0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
106 vues11 pages
Behavior over time (BOT) graphs are a kind of systems thinking tool. Causal loop diagrams help you form theories about why things are happening as they are. A systems thinking consultant can help you develop and test your theories.
Behavior over time (BOT) graphs are a kind of systems thinking tool. Causal loop diagrams help you form theories about why things are happening as they are. A systems thinking consultant can help you develop and test your theories.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Behavior over time (BOT) graphs are a kind of systems thinking tool. Causal loop diagrams help you form theories about why things are happening as they are. A systems thinking consultant can help you develop and test your theories.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
of systems thinking tool. Like other basic graphs, they have horizontal and vertical axes, with a line showing how something is changing over time. You draw a BOT graph in order to depict patterns of behavior that you want to explore from a systems thinking perspective. For example, you might want to show changes in your company's sales over the past, say, five years—as well as future sales patterns that you'd like or expect to see happen. BOT graphs often reveal "signature" patterns of behavior that indicate that a particular systemic process is at work. For instance, suppose your company makes a cell phone with snazzy new features on it. If your graph of the sales history of this product shows sales increasing dramatically and then leveling off, then perhaps your product is experiencing market saturation—e.g., everyone who wants one of these phones has bought one. This is a common eventual constraint on the sales growth of a hot new product. You can also graph more than one thing on a BOT graph, which helps you see how the two things might be related. To illustrate, suppose you graphed your cell-phone sales history and the number of dollars spent on marketing for that product. You might come up with a graph that looks like this: This graph vividly shows how a rise in investment in marketing a product might be contributing to a jump in sales of that product. BOT graphs also encourage you to think about what time frame to use in your analysis. For example, if it typically takes several years to develop a new product, you wouldn't want to graph "number of new products developed" over the course of just a few quarters—you'd want to extend that horizontal axis of your graph to include plenty of product-development cycles, perhaps six or 10 years' worth to start seeing patterns. Though they might seem simple at first, BOT graphs let you form some theories about why things might be happening as they are in your organization. And once you form some theories, you have a much better chance of testing them—and possibly turning around some of the more troubling patterns!
2. CAUSAL LOOP DIAGRAMS
Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) are a kind of
systems thinking tool. These diagrams consist of arrows connecting variables (things that change over time) in a way that shows how one variable affects another. Here are some examples:
Each arrow in a causal loop diagram is labeled
with an "s" or an "o." "S" means that when the first variable changes, the second one changes in the same direction (for example, as your anxiety at work goes up, the number of mistakes you make goes up, too).
"O" means that the first variables causes a change
in the opposite direction in the second variable (for example, the more relaxation exercises you do, the less stressed you feel). In CLDs, the arrows come together to form loops, and each loop is labeled with an "R" or a "B." "R" means reinforcing; i.e., the causal relationships within the loop create exponential growth or collapse. (For instance, the more anxious you are at work, the more mistakes you make, and as you make more mistakes, you get even more anxious, and so on, in a vicious, upward spiral). "B" means balancing; i.e., the causal influences in the loop keep things in equilibrium. (For example, if you feel more stressed, you do more relaxation exercises, which brings your stress level down.) CLDs can contain many different "R" and "B" loops, all connected together with arrows. By drawing these diagrams with your work team or other colleagues, you can get a rich array of perspectives on what's happening in your organization. You can then look for ways to make changes so as to improve things. For example, by understanding the connection between anxiety and mistakes, you could look for ways to reduce anxiety in your organization. 2.1 Reinforcing Loops: when small changes become big changes Reinforcing loops generate exponential growth and collapse, in which the growth or collapse continues at an ever-increasing rate. To grasp the often-surprising ramifications of exponential growth, consider an interest-bearing bank account. Your money grows much faster than it would if you merely put $100 each year into a piggy bank. At first, the difference seems small, interest would generate only a few extra dollars per year. But if you left the interest in the bank, the money would grow at an ever-faster rate. After fifty years (at 7 percent interest), you'd have more than $40,000, more than eight times as much as the piggy bank would generate by growing at the same rate, year after year. REINFORCING LOOP TEMPLATE
2.2 Balancing loops: pushing stability,
resistance, and limits Balancing processes generate the forces of resistance, which eventually limit growth. But they are also the mechanisms, found in nature and all systems, that fix problems, maintain stability, and achieve equilibrium. They ensure that every system never strays far from its "natural" operating range -- a human body's homeostatic state, an ecosystem's balance of predator and prey, or a company's "natural" expenses, which, whenever you cut them, seem to balloon up somewhere else. Balancing loops are often found in situations which seem to be self-correcting and self- regulating, whether the participants like it or not. If people talk about "being on a roller coaster," or "being flung up and down like a yo-yo," then they are caught in one type of balancing structure. If caught in another type, they may say, "We're running into walls," or "We can't break through the barrier," or "No matter what we try, we can't change the system." Despite the frustration they often engender, balancing loops aren't innately bad: they ensure, for example, that there is usually some way to stop a runaway vicious spiral. Our survival depends on the many balancing processes which regulate the earth, the climate, and our bodies. Balancing processes are always bound to a target -- a constraint or goal which is often implicitly set by the forces of the system. Whenever current reality doesn't match the balancing loop's target, the resulting gap (between the target and the svstem's actual performance) generates a kind of pressure which the system cannot ignore. The greater the gap, the greater the pressure. It's as if the system itself has a single-minded awareness of "how things ought to be," and will do everything in its power to return to that state. Until you recognize the gap, and identify the goal or constraint which drives it, you won't understand the behavior of the balancing loop. The North Millerfield Community Hospital (a pseudonym) in Connecticut opened a very attractive outpatient clinic in the late 1980s. The administrators knew that it was meeting a real need, and they assumed it would always be filled with patients, almost up to its capacity. That would make it a constant revenue generator. However, a few months after it opened, the number of patient visits (and thus revenues) leveled off, below the hospital's forecasts. The hospital started a community marketing campaign, and patient visits rose for a time, but soon dropped off again. Finally, the administrators took a close look at their patient volume statistics. They spent time in the waiting room and surveyed staff at the front desk and patients. It turned out that when traffic was low, people were served quickly. Word got around, doctors and paramedics referred people, and North Millerfield's clinic became crowded. But people have an innate distaste for sitting in busy waiting rooms. Since they had a choice, they went elsewhere. The general lesson for all businesses is: if you don't adjust your service satisfaction to the level expected by your customers, the system will do it for you! Sometimes, the target is clearly articulated and shared. Everyone in a sales force knows their sales targets. Other times, it is obscure, ill- defined, implicit, or assumed. The level of quality which customers would accept has driven the changes in the auto industry for the past twenty years, but no one has been able to agree on, or measure, that level of quality. A vision may drive the behavior of a team but never be articulated. Sometimes the target moves or changes, because it too is subject to influences from the system. In fact, discovering or creating new targets is often the key to overcoming the resistance that confronts you. BALANCING LOOP TEMPLATE:
The Conflict With Slavery and Others, Complete, Volume VII, The Works of Whittier: The Conflict With Slavery, Politicsand Reform, The Inner Life and Criticism by Whittier, John Greenleaf, 1807-1892