Bibliography on Authorship, Plagiarism, Originality, and Textuality

Alford, William P. 1995. To Steal a Book Is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property Law in Chinese
Civilization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Babbitt, Irving. 1908. On Being Original. Atlantic Monthly 101:388-396. (Reprinted as pp. 215-245 in
Literature in the American College. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.)
Barth, John. 1982. The Literature of Exhaustion and the Literature of Replenishment. Northridge,
California: Lord John Press.
Barron, Anne. 2006. Copyright Laws Musical Work. Social & Legal Studies 15(1):101-127
Behme, Tim. 2004. Isocrates on the Ethics of Authorship. Rhetoric Review 23(3):197-215
Bently, Lionel. 2008. R. v The Author: From Death Penalty to Community Service. Columbia Journal
of Law & the Arts 32:1-109
Berensmeyer, Ingo, Gert Buelens, and Marysa Demoor. 2012. Authorship as Cultural Performance: New
Perspectives in Authorship Studies. Zeitschrift fr Anglistik und Amerikanistik 60(1):529
Bettig, Ronald. 1996. Copyrighting Culture: the Political Economy of Intellectual Property. Boulder,
Colorado: Westview Press.
Bielo, James S. 2009. Words Upon the Word: an Ethnography of Evangelical Group Bible Study. New
York: New York University Press.
Blum, Susan. 2009. My Word!: Plagiarism and College Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Boyle, James. 1988. The Search for an Author: Shakespeare and the Framers. American University Law
Review 37:625-643
Boyle, James. 1996. Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information
Society. Harvard University Press.
Bracha, Oren, 2008. The Ideology of Authorship Revisited: Authors, Markets, and Liberal Values in Early
American Copyright. Yale Law Journal 118(2):186-271
Buranen, Lise. 1999. But I Wasnt Cheating: Plagiarism and Cross-Cultural Mythology. Pp. 63-74 in
Buranen & Roy (1999).
Buranen, Lise, and Alice M. Roy (eds.) 1999. Perspectives on Plagiarism and Intellectual Property in a
Postmodern World. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Burke, Sean. 1992. The Death and Return of the Author. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Dewoskin. Kenneth J. 1992. "Chinese and Japanese Aesthetics." In A Companion to Aesthetics, edited by
David Cooper, 68-73. Oxford. UK: Blackwell.
Dryden, L. M. 1999. A Distant Mirror or Through the Looking Glass? Plagiarism and Intellectual
Property in Japanese Education. Pp. 75-85 in Buranen & Roy (1999).
Dubois, Thomas A. 1996. Native Hermeneutics: Traditional Means of Interpreting Lyric Songs in
Northern Europe. Journal of American Folklore 109(433):235-266

Engelke, Matthew. 2007. A Problem of Presence: Beyond Scripture in an African Church. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Erasmus, Desiderius. 1908. CICERONIANUS, or A Dialogue on the Best Style of Speaking. (Translation
of Dialogus Ciceronianus, 1528). Translated by Izora Scott. New York City: Teachers College,
Columbia University.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Faudree, Paja. 2015. Tales from the Land of Magic Plants: Textual Ideologies and Fetishes of Indigeneity
in Mexicos Sierra Mazateca. Comparative Studies in Society and History 57(3):838869.
Frosio, Giancarlo. 2014. Rediscovering Cumulative Creativity From The Oral Formulaic Tradition To
Digital Remix: Can I Get A Witness? John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law 13:341395
Genette, Grard. 1982/1997. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Lincoln: University of
Nebraska Press.
Gunkel, David. 2012. What Does it Matter Who is Speaking? Authorship, Authority, and the Mashup.
Popular Music and Society 35(1):71-91
Hu, Guangwei & Jun Lei. 2015. Chinese University Students Perceptions of Plagiarism. Ethics &
Behavior 25(3):233-255
Irwin, William (ed.) 2002. The Death and Resurrection of the Author? Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood
Press.
Iseminger, Gary (ed.). 1992. Intention and interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Ivanhoe, Philip. 2005. Intellectual Property and Traditional Chinese Culture. Pp. 125-142 in Joseph
Keirn Campbell, Michael O'Rourke, and David Shier (eds.), Law and Social Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
Jaszi, Peter. 1981. When Works Collide: Derivative Motion Pictures, Underlying Rights, and the Public
Interest. UCLA Law Review 28:715-815
Jaszi, Peter. 1988. Brief of Appellant Edward De Vere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford. American University
Law Review 37:645ff.
Jaszi, Peter. 1991. Toward a Theory of Copyright: The Metamorphoses of Authorship. Duke Law
Journal 1991(2):455-502.
Jaszi, Peter. 2009. Is There Such a Thing as Postmodern Copyright? Tulane Journal of Technology &
Intellectual Property, 12.
Jaszi, Peter, and Martha Woodmansee. 1992/1994. Introduction. Pp. 1-13 in The Construction of
Authorship
Juvan, Marko. 2008. Towards a History of Intertextuality in Literary and Culture Studies. CLCWeb:
Comparative Literature and Culture 10.3 (2008)
Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1992. Beyond Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keane, Webb. 2003. Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language & Communication

