Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A PROJECT REPORT
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
In
POWER ELECTRONICS
SWARNANDHRA
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING &TECHNOLOGY|
(Autonomous)
Seetharampuram-534280
J.N.T.UNIVERSITY:: KAKINADA
DECEMBER-2016
This is to certify that this project report entitled DESIGN OF FUZZY LOGIC BASED
CONTROLLER FOR HYBRID SWITCHED INDUCTOR BASED STEP UP
CONVERTER submitted by BANDARU BHARGAV SANTOSH (14A21D4302) to
Jawaharlal Nehru University Kakinada, with Swarnandhra College of Engineering &
Technology (Autonomous) for the award of the Degree of Master of Technology in Power
Electronics is a bonafide record of project work carried out by him/her under my
supervision during the year 2015-2016. The contents of this report, in full or in parts, have
not been submitted to any other Institute or University for the award of any degree or
diploma.
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
Dr.K.S.GOWRI SANKAR
SUPERVISOR
Associate professor
INTERNAL EXAMINER
EXTERNAL EXAMINER
ABSTRACT
High step-up DC DC converters are suitable for high voltage gain applications
like photovoltaic grid connected systems, fuel cell and high intensity discharge lamps
used in automobile applications and applications that use low magnitude DC voltages at
their input terminals. Boosting of input voltage is very essential in these applications. The
voltage gain of traditional boost converters is limited due to the current ripple and system
efficiency.
To overcome this drawback there is need for new converter configuration that gives
high step up gain. Switched inductor converters are much suitable to achieve this. In the
proposed work a hybrid switched inductor converter is derived with the help of passive
and active switched inductors. Voltage mode based closed loop operation of hybrid
switched inductor converter is modeled and analyzed using fuzzy logic based controller.
The fuzzy logic controller is modeled with the help of fuzzy logic controller toolbox of
MATLAB / SIMULINK. The fuzzy rules are modeled with the help Mamdani rule set.
Modeling and simulation results of the circuit are presented.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my profound gratitude and respect to the project guide,
Mr.J.RAMACHANDRA RAO Associate Professor of Department of Electrical &
Electronics Engineering for assisting us both technically and morally for giving valuable
suggestions, and constantly encouraging us throughout this project work.
I wish to regard my deep sense of gratitude to my project coordinator
Mr.V.MOORTHY, Associate Professor of Department of Electrical and Electronics
Engineering. With reverence and humility I express my deep sense of gratitude to
Dr.K.S.GOWRISANKAR Head of the Department, Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
Swarnandhra college of Engineering & Technology for his support and encouragement to
carry out this project successfully.
I profusely grateful to our principal Dr. M. SREENIVASA KUMAR and
Dr.S.RAMESH BABU, Secretary and Correspondent of Swarnandhra college of
Engineering & Technology for providing the necessary infrastructure for carrying out this
project successfully.
I am thankful to my entire department faculty and my family members for their
kind co-operation and help, extended throughout the progress of this work.
B.BHARGAV SANTOSH
(14A21D4302)
NOMENCLATURE
Symbols
Definitions
CCM
DCM
PHEV
RHFL
TSSC
ASL
Active switched-inductor
PSL
passive switched-inductor
SH-SLC
AH-SLC
VMC
CMC
VSS
PWM
Pulse-width modulation
PDM
pulse-duration modulation
FL
Fuzzy Logic
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.NO
TITLE
PAGE NO
ABSTRACT
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
NOMENCLATURE
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER
CHAPTER
CHAPTER 3
CHAPTER 4
LIST OF TABLES
Introduction
1.1
Background Study
1.2
Literature Survey
1.3
Problem Statement
1.4
Aim and Objective
1.5
Organization Of The Project Report
Topology Of Fuzzy Logic Based Controller For Hybrid
iii
iv
v
xi
xiii
1
1
2
4
4
5
6
2.2
2.3
Converters
2.3.1 for asymmetrical
structure
with
equal
2.3.2
with
equal
2.3.3
with
equal
11
2.3.4
with
equal
13
16
3.1`
16
3.2
17
3.3
3.4
3.5
Pid Controller
Sliding Mode Controllers
Pulse Width Modulation Controller
18
19
20
3.6
Fuzzy Logic Controller
Simulation Circuits And Results
20
22
4.1
4.2
22
23
23
24
4.3
24
4.3.1
25
4.4
25
4.5
26
4.6
26
4.7
27
4.8
27
4.9
28
4.10
waveform
Output inductor voltages upper leg waveforms
28
4.11
CHAPTER 5
4.12
4.13
waveforms
Fuzzy logic based closed loop control lower leg
29
29
30
waveforms
Conclusion
31
References
32
LIST OF FIGURES
Page No.
