Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Desk fans for the control of the convection ow around occupants using ceiling
mounted personalized ventilation
A. Makhoul*, K. Ghali, N. Ghaddar
Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box 11-0236, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 13 July 2012
Received in revised form
29 August 2012
Accepted 29 August 2012
This study aims at studying by modeling and experimentation the performance enhancement of ceilingmounted personalized ventilation (PV) nozzle when assisted by small desk-mounted fans to reduce the
effect of thermal plume generated by the occupant. Detailed computational uid dynamics CFD simulations were performed to study the ow, thermal, and CO2 concentration elds around an occupant
using a single jet ceiling-mounted PV nozzle in the conditioned space while the fans are on. The CFD
model was integrated with a bioheat model to determine the corresponding human body segmental heat
uxes and convective plumes for predicting the occupant segmental and overall comfort. The CFD model
was validated with experiments using a cylindrical heat source and comparing measured velocity,
temperature and CO2 concentrations in the vicinity of the nozzle and the cylinder. Good agreement is
found between the measured and the numerically predicted values. The performance of the PV nozzle
assisted with desk fans is assessed by evaluation of ventilation effectiveness in the occupant microclimate and comfort conditions and results are compared with single jet PV and co-axial jet PV, both
without the use of desk fans. The desk-mounted fans were able to reduce the convection plumes around
the occupant and improved the performance of the single jet PV nozzle by doubling the ventilation
effectiveness and improving comfort. They permitted also to achieve a reduced energy saving by up to
13% when compared with conventional mixing ventilation systems.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Personalized ventilation
Air quality
Thermal comfort
Energy efciency
1. Introduction
Means of reducing cooling requirements of spaces includes
localizing the ow around the occupant using variable angle
diffuser with central return vent as suggested by Lo et al. [1]. The
localizing ventilation system will permit to conne the conditioned
air in a canopy around each occupant separately thus allowing for
considerable energy savings when ofce spaces are partially
occupied. Although the mentioned system allows for reducing the
cooling requirements of ofce spaces, it does not provide the
occupants with effective fresh air delivery for enhanced indoor air
quality. For improved ventilation effectiveness, researchers suggested the usage of personalized ventilation (PV) modules with
adjustable ow rates and temperatures to meet the occupants
comfort needs [2,3]. Rather than installing the PV modules on ofce
desks as done conventionally, Yang [4] suggested combining the PV
devices with mixing ventilation systems using ceiling-mounted PV
for ofces in tropical climates. The nozzle was mounted in the
Nomenclature
Symbols
AQI
AC
C
D
D
IAQ
PV
t
y
Greek symbols
3
effectiveness
r
density of CO2 (kg/m3)
m
viscosity of air (kg/m$s)
Subscripts
b
breathing zone
f
fresh air
r
return vent
t
turbulent
v
ventilation
recirculated air at the same velocity). Khalifa et al. [6,7] used coaxial horizontal PV jet and showed improvement in ventilation
effectiveness because of superior jet entrainment into the
breathing zone. This coaxial nozzle was initially intended to be
mounted on ofce desks for supplying air horizontally to the
breathing zone of the occupant. However, Makhoul et al. [8]
investigated the performance of the low-mixing coaxial nozzle
mounted in the ceiling and supplying vertical fresh air jet to the
occupant breathing zone. The nozzle was integrated with a diffuser
having a variable supply angle for ow localization. The effect of the
combined nozzle-diffuser on the energy consumption and the
occupants induced thermal comfort was assessed. Makhoul et al.
[8] reported that the coaxial nozzle achieved 3e4 times better
ventilation effectiveness when compared to a conventional
nozzle delivering the same amount of clean air in task ventilation
system (TVS) applications while attaining notable comfort levels
and achieving substantial energy savings up to 30%. Makhoul
et al. [8] system, although provides excellent ventilation effectiveness, it is more complex to design, operate, and control since slight
change in axial velocities may result in major change in performance. It is of interest to nd other means by which the simple PV
jet system of Yang et al. [4,5] can be modied without major
changes in the system design. The constraining parameter in the
design of Yang et al. [5] single jet PV stems from the ability of the jet
to penetrate down the rising occupant plume. If there is a way to
reduce the upward plume ow, then better ventilation effectiveness might be achieved near the occupant.
Bolashikov et al. [9,10] have used desk mounted fans to improve
the effectiveness of personalized ventilation devices by control of
convective ow around the occupant using desk mounted suction
fan to block free convection and hence enhance the penetration of
the horizontal PV supplied air to the face. The active control of
thermal plume used by Bolashikov et al. [9,10] made it possible to
provide 90% of clean air to the breathing zone of the occupant and
reduced PV supply ow rate. No work has been reported in the
literature to address the active control of free convection ow
above the occupant and at the occupant breathing zone when
337
338
Fig. 1. (a) Frontal and top views of the proposed ceiling nozzle and (b) computational domain.