23 (2003) 409425
Kitch, Edmund. 1968. Review of An Unhurried View of Copyright by Benjamin Kaplan. Stanford Law
Review 20(4):794-798
Lamarque, Peter. 1990. The Death of the Author: An Analytical Autopsy. British Journal of Aesthetics
30(4):319-331
Lavik, Erlend. 2014. Romantic authorship in Copyright Law and the Uses of Aesthetics. Pp. 4593 in Mireille van Eechoud (ed.), The Work of Authorship. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Lemley, Mark. 1997. Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property. Texas Law Review 75:873-906.
Liu, Deming. 2009. Reflections on Lack of a Patent System throughout Chinas Long History. Journal of
World Intellectual Property 12(2):122136
Livingston, Paisley. 2005. Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon.
Logie, John. 2013. 1967: The Birth of The Death of the Author. College English 75(5):493-512
Logie, John. 2015. Peeling the Layers of the Onion: Authorship in Mashup and Remix Cultures. Pp.
296-309 in Eduardo Navas, Owen Gallagher, and xtine burrough (eds.), The Routledge Companion to
Remix Studies. New York: Routledge.
Lu, Jia. 2009. Chinese culture and software copyright. New Media & Society 11: 1372-1393
Lubart, Todd. 1999. Creativity Across Cultures. Pp. 339-350 in Robert J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of
Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Macfarlane, Robert. 2007. Original Copy: Plagiarism and Originality in Nineteenth-Century Literature.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
McGann, Jerome. 1983. The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
McGinnis, Reginald (ed.). 2009. Originality and Intellectual Property in the French and English
Enlightenment. London: Routledge.
McLeod, Susan H. 1992. "Responding to Plagiarism: The Role of the WPA." WPA: Writing Program
Administration 15:7-16.
Makihara, Miki and Bambi B. Schieffelin. 2007. Cultural Processes and Linguistic Mediations: Pacific
Explorations. Pp. 3-29 in Consequences of Contact: Language Ideologies and Sociocultural
Transformations in Pacific Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mann, Elizabeth. 1939. The Problem of Originality in English Literary Criticism, 1750-1800.
Philological Quarterly 18(2):978-118
Miller, Keith D. 1991. Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Black Folk Pulpit. Journal of American History
78(1):120-123
Newman, G. E., & Bloom, P. 2012. Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of
value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141:558569.
Olcott 2002. Ancient and Modern Notions of Plagiarism: A Study of Concepts of Intellectual Property in

Classical Greece. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 49(4):1047-1052

Pappas, Theodore. 1998. Plagiarism and the Culture War: The Writings of Martin Luther King Jr. and
Other Prominent Americans Tampa, FL: Hallberg.
Pettitt, Thomas. 2007. Opening the Gutenberg Parenthesis: Media in Transition in Shakespeares
England. Papers presented to Conference, Creativity, Ownership and Collaboration in the Digital
Age, Media in Transition 5, Communications Forum, Massachussetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, 27-29 April. Available at http://web.mit.edu/commforum/
mit5/papers/Pettitt.Gutenberg%20Parenthesis.Paper.pdf
Philips, Susan. 2000. Constructing a Tongan nation-state through language ideology in the courtroom.
Pp. 229-257 in Kroskrity (2000).
Posner, Richard. 1988. Law and Literature: A Misunderstood Relation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Schumacher, Thomas G. 2004. This Is a Sampling Sport: Digital Sampling, Rap Music, and the Law in
Cultural Production. Pp. 443-458 in Murray Forman and Mark Anthony Neal (eds.), Thats The
Joint: The Hip-Hop Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
Seeger, Anthony. 2004. Why Suy Sing: A Musical Anthropology of an Amazonian People. Urbana:
University of Illinois Press.
Shao, Ke. 2005. Alien to Copyright?: A Reconsideration of the Chinese Historical Episodes of Copyright.
Intellectual Property Quarterly 4:400-431
Smith, Rosanna K. and George E. Newman. 2014. When Multiple Creators Are Worse Than One: The
Bias Toward Single Authors in the Evaluation of Art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
8(3):303310
Stone, Charles. 2008. What Plagiarism Was Not: Some Preliminary Observations on Classical Chinese
Attitudes Toward What the West Calls Intellectual Property. Marquette Law Review 92:199-230
Student Papers. 1991. The Martin Luther King, Jr., Papers Project, The Student Papers of Martin Luther
King, Jr.: A Summary Statement on Research. Journal of American History 78(1):23-31
Sutrop, Margit. 1994. The Death of the Literary Work. Philosophy and Literature 18(1):38-49
Terry, Richard. 2010. The plagiarism allegation in English literature from Butler to Sterne. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Thbrge, Paul. 2004. Technology, Creative Practice and Copyright. Pp. 139-156 in Simon Frith & Lee
Marshall (eds.), Music and Copyright. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
Van Eechoud, Mireille. 2014. Voices near and far. Pp. 7-17 in Mireille van Eechoud (ed.), The Work of
Authorship. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Wen Fong. 1962. The Problem of Forgeries in Chinese Painting. Artibus Asiae 25(2-3):95-140.
Wheeler, Greg. 2009. Plagiarism in the Japanese universities: Truly a cultural matter? Journal of Second
Language Writing 18:1729
White, Harold Ogden. 1935. Plagiarism and Imitation During the English Renaissance: A Study in Critical
Distinctions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wilf, Eitan. 2014. Semiotic Dimensions of Creativity. Annual Review of Anthropology 43:397-412
Woodmansee, Martha. 1984. The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the
Emergence of the Author. Eighteenth-Century Studies 17(4):425-448.
Woodmansee, Martha. 1994. The author, art, and the market: rereading the history of aesthetics. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Woodmansee, Martha and Jaszi, Peter, 1995. The Law of Texts: Copyright in the Academy. College
English 57(7).
Worton, Michael and Judith Still (eds). 1990. Intertextuality: Theories and Practices. Manchester:
Manchester University Press.
Young, Edward. 1759/1918. Conjectures on Original Composition, ed. Edith J. Morley, Manchester and
London.