Figure 2.1
07
Figure 2.2
Asymmetrical structure
07
Figure 2.3
Symmetrical structure
08
Figure 2.4
08
Figure 2.5
09
Figure 2.6
09
Figure 2.7
11
Figure 2.8
11
Figure 2.9
11
Figure 2.10
12
Figure 2.11
14
Figure 2.12
15
Figure 3.1
16
Figure 3.2
17
Figure 3.3
18
Figure 3.4
20
Figure 3.5
21
Figure 4.1
23
Figure 4.2
23
Figure 4.3
24
Figure 4.4
24
Figure 4.5
24
Figure 4.6
24
Figure 4.7
25
Figure 4.8
25
Figure 4.9
26
Figure 4.10
26
Figure 4.11
27
Figure 4.12
27
Figure 4.13
28
Figure 4.14
29
Figure.4.15
Figure.4.16
29
30
LIST OF TABLES
Page No.
Table 1
15
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
BACKGROUND STUDY
A DC DC converter nothing but a chopper is an electronic circuit or
electromechanical device that converts a source of direct current (DC) from one voltage
level to another. It is a type of electric power converter. Power levels range from very low
(small batteries) to very high (high voltage power transmission).
Generally these DC DC converters comprising of a four basic converters .They are
boost, buck, buck- boost, and Cuk converters. These converters work in two distinct modes
with respect to the inductor current: the continuous conduction mode (CCM) and
discontinuous conduction mode (DCM). When the inductor current is always greater than
zero, it is in CCM. When the average inductor current is too low due to the high load
resistance or low switching frequency, then the converter is in DCM. The CCM is
preferable for high efficiency and efficient use of semiconductor switches and passive
components. The DCM requires a special control since the dynamic order of the converter
is reduced. Thus, it is required to find out the minimum value of the inductor to maintain
the CCM.
Fuzzy logic is an approach to computing based on degrees of truth rather than the
usual true or false Boolean logic on which the modern computer is based. The idea of
fuzzy logic was first advanced by Lotfi Zadeh in the year 1960.
The input variables in a fuzzy control system are in general mapped by sets of
membership functions similar to this, known as "fuzzy sets". The process of converting a
crisp input value to a fuzzy value is called "fuzzification". A control system may also have
various types of switch, or "ONOFF", inputs along with its analog inputs, and such switch
inputs of course will always have a truth value equal to either 1 or 0, but the scheme can
deal with them as simplified fuzzy functions that happen to be either one value or another.
Given "mappings" of input variables into membership functions and truth values, the
microcontroller then makes decisions for what action to take, based on a set of "rules", each
of the form
Fuzzy controllers are very simple conceptually. They consist of an input stage, a
processing stage, and an output stage. The input stage maps sensor or other inputs, such as
switches, thumbwheels, and so on, to the appropriate membership functions and truth
values. The processing stage invokes each appropriate rule and generates a result for each,
then combines the results of the rules. Finally, the output stage converts the combined
result back into a specific control output value.