339
340
Cr Cb
Cr Cf
(1)
Fig. 4. (a) Frontal and (b) top view of the experimental setup for the validation process.
341
Fig. 5. Picture showing the experimental setup with the heated cylinder and the deskmounted fan.
342
placed underneath the nozzles while the return duct was seeded
with 0.0035 L/s ow rate of CO2 to mimic indoor pollutants (Fig. 4).
At steady state, the data was compared with CO2 measurements
taken at the inlet of the return vent and the air quality was evaluated using the ventilation effectiveness equation. It is important to
note that the CO2 sensors were calibrated at the outdoor conditions
before starting the data sampling. The difference in the CO2
concentration between the breathing zone and the macroclimate is
required to assess the IAQ. In addition, and in order to be able to
validate the thermal ow eld obtained numerically, the
measurement of the temperature eld around the human body is
necessary. A set of 9 T-type thermocouples with 0.3 C accuracy
manufactured by Omega were distributed around the cylinder as
shown in Fig. 4a to monitor the variations in the temperature eld.
These thermocouples were connected to an OMEGA DaqPro data
logger to store the data. The measurements were recorded at steady
state, which is assumed to be reached when the monitored
temperatures reach nearly constant values with variation within
0.3 C.
For the model validation, eighteen experiments were performed
at three different fresh air ow rates (5 L/s, 7.5 L/s, 10 L/s) in addition to three associated temperatures (24 C, 20 C, 16 C) for each
of the fans status (ON or OFF). The peripheral diffusers delivered air
at 45 from the ceiling plane at a temperature of 16 C. The CFD
simulations have shown that a peripheral supply angle of 45 is
optimal to obtain a localized ow around the occupant. The CO2
concentration in the air was measured at the horizontal rake that is
situated at 1.2 m from the oor. The height of the ceiling was 2.6 m,
thus the distance separating the inhaled air quality measurements
from the nozzles supply is 1.4 m. The desk fans were mounted in
the middle under the desktop at a height of 0.7 m from the oor
and at a distance of 0.1 m from the heated cylinder. The macroclimate air temperature (which is considered the temperature of
the air away from the human microclimate) was controlled and
maintained at 26 C for all the simulated cases. It is important to
note that the experiments were focused on validating the CFD
model of the single jet ceiling nozzle with and without the deskmounted fans. The experimental validation of the coaxial ceiling
nozzle was performed and reported in the work of Makhoul et al.
[8].
3. Results and discussions
3.1. Validation of the CFD model
Fig. 7 shows the velocity and turbulence intensity measured at
the outlet of the PV nozzle and that were later used as inputs to the
CFD model to dene the nozzle boundary conditions. The velocity
measurements showed steady amplitude at the nozzle outlet that
343
Fig. 8. Measured and predicted ventilation effectiveness for a PV fresh air ow rate of
(a) 5 L/s, (b) 7.5 L/s and (c) 10 L/s.
344
Fig. 9. Validation of temperature prole in the vicinity of the heated cylinder with
experimental data using a 10 L/s jet ow rate and 16 C temperature.
Table 1
Comparison of the terminal temperature, velocity and ventilation effectiveness for the different cases when the desk mounted fans are turned ON or OFF and when using
a coaxial nozzle.
Case
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
5 L/s, T 24 C
5 L/s, T 20 C
5 L/s, T 16 C
7.5 L/s, T 24 C
7.5 L/s, T 20 C
7.5 L/s, T 16 C
10 L/s, T 24 C
10 L/s, T 20 C
10 L/s, T 16 C
Fans OFF
Fans ON
Coaxial nozzle
Terminal
temp. [ C]
Terminal
velocity [m/s]
3v
Terminal
temp. [ C]
Terminal
velocity [m/s]
3v
Terminal temp. [ C]
Terminal
velocity [m/s]
3v
26.53
26.47
26.42
26.06
26.00
25.85
25.68
25.35
25.17
0.26
0.26
0.27
0.33
0.36
0.36
0.40
0.46
0.48
0.13%
0.10%
0.94%
0.03%
0.38%
8.60%
0.84%
2.01%
10.38%
26.39
26.33
26.21
26.01
25.96
24.72
25.64
25.23
24.63
0.28
0.31
0.34
0.38
0.43
0.48
0.47
0.52
0.58
1.55%
1.61%
11.14%
2.04%
8.44%
20.67%
2.95%
14.56%
22.05%
26.65
25.85
25.32
26.20
25.44
24.68
25.60
25.16
24.22
0.23
0.31
0.40
0.55
0.62
0.67
0.86
0.90
0.93
10.64%
21.09%
21.48%
27.32%
27.84%
28.12%
32.29%
32.66%
32.98%
345
Fig. 10. Overall thermal comfort with the desk mounted fans turned (a) OFF, (b) ON,
and (c) for the coaxial PV nozzle.
346
Fig. 11. (a) Temperature, (b) velocity, and (c) CO2 contours for the vertical jet with 7.5 L/s fresh air ow rate supplied at 20 C with a macroclimate temperature of 27 C.
