
93
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
94
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
Chloride in cement
Galan and Glasser
97