1.2
LITERATURE SURVEY
Firstly research done about a photovoltaic (PV) system. The system which
significantly reduces rated power converter and efficiency increases by means of it flats
throughout all load ranges at power conversion stages. Because analysis of the proposed
topology, only 20% of total PV system power is produced by the dc/dc power conversion
stage so it have flat efficiency throughout all loads leads to implementation burden of highpower dc/dc power conversion stages is low. So, this technique helpful in this project and
applied to all power rating PCS. Since dc-link voltage can be boosted enough to provide
the ac voltage directly, the current rating of IGBT is about half of that of conventional PCS
with low dc-link voltage without boost converter which leads to increases efficiency. [1]
On comparison of different soft switching converters with conventional singlestage DCM PFC converters, Fly back converter are advanced technique useful for reduce
and to transfer electrical energy between the battery pack and the high-voltage bus of the
electric traction system. This PHEV conversion also provides reduced number of highcurrent inductors and current transducers and has provided fault-current tolerance. To
verify the practicality of the proposed converter for PHEV applications with prototype and
vehicle power management system need to be implemented in a real vehicle, and fault
tolerance of the system should be tested in real-world applications [5]
A soft-switching scheme is presented and verified for an isolated multiphase
dc/pulsating-dc converter, which is the front-end stage of a three-phase rectifier-type highfrequency-link inverter (RHFL). This analysis outlines a switching scheme to improve the
energy efficiency for an isolated high-frequency multiphase dc/pulsating-dc converter. In
this project implementing without usage of any auxiliary circuit to RHFL introduces a
switching scheme achieves zero-current or zero-voltage switching for the power switches.
Moreover, on the back-end pulsating-dc/ac converter, the proposed soft-switching scheme
reduces the switching frequency requirements for the associated switchers, which need
high-frequency switching.
In conjunction with the hybrid modulation scheme on the back-end pulsating-dc/ac
converter, this switching scheme leads to less overall switching loss than other existing
schemes. These schemes are suitable for isolated low-voltage dc to three-phase highvoltage ac applications from the stand points of cost, efficiency, and footprint, also
proposed scheme reduces the frequency of the pulsating-dc output, which normally equals
twice or higher of the switching frequency, thereby reducing the switching requirement
(i.e., switching loss) [6]
Reference [7] analysis the differences of advantages the hard switching and soft
switching, In earlier papers discussed about switches of resulting topologies operate in hard
switching mode, but it have some switching losses. In order to achieve soft switching an
active clamping circuit was added means an active clamping modified push-pull converter
using the three-state switching cell (TSSC).
The active clamping circuit allows soft switching in the converter switches for a
determined load range. Thus, switching losses are reduced and the converter efficiency is
improved. Qualitative and quantitative analyses, a design example and experimental results
are presented for the proposed converter. The experimental tests are performed on a 1 kW
laboratory prototype, which steps the input voltage from 48 V to 400V. So in this project
utilizing a modified push-pull converter based on the TSSC allows the connection of a
blocking capacitor in series with the primary winding of the isolator transformer, as it is
possible to avoid its saturation. [7]
1.3 PROBLEM STATEMENT
Conventional converters suffers with the drawback of low conversion gain as a result
fly back converters are found to be a better option for achieving higher conversion gains
but the transformer used in fly back converters increases stress of the switches which in
tuned increases the switching losses As a result life of the switches decreases so this
imposes a need for a new circuit that can minimize the losses the circuit proposed for study
minimizes forsake issues
1.4 AIM AND OBJECTIVE
The project is aimed to design a high gain DC-DC converter based on fuzzy logic
controller with switched inductor.
The primary objective of the project is to develop and simulate a high gain DC-DC
converter. The secondary objective is to design and implement pulse width modulation
(PWM), fuzzy logic based closed loop controllers for achieving better dynamic response.
Finally, to compare the performance of PWM and fuzzy logic controller for high gain DCDC output response.
1.5 ORGANISATION OF THE PROJECT REPORT
The thesis has been organized into five chapters.
Chapter 1:
Chapter 2:
Discussed about the topology of fuzzy logic based controlled for hybrid
switched inductor based step up converter and modes of operation.
Chapter 3:
Discussed about respected simulated circuits for fuzzy logic based step up
converter using MATLAB/SIMULINK
Chapter 4: Discussed about the Simulation results of hybrid switches step up converter
with and without fuzzy logic controller
Chapter 5:
Discussed about conclusion & references of the work under taken in this
thesis and also acknowledge about the future work.