347
Table 2
Segmental thermal comfort for selected cases.
Case
Fans OFF
F 10 L/s T 20 C
F 10 L/s T 16 C
Fans ON
F 10 L/s T 20 C
F 10 L/s T 16 C
Head
Chest
Back
Abdomen
Buttocks
U. arm
L. arm
Hands
Thighs
Calves
Feet
Overall
Comfort
Sensation
Comfort
Sensation
1.34
2.33
1.41
0.60
1.91
1.19
1.43
1.20
0.46
1.28
0.25
1.34
0.43
0.41
0.66
0.46
0.23
0.21
0.66
0.26
1.36
0.83
1.30
0.87
0.31
1.42
0.32
1.49
0.31
0.71
0.73
0.59
1.22
0.51
1.18
0.53
0.64
0.66
0.65
0.68
1.82
0.69
1.68
0.71
0.04
1.30
0.59
0.69
Comfort
Sensation
Comfort
Sensation
0.64
0.66
1.17
1.28
1.74
1.09
1.66
0.61
0.35
1.34
0.79
0.85
0.61
0.42
0.90
0.48
0.50
0.25
1.02
0.34
1.36
0.83
1.24
0.90
0.42
1.41
0.34
1.54
0.44
0.73
0.85
0.70
1.21
0.52
1.18
0.53
0.58
0.73
0.57
0.77
1.73
0.70
1.58
0.69
0.60
0.91
0.86
0.15
Table 3
Energy savings at equivalent thermal sensation and inhaled air quality.
Case
Thermal
comfort
Thermal
sensation
3v
Energy
savings
Fans OFF
F
F
F
F
7.5 L/s, T 20 C
7.5 L/s, T 16 C
10 L/s, T 20 C
10 L/s, T 16 C
0.06
0.52
0.04
0.59
1.38
0.83
1.3
0.69
0.38%
8.60%
2.01%
10.38%
7.53
8.21
10.23
11.18
25.88
25.33
25.8
25.19
4.67%
6.99%
6.66%
8.25%
Fans ON
F
F
F
F
7.5 L/s, T 20 C
7.5 L/s, T 16 C
10 L/s, T 20 C
10 L/s, T 16 C
0.38
0.67
0.60
0.86
0.99
0.27
0.91
0.15
8.44%
20.67%
14.56%
22.05%
8.20
9.46
11.73
12.86
25.49
24.77
25.41
24.65
6.50%
11.68%
10.51%
13.25%
Coaxial nozzle
F
F
F
F
7.5 L/s, T 20 C
7.5 L/s, T 16 C
10 L/s, T 20 C
10 L/s, T 16 C
1.42
1.19
1.12
0.79
0.78
0.96
0.99
1.16
26.59%
27.06%
31.85%
32.12%
10.22
10.29
14.71
14.76
23.44
23.08
23.02
22.68
26.78%
24.93%
30.08%
27.08%
4. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
348
[20] Chen Q, Jiang Zh. Simulation of a complex air diffuser with CFD techniques.
Proc Roomvent 1996;1:227e34.
[21] Makhoul A, Ghali K, Ghaddar N. The energy saving potential and the associated thermal comfort of displacement ventilation systems assisted by
personalized ventilation. Indoor Built Environ [published online 05.04.12],
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1420326X12443847.
[22] Cropper P, Yang T, Cook M, Fiala D, Yousaf R. Simulating the effect of complex
indoor environmental conditions on human thermal comfort. Building Simulat 2009. Scotland.
[23] Sorensen DN, Weschler CJ. Modeling-gas phase reactions in indoor environments using computational uid dynamics. Atmos Environ 2002;36:9e18.
[24] Kulkarni V, Sahoo N, Chavan S. Simulation of honeycombescreen combinations for turbulence management in a subsonic wind tunnel. J Wind Eng
Indust Aerodyn 2011;99:37e45.
[25] Bolashikov ZD, Nikolaev L, Melikov AK, Kaczmarczyk J, Fanger PO. Personalized ventilation: air terminal devices with high efciency. Proceedings of
Healthy Building, 2003; 850e55.
[26] Ghaddar N, Ghali K, Chehaitly S. Assessing thermal comfort of active people in
transitional spaces in presence of air movement. Energy Buildings 2011;
43(10):2832e42.
[27] Ghali K, Ghaddar N, Bizri M. The Inuence of wind on outdoor thermal
comfort in the city of Beirut: a theoretical and eld study. Int J HVAC R Res
2011;17(5):813e28.
[28] de Dear Cndido RJ, Lamberts R, Bittencourt L. Air movement acceptability
limits and thermal comfort in Brazils hot humid climate zone. Building
Environ 2010;45(1):222e9.
[29] Newsham G, Brand J, Donnelly C, Veitch J, Aries M, Charles K. Linking indoor
environment conditions to job satisfaction: a eld study. Building Res Inf
2009;37(2):129e47.