CHAPTER-2
HYBRID SWITCHED-INDUCTOR HIGH GAIN DC-DC
CONVERTERS
2.1
INTRODUCTION
The one of the important electronic circuits are DC-DC converters, which are
widely used in power electronics. The main problem with operation of DC-DC converter is
unregulated power supply, which leads to improper function of DC -DC converters. There
are various analogue and digital control methods used for dc-dc converters and some have
been adopted by industry including voltage- and current-mode control techniques .The DCDC converter inputs are generally unregulated dc voltage input and the required outputs
should be a constant or fixed voltage. Application of a voltage regulator is that it should
maintains a constant or fixed output voltage irrespective of variation in load current or
input voltage. Various kinds of voltage regulators with a variety of control schemes are
used to enhance the efficiency of DC-DC converters.
Today due to the advancement in power electronics and improved technology a
more severe requirement for accurate and reliable regulation is desired. This has led to need
for more advanced and reliable design of controller for dc-dc converters. There are various
types of DC-DC converters required for particular purpose like Buck, Boost, Buck and
Boost, Cuk and fly back. These all DC-DC converters have their specific configurations to
complete their tasks. Varieties in DC-DC converter required different type of controlling
techniques because single technique cannot be applied to all converters as the all have
different specifications.
2.2
Transformer less high gain converters with passive switched-inductor unit (P-SL)
and active switched-inductor unit (A-SL) shown in Figure 2.1. The P-SL unit consists two
inductors Lu L2 and three diodes D1, D2, D3, when the potential voltage across the point A
and B (i.e. VAB) is positive, Db D2 become conduct and D3 is shutting off, two inductors
are parallel connected; when VAB becomes negative, D1 D2 are reverse biased and D3 is
conducted, then the two inductors are series connected with the input (1-1') of the two-port
network.
.
Figure 2.2 Asymmetrical structure
Where Figure 2.2 shows the asymmetrical structure and Figure 2.3 shows the
symmetrical structure. The power switches share the same switching signals, which is easy
to control. When the switches are conduct, the inductors operates in parallel connection and
charged by the power source; when the switches are shutting off, the inductors operates in
series connection and discharged to the output.
Mode-1 [t0-t1]: The switches S1 and S2 are triggered on during the time interval. The
equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 2.4 (a). The three inductors L1a, L1b, L2 are charged
in parallel by the power source. The voltage across the inductors can be expressed as
V LIa =V LIb =V L 2=V i
(2.1)
V iV 0
3
(2.2)
V i V 0
3
The voltage gain in CCM operation is:
V
1+2 D
GCCM = 0 =
V i 1D
(2.3)
D .V i + ( 1D ) .
(2.4)
vi
DT s
L
(2.5)
V 0 V i
D2 T S
3L
(2.6)
Mode 3[t2-t3]: During this time interval, the equivalent circuit is shown in Figure
5.3(c). The load is supplied by the capacitor. Combining (5.5) and (5.6), the relationship
between D2 and D is:
D 2=
3Vi
D
V 0V i
(2.7)
The average current through the output diode is equal to load current Io, therefore:
V
1
D2 i LIp =I 0= 0
2
RL
(2.8)
1+ 1+
V 0=
6 D2
t
(2.9)
Vi
Lf S
RL
(2.10)
Where L is the inductance of the three inductors; is the switching frequency; RL is the load.
The voltage gain in DCM operation is:
GDCM =
V0
=
Vi
1+ 1+
2
6 D2
t
(2.11)
Mode 2 [t1-t2]: During this time interval, S1 and S2 are turned off. The current-flow path
is shown in Figure 7(b). The four inductors L1a, L1b, L2a, L2b are discharged to the output
in series. The voltage across the inductors is
V LIa =V LI b =V L 2 a=V L2 b=
V iV 0
4
(2.13)
V i V 0
=0
4
(2.14)
The voltage gain in CCM operation is
GCCM =
(2.15)
V 0 1+3 D
=
V i 1D
Vi
DT S
L
(2.16)
Mode 2[t1-t2]: This mode is similar to Mode 2 in CCM operation. During the time t2, the
inductor current decreased to 0. iL1apiL1bpiL2apiL2bp can be expressed as:
i LIap =i LIbp =i L2 ap=i L2 bp=
V 0V i
D2T S .
4L
(2.17)
Mode 3[t2-t3]: During this time interval, the equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 5(c).
The load is supplied by the capacitor. Combining (16) and (17), D2 could be expressed as
D 2=
4Vi
D.
V 0V i
(2.18)
The average current through the output diode is equal to load current Io, therefore:
V
1
D2 i LIp =I 0= 0
2
RL
(2.19)
Combing (16), (18) and (19), the output voltage could be obtained
V 0=
1 1
8D2
+ 1+
Vi
2 2
t
(2.20)
V0 1 1
8 D2
= + 1+
Vi 2 2
t
(2.21)
The comparison of switch voltage stress in the four converters is shown in Table. To
realize the same voltage ratio, the Boost converter and SL-Boost converter present the high
voltage stress across the switch; while the switch voltage stress is greatly decreased in SHSLC and SC-Boost. That means the switches with low voltage stress can be utilized. These
Utilized Components and Parameters of Sh-Slc as shown in Table 1
Table 1 Utilized Components and Parameters of Sh-Slc
SH-SLC
AH-SLC
SC-Boost
SL-Boost
Boost
Voltage gain
1+3 D
1D
1+2 D
1D
2
1D
1+ D
1D
1
1D
Voltage of
MOSFET
( 1+G ) Vi
2
1+2 GVi
3
GV i
2
GV i
GV i
GV i
2
GV i
GV i
2+GVi
3
Voltage of
output
diodes
Voltage of
diodes in th
P-SL
( 1+G ) Vi
( 1+G ) Vi
( G1 ) V i
4
( G1 ) V i
3
( G1 ) V i
2
Vi
Vi
Vi
GV i
2
Voltage of
diodes in th
SC
IL
Io
G CCM +3
4
GCCM
G CCM +1
2
GCCM
CHAPTER-3
CONTROLLERS FOR HIGH GAIN DC-DC CONVERTERS
3.1
output voltage is measured and compared to a reference voltage Figure 3.1. This VMC
method is used in research as well as in industry due its easy implementation It uses
measured output and reference voltage to generate the control voltage.
After this the control voltage is used to determine the switching duty ratio by comparison
with a constant frequency waveform. This duty ratio is used to maintain the average
voltage across the inductor. This will eventually bring the output voltage to its reference
value and which help in the delivery of constant voltage without any variation.
There are various drawbacks in VMC method:
3.2
control loops Figure 3.2. There are various application of CMC for different application.
After sensing the inductor current it is used to control the duty cycle. An error signal is
produced after comparing the output voltage Vo with fixed reference voltage Vref and this
error signal is used to generate control signal ic. The next step is to sense inductor current
and compared with control signal ic to generate the duty cycle of particular frequency and
drive the switch of the converter.
All response depend on the position of feedback loop as if the feedback loop is
closed, the inductor current is proportional to the control signal ic and the output voltage
becomes equal to reference voltage Vref. Irrespective of the various advantages of CMC it
also has some drawbacks.
PID CONTROLLER
PID control is one of the oldest and classical control technique used for DC-DC
converters .It uses one of its families of controllers including P, PD, PI and PID controllers
Figure 3.3. These different combinations will gives us various ways to regulate dc power
supply in these converters. But here we will discuss only PID in details. Due to the various
advantages of PID it is widely used for industrial applications in the area of power
electronics. One of the main causes for the use of this classical technique still in industrial
applications is easy implementation of tuning method like Ziegler-Nichols tuning
procedure by which we can easily optimise proportional, integral and derivative term of
this control method needed to achieve a desired closed-loop performance.
A proportional integral derivation controller (PID Controller) is a generic control
loop feedback mechanism widely used in industrial control system as well as in research.
This approach is often viewed as simple, reliable, and easy to implement. PID controllers
are commonly used as controllers for boost converters in PV. Some important advantages
and disadvantages of PID control technique are:
Advantages of PID controllers: i. It is easy and simple to implement. ii. Easy to
understand. iii. Reliable for linear systems.
Disadvantages of PID controllers: i. It does not reliable and satisfactorily in case of
non-linear systems. ii. It shows longer rise time when overshoot in output voltage
decreases. iii. It suffers from dynamic response and produces overshoot affecting the output
voltage regulation of converter.
algorithms used in photovoltaic solar battery chargers the other being maximum power
point tracking.
The average value of voltage (and current) fed to the load is controlled by turning the
switch between supply and load on and off at a fast rate. The longer the switch is on
compared to the off periods, the higher the total power supplied to the load.
The PWM switching frequency has to be much higher than what would affect the load (the
device that uses the power), which is to say that the resultant waveform perceived by the
load must be as smooth as possible. The rate (or frequency) at which the power supply
must switch can vary greatly depending on load and application. The term duty
cycle describes the proportion of 'on' time to the regular interval or 'period' of time; a low
duty cycle corresponds to low power, because the power is off for most of the time. Duty
cycle is expressed in percent, 100% being fully on.
3.6
alternative for a variety control applications .The concept of Fuzzy Logic (FL) was
conceived by Lotfi Zadeh, a professor at the University of California at Berkley. According
to him, it not as a control methodology, but as a way of processing data by allowing partial
set membership function rather than crisp.
There are four main elements in the fuzzy logic controller system structure named
as: Fuzzifier, Rule base, Inference engine and defuzzyfier. The working of fuzzy logic
controller structure can be easily understood from the block diagram Figure 2.5. Its
working is divided in 3 main steps: i. Fuzzification. ii. Inference. iii. Defuzzification.
CHAPTER-4
SIMULATION FRAMEWORK AND RESULTS
4.1
because before the system can be modeled as a hardware prototype, it needs to be tested for
actual operation, fault analysis, possible improvements etc. It should also be noted that all
system variables are accessible to be studied in detail, and the dynamics of the system can
be predicted. It is known that disturbances can be suppressed and parts of a system can be
studied in isolation through simulations. The important reasons for performing a simulation
before hardware implementation are that the latter is too expensive, might be unsafe since it
has never been done before among other practical problems.
Simulation allows for exhaustive experiments to be carried out. Simulation also
facilitates learning about the system behavior under different operating conditions,
providing realistic operator training and experiment under various load profiles. Once the
designs of the entire system and individual components have been finalized, as done in the
previous section, the next step in the procedure is to develop a simulation model. This
model would be a simulation implementation in order to demonstrate the working
capability of the proposed system and the proof of principle of operation. The simulations
have been carried out using MATLAB and Simulink software. The significance of various
blocks is explained. Some of the blocks have embedded MATLAB code, which is
presented in the appendices. The simulation parameters are given at the end of the section.
Figure 4.4 Simulated model of Passive Switch with lower leg (b)
4.3
load out put voltage wave form generated under open loop control technique
inductor voltages across lower leg switch wave forms as shown in the figure 4.9. These
output inductor voltages under open loop control.
4.9
these load output voltage wave form generated under fuzzy logic based closed loop control
technique .Compare these waveform with Open loop control waveform and observe the
variations in Load output voltage
inductor voltages across upper leg switch wave forms as shown in the figure 4.13 .These
output inductor voltages under Fuzzy logic based loop control
4.12
In Hybrid switched-inductor converter, the switches are hybrid and the respective
inductor voltages across lower leg switch wave forms as shown in the figure 4.16 .These
output inductor voltages under Fuzzy logic based loop control
CHAPTER-5
CONCLUSION
Hybrid switched-inductor converters which based on the switched-inductor cell and
active-network are studied with the help of fuzzy logic controller. The characteristics of the
converters are shown as following:
The proposed converter can achieve a high gain(up to 20 times) with a small duty cycle
which is difficult for traditional Boost converter; The proposed SH-SLC combines the
advantages of switched-inductor cell that can reduce the current stress of inductors and
active-network which can bring down voltage stress of switches; The inductors in the SLcell can be integrated into one magnetic core, which helps to reduce the size of magnetic
components Simulation and experimental results have been given to verify the analysis.
REFERENCES
[1].X. Wu, J. Zhang, X. Ye, and Z. Qian, Analysis and derivations for a family ZVS
converter based on a new active clamp ZVS cell, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol.
55, no. 2, pp. 773781, Feb. 2008.
[2].C. T. Pan and C. M. Lai, A High-Efficiency High Step-Up Converter With Low
Switch Voltage Stress for Fuel-Cell System Applications, IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 19982006, Jun. 2010.
[3].M. Sarhangzadeh, S. H. Hosseini, M. B. B. Sharifian, and G. B. Gharehpetian,
Multiinput Direct DCAC Converter With High-Frequency Link for Clean
Power-Generation Systems, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 26, no. 6, pp.17771789, Jun 2011.
[4].L. S. Yang and T. J. Liang. Analysis and Implementation of a Novel Bidirectional
DCDC Converter, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 422434, Jan.
2012.
[5].Y. Zhao, W. H. Li, and X. N. He, Single-Phase Improved Active Clamp CoupledInductor-Based Converter With Extended Voltage Doubler Cell, IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2869-2878, Jun. 2012.
[6].Y. P. Hsieh, J. F. Chen, T. J. Liang, L. S. Yang, Novel High Step-Up DCDC
Converter With Coupled-Inductor and Switched-Capacitor Techniques , IEEE
Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 9981007, Feb. 2012
[7].R.G Ganesan and M. Prabhakar, Non-isolated high gain boost converter for
photovoltaic applications, in Proc. IEEE ICPEC, 2013pp.277-280. 1
[8].B. Gu, J. Dominic, J. S. Lai, Z. Zhao, and C. Liu, High Boost Ratio Hybrid
Transformer DCDC Converter for Photovoltaic Module Applications, IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 2048-2058, Apr. 2013.
[9].P. H. Tseng, J. F. Chen, and Y. P. Hsieh, A novel active clamp high step-up DC-DC
converter with coupled-inductor for fuel cell system, in Proc. IEEE IFEEC, 2013,
pp. 326-331
[10]. H. M. Hsu and C. T. Chien, Multiple Turn Ratios of On-Chip Transformer With
Four Intertwining Coils, IEEE Trans.Electron Devices., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 44-47,
Jan. 2014.
[11]. X. Zhang, C. C. Yao, C. Li, L. X. Fu, F. Guo, and J. Wang, A Wide Bandgap
Device-Based Isolated Quasi-Switched-Capacitor DC/DC Converter, IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2500-2510, May. 2014.
[12]. H. S. Kim, J. W. Baek, M. H. Ryu, J. H. Kim, and J. H. Jung, The HighEfficiency Isolated ACDC Converter Using the Three-Phase Interleaved LLC
Resonant Converter Employing the Y-Connected Rectifier, IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 4017-4028, Aug. 2014.
[13]. Y. H. Hu, W. D. Xiao, W. H. Li, and X. N. He, Three-phase interleaved highstep-up converter with coupled-inductor-based voltage quadrupler, IET Power
Electronics., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1841-1849, Jul. 2014.
[14]. T. Meng, S. Yu, H. Q. Ben, and G. Wei, A Family of Multilevel Passive Clamp
Circuits With Coupled Inductor Suitable for Single-Phase Isolated Full-Bridge
Boost PFC Converter, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 4348-4356,
Aug. 2014.
[15]. J. H. Lee, T. J. Liang, J. F. Chen, Isolated Coupled-Inductor-Integrated DCDC
Converter With Non dissipative Snubber for Solar Energy Applications, IEEE
Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 3337-3348, Jul. 